The Interplay of Competition and Cooperation Among Service Providers (Part II)
This paper investigates the incentives of mobile network operators (MNOs) for acquiring additional spectrum to offer mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs) and thereby inviting competition for a common pool of end users (EUs). We consider interactions between two service providers (SPs), a MNO and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on network science and engineering 2020-10, Vol.7 (4), p.2815-2829 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2829 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 2815 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on network science and engineering |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Chen, Xingran Sarkar, Saswati Lotfi, Mohammad Hassan |
description | This paper investigates the incentives of mobile network operators (MNOs) for acquiring additional spectrum to offer mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs) and thereby inviting competition for a common pool of end users (EUs). We consider interactions between two service providers (SPs), a MNO and an MVNO, under two different scenarios: 1) EUs must choose one of them 2) EUs have the option to defect to a provider outside the system under consideration should the SP duo offer unsatisfactory access fees or qualities of service. We formulate a multi-stage hybrid of cooperative bargaining and non-cooperative games. In this formulation, first the two SPs jointly determine their spectrum acquisitions, allocations and mutual money flows through the bargaining game; subsequently the two SPs individually determine the access fees for the EUs through the non-cooperative game. We identify when the overall equilibrium solutions exist and when the equilibrium solution is unique. We obtain computationally simple characterizations of the equilibrium solutions when they exist, which are in closed form or involve optimizations in only one decision variable. The hybrid framework allows us to determine whether and by how much the different entities benefit due to the cooperation in spectrum acquisition decision. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TNSE.2020.3001946 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2474857326</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9115880</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2474857326</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-af5124a5bc19b467a7f783253010555fd22f90759c7ca1659f5cf6804b344f1b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LAzEURYMoWGp_gLgJuNHF1HxnsizFj4FSC63gLmTSRKe0kzGZFvrvnbHF1XsXzn0PDgC3GI0xRuppNV8-jwkiaEwRwoqJCzAglLKMEvV52e9EZkwoeQ1GKW1QB5FcUEoHYL76drCoWxebrTnC4OE07BrXVm0VamjqdZdD46L5y5NdqL_g0sVDZR1cxHCo1i4m-LAwsYVF8XgDrrzZJjc6zyH4eHleTd-y2ftrMZ3MMksUbTPjOSbM8NJiVTIhjfQyp4RThBHn3K8J8QpJrqy0BguuPLde5IiVlDGPSzoE96e7TQw_e5davQn7WHcvNWGS5VxSIjoKnygbQ0rRed3EamfiUWOke3O6N6d7c_psruvcnTqVc-6fVxjzPEf0F-QeZ8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2474857326</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Interplay of Competition and Cooperation Among Service Providers (Part II)</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Chen, Xingran ; Sarkar, Saswati ; Lotfi, Mohammad Hassan</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xingran ; Sarkar, Saswati ; Lotfi, Mohammad Hassan</creatorcontrib><description>This paper investigates the incentives of mobile network operators (MNOs) for acquiring additional spectrum to offer mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs) and thereby inviting competition for a common pool of end users (EUs). We consider interactions between two service providers (SPs), a MNO and an MVNO, under two different scenarios: 1) EUs must choose one of them 2) EUs have the option to defect to a provider outside the system under consideration should the SP duo offer unsatisfactory access fees or qualities of service. We formulate a multi-stage hybrid of cooperative bargaining and non-cooperative games. In this formulation, first the two SPs jointly determine their spectrum acquisitions, allocations and mutual money flows through the bargaining game; subsequently the two SPs individually determine the access fees for the EUs through the non-cooperative game. We identify when the overall equilibrium solutions exist and when the equilibrium solution is unique. We obtain computationally simple characterizations of the equilibrium solutions when they exist, which are in closed form or involve optimizations in only one decision variable. The hybrid framework allows us to determine whether and by how much the different entities benefit due to the cooperation in spectrum acquisition decision.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2327-4697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2334-329X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TNSE.2020.3001946</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITNSD5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway: IEEE</publisher><subject>Allocations ; Competition ; Cooperation ; Economics ; End users ; Game Theory ; Games ; Heterogeneous networks ; Hierarchical games ; Incentives ; Nash Equilibrium ; Operators ; Quality of service ; Regulators ; Resource management ; Service Providers ; Spectrum provisioning ; Subscriber pricing ; Systems engineering and theory ; Virtual networks ; Wireless communication ; Wireless Internet Market</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on network science and engineering, 2020-10, Vol.7 (4), p.2815-2829</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-af5124a5bc19b467a7f783253010555fd22f90759c7ca1659f5cf6804b344f1b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-af5124a5bc19b467a7f783253010555fd22f90759c7ca1659f5cf6804b344f1b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7146-1061</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9115880$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9115880$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xingran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Saswati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotfi, Mohammad Hassan</creatorcontrib><title>The Interplay of Competition and Cooperation Among Service Providers (Part II)</title><title>IEEE transactions on network science and engineering</title><addtitle>TNSE</addtitle><description>This paper investigates the incentives of mobile network operators (MNOs) for acquiring additional spectrum to offer mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs) and thereby inviting competition for a common pool of end users (EUs). We consider interactions between two service providers (SPs), a MNO and an MVNO, under two different scenarios: 1) EUs must choose one of them 2) EUs have the option to defect to a provider outside the system under consideration should the SP duo offer unsatisfactory access fees or qualities of service. We formulate a multi-stage hybrid of cooperative bargaining and non-cooperative games. In this formulation, first the two SPs jointly determine their spectrum acquisitions, allocations and mutual money flows through the bargaining game; subsequently the two SPs individually determine the access fees for the EUs through the non-cooperative game. We identify when the overall equilibrium solutions exist and when the equilibrium solution is unique. We obtain computationally simple characterizations of the equilibrium solutions when they exist, which are in closed form or involve optimizations in only one decision variable. The hybrid framework allows us to determine whether and by how much the different entities benefit due to the cooperation in spectrum acquisition decision.</description><subject>Allocations</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>End users</subject><subject>Game Theory</subject><subject>Games</subject><subject>Heterogeneous networks</subject><subject>Hierarchical games</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Nash Equilibrium</subject><subject>Operators</subject><subject>Quality of service</subject><subject>Regulators</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Service Providers</subject><subject>Spectrum provisioning</subject><subject>Subscriber pricing</subject><subject>Systems engineering and theory</subject><subject>Virtual networks</subject><subject>Wireless communication</subject><subject>Wireless Internet Market</subject><issn>2327-4697</issn><issn>2334-329X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1LAzEURYMoWGp_gLgJuNHF1HxnsizFj4FSC63gLmTSRKe0kzGZFvrvnbHF1XsXzn0PDgC3GI0xRuppNV8-jwkiaEwRwoqJCzAglLKMEvV52e9EZkwoeQ1GKW1QB5FcUEoHYL76drCoWxebrTnC4OE07BrXVm0VamjqdZdD46L5y5NdqL_g0sVDZR1cxHCo1i4m-LAwsYVF8XgDrrzZJjc6zyH4eHleTd-y2ftrMZ3MMksUbTPjOSbM8NJiVTIhjfQyp4RThBHn3K8J8QpJrqy0BguuPLde5IiVlDGPSzoE96e7TQw_e5davQn7WHcvNWGS5VxSIjoKnygbQ0rRed3EamfiUWOke3O6N6d7c_psruvcnTqVc-6fVxjzPEf0F-QeZ8A</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Chen, Xingran</creator><creator>Sarkar, Saswati</creator><creator>Lotfi, Mohammad Hassan</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7146-1061</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>The Interplay of Competition and Cooperation Among Service Providers (Part II)</title><author>Chen, Xingran ; Sarkar, Saswati ; Lotfi, Mohammad Hassan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-af5124a5bc19b467a7f783253010555fd22f90759c7ca1659f5cf6804b344f1b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Allocations</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>End users</topic><topic>Game Theory</topic><topic>Games</topic><topic>Heterogeneous networks</topic><topic>Hierarchical games</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Nash Equilibrium</topic><topic>Operators</topic><topic>Quality of service</topic><topic>Regulators</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Service Providers</topic><topic>Spectrum provisioning</topic><topic>Subscriber pricing</topic><topic>Systems engineering and theory</topic><topic>Virtual networks</topic><topic>Wireless communication</topic><topic>Wireless Internet Market</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xingran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Saswati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotfi, Mohammad Hassan</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on network science and engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Xingran</au><au>Sarkar, Saswati</au><au>Lotfi, Mohammad Hassan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Interplay of Competition and Cooperation Among Service Providers (Part II)</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on network science and engineering</jtitle><stitle>TNSE</stitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2815</spage><epage>2829</epage><pages>2815-2829</pages><issn>2327-4697</issn><eissn>2334-329X</eissn><coden>ITNSD5</coden><abstract>This paper investigates the incentives of mobile network operators (MNOs) for acquiring additional spectrum to offer mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs) and thereby inviting competition for a common pool of end users (EUs). We consider interactions between two service providers (SPs), a MNO and an MVNO, under two different scenarios: 1) EUs must choose one of them 2) EUs have the option to defect to a provider outside the system under consideration should the SP duo offer unsatisfactory access fees or qualities of service. We formulate a multi-stage hybrid of cooperative bargaining and non-cooperative games. In this formulation, first the two SPs jointly determine their spectrum acquisitions, allocations and mutual money flows through the bargaining game; subsequently the two SPs individually determine the access fees for the EUs through the non-cooperative game. We identify when the overall equilibrium solutions exist and when the equilibrium solution is unique. We obtain computationally simple characterizations of the equilibrium solutions when they exist, which are in closed form or involve optimizations in only one decision variable. The hybrid framework allows us to determine whether and by how much the different entities benefit due to the cooperation in spectrum acquisition decision.</abstract><cop>Piscataway</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TNSE.2020.3001946</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7146-1061</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 2327-4697 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on network science and engineering, 2020-10, Vol.7 (4), p.2815-2829 |
issn | 2327-4697 2334-329X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2474857326 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Allocations Competition Cooperation Economics End users Game Theory Games Heterogeneous networks Hierarchical games Incentives Nash Equilibrium Operators Quality of service Regulators Resource management Service Providers Spectrum provisioning Subscriber pricing Systems engineering and theory Virtual networks Wireless communication Wireless Internet Market |
title | The Interplay of Competition and Cooperation Among Service Providers (Part II) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T20%3A02%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Interplay%20of%20Competition%20and%20Cooperation%20Among%20Service%20Providers%20(Part%20II)&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20network%20science%20and%20engineering&rft.au=Chen,%20Xingran&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2815&rft.epage=2829&rft.pages=2815-2829&rft.issn=2327-4697&rft.eissn=2334-329X&rft.coden=ITNSD5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TNSE.2020.3001946&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2474857326%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2474857326&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=9115880&rfr_iscdi=true |