Tectonic Fragmentation and Geodynamic Regime of Elbrus and Kazbek Volcanoes (Central Caucasus, Russia): Results of the Deep Geophysical Research

— A comprehensive analysis of instrumental data was carried out to establish indicators of the geodynamic conditions of interaction between the Scythian Plate and the collage of southern plates; and to determine the type and kinematics of the Main Caucasian Thrust and the nature of volcanoes in the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geotectonics 2020-09, Vol.54 (5), p.652-664
Hauptverfasser: Shempelev, A. G., Zaalishvili, V. B., Chotchaev, Kh. O., Shamanovskaya, S. P., Rogozhin, E. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 664
container_issue 5
container_start_page 652
container_title Geotectonics
container_volume 54
creator Shempelev, A. G.
Zaalishvili, V. B.
Chotchaev, Kh. O.
Shamanovskaya, S. P.
Rogozhin, E. A.
description — A comprehensive analysis of instrumental data was carried out to establish indicators of the geodynamic conditions of interaction between the Scythian Plate and the collage of southern plates; and to determine the type and kinematics of the Main Caucasian Thrust and the nature of volcanoes in the North Caucasus. In terms of structure and tectonics, the studies were conducted within the alpine structure of the Greater Caucasus, and they equally characterize both of its first-order structures: the folded-block uplift of the Main Range and the North Caucasian regional massif. In the kinematics of the Main Caucasian Thrust and volcanoes of the North Caucasus, there are no subduction elements. The absence of correspondence of the Main Thrust to the Benioff zone, and, conversely, its similarity to listric faults and shallow-focus volcanic centers are more consistent with a collisional geodynamic situation. Geological and geophysical sections along the network of regional profiles of deep geophysical studies in Ciscaucasia and the central part of the Greater Caucasus are characterized by similarity in the elements of the deep structure and semithrust kinematics of interaction with the consolidated crust of the southern microplates–terranes framing the Arabian Plate from the north. The volcanoes of the Central Caucasus arose in a collisional setting and a relationship between Elbrus volcano and the Main Caucasian Thrust as a collision compression structure is assumed. Data were obtained on the results of geophysical studies using the earthquake converted-wave method (ECWM), microseismic sounding method (MSM), magnetotelluric sounding (MTS), and gravimagnetic measurements in combination with data obtained from processing of satellite images of the specific length of lineaments of tectonic fragmentation for different depths of lithospheric sections. Laboratory determination of radiocarbon dating of volcanic complexes, distribution of the thermal field in surface and deep thermal springs, as well as isotopic assessment of the ratios of indicator elements of Elbrus volcano, which make it possible to confidently identify a magma chamber at depth of ~5 km and a magma chamber at depth of ~30–40 km. Our studies allow us to consider the main characteristics as an increased thermal field, variations in the helium isotope ratios, a seismic gap under the volcanic structure, and insignificant energy unloadings occurring on gentle low-power tectonic zones on the northeastern
doi_str_mv 10.1134/S0016852120050088
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2473798785</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2473798785</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-2e2574907b61343a8e9df4bcbbccebd8448b299b01dd99295ff4dded04abfc293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAewssQGJgO08zQ6FtiAqIZXCNvJj0qakcbGTRfkKPhmHIrFArGZx7rmjGYROKbmiNIyunwmhSRYzygiJCcmyPTSgcZwElKfJPhr0OOj5ITpybkVISDwdoM85qNY0lcJjKxZraFrRVqbBotF4AkZvG7H2cAaLag3YlHhUS9u5b_4oPiS84VdTK9EYcPg8974VNc5Fp4Tr3CWedc5V4uLGN7iubl1f0S4B3wFs-gWb5dZVyiueg7BqeYwOSlE7OPmZQ_QyHs3z-2D6NHnIb6eBCEPeBgxYnEacpDLx54ciA67LSCoplQKpsyjKJONcEqo154zHZRlpDZpEQpaK8XCIzna9G2veO3BtsTKdbfzKgkVpmPIszWKforuUssY5C2WxsdVa2G1BSdE_vvjzeO-wneN8tlmA_W3-X_oCFcuGZQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473798785</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tectonic Fragmentation and Geodynamic Regime of Elbrus and Kazbek Volcanoes (Central Caucasus, Russia): Results of the Deep Geophysical Research</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Shempelev, A. G. ; Zaalishvili, V. B. ; Chotchaev, Kh. O. ; Shamanovskaya, S. P. ; Rogozhin, E. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shempelev, A. G. ; Zaalishvili, V. B. ; Chotchaev, Kh. O. ; Shamanovskaya, S. P. ; Rogozhin, E. A.</creatorcontrib><description>— A comprehensive analysis of instrumental data was carried out to establish indicators of the geodynamic conditions of interaction between the Scythian Plate and the collage of southern plates; and to determine the type and kinematics of the Main Caucasian Thrust and the nature of volcanoes in the North Caucasus. In terms of structure and tectonics, the studies were conducted within the alpine structure of the Greater Caucasus, and they equally characterize both of its first-order structures: the folded-block uplift of the Main Range and the North Caucasian regional massif. In the kinematics of the Main Caucasian Thrust and volcanoes of the North Caucasus, there are no subduction elements. The absence of correspondence of the Main Thrust to the Benioff zone, and, conversely, its similarity to listric faults and shallow-focus volcanic centers are more consistent with a collisional geodynamic situation. Geological and geophysical sections along the network of regional profiles of deep geophysical studies in Ciscaucasia and the central part of the Greater Caucasus are characterized by similarity in the elements of the deep structure and semithrust kinematics of interaction with the consolidated crust of the southern microplates–terranes framing the Arabian Plate from the north. The volcanoes of the Central Caucasus arose in a collisional setting and a relationship between Elbrus volcano and the Main Caucasian Thrust as a collision compression structure is assumed. Data were obtained on the results of geophysical studies using the earthquake converted-wave method (ECWM), microseismic sounding method (MSM), magnetotelluric sounding (MTS), and gravimagnetic measurements in combination with data obtained from processing of satellite images of the specific length of lineaments of tectonic fragmentation for different depths of lithospheric sections. Laboratory determination of radiocarbon dating of volcanic complexes, distribution of the thermal field in surface and deep thermal springs, as well as isotopic assessment of the ratios of indicator elements of Elbrus volcano, which make it possible to confidently identify a magma chamber at depth of ~5 km and a magma chamber at depth of ~30–40 km. Our studies allow us to consider the main characteristics as an increased thermal field, variations in the helium isotope ratios, a seismic gap under the volcanic structure, and insignificant energy unloadings occurring on gentle low-power tectonic zones on the northeastern and eastern slopes, where periodic fumarole gas emissions are inherent to the active volcano.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-8521</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-1976</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1134/S0016852120050088</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Moscow: Pleiades Publishing</publisher><subject>Benioff zone ; Chambers ; Compression ; Data compression ; Depth ; Depth profiling ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earthquakes ; Fragmentation ; Geological faults ; Geophysical studies ; Geophysics ; Geothermal springs ; Helium ; Helium isotopes ; Hot springs ; Isotope ratios ; Kinematics ; Lava ; Magma ; Magma chambers ; Massifs ; Microseisms ; Plates ; Plates (tectonics) ; Radiocarbon dating ; Radiometric dating ; Ratios ; Satellite imagery ; Seismic activity ; Similarity ; Sounding ; Spaceborne remote sensing ; Structural Geology ; Subduction ; Subduction (geology) ; Tectonics ; Thermal springs ; Uplift ; Volcanic activity ; Volcanoes</subject><ispartof>Geotectonics, 2020-09, Vol.54 (5), p.652-664</ispartof><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2020</rights><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-2e2574907b61343a8e9df4bcbbccebd8448b299b01dd99295ff4dded04abfc293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-2e2574907b61343a8e9df4bcbbccebd8448b299b01dd99295ff4dded04abfc293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1134/S0016852120050088$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1134/S0016852120050088$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shempelev, A. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaalishvili, V. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chotchaev, Kh. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shamanovskaya, S. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogozhin, E. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Tectonic Fragmentation and Geodynamic Regime of Elbrus and Kazbek Volcanoes (Central Caucasus, Russia): Results of the Deep Geophysical Research</title><title>Geotectonics</title><addtitle>Geotecton</addtitle><description>— A comprehensive analysis of instrumental data was carried out to establish indicators of the geodynamic conditions of interaction between the Scythian Plate and the collage of southern plates; and to determine the type and kinematics of the Main Caucasian Thrust and the nature of volcanoes in the North Caucasus. In terms of structure and tectonics, the studies were conducted within the alpine structure of the Greater Caucasus, and they equally characterize both of its first-order structures: the folded-block uplift of the Main Range and the North Caucasian regional massif. In the kinematics of the Main Caucasian Thrust and volcanoes of the North Caucasus, there are no subduction elements. The absence of correspondence of the Main Thrust to the Benioff zone, and, conversely, its similarity to listric faults and shallow-focus volcanic centers are more consistent with a collisional geodynamic situation. Geological and geophysical sections along the network of regional profiles of deep geophysical studies in Ciscaucasia and the central part of the Greater Caucasus are characterized by similarity in the elements of the deep structure and semithrust kinematics of interaction with the consolidated crust of the southern microplates–terranes framing the Arabian Plate from the north. The volcanoes of the Central Caucasus arose in a collisional setting and a relationship between Elbrus volcano and the Main Caucasian Thrust as a collision compression structure is assumed. Data were obtained on the results of geophysical studies using the earthquake converted-wave method (ECWM), microseismic sounding method (MSM), magnetotelluric sounding (MTS), and gravimagnetic measurements in combination with data obtained from processing of satellite images of the specific length of lineaments of tectonic fragmentation for different depths of lithospheric sections. Laboratory determination of radiocarbon dating of volcanic complexes, distribution of the thermal field in surface and deep thermal springs, as well as isotopic assessment of the ratios of indicator elements of Elbrus volcano, which make it possible to confidently identify a magma chamber at depth of ~5 km and a magma chamber at depth of ~30–40 km. Our studies allow us to consider the main characteristics as an increased thermal field, variations in the helium isotope ratios, a seismic gap under the volcanic structure, and insignificant energy unloadings occurring on gentle low-power tectonic zones on the northeastern and eastern slopes, where periodic fumarole gas emissions are inherent to the active volcano.</description><subject>Benioff zone</subject><subject>Chambers</subject><subject>Compression</subject><subject>Data compression</subject><subject>Depth</subject><subject>Depth profiling</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Fragmentation</subject><subject>Geological faults</subject><subject>Geophysical studies</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Geothermal springs</subject><subject>Helium</subject><subject>Helium isotopes</subject><subject>Hot springs</subject><subject>Isotope ratios</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Lava</subject><subject>Magma</subject><subject>Magma chambers</subject><subject>Massifs</subject><subject>Microseisms</subject><subject>Plates</subject><subject>Plates (tectonics)</subject><subject>Radiocarbon dating</subject><subject>Radiometric dating</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Satellite imagery</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Similarity</subject><subject>Sounding</subject><subject>Spaceborne remote sensing</subject><subject>Structural Geology</subject><subject>Subduction</subject><subject>Subduction (geology)</subject><subject>Tectonics</subject><subject>Thermal springs</subject><subject>Uplift</subject><subject>Volcanic activity</subject><subject>Volcanoes</subject><issn>0016-8521</issn><issn>1556-1976</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAewssQGJgO08zQ6FtiAqIZXCNvJj0qakcbGTRfkKPhmHIrFArGZx7rmjGYROKbmiNIyunwmhSRYzygiJCcmyPTSgcZwElKfJPhr0OOj5ITpybkVISDwdoM85qNY0lcJjKxZraFrRVqbBotF4AkZvG7H2cAaLag3YlHhUS9u5b_4oPiS84VdTK9EYcPg8974VNc5Fp4Tr3CWedc5V4uLGN7iubl1f0S4B3wFs-gWb5dZVyiueg7BqeYwOSlE7OPmZQ_QyHs3z-2D6NHnIb6eBCEPeBgxYnEacpDLx54ciA67LSCoplQKpsyjKJONcEqo154zHZRlpDZpEQpaK8XCIzna9G2veO3BtsTKdbfzKgkVpmPIszWKforuUssY5C2WxsdVa2G1BSdE_vvjzeO-wneN8tlmA_W3-X_oCFcuGZQ</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Shempelev, A. G.</creator><creator>Zaalishvili, V. B.</creator><creator>Chotchaev, Kh. O.</creator><creator>Shamanovskaya, S. P.</creator><creator>Rogozhin, E. A.</creator><general>Pleiades Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Tectonic Fragmentation and Geodynamic Regime of Elbrus and Kazbek Volcanoes (Central Caucasus, Russia): Results of the Deep Geophysical Research</title><author>Shempelev, A. G. ; Zaalishvili, V. B. ; Chotchaev, Kh. O. ; Shamanovskaya, S. P. ; Rogozhin, E. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-2e2574907b61343a8e9df4bcbbccebd8448b299b01dd99295ff4dded04abfc293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Benioff zone</topic><topic>Chambers</topic><topic>Compression</topic><topic>Data compression</topic><topic>Depth</topic><topic>Depth profiling</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Fragmentation</topic><topic>Geological faults</topic><topic>Geophysical studies</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Geothermal springs</topic><topic>Helium</topic><topic>Helium isotopes</topic><topic>Hot springs</topic><topic>Isotope ratios</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Lava</topic><topic>Magma</topic><topic>Magma chambers</topic><topic>Massifs</topic><topic>Microseisms</topic><topic>Plates</topic><topic>Plates (tectonics)</topic><topic>Radiocarbon dating</topic><topic>Radiometric dating</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Satellite imagery</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Similarity</topic><topic>Sounding</topic><topic>Spaceborne remote sensing</topic><topic>Structural Geology</topic><topic>Subduction</topic><topic>Subduction (geology)</topic><topic>Tectonics</topic><topic>Thermal springs</topic><topic>Uplift</topic><topic>Volcanic activity</topic><topic>Volcanoes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shempelev, A. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaalishvili, V. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chotchaev, Kh. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shamanovskaya, S. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogozhin, E. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Geotectonics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shempelev, A. G.</au><au>Zaalishvili, V. B.</au><au>Chotchaev, Kh. O.</au><au>Shamanovskaya, S. P.</au><au>Rogozhin, E. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tectonic Fragmentation and Geodynamic Regime of Elbrus and Kazbek Volcanoes (Central Caucasus, Russia): Results of the Deep Geophysical Research</atitle><jtitle>Geotectonics</jtitle><stitle>Geotecton</stitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>652</spage><epage>664</epage><pages>652-664</pages><issn>0016-8521</issn><eissn>1556-1976</eissn><abstract>— A comprehensive analysis of instrumental data was carried out to establish indicators of the geodynamic conditions of interaction between the Scythian Plate and the collage of southern plates; and to determine the type and kinematics of the Main Caucasian Thrust and the nature of volcanoes in the North Caucasus. In terms of structure and tectonics, the studies were conducted within the alpine structure of the Greater Caucasus, and they equally characterize both of its first-order structures: the folded-block uplift of the Main Range and the North Caucasian regional massif. In the kinematics of the Main Caucasian Thrust and volcanoes of the North Caucasus, there are no subduction elements. The absence of correspondence of the Main Thrust to the Benioff zone, and, conversely, its similarity to listric faults and shallow-focus volcanic centers are more consistent with a collisional geodynamic situation. Geological and geophysical sections along the network of regional profiles of deep geophysical studies in Ciscaucasia and the central part of the Greater Caucasus are characterized by similarity in the elements of the deep structure and semithrust kinematics of interaction with the consolidated crust of the southern microplates–terranes framing the Arabian Plate from the north. The volcanoes of the Central Caucasus arose in a collisional setting and a relationship between Elbrus volcano and the Main Caucasian Thrust as a collision compression structure is assumed. Data were obtained on the results of geophysical studies using the earthquake converted-wave method (ECWM), microseismic sounding method (MSM), magnetotelluric sounding (MTS), and gravimagnetic measurements in combination with data obtained from processing of satellite images of the specific length of lineaments of tectonic fragmentation for different depths of lithospheric sections. Laboratory determination of radiocarbon dating of volcanic complexes, distribution of the thermal field in surface and deep thermal springs, as well as isotopic assessment of the ratios of indicator elements of Elbrus volcano, which make it possible to confidently identify a magma chamber at depth of ~5 km and a magma chamber at depth of ~30–40 km. Our studies allow us to consider the main characteristics as an increased thermal field, variations in the helium isotope ratios, a seismic gap under the volcanic structure, and insignificant energy unloadings occurring on gentle low-power tectonic zones on the northeastern and eastern slopes, where periodic fumarole gas emissions are inherent to the active volcano.</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>Pleiades Publishing</pub><doi>10.1134/S0016852120050088</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-8521
ispartof Geotectonics, 2020-09, Vol.54 (5), p.652-664
issn 0016-8521
1556-1976
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2473798785
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Benioff zone
Chambers
Compression
Data compression
Depth
Depth profiling
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Earthquakes
Fragmentation
Geological faults
Geophysical studies
Geophysics
Geothermal springs
Helium
Helium isotopes
Hot springs
Isotope ratios
Kinematics
Lava
Magma
Magma chambers
Massifs
Microseisms
Plates
Plates (tectonics)
Radiocarbon dating
Radiometric dating
Ratios
Satellite imagery
Seismic activity
Similarity
Sounding
Spaceborne remote sensing
Structural Geology
Subduction
Subduction (geology)
Tectonics
Thermal springs
Uplift
Volcanic activity
Volcanoes
title Tectonic Fragmentation and Geodynamic Regime of Elbrus and Kazbek Volcanoes (Central Caucasus, Russia): Results of the Deep Geophysical Research
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T14%3A02%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tectonic%20Fragmentation%20and%20Geodynamic%20Regime%20of%20Elbrus%20and%20Kazbek%20Volcanoes%20(Central%20Caucasus,%20Russia):%20Results%20of%20the%20Deep%20Geophysical%20Research&rft.jtitle=Geotectonics&rft.au=Shempelev,%20A.%20G.&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=652&rft.epage=664&rft.pages=652-664&rft.issn=0016-8521&rft.eissn=1556-1976&rft_id=info:doi/10.1134/S0016852120050088&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2473798785%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473798785&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true