Evaluation of RC Beam-Column Retrofitting Methods against Near-Field Blast Loading

AbstractThis study numerically evaluated the retrofitting of RC columns using different transverse rebar arrangements and retrofitting methods using European standard I-section profile (IPE) and fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) coatings. The degree of deformation, failure pattern of the element, and r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of performance of constructed facilities 2021-04, Vol.35 (2)
Hauptverfasser: Nouri, Gholamreza, Yoosefpoor Avandari, Abolfazl, Barmah, Jamal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Journal of performance of constructed facilities
container_volume 35
creator Nouri, Gholamreza
Yoosefpoor Avandari, Abolfazl
Barmah, Jamal
description AbstractThis study numerically evaluated the retrofitting of RC columns using different transverse rebar arrangements and retrofitting methods using European standard I-section profile (IPE) and fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) coatings. The degree of deformation, failure pattern of the element, and residual axial strength of the RC columns after exposure to a blast were the performance criteria. Fifteen different models were evaluated to determine the effect of spacing and arrangement of rebars and the effect of FRP and IPE retrofitting. The results indicated that the RC element with transverse rebars with branches showed the least amount of deformation. Furthermore, the damage and deformation of the structure against blast loading decreased by 25% and 20%, respectively, when applying I-shaped profiles and RC columns with FRP coating. The residual capacity of the columns was highest in the models retrofitted with FRP and IPE.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001562
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2473910398</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2473910398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a300t-310b9fd30e097bbce6067e2c0370337d43178d61098dd4d1533cb20ded5ad7c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFFLwzAUhYMoOKf_IeiLPnTeNG3T-LaVVYWpMPU5pE06O7pmJunAf2_Lpj75dOFwvnPhQ-iSwIRAQm6vp6_Z_CbLJ4RHNIhj4BMAIHESHqHRb3aMRpCmLKBpmJ6iM-fWfSlknI3Qcr6TTSd9bVpsKrzM8EzLTZCZptu0eKm9NVXtfd2u8JP2H0Y5LFeybp3Hz1raIK91o_CskX2wMFL1xXN0UsnG6YvDHaP3fP6WPQSLl_vHbLoIJAXwASVQ8EpR0MBZUZQ6gYTpsATKgFKmIkpYqhICPFUqUiSmtCxCUFrFUrEypWN0td_dWvPZaefF2nS27V-KMGKUE6B8aN3tW6U1zlldia2tN9J-CQJicCjE4FBkuRh8icGXODjs4WQPS1fqv_kf8n_wG4FPdGI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473910398</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of RC Beam-Column Retrofitting Methods against Near-Field Blast Loading</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Nouri, Gholamreza ; Yoosefpoor Avandari, Abolfazl ; Barmah, Jamal</creator><creatorcontrib>Nouri, Gholamreza ; Yoosefpoor Avandari, Abolfazl ; Barmah, Jamal</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractThis study numerically evaluated the retrofitting of RC columns using different transverse rebar arrangements and retrofitting methods using European standard I-section profile (IPE) and fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) coatings. The degree of deformation, failure pattern of the element, and residual axial strength of the RC columns after exposure to a blast were the performance criteria. Fifteen different models were evaluated to determine the effect of spacing and arrangement of rebars and the effect of FRP and IPE retrofitting. The results indicated that the RC element with transverse rebars with branches showed the least amount of deformation. Furthermore, the damage and deformation of the structure against blast loading decreased by 25% and 20%, respectively, when applying I-shaped profiles and RC columns with FRP coating. The residual capacity of the columns was highest in the models retrofitted with FRP and IPE.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-3828</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5509</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001562</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Beam-columns ; Blast loads ; Deformation ; Fiber reinforced plastics ; Fiber reinforced polymers ; Rebar ; Reinforcing steels ; Retrofitting ; Technical Papers</subject><ispartof>Journal of performance of constructed facilities, 2021-04, Vol.35 (2)</ispartof><rights>2020 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a300t-310b9fd30e097bbce6067e2c0370337d43178d61098dd4d1533cb20ded5ad7c83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a300t-310b9fd30e097bbce6067e2c0370337d43178d61098dd4d1533cb20ded5ad7c83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4037-7991 ; 0000-0002-2936-599X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001562$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001562$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,75935,75943</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nouri, Gholamreza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoosefpoor Avandari, Abolfazl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barmah, Jamal</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of RC Beam-Column Retrofitting Methods against Near-Field Blast Loading</title><title>Journal of performance of constructed facilities</title><description>AbstractThis study numerically evaluated the retrofitting of RC columns using different transverse rebar arrangements and retrofitting methods using European standard I-section profile (IPE) and fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) coatings. The degree of deformation, failure pattern of the element, and residual axial strength of the RC columns after exposure to a blast were the performance criteria. Fifteen different models were evaluated to determine the effect of spacing and arrangement of rebars and the effect of FRP and IPE retrofitting. The results indicated that the RC element with transverse rebars with branches showed the least amount of deformation. Furthermore, the damage and deformation of the structure against blast loading decreased by 25% and 20%, respectively, when applying I-shaped profiles and RC columns with FRP coating. The residual capacity of the columns was highest in the models retrofitted with FRP and IPE.</description><subject>Beam-columns</subject><subject>Blast loads</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Fiber reinforced plastics</subject><subject>Fiber reinforced polymers</subject><subject>Rebar</subject><subject>Reinforcing steels</subject><subject>Retrofitting</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><issn>0887-3828</issn><issn>1943-5509</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kFFLwzAUhYMoOKf_IeiLPnTeNG3T-LaVVYWpMPU5pE06O7pmJunAf2_Lpj75dOFwvnPhQ-iSwIRAQm6vp6_Z_CbLJ4RHNIhj4BMAIHESHqHRb3aMRpCmLKBpmJ6iM-fWfSlknI3Qcr6TTSd9bVpsKrzM8EzLTZCZptu0eKm9NVXtfd2u8JP2H0Y5LFeybp3Hz1raIK91o_CskX2wMFL1xXN0UsnG6YvDHaP3fP6WPQSLl_vHbLoIJAXwASVQ8EpR0MBZUZQ6gYTpsATKgFKmIkpYqhICPFUqUiSmtCxCUFrFUrEypWN0td_dWvPZaefF2nS27V-KMGKUE6B8aN3tW6U1zlldia2tN9J-CQJicCjE4FBkuRh8icGXODjs4WQPS1fqv_kf8n_wG4FPdGI</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Nouri, Gholamreza</creator><creator>Yoosefpoor Avandari, Abolfazl</creator><creator>Barmah, Jamal</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4037-7991</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2936-599X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Evaluation of RC Beam-Column Retrofitting Methods against Near-Field Blast Loading</title><author>Nouri, Gholamreza ; Yoosefpoor Avandari, Abolfazl ; Barmah, Jamal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a300t-310b9fd30e097bbce6067e2c0370337d43178d61098dd4d1533cb20ded5ad7c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Beam-columns</topic><topic>Blast loads</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Fiber reinforced plastics</topic><topic>Fiber reinforced polymers</topic><topic>Rebar</topic><topic>Reinforcing steels</topic><topic>Retrofitting</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nouri, Gholamreza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoosefpoor Avandari, Abolfazl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barmah, Jamal</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of performance of constructed facilities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nouri, Gholamreza</au><au>Yoosefpoor Avandari, Abolfazl</au><au>Barmah, Jamal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of RC Beam-Column Retrofitting Methods against Near-Field Blast Loading</atitle><jtitle>Journal of performance of constructed facilities</jtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>0887-3828</issn><eissn>1943-5509</eissn><abstract>AbstractThis study numerically evaluated the retrofitting of RC columns using different transverse rebar arrangements and retrofitting methods using European standard I-section profile (IPE) and fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) coatings. The degree of deformation, failure pattern of the element, and residual axial strength of the RC columns after exposure to a blast were the performance criteria. Fifteen different models were evaluated to determine the effect of spacing and arrangement of rebars and the effect of FRP and IPE retrofitting. The results indicated that the RC element with transverse rebars with branches showed the least amount of deformation. Furthermore, the damage and deformation of the structure against blast loading decreased by 25% and 20%, respectively, when applying I-shaped profiles and RC columns with FRP coating. The residual capacity of the columns was highest in the models retrofitted with FRP and IPE.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001562</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4037-7991</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2936-599X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0887-3828
ispartof Journal of performance of constructed facilities, 2021-04, Vol.35 (2)
issn 0887-3828
1943-5509
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2473910398
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects Beam-columns
Blast loads
Deformation
Fiber reinforced plastics
Fiber reinforced polymers
Rebar
Reinforcing steels
Retrofitting
Technical Papers
title Evaluation of RC Beam-Column Retrofitting Methods against Near-Field Blast Loading
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T12%3A22%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20RC%20Beam-Column%20Retrofitting%20Methods%20against%20Near-Field%20Blast%20Loading&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20performance%20of%20constructed%20facilities&rft.au=Nouri,%20Gholamreza&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=0887-3828&rft.eissn=1943-5509&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001562&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2473910398%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473910398&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true