Sexualized and Athletic: Viewers’ Attitudes toward Sexualized Performance Images of Female Athletes

Using an experimental methodology, the present study investigated college students’ attitudes toward media images of female athletes. We are particularly focused on how viewers perceive media images of female athletes that have both an appearance and athleticism focus, such as those found in ESPN’s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sex roles 2021, Vol.84 (1-2), p.112-124
Hauptverfasser: Daniels, Elizabeth A., Hood, Amanda, LaVoi, Nicole M., Cooky, Cheryl
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 124
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 112
container_title Sex roles
container_volume 84
creator Daniels, Elizabeth A.
Hood, Amanda
LaVoi, Nicole M.
Cooky, Cheryl
description Using an experimental methodology, the present study investigated college students’ attitudes toward media images of female athletes. We are particularly focused on how viewers perceive media images of female athletes that have both an appearance and athleticism focus, such as those found in ESPN’s The Body Issue . An aim of our study was to assess viewers’ attitudes toward these images that are not purely objectified, thereby contributing to the objectification literature and providing empirical data relevant to theorizing on the social impact of these images. U.S. college students ( n  = 563) viewed one of four types of images of the same athletes including: (a) sexualized athletes, (b) sexualized performance athletes (in which both athleticism and sexualization are present), (c) sport performance athletes (in which athletes are depicted playing their sport), or (d) non-sexualized athletes. They then rated the athletes’ competence, esteem, and sexual appeal. Overall, sexualized performance athletes were rated more positively than sexualized athletes, but less positively than sport performance athletes. These results have implications for advocacy efforts calling for more media coverage in which women are depicted as athletes rather than as sexual objects.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11199-020-01152-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2474583492</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2474583492</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c8c4584aebcdd810f5942d89d49eb5c6968cac948c6abacbc82dc378a93804563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKw0AUhgdRsFZfwFXAdXRuSWbclWK1UFDwsh0mMyc1JZc6k1Drytfw9XwSR1PQlasD53zff-BH6JTgc4JxduEJIVLGmOIYE5LQeLuHRiTJWEyzlO6jEWZpOGGaHKIj71cY4-DxEYJ7eO11Vb6BjXRjo0n3XEFXmsvoqYQNOP_5_hGWXdn1FnzUtRvtbPRHugNXtK7WjYFoXutlgNoimkGtK9ilgT9GB4WuPJzs5hg9zq4epjfx4vZ6Pp0sYsOI7GIjDE8E15AbawXBRSI5tUJaLiFPTCpTYbSRXJhU59rkRlBrWCa0ZALzJGVjdDbkrl370oPv1KrtXRNeKsqzkM24pIGiA2Vc672DQq1dWWu3VQSr7zrVUKcKdaqfOtU2SGyQfICbJbjf6H-sL0UvetA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2474583492</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sexualized and Athletic: Viewers’ Attitudes toward Sexualized Performance Images of Female Athletes</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Daniels, Elizabeth A. ; Hood, Amanda ; LaVoi, Nicole M. ; Cooky, Cheryl</creator><creatorcontrib>Daniels, Elizabeth A. ; Hood, Amanda ; LaVoi, Nicole M. ; Cooky, Cheryl</creatorcontrib><description>Using an experimental methodology, the present study investigated college students’ attitudes toward media images of female athletes. We are particularly focused on how viewers perceive media images of female athletes that have both an appearance and athleticism focus, such as those found in ESPN’s The Body Issue . An aim of our study was to assess viewers’ attitudes toward these images that are not purely objectified, thereby contributing to the objectification literature and providing empirical data relevant to theorizing on the social impact of these images. U.S. college students ( n  = 563) viewed one of four types of images of the same athletes including: (a) sexualized athletes, (b) sexualized performance athletes (in which both athleticism and sexualization are present), (c) sport performance athletes (in which athletes are depicted playing their sport), or (d) non-sexualized athletes. They then rated the athletes’ competence, esteem, and sexual appeal. Overall, sexualized performance athletes were rated more positively than sexualized athletes, but less positively than sport performance athletes. These results have implications for advocacy efforts calling for more media coverage in which women are depicted as athletes rather than as sexual objects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-0025</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11199-020-01152-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Athletes ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; College students ; Females ; Gender Studies ; Mass media images ; Media coverage ; Medicine/Public Health ; Original Article ; Psychology ; Sexualization ; Social impact ; Sociology ; Sports ; Student attitudes</subject><ispartof>Sex roles, 2021, Vol.84 (1-2), p.112-124</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c8c4584aebcdd810f5942d89d49eb5c6968cac948c6abacbc82dc378a93804563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c8c4584aebcdd810f5942d89d49eb5c6968cac948c6abacbc82dc378a93804563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11199-020-01152-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11199-020-01152-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27344,27924,27925,33774,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Daniels, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hood, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaVoi, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooky, Cheryl</creatorcontrib><title>Sexualized and Athletic: Viewers’ Attitudes toward Sexualized Performance Images of Female Athletes</title><title>Sex roles</title><addtitle>Sex Roles</addtitle><description>Using an experimental methodology, the present study investigated college students’ attitudes toward media images of female athletes. We are particularly focused on how viewers perceive media images of female athletes that have both an appearance and athleticism focus, such as those found in ESPN’s The Body Issue . An aim of our study was to assess viewers’ attitudes toward these images that are not purely objectified, thereby contributing to the objectification literature and providing empirical data relevant to theorizing on the social impact of these images. U.S. college students ( n  = 563) viewed one of four types of images of the same athletes including: (a) sexualized athletes, (b) sexualized performance athletes (in which both athleticism and sexualization are present), (c) sport performance athletes (in which athletes are depicted playing their sport), or (d) non-sexualized athletes. They then rated the athletes’ competence, esteem, and sexual appeal. Overall, sexualized performance athletes were rated more positively than sexualized athletes, but less positively than sport performance athletes. These results have implications for advocacy efforts calling for more media coverage in which women are depicted as athletes rather than as sexual objects.</description><subject>Athletes</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender Studies</subject><subject>Mass media images</subject><subject>Media coverage</subject><subject>Medicine/Public Health</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Sexualization</subject><subject>Social impact</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sports</subject><subject>Student attitudes</subject><issn>0360-0025</issn><issn>1573-2762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKw0AUhgdRsFZfwFXAdXRuSWbclWK1UFDwsh0mMyc1JZc6k1Drytfw9XwSR1PQlasD53zff-BH6JTgc4JxduEJIVLGmOIYE5LQeLuHRiTJWEyzlO6jEWZpOGGaHKIj71cY4-DxEYJ7eO11Vb6BjXRjo0n3XEFXmsvoqYQNOP_5_hGWXdn1FnzUtRvtbPRHugNXtK7WjYFoXutlgNoimkGtK9ilgT9GB4WuPJzs5hg9zq4epjfx4vZ6Pp0sYsOI7GIjDE8E15AbawXBRSI5tUJaLiFPTCpTYbSRXJhU59rkRlBrWCa0ZALzJGVjdDbkrl370oPv1KrtXRNeKsqzkM24pIGiA2Vc672DQq1dWWu3VQSr7zrVUKcKdaqfOtU2SGyQfICbJbjf6H-sL0UvetA</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Daniels, Elizabeth A.</creator><creator>Hood, Amanda</creator><creator>LaVoi, Nicole M.</creator><creator>Cooky, Cheryl</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>888</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Sexualized and Athletic: Viewers’ Attitudes toward Sexualized Performance Images of Female Athletes</title><author>Daniels, Elizabeth A. ; Hood, Amanda ; LaVoi, Nicole M. ; Cooky, Cheryl</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c8c4584aebcdd810f5942d89d49eb5c6968cac948c6abacbc82dc378a93804563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Athletes</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender Studies</topic><topic>Mass media images</topic><topic>Media coverage</topic><topic>Medicine/Public Health</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Sexualization</topic><topic>Social impact</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sports</topic><topic>Student attitudes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Daniels, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hood, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaVoi, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooky, Cheryl</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>GenderWatch</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's &amp; Gender Studies</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sex roles</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Daniels, Elizabeth A.</au><au>Hood, Amanda</au><au>LaVoi, Nicole M.</au><au>Cooky, Cheryl</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sexualized and Athletic: Viewers’ Attitudes toward Sexualized Performance Images of Female Athletes</atitle><jtitle>Sex roles</jtitle><stitle>Sex Roles</stitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>112</spage><epage>124</epage><pages>112-124</pages><issn>0360-0025</issn><eissn>1573-2762</eissn><abstract>Using an experimental methodology, the present study investigated college students’ attitudes toward media images of female athletes. We are particularly focused on how viewers perceive media images of female athletes that have both an appearance and athleticism focus, such as those found in ESPN’s The Body Issue . An aim of our study was to assess viewers’ attitudes toward these images that are not purely objectified, thereby contributing to the objectification literature and providing empirical data relevant to theorizing on the social impact of these images. U.S. college students ( n  = 563) viewed one of four types of images of the same athletes including: (a) sexualized athletes, (b) sexualized performance athletes (in which both athleticism and sexualization are present), (c) sport performance athletes (in which athletes are depicted playing their sport), or (d) non-sexualized athletes. They then rated the athletes’ competence, esteem, and sexual appeal. Overall, sexualized performance athletes were rated more positively than sexualized athletes, but less positively than sport performance athletes. These results have implications for advocacy efforts calling for more media coverage in which women are depicted as athletes rather than as sexual objects.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11199-020-01152-y</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-0025
ispartof Sex roles, 2021, Vol.84 (1-2), p.112-124
issn 0360-0025
1573-2762
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2474583492
source Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Athletes
Behavioral Science and Psychology
College students
Females
Gender Studies
Mass media images
Media coverage
Medicine/Public Health
Original Article
Psychology
Sexualization
Social impact
Sociology
Sports
Student attitudes
title Sexualized and Athletic: Viewers’ Attitudes toward Sexualized Performance Images of Female Athletes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T18%3A15%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sexualized%20and%20Athletic:%20Viewers%E2%80%99%20Attitudes%20toward%20Sexualized%20Performance%20Images%20of%20Female%20Athletes&rft.jtitle=Sex%20roles&rft.au=Daniels,%20Elizabeth%20A.&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=112&rft.epage=124&rft.pages=112-124&rft.issn=0360-0025&rft.eissn=1573-2762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11199-020-01152-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2474583492%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2474583492&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true