Availability and Nature of Commercial Tick Control Services in Three Lyme Disease Endemic States

In an update of earlier surveys conducted in Connecticut and New Jersey in the mid-1990s, an online survey of private commercial pest control firms engaged in residential tick control showed that the application of synthetic acaricides continues to be the primary method of control used. The carbamat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of medical entomology 2020-05, Vol.57 (3), p.807-814
Hauptverfasser: Jordan, Robert A., Schulze, Terry L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 814
container_issue 3
container_start_page 807
container_title Journal of medical entomology
container_volume 57
creator Jordan, Robert A.
Schulze, Terry L.
description In an update of earlier surveys conducted in Connecticut and New Jersey in the mid-1990s, an online survey of private commercial pest control firms engaged in residential tick control showed that the application of synthetic acaricides continues to be the primary method of control used. The carbamate and organophospate acaricides, previously the most commonly used against ticks, have given way to synthetic pyrethroids and, to a lesser extent, the use of natural product/organic acaricides. Typical costs for a single acaricide application today ($100–$200 for a 1 acre [0.4 ha] property) remain similar to those reported from the earlier surveys, although the frequency of applications and, therefore, also the overall annual cost has increased. The application habitats within residential properties, life stages targeted, and application equipment used have not changed appreciably since the mid-1990s. While most survey respondents expressed knowledge of natural product acaricides and Damminix Tick Tubes, many reported that they either did not employ or knew very little about other alternative tick control methods (including entomopathogenic fungus and topical application of acaricides to tick hosts via 4-Poster deer treatment stations or Select TCS rodent bait boxes). This suggests either a failure to adequately inform the pest management industry and their potential client base of the availability of alternate methods, and/or industry concerns about cost and effectiveness of the alternatives.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jme/tjz215
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2476538218</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jme/tjz215</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2476538218</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-25f39443419f66305c362004d276dd87333083c83a1122f421a0f331b50708ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1Lw0AQBuBFFFurF3-ALIggQuzuTj42x1LrBxQ9tJ7jJpngxiRbd5NC_fVGoh57GgYe3hleQs45u-UshmlZ47QtvwQPDsiYxyA9EQt5SMaMCeGJQAYjcuJcyRiT3I-PyQh4FPuMw5i8zbZKVyrVlW53VDU5fVZtZ5Gags5NXaPNtKroWmcf_d601lR0hXarM3RUN3T9bhHpclcjvdMOlUO6aHKsdUZXrWrRnZKjQlUOz37nhLzeL9bzR2_58vA0ny29FCLZ9l8WEPs--DwuwhBYkEEoGPNzEYV5LiMAYBIyCYpzIQpfcMUKAJ4GLGJSpTAhl0PuxprPDl2blKazTX8yEX4UBiAFl726GVRmjXMWi2Rjda3sLuEs-Skz6ctMhjJ7fPEb2aU15v_0r70eXA3AdJv9QdeDS7UxDe6j34kmiIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2476538218</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Availability and Nature of Commercial Tick Control Services in Three Lyme Disease Endemic States</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jordan, Robert A. ; Schulze, Terry L.</creator><contributor>Andreadis, Theodore</contributor><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Robert A. ; Schulze, Terry L. ; Andreadis, Theodore</creatorcontrib><description>In an update of earlier surveys conducted in Connecticut and New Jersey in the mid-1990s, an online survey of private commercial pest control firms engaged in residential tick control showed that the application of synthetic acaricides continues to be the primary method of control used. The carbamate and organophospate acaricides, previously the most commonly used against ticks, have given way to synthetic pyrethroids and, to a lesser extent, the use of natural product/organic acaricides. Typical costs for a single acaricide application today ($100–$200 for a 1 acre [0.4 ha] property) remain similar to those reported from the earlier surveys, although the frequency of applications and, therefore, also the overall annual cost has increased. The application habitats within residential properties, life stages targeted, and application equipment used have not changed appreciably since the mid-1990s. While most survey respondents expressed knowledge of natural product acaricides and Damminix Tick Tubes, many reported that they either did not employ or knew very little about other alternative tick control methods (including entomopathogenic fungus and topical application of acaricides to tick hosts via 4-Poster deer treatment stations or Select TCS rodent bait boxes). This suggests either a failure to adequately inform the pest management industry and their potential client base of the availability of alternate methods, and/or industry concerns about cost and effectiveness of the alternatives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-2928</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjz215</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31794013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Acaricides ; Acaricides - economics ; Animals ; Arachnids ; Availability ; Baits ; Control methods ; Entomopathogenic fungi ; Humans ; Lyme disease ; Lyme Disease - prevention &amp; control ; Mid-Atlantic Region ; Natural products ; Pest control ; pest management industry ; Pests ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Pyrethroids ; surveys ; tick control ; Tick Control - economics ; Tick Control - methods ; Tick Control - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Ticks ; Topical application ; Tubes ; VECTOR CONTROL, PEST MANAGEMENT, RESISTANCE, REPELLENTS ; Vector-borne diseases</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical entomology, 2020-05, Vol.57 (3), p.807-814</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2019</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-25f39443419f66305c362004d276dd87333083c83a1122f421a0f331b50708ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-25f39443419f66305c362004d276dd87333083c83a1122f421a0f331b50708ab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2777-392X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31794013$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Andreadis, Theodore</contributor><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulze, Terry L.</creatorcontrib><title>Availability and Nature of Commercial Tick Control Services in Three Lyme Disease Endemic States</title><title>Journal of medical entomology</title><addtitle>J Med Entomol</addtitle><description>In an update of earlier surveys conducted in Connecticut and New Jersey in the mid-1990s, an online survey of private commercial pest control firms engaged in residential tick control showed that the application of synthetic acaricides continues to be the primary method of control used. The carbamate and organophospate acaricides, previously the most commonly used against ticks, have given way to synthetic pyrethroids and, to a lesser extent, the use of natural product/organic acaricides. Typical costs for a single acaricide application today ($100–$200 for a 1 acre [0.4 ha] property) remain similar to those reported from the earlier surveys, although the frequency of applications and, therefore, also the overall annual cost has increased. The application habitats within residential properties, life stages targeted, and application equipment used have not changed appreciably since the mid-1990s. While most survey respondents expressed knowledge of natural product acaricides and Damminix Tick Tubes, many reported that they either did not employ or knew very little about other alternative tick control methods (including entomopathogenic fungus and topical application of acaricides to tick hosts via 4-Poster deer treatment stations or Select TCS rodent bait boxes). This suggests either a failure to adequately inform the pest management industry and their potential client base of the availability of alternate methods, and/or industry concerns about cost and effectiveness of the alternatives.</description><subject>Acaricides</subject><subject>Acaricides - economics</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Arachnids</subject><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Baits</subject><subject>Control methods</subject><subject>Entomopathogenic fungi</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lyme disease</subject><subject>Lyme Disease - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Mid-Atlantic Region</subject><subject>Natural products</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>pest management industry</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Pyrethroids</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>tick control</subject><subject>Tick Control - economics</subject><subject>Tick Control - methods</subject><subject>Tick Control - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Ticks</subject><subject>Topical application</subject><subject>Tubes</subject><subject>VECTOR CONTROL, PEST MANAGEMENT, RESISTANCE, REPELLENTS</subject><subject>Vector-borne diseases</subject><issn>0022-2585</issn><issn>1938-2928</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E1Lw0AQBuBFFFurF3-ALIggQuzuTj42x1LrBxQ9tJ7jJpngxiRbd5NC_fVGoh57GgYe3hleQs45u-UshmlZ47QtvwQPDsiYxyA9EQt5SMaMCeGJQAYjcuJcyRiT3I-PyQh4FPuMw5i8zbZKVyrVlW53VDU5fVZtZ5Gags5NXaPNtKroWmcf_d601lR0hXarM3RUN3T9bhHpclcjvdMOlUO6aHKsdUZXrWrRnZKjQlUOz37nhLzeL9bzR2_58vA0ny29FCLZ9l8WEPs--DwuwhBYkEEoGPNzEYV5LiMAYBIyCYpzIQpfcMUKAJ4GLGJSpTAhl0PuxprPDl2blKazTX8yEX4UBiAFl726GVRmjXMWi2Rjda3sLuEs-Skz6ctMhjJ7fPEb2aU15v_0r70eXA3AdJv9QdeDS7UxDe6j34kmiIQ</recordid><startdate>20200504</startdate><enddate>20200504</enddate><creator>Jordan, Robert A.</creator><creator>Schulze, Terry L.</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2777-392X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200504</creationdate><title>Availability and Nature of Commercial Tick Control Services in Three Lyme Disease Endemic States</title><author>Jordan, Robert A. ; Schulze, Terry L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-25f39443419f66305c362004d276dd87333083c83a1122f421a0f331b50708ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acaricides</topic><topic>Acaricides - economics</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Arachnids</topic><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Baits</topic><topic>Control methods</topic><topic>Entomopathogenic fungi</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lyme disease</topic><topic>Lyme Disease - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Mid-Atlantic Region</topic><topic>Natural products</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>pest management industry</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Pyrethroids</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>tick control</topic><topic>Tick Control - economics</topic><topic>Tick Control - methods</topic><topic>Tick Control - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Ticks</topic><topic>Topical application</topic><topic>Tubes</topic><topic>VECTOR CONTROL, PEST MANAGEMENT, RESISTANCE, REPELLENTS</topic><topic>Vector-borne diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulze, Terry L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jordan, Robert A.</au><au>Schulze, Terry L.</au><au>Andreadis, Theodore</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Availability and Nature of Commercial Tick Control Services in Three Lyme Disease Endemic States</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Entomol</addtitle><date>2020-05-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>807</spage><epage>814</epage><pages>807-814</pages><issn>0022-2585</issn><eissn>1938-2928</eissn><abstract>In an update of earlier surveys conducted in Connecticut and New Jersey in the mid-1990s, an online survey of private commercial pest control firms engaged in residential tick control showed that the application of synthetic acaricides continues to be the primary method of control used. The carbamate and organophospate acaricides, previously the most commonly used against ticks, have given way to synthetic pyrethroids and, to a lesser extent, the use of natural product/organic acaricides. Typical costs for a single acaricide application today ($100–$200 for a 1 acre [0.4 ha] property) remain similar to those reported from the earlier surveys, although the frequency of applications and, therefore, also the overall annual cost has increased. The application habitats within residential properties, life stages targeted, and application equipment used have not changed appreciably since the mid-1990s. While most survey respondents expressed knowledge of natural product acaricides and Damminix Tick Tubes, many reported that they either did not employ or knew very little about other alternative tick control methods (including entomopathogenic fungus and topical application of acaricides to tick hosts via 4-Poster deer treatment stations or Select TCS rodent bait boxes). This suggests either a failure to adequately inform the pest management industry and their potential client base of the availability of alternate methods, and/or industry concerns about cost and effectiveness of the alternatives.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>31794013</pmid><doi>10.1093/jme/tjz215</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2777-392X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2585
ispartof Journal of medical entomology, 2020-05, Vol.57 (3), p.807-814
issn 0022-2585
1938-2928
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2476538218
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acaricides
Acaricides - economics
Animals
Arachnids
Availability
Baits
Control methods
Entomopathogenic fungi
Humans
Lyme disease
Lyme Disease - prevention & control
Mid-Atlantic Region
Natural products
Pest control
pest management industry
Pests
Polls & surveys
Pyrethroids
surveys
tick control
Tick Control - economics
Tick Control - methods
Tick Control - statistics & numerical data
Ticks
Topical application
Tubes
VECTOR CONTROL, PEST MANAGEMENT, RESISTANCE, REPELLENTS
Vector-borne diseases
title Availability and Nature of Commercial Tick Control Services in Three Lyme Disease Endemic States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T19%3A59%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Availability%20and%20Nature%20of%20Commercial%20Tick%20Control%20Services%20in%20Three%20Lyme%20Disease%20Endemic%20States&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20entomology&rft.au=Jordan,%20Robert%20A.&rft.date=2020-05-04&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=807&rft.epage=814&rft.pages=807-814&rft.issn=0022-2585&rft.eissn=1938-2928&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jme/tjz215&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2476538218%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2476538218&rft_id=info:pmid/31794013&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jme/tjz215&rfr_iscdi=true