The Interplay of Competition and Cooperation Among Service Providers (Part II)

This paper investigates the incentives of mobile network operators (MNOs) for acquiring additional spectrum to offer mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs) and thereby inviting competition for a common pool of end users (EUs). We consider interactions between two service providers (SPs), a MNO and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on network science and engineering 2020-10, Vol.7 (4), p.2815-2829
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Xingran, Sarkar, Saswati, Lotfi, Mohammad Hassan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2829
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2815
container_title IEEE transactions on network science and engineering
container_volume 7
creator Chen, Xingran
Sarkar, Saswati
Lotfi, Mohammad Hassan
description This paper investigates the incentives of mobile network operators (MNOs) for acquiring additional spectrum to offer mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs) and thereby inviting competition for a common pool of end users (EUs). We consider interactions between two service providers (SPs), a MNO and an MVNO, under two different scenarios: 1) EUs must choose one of them 2) EUs have the option to defect to a provider outside the system under consideration should the SP duo offer unsatisfactory access fees or qualities of service. We formulate a multi-stage hybrid of cooperative bargaining and non-cooperative games. In this formulation, first the two SPs jointly determine their spectrum acquisitions, allocations and mutual money flows through the bargaining game; subsequently the two SPs individually determine the access fees for the EUs through the non-cooperative game. We identify when the overall equilibrium solutions exist and when the equilibrium solution is unique. We obtain computationally simple characterizations of the equilibrium solutions when they exist, which are in closed form or involve optimizations in only one decision variable. The hybrid framework allows us to determine whether and by how much the different entities benefit due to the cooperation in spectrum acquisition decision.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TNSE.2020.3001946
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2474857326</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9115880</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2474857326</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-af5124a5bc19b467a7f783253010555fd22f90759c7ca1659f5cf6804b344f1b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LAzEURYMoWGp_gLgJuNHF1HxnsizFj4FSC63gLmTSRKe0kzGZFvrvnbHF1XsXzn0PDgC3GI0xRuppNV8-jwkiaEwRwoqJCzAglLKMEvV52e9EZkwoeQ1GKW1QB5FcUEoHYL76drCoWxebrTnC4OE07BrXVm0VamjqdZdD46L5y5NdqL_g0sVDZR1cxHCo1i4m-LAwsYVF8XgDrrzZJjc6zyH4eHleTd-y2ftrMZ3MMksUbTPjOSbM8NJiVTIhjfQyp4RThBHn3K8J8QpJrqy0BguuPLde5IiVlDGPSzoE96e7TQw_e5davQn7WHcvNWGS5VxSIjoKnygbQ0rRed3EamfiUWOke3O6N6d7c_psruvcnTqVc-6fVxjzPEf0F-QeZ8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2474857326</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Interplay of Competition and Cooperation Among Service Providers (Part II)</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Chen, Xingran ; Sarkar, Saswati ; Lotfi, Mohammad Hassan</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xingran ; Sarkar, Saswati ; Lotfi, Mohammad Hassan</creatorcontrib><description>This paper investigates the incentives of mobile network operators (MNOs) for acquiring additional spectrum to offer mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs) and thereby inviting competition for a common pool of end users (EUs). We consider interactions between two service providers (SPs), a MNO and an MVNO, under two different scenarios: 1) EUs must choose one of them 2) EUs have the option to defect to a provider outside the system under consideration should the SP duo offer unsatisfactory access fees or qualities of service. We formulate a multi-stage hybrid of cooperative bargaining and non-cooperative games. In this formulation, first the two SPs jointly determine their spectrum acquisitions, allocations and mutual money flows through the bargaining game; subsequently the two SPs individually determine the access fees for the EUs through the non-cooperative game. We identify when the overall equilibrium solutions exist and when the equilibrium solution is unique. We obtain computationally simple characterizations of the equilibrium solutions when they exist, which are in closed form or involve optimizations in only one decision variable. The hybrid framework allows us to determine whether and by how much the different entities benefit due to the cooperation in spectrum acquisition decision.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2327-4697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2334-329X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TNSE.2020.3001946</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITNSD5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway: IEEE</publisher><subject>Allocations ; Competition ; Cooperation ; Economics ; End users ; Game Theory ; Games ; Heterogeneous networks ; Hierarchical games ; Incentives ; Nash Equilibrium ; Operators ; Quality of service ; Regulators ; Resource management ; Service Providers ; Spectrum provisioning ; Subscriber pricing ; Systems engineering and theory ; Virtual networks ; Wireless communication ; Wireless Internet Market</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on network science and engineering, 2020-10, Vol.7 (4), p.2815-2829</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-af5124a5bc19b467a7f783253010555fd22f90759c7ca1659f5cf6804b344f1b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-af5124a5bc19b467a7f783253010555fd22f90759c7ca1659f5cf6804b344f1b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7146-1061</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9115880$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9115880$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xingran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Saswati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotfi, Mohammad Hassan</creatorcontrib><title>The Interplay of Competition and Cooperation Among Service Providers (Part II)</title><title>IEEE transactions on network science and engineering</title><addtitle>TNSE</addtitle><description>This paper investigates the incentives of mobile network operators (MNOs) for acquiring additional spectrum to offer mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs) and thereby inviting competition for a common pool of end users (EUs). We consider interactions between two service providers (SPs), a MNO and an MVNO, under two different scenarios: 1) EUs must choose one of them 2) EUs have the option to defect to a provider outside the system under consideration should the SP duo offer unsatisfactory access fees or qualities of service. We formulate a multi-stage hybrid of cooperative bargaining and non-cooperative games. In this formulation, first the two SPs jointly determine their spectrum acquisitions, allocations and mutual money flows through the bargaining game; subsequently the two SPs individually determine the access fees for the EUs through the non-cooperative game. We identify when the overall equilibrium solutions exist and when the equilibrium solution is unique. We obtain computationally simple characterizations of the equilibrium solutions when they exist, which are in closed form or involve optimizations in only one decision variable. The hybrid framework allows us to determine whether and by how much the different entities benefit due to the cooperation in spectrum acquisition decision.</description><subject>Allocations</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>End users</subject><subject>Game Theory</subject><subject>Games</subject><subject>Heterogeneous networks</subject><subject>Hierarchical games</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Nash Equilibrium</subject><subject>Operators</subject><subject>Quality of service</subject><subject>Regulators</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Service Providers</subject><subject>Spectrum provisioning</subject><subject>Subscriber pricing</subject><subject>Systems engineering and theory</subject><subject>Virtual networks</subject><subject>Wireless communication</subject><subject>Wireless Internet Market</subject><issn>2327-4697</issn><issn>2334-329X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1LAzEURYMoWGp_gLgJuNHF1HxnsizFj4FSC63gLmTSRKe0kzGZFvrvnbHF1XsXzn0PDgC3GI0xRuppNV8-jwkiaEwRwoqJCzAglLKMEvV52e9EZkwoeQ1GKW1QB5FcUEoHYL76drCoWxebrTnC4OE07BrXVm0VamjqdZdD46L5y5NdqL_g0sVDZR1cxHCo1i4m-LAwsYVF8XgDrrzZJjc6zyH4eHleTd-y2ftrMZ3MMksUbTPjOSbM8NJiVTIhjfQyp4RThBHn3K8J8QpJrqy0BguuPLde5IiVlDGPSzoE96e7TQw_e5davQn7WHcvNWGS5VxSIjoKnygbQ0rRed3EamfiUWOke3O6N6d7c_psruvcnTqVc-6fVxjzPEf0F-QeZ8A</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Chen, Xingran</creator><creator>Sarkar, Saswati</creator><creator>Lotfi, Mohammad Hassan</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7146-1061</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>The Interplay of Competition and Cooperation Among Service Providers (Part II)</title><author>Chen, Xingran ; Sarkar, Saswati ; Lotfi, Mohammad Hassan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-af5124a5bc19b467a7f783253010555fd22f90759c7ca1659f5cf6804b344f1b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Allocations</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>End users</topic><topic>Game Theory</topic><topic>Games</topic><topic>Heterogeneous networks</topic><topic>Hierarchical games</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Nash Equilibrium</topic><topic>Operators</topic><topic>Quality of service</topic><topic>Regulators</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Service Providers</topic><topic>Spectrum provisioning</topic><topic>Subscriber pricing</topic><topic>Systems engineering and theory</topic><topic>Virtual networks</topic><topic>Wireless communication</topic><topic>Wireless Internet Market</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xingran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Saswati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotfi, Mohammad Hassan</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on network science and engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Xingran</au><au>Sarkar, Saswati</au><au>Lotfi, Mohammad Hassan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Interplay of Competition and Cooperation Among Service Providers (Part II)</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on network science and engineering</jtitle><stitle>TNSE</stitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2815</spage><epage>2829</epage><pages>2815-2829</pages><issn>2327-4697</issn><eissn>2334-329X</eissn><coden>ITNSD5</coden><abstract>This paper investigates the incentives of mobile network operators (MNOs) for acquiring additional spectrum to offer mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs) and thereby inviting competition for a common pool of end users (EUs). We consider interactions between two service providers (SPs), a MNO and an MVNO, under two different scenarios: 1) EUs must choose one of them 2) EUs have the option to defect to a provider outside the system under consideration should the SP duo offer unsatisfactory access fees or qualities of service. We formulate a multi-stage hybrid of cooperative bargaining and non-cooperative games. In this formulation, first the two SPs jointly determine their spectrum acquisitions, allocations and mutual money flows through the bargaining game; subsequently the two SPs individually determine the access fees for the EUs through the non-cooperative game. We identify when the overall equilibrium solutions exist and when the equilibrium solution is unique. We obtain computationally simple characterizations of the equilibrium solutions when they exist, which are in closed form or involve optimizations in only one decision variable. The hybrid framework allows us to determine whether and by how much the different entities benefit due to the cooperation in spectrum acquisition decision.</abstract><cop>Piscataway</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TNSE.2020.3001946</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7146-1061</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 2327-4697
ispartof IEEE transactions on network science and engineering, 2020-10, Vol.7 (4), p.2815-2829
issn 2327-4697
2334-329X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2474857326
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Allocations
Competition
Cooperation
Economics
End users
Game Theory
Games
Heterogeneous networks
Hierarchical games
Incentives
Nash Equilibrium
Operators
Quality of service
Regulators
Resource management
Service Providers
Spectrum provisioning
Subscriber pricing
Systems engineering and theory
Virtual networks
Wireless communication
Wireless Internet Market
title The Interplay of Competition and Cooperation Among Service Providers (Part II)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T20%3A02%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Interplay%20of%20Competition%20and%20Cooperation%20Among%20Service%20Providers%20(Part%20II)&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20network%20science%20and%20engineering&rft.au=Chen,%20Xingran&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2815&rft.epage=2829&rft.pages=2815-2829&rft.issn=2327-4697&rft.eissn=2334-329X&rft.coden=ITNSD5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TNSE.2020.3001946&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2474857326%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2474857326&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=9115880&rfr_iscdi=true