A Devious Equatorial Dipole Hypothesis: on the Low-Latitude Glaciations Problem and Geomagnetic Field Configuration in Late Precambrian

—The analysis of paleomagnetic data from Late Neoproterozoic complexes of Siberia and Australia is carried out. We show that the existing paleomagnetic datasets are in a disagreement with the concept of the axial-dipole configuration of the Late Neoproterozoic geomagnetic field: proposed non-actuali...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Izvestiya. Physics of the solid earth 2020-11, Vol.56 (6), p.833-853
Hauptverfasser: Shatsillo, A. V., Rud’ko, S. V., Latysheva, I. V., Rud’ko, D. V., Fedyukin, I. V., Powerman, V. I., Kuznetsov, N. B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 853
container_issue 6
container_start_page 833
container_title Izvestiya. Physics of the solid earth
container_volume 56
creator Shatsillo, A. V.
Rud’ko, S. V.
Latysheva, I. V.
Rud’ko, D. V.
Fedyukin, I. V.
Powerman, V. I.
Kuznetsov, N. B.
description —The analysis of paleomagnetic data from Late Neoproterozoic complexes of Siberia and Australia is carried out. We show that the existing paleomagnetic datasets are in a disagreement with the concept of the axial-dipole configuration of the Late Neoproterozoic geomagnetic field: proposed non-actualistic models of the field do not reasonably explain the distribution of the paleomagnetic poles. We carried out analysis of paleomagnetic and virtual geomagnetic poles distribution based on simple geometric calculations. The analysis suggests that the configuration of the Late Neoproterozoic geomagnetic field was determined by the coexistence of a weak, long-lived source that was stably fixed in space, with a main dipole source that experienced sporadic multidirectional jumps within a certain preferred region of the Earth. Predominantly equatorial orientation of the main dipole source is substantiated by paleoclimate proxies. We propose a descriptive non-actualistic model of the Late Neoproterozoic geomagnetic field—the Devious Equatorial Dipole hypothesis, which brings paleomagnetic and paleoclimate data into accordance.
doi_str_mv 10.1134/S1069351320060087
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2473775348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2473775348</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-2d81baf4b96771d367ce012783b1524c4f54de97f2f5545f63b634034854d7d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kN1KxDAQhYMouK4-gHcBr6tJ89d6t-yvUFBQr0vaJmuWNtlNWmWfwNc26wpeiFdzZuY7Z2AAuMboFmNC754x4jlhmKQIcYQycQJGmDGWcIb4adRxnRz25-AihA1ClJI8H4HPCZypd-OGAOe7QfbOG9nCmdm6VsHVfuv6NxVMuIfOwihh4T6SQvamHxoFl62sTWycDfDJu6pVHZS2gUvlOrm2qjc1XBjVNnDqrDbrwX_D0FgYM1T0qFp2VTxpL8GZlm1QVz91DF4X85fpKikelw_TSZFIQvI-SZsMV1LTKudC4IZwUSuEU5GRCrOU1lQz2qhc6FQzRpnmpOKEIkKzOBdNTsbg5pi79W43qNCXGzd4G0-WKRVECBbZSOEjVXsXgle63HrTSb8vMSoP_y7__Dt60qMnRNaulf9N_t_0BTzkgfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473775348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Devious Equatorial Dipole Hypothesis: on the Low-Latitude Glaciations Problem and Geomagnetic Field Configuration in Late Precambrian</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Shatsillo, A. V. ; Rud’ko, S. V. ; Latysheva, I. V. ; Rud’ko, D. V. ; Fedyukin, I. V. ; Powerman, V. I. ; Kuznetsov, N. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shatsillo, A. V. ; Rud’ko, S. V. ; Latysheva, I. V. ; Rud’ko, D. V. ; Fedyukin, I. V. ; Powerman, V. I. ; Kuznetsov, N. B.</creatorcontrib><description>—The analysis of paleomagnetic data from Late Neoproterozoic complexes of Siberia and Australia is carried out. We show that the existing paleomagnetic datasets are in a disagreement with the concept of the axial-dipole configuration of the Late Neoproterozoic geomagnetic field: proposed non-actualistic models of the field do not reasonably explain the distribution of the paleomagnetic poles. We carried out analysis of paleomagnetic and virtual geomagnetic poles distribution based on simple geometric calculations. The analysis suggests that the configuration of the Late Neoproterozoic geomagnetic field was determined by the coexistence of a weak, long-lived source that was stably fixed in space, with a main dipole source that experienced sporadic multidirectional jumps within a certain preferred region of the Earth. Predominantly equatorial orientation of the main dipole source is substantiated by paleoclimate proxies. We propose a descriptive non-actualistic model of the Late Neoproterozoic geomagnetic field—the Devious Equatorial Dipole hypothesis, which brings paleomagnetic and paleoclimate data into accordance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-3513</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-6506</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1134/S1069351320060087</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Moscow: Pleiades Publishing</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Configurations ; Dipoles ; Distribution ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Equatorial regions ; Geomagnetic field ; Geomagnetism ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Hypotheses ; Magnetism ; Palaeomagnetism ; Paleoclimate ; Paleomagnetism ; Poles ; Precambrian</subject><ispartof>Izvestiya. Physics of the solid earth, 2020-11, Vol.56 (6), p.833-853</ispartof><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2020</rights><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-2d81baf4b96771d367ce012783b1524c4f54de97f2f5545f63b634034854d7d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-2d81baf4b96771d367ce012783b1524c4f54de97f2f5545f63b634034854d7d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1134/S1069351320060087$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1134/S1069351320060087$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shatsillo, A. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rud’ko, S. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latysheva, I. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rud’ko, D. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedyukin, I. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powerman, V. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuznetsov, N. B.</creatorcontrib><title>A Devious Equatorial Dipole Hypothesis: on the Low-Latitude Glaciations Problem and Geomagnetic Field Configuration in Late Precambrian</title><title>Izvestiya. Physics of the solid earth</title><addtitle>Izv., Phys. Solid Earth</addtitle><description>—The analysis of paleomagnetic data from Late Neoproterozoic complexes of Siberia and Australia is carried out. We show that the existing paleomagnetic datasets are in a disagreement with the concept of the axial-dipole configuration of the Late Neoproterozoic geomagnetic field: proposed non-actualistic models of the field do not reasonably explain the distribution of the paleomagnetic poles. We carried out analysis of paleomagnetic and virtual geomagnetic poles distribution based on simple geometric calculations. The analysis suggests that the configuration of the Late Neoproterozoic geomagnetic field was determined by the coexistence of a weak, long-lived source that was stably fixed in space, with a main dipole source that experienced sporadic multidirectional jumps within a certain preferred region of the Earth. Predominantly equatorial orientation of the main dipole source is substantiated by paleoclimate proxies. We propose a descriptive non-actualistic model of the Late Neoproterozoic geomagnetic field—the Devious Equatorial Dipole hypothesis, which brings paleomagnetic and paleoclimate data into accordance.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Configurations</subject><subject>Dipoles</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Equatorial regions</subject><subject>Geomagnetic field</subject><subject>Geomagnetism</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Magnetism</subject><subject>Palaeomagnetism</subject><subject>Paleoclimate</subject><subject>Paleomagnetism</subject><subject>Poles</subject><subject>Precambrian</subject><issn>1069-3513</issn><issn>1555-6506</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kN1KxDAQhYMouK4-gHcBr6tJ89d6t-yvUFBQr0vaJmuWNtlNWmWfwNc26wpeiFdzZuY7Z2AAuMboFmNC754x4jlhmKQIcYQycQJGmDGWcIb4adRxnRz25-AihA1ClJI8H4HPCZypd-OGAOe7QfbOG9nCmdm6VsHVfuv6NxVMuIfOwihh4T6SQvamHxoFl62sTWycDfDJu6pVHZS2gUvlOrm2qjc1XBjVNnDqrDbrwX_D0FgYM1T0qFp2VTxpL8GZlm1QVz91DF4X85fpKikelw_TSZFIQvI-SZsMV1LTKudC4IZwUSuEU5GRCrOU1lQz2qhc6FQzRpnmpOKEIkKzOBdNTsbg5pi79W43qNCXGzd4G0-WKRVECBbZSOEjVXsXgle63HrTSb8vMSoP_y7__Dt60qMnRNaulf9N_t_0BTzkgfQ</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Shatsillo, A. V.</creator><creator>Rud’ko, S. V.</creator><creator>Latysheva, I. V.</creator><creator>Rud’ko, D. V.</creator><creator>Fedyukin, I. V.</creator><creator>Powerman, V. I.</creator><creator>Kuznetsov, N. B.</creator><general>Pleiades Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>A Devious Equatorial Dipole Hypothesis: on the Low-Latitude Glaciations Problem and Geomagnetic Field Configuration in Late Precambrian</title><author>Shatsillo, A. V. ; Rud’ko, S. V. ; Latysheva, I. V. ; Rud’ko, D. V. ; Fedyukin, I. V. ; Powerman, V. I. ; Kuznetsov, N. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-2d81baf4b96771d367ce012783b1524c4f54de97f2f5545f63b634034854d7d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Configurations</topic><topic>Dipoles</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Equatorial regions</topic><topic>Geomagnetic field</topic><topic>Geomagnetism</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Magnetism</topic><topic>Palaeomagnetism</topic><topic>Paleoclimate</topic><topic>Paleomagnetism</topic><topic>Poles</topic><topic>Precambrian</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shatsillo, A. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rud’ko, S. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latysheva, I. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rud’ko, D. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedyukin, I. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powerman, V. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuznetsov, N. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Izvestiya. Physics of the solid earth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shatsillo, A. V.</au><au>Rud’ko, S. V.</au><au>Latysheva, I. V.</au><au>Rud’ko, D. V.</au><au>Fedyukin, I. V.</au><au>Powerman, V. I.</au><au>Kuznetsov, N. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Devious Equatorial Dipole Hypothesis: on the Low-Latitude Glaciations Problem and Geomagnetic Field Configuration in Late Precambrian</atitle><jtitle>Izvestiya. Physics of the solid earth</jtitle><stitle>Izv., Phys. Solid Earth</stitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>833</spage><epage>853</epage><pages>833-853</pages><issn>1069-3513</issn><eissn>1555-6506</eissn><abstract>—The analysis of paleomagnetic data from Late Neoproterozoic complexes of Siberia and Australia is carried out. We show that the existing paleomagnetic datasets are in a disagreement with the concept of the axial-dipole configuration of the Late Neoproterozoic geomagnetic field: proposed non-actualistic models of the field do not reasonably explain the distribution of the paleomagnetic poles. We carried out analysis of paleomagnetic and virtual geomagnetic poles distribution based on simple geometric calculations. The analysis suggests that the configuration of the Late Neoproterozoic geomagnetic field was determined by the coexistence of a weak, long-lived source that was stably fixed in space, with a main dipole source that experienced sporadic multidirectional jumps within a certain preferred region of the Earth. Predominantly equatorial orientation of the main dipole source is substantiated by paleoclimate proxies. We propose a descriptive non-actualistic model of the Late Neoproterozoic geomagnetic field—the Devious Equatorial Dipole hypothesis, which brings paleomagnetic and paleoclimate data into accordance.</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>Pleiades Publishing</pub><doi>10.1134/S1069351320060087</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1069-3513
ispartof Izvestiya. Physics of the solid earth, 2020-11, Vol.56 (6), p.833-853
issn 1069-3513
1555-6506
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2473775348
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Analysis
Configurations
Dipoles
Distribution
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Equatorial regions
Geomagnetic field
Geomagnetism
Geophysics/Geodesy
Hypotheses
Magnetism
Palaeomagnetism
Paleoclimate
Paleomagnetism
Poles
Precambrian
title A Devious Equatorial Dipole Hypothesis: on the Low-Latitude Glaciations Problem and Geomagnetic Field Configuration in Late Precambrian
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T06%3A57%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Devious%20Equatorial%20Dipole%20Hypothesis:%20on%20the%20Low-Latitude%20Glaciations%20Problem%20and%20Geomagnetic%20Field%20Configuration%20in%20Late%20Precambrian&rft.jtitle=Izvestiya.%20Physics%20of%20the%20solid%20earth&rft.au=Shatsillo,%20A.%20V.&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=833&rft.epage=853&rft.pages=833-853&rft.issn=1069-3513&rft.eissn=1555-6506&rft_id=info:doi/10.1134/S1069351320060087&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2473775348%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473775348&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true