Combining herbarium databases and genetic methods to evaluate the invasion of a popular horticultural species, baby’s breath (Gypsophila paniculata), in the United States
Gypsophila paniculata (baby’s breath) is a popular garden ornamental and horticultural crop introduced to North America in the late 1800s. After introduction it quickly spread, often forming dense monotypic stands and crowding out native species. To better understand this invasion, samples of G. pan...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biological invasions 2021, Vol.23 (1), p.37-52 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 52 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | Biological invasions |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Lamar, Sarah K. Partridge, Charlyn G. |
description | Gypsophila paniculata
(baby’s breath) is a popular garden ornamental and horticultural crop introduced to North America in the late 1800s. After introduction it quickly spread, often forming dense monotypic stands and crowding out native species. To better understand this invasion, samples of
G. paniculata
from seven distinct populations spanning a portion of the plant’s invaded range within the United States (Washington, North Dakota, Minnesota, and Michigan) were collected and genotyped using 14 microsatellite loci. Population structure was inferred using both Bayesian and multivariate methods. The results suggest the presence of at least two genetic clusters among the seven sampling locations, with samples from Washington, North Dakota, Minnesota, and northwestern Michigan forming one genetic cluster and the second cluster consisting of two more southern sampling locations in Michigan. Public herbarium records were used to examine the invasion status (expansion vs. plateau phase) of the identified genetic clusters for
G. paniculata
. Invasion curves were created from a database of 351 herbarium collections dating from the late 1800s to current day. Results showed that time periods of invasion differed between the two genetics clusters, suggesting at least two invasion events. Patterns of reduced genetic diversity within the earlier invasion could reflect limited standing genetic variation during the initial period of this horticultural species’ import. This study emphasizes how anthropogenic influences can shape the study of invasive plant ecology, particularly when considering species popular in the botanical or horticultural industries. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10530-020-02354-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2476734777</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2476734777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-51935ec0fed7d7bbfcfb9a346da3c0b6506cab59db49f08a15397c96be6650c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhiMEEqXwApxG4gJSA846jpsjWkFBqsSBcrbGzmTjKmsHj1N1b7wG78BT8SR4u0jcOIxmpPm__z_8VfWyEW8bIfQ7boSSohab40jV1vePqrNGaVk3bdc-Lre81HV56KfVM-ZbIUSvhTqrfm3j3vrgww4mShaTX_cwYEaLTAwYBthRoOwd7ClPcWDIEegO5xUzQZ4IfLhD9jFAHAFhics6Y4IppgKtc14TzsALOU98ARbt4fePnww2EeYJXl8dFo7L5OeCYjgSJfzNRXF9MP8WfKYBvuaSxs-rJyPOTC_-7vPq5uOHm-2n-vrL1eft--vayU7mWjW9VOTESIMetLWjG22Psu0GlE7YTonOoVX9YNt-FJfYKNlr13eWuvJz8rx6dbJdUvy-EmdzG9cUSqLZtLrTstVaF9XmpHIpMicazZL8HtPBNMIcSzGnUkwpxTyUYu4LJE8QF3HYUfpn_R_qD6SnlUg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2476734777</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combining herbarium databases and genetic methods to evaluate the invasion of a popular horticultural species, baby’s breath (Gypsophila paniculata), in the United States</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Lamar, Sarah K. ; Partridge, Charlyn G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lamar, Sarah K. ; Partridge, Charlyn G.</creatorcontrib><description>Gypsophila paniculata
(baby’s breath) is a popular garden ornamental and horticultural crop introduced to North America in the late 1800s. After introduction it quickly spread, often forming dense monotypic stands and crowding out native species. To better understand this invasion, samples of
G. paniculata
from seven distinct populations spanning a portion of the plant’s invaded range within the United States (Washington, North Dakota, Minnesota, and Michigan) were collected and genotyped using 14 microsatellite loci. Population structure was inferred using both Bayesian and multivariate methods. The results suggest the presence of at least two genetic clusters among the seven sampling locations, with samples from Washington, North Dakota, Minnesota, and northwestern Michigan forming one genetic cluster and the second cluster consisting of two more southern sampling locations in Michigan. Public herbarium records were used to examine the invasion status (expansion vs. plateau phase) of the identified genetic clusters for
G. paniculata
. Invasion curves were created from a database of 351 herbarium collections dating from the late 1800s to current day. Results showed that time periods of invasion differed between the two genetics clusters, suggesting at least two invasion events. Patterns of reduced genetic diversity within the earlier invasion could reflect limited standing genetic variation during the initial period of this horticultural species’ import. This study emphasizes how anthropogenic influences can shape the study of invasive plant ecology, particularly when considering species popular in the botanical or horticultural industries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-3547</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10530-020-02354-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Anthropogenic factors ; Bayesian analysis ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Clusters ; Developmental Biology ; Ecological effects ; Ecology ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Genetic diversity ; Genetics ; Gypsophila paniculata ; Horticultural crops ; Horticulture ; Human influences ; Indigenous species ; Invasive plants ; Invasive species ; Life Sciences ; Original Paper ; Plant ecology ; Plant Sciences ; Population structure ; Sampling</subject><ispartof>Biological invasions, 2021, Vol.23 (1), p.37-52</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-51935ec0fed7d7bbfcfb9a346da3c0b6506cab59db49f08a15397c96be6650c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-51935ec0fed7d7bbfcfb9a346da3c0b6506cab59db49f08a15397c96be6650c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5477-7403</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10530-020-02354-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10530-020-02354-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lamar, Sarah K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Partridge, Charlyn G.</creatorcontrib><title>Combining herbarium databases and genetic methods to evaluate the invasion of a popular horticultural species, baby’s breath (Gypsophila paniculata), in the United States</title><title>Biological invasions</title><addtitle>Biol Invasions</addtitle><description>Gypsophila paniculata
(baby’s breath) is a popular garden ornamental and horticultural crop introduced to North America in the late 1800s. After introduction it quickly spread, often forming dense monotypic stands and crowding out native species. To better understand this invasion, samples of
G. paniculata
from seven distinct populations spanning a portion of the plant’s invaded range within the United States (Washington, North Dakota, Minnesota, and Michigan) were collected and genotyped using 14 microsatellite loci. Population structure was inferred using both Bayesian and multivariate methods. The results suggest the presence of at least two genetic clusters among the seven sampling locations, with samples from Washington, North Dakota, Minnesota, and northwestern Michigan forming one genetic cluster and the second cluster consisting of two more southern sampling locations in Michigan. Public herbarium records were used to examine the invasion status (expansion vs. plateau phase) of the identified genetic clusters for
G. paniculata
. Invasion curves were created from a database of 351 herbarium collections dating from the late 1800s to current day. Results showed that time periods of invasion differed between the two genetics clusters, suggesting at least two invasion events. Patterns of reduced genetic diversity within the earlier invasion could reflect limited standing genetic variation during the initial period of this horticultural species’ import. This study emphasizes how anthropogenic influences can shape the study of invasive plant ecology, particularly when considering species popular in the botanical or horticultural industries.</description><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Clusters</subject><subject>Developmental Biology</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Gypsophila paniculata</subject><subject>Horticultural crops</subject><subject>Horticulture</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Invasive plants</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant ecology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Population structure</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><issn>1387-3547</issn><issn>1573-1464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhiMEEqXwApxG4gJSA846jpsjWkFBqsSBcrbGzmTjKmsHj1N1b7wG78BT8SR4u0jcOIxmpPm__z_8VfWyEW8bIfQ7boSSohab40jV1vePqrNGaVk3bdc-Lre81HV56KfVM-ZbIUSvhTqrfm3j3vrgww4mShaTX_cwYEaLTAwYBthRoOwd7ClPcWDIEegO5xUzQZ4IfLhD9jFAHAFhics6Y4IppgKtc14TzsALOU98ARbt4fePnww2EeYJXl8dFo7L5OeCYjgSJfzNRXF9MP8WfKYBvuaSxs-rJyPOTC_-7vPq5uOHm-2n-vrL1eft--vayU7mWjW9VOTESIMetLWjG22Psu0GlE7YTonOoVX9YNt-FJfYKNlr13eWuvJz8rx6dbJdUvy-EmdzG9cUSqLZtLrTstVaF9XmpHIpMicazZL8HtPBNMIcSzGnUkwpxTyUYu4LJE8QF3HYUfpn_R_qD6SnlUg</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Lamar, Sarah K.</creator><creator>Partridge, Charlyn G.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5477-7403</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Combining herbarium databases and genetic methods to evaluate the invasion of a popular horticultural species, baby’s breath (Gypsophila paniculata), in the United States</title><author>Lamar, Sarah K. ; Partridge, Charlyn G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-51935ec0fed7d7bbfcfb9a346da3c0b6506cab59db49f08a15397c96be6650c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Clusters</topic><topic>Developmental Biology</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Gypsophila paniculata</topic><topic>Horticultural crops</topic><topic>Horticulture</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Invasive plants</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant ecology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Population structure</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lamar, Sarah K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Partridge, Charlyn G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lamar, Sarah K.</au><au>Partridge, Charlyn G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combining herbarium databases and genetic methods to evaluate the invasion of a popular horticultural species, baby’s breath (Gypsophila paniculata), in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle><stitle>Biol Invasions</stitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>52</epage><pages>37-52</pages><issn>1387-3547</issn><eissn>1573-1464</eissn><abstract>Gypsophila paniculata
(baby’s breath) is a popular garden ornamental and horticultural crop introduced to North America in the late 1800s. After introduction it quickly spread, often forming dense monotypic stands and crowding out native species. To better understand this invasion, samples of
G. paniculata
from seven distinct populations spanning a portion of the plant’s invaded range within the United States (Washington, North Dakota, Minnesota, and Michigan) were collected and genotyped using 14 microsatellite loci. Population structure was inferred using both Bayesian and multivariate methods. The results suggest the presence of at least two genetic clusters among the seven sampling locations, with samples from Washington, North Dakota, Minnesota, and northwestern Michigan forming one genetic cluster and the second cluster consisting of two more southern sampling locations in Michigan. Public herbarium records were used to examine the invasion status (expansion vs. plateau phase) of the identified genetic clusters for
G. paniculata
. Invasion curves were created from a database of 351 herbarium collections dating from the late 1800s to current day. Results showed that time periods of invasion differed between the two genetics clusters, suggesting at least two invasion events. Patterns of reduced genetic diversity within the earlier invasion could reflect limited standing genetic variation during the initial period of this horticultural species’ import. This study emphasizes how anthropogenic influences can shape the study of invasive plant ecology, particularly when considering species popular in the botanical or horticultural industries.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10530-020-02354-x</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5477-7403</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1387-3547 |
ispartof | Biological invasions, 2021, Vol.23 (1), p.37-52 |
issn | 1387-3547 1573-1464 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2476734777 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Anthropogenic factors Bayesian analysis Biomedical and Life Sciences Clusters Developmental Biology Ecological effects Ecology Freshwater & Marine Ecology Genetic diversity Genetics Gypsophila paniculata Horticultural crops Horticulture Human influences Indigenous species Invasive plants Invasive species Life Sciences Original Paper Plant ecology Plant Sciences Population structure Sampling |
title | Combining herbarium databases and genetic methods to evaluate the invasion of a popular horticultural species, baby’s breath (Gypsophila paniculata), in the United States |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T07%3A02%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combining%20herbarium%20databases%20and%20genetic%20methods%20to%20evaluate%20the%20invasion%20of%20a%20popular%20horticultural%20species,%20baby%E2%80%99s%20breath%20(Gypsophila%20paniculata),%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Biological%20invasions&rft.au=Lamar,%20Sarah%20K.&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=52&rft.pages=37-52&rft.issn=1387-3547&rft.eissn=1573-1464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10530-020-02354-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2476734777%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2476734777&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |