A Roadmap for CANS Validation
In nearly every jurisdiction, juvenile or family courts will be using the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths (CANS) tool to assess whether children can safely be treated in family‐like settings to meet federal Family First Prevention Services Act (FFPSA) requirements. Yet, a number of peer‐rev...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Juvenile & family court journal 2020-12, Vol.71 (4), p.63-69 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 69 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 63 |
| container_title | Juvenile & family court journal |
| container_volume | 71 |
| creator | Kraus, David R. |
| description | In nearly every jurisdiction, juvenile or family courts will be using the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths (CANS) tool to assess whether children can safely be treated in family‐like settings to meet federal Family First Prevention Services Act (FFPSA) requirements. Yet, a number of peer‐reviewed publications have raised serious concerns regarding the lack of CANS validation research. Rather than reject CANS, this article provides a roadmap for validating the tool with data that jurisdictions have already collected. Courts should require these three simple analyses before relying on the assessment. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jfcj.12188 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2473422545</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2473422545</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-cbf8ef2bf6cf7d7a3b18bbf67f86e073448ad894de68935e73fc96caa6a02e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j89LwzAUx4MoWKcX70LBm9CZH23yeizFqWMo6PAa0jSBlm6pyYbsv19mPfsuXx58vu_xQeiW4DmJ89hb3c8JJQBnKCGiKDJeApyjBBNOMkFweYmuQugxZoKVkKC7Kv1wqt2oMbXOp3X19pl-qaFr1a5z22t0YdUQzM1fztB68bSuX7LV-_NrXa0yzTCBTDcWjKWN5dqKVijWEGjiJixwgwXLc1AtlHlrOJSsMIJZXXKtFFeYGsxm6H46O3r3vTdhJ3u399v4UdI81ikt8iJSDxOlvQvBGytH322UP0iC5clenuzlr32EyQT_dIM5_EPK5aJeTp0jX0NaYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473422545</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Roadmap for CANS Validation</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Kraus, David R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kraus, David R.</creatorcontrib><description>In nearly every jurisdiction, juvenile or family courts will be using the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths (CANS) tool to assess whether children can safely be treated in family‐like settings to meet federal Family First Prevention Services Act (FFPSA) requirements. Yet, a number of peer‐reviewed publications have raised serious concerns regarding the lack of CANS validation research. Rather than reject CANS, this article provides a roadmap for validating the tool with data that jurisdictions have already collected. Courts should require these three simple analyses before relying on the assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-7109</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-6988</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jfcj.12188</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reno: National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges</publisher><subject>assessment ; CANS ; child welfare ; Courts ; Family First ; Family law ; Jurisdiction ; Prevention programs ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Juvenile & family court journal, 2020-12, Vol.71 (4), p.63-69</ispartof><rights>2020 National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-cbf8ef2bf6cf7d7a3b18bbf67f86e073448ad894de68935e73fc96caa6a02e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-cbf8ef2bf6cf7d7a3b18bbf67f86e073448ad894de68935e73fc96caa6a02e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjfcj.12188$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjfcj.12188$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kraus, David R.</creatorcontrib><title>A Roadmap for CANS Validation</title><title>Juvenile & family court journal</title><description>In nearly every jurisdiction, juvenile or family courts will be using the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths (CANS) tool to assess whether children can safely be treated in family‐like settings to meet federal Family First Prevention Services Act (FFPSA) requirements. Yet, a number of peer‐reviewed publications have raised serious concerns regarding the lack of CANS validation research. Rather than reject CANS, this article provides a roadmap for validating the tool with data that jurisdictions have already collected. Courts should require these three simple analyses before relying on the assessment.</description><subject>assessment</subject><subject>CANS</subject><subject>child welfare</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Family First</subject><subject>Family law</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Prevention programs</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0161-7109</issn><issn>1755-6988</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9j89LwzAUx4MoWKcX70LBm9CZH23yeizFqWMo6PAa0jSBlm6pyYbsv19mPfsuXx58vu_xQeiW4DmJ89hb3c8JJQBnKCGiKDJeApyjBBNOMkFweYmuQugxZoKVkKC7Kv1wqt2oMbXOp3X19pl-qaFr1a5z22t0YdUQzM1fztB68bSuX7LV-_NrXa0yzTCBTDcWjKWN5dqKVijWEGjiJixwgwXLc1AtlHlrOJSsMIJZXXKtFFeYGsxm6H46O3r3vTdhJ3u399v4UdI81ikt8iJSDxOlvQvBGytH322UP0iC5clenuzlr32EyQT_dIM5_EPK5aJeTp0jX0NaYw</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Kraus, David R.</creator><general>National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K7.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>A Roadmap for CANS Validation</title><author>Kraus, David R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-cbf8ef2bf6cf7d7a3b18bbf67f86e073448ad894de68935e73fc96caa6a02e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>assessment</topic><topic>CANS</topic><topic>child welfare</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Family First</topic><topic>Family law</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Prevention programs</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kraus, David R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Juvenile & family court journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kraus, David R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Roadmap for CANS Validation</atitle><jtitle>Juvenile & family court journal</jtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>63-69</pages><issn>0161-7109</issn><eissn>1755-6988</eissn><abstract>In nearly every jurisdiction, juvenile or family courts will be using the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths (CANS) tool to assess whether children can safely be treated in family‐like settings to meet federal Family First Prevention Services Act (FFPSA) requirements. Yet, a number of peer‐reviewed publications have raised serious concerns regarding the lack of CANS validation research. Rather than reject CANS, this article provides a roadmap for validating the tool with data that jurisdictions have already collected. Courts should require these three simple analyses before relying on the assessment.</abstract><cop>Reno</cop><pub>National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges</pub><doi>10.1111/jfcj.12188</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0161-7109 |
| ispartof | Juvenile & family court journal, 2020-12, Vol.71 (4), p.63-69 |
| issn | 0161-7109 1755-6988 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2473422545 |
| source | Wiley Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | assessment CANS child welfare Courts Family First Family law Jurisdiction Prevention programs Validity |
| title | A Roadmap for CANS Validation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T05%3A49%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Roadmap%20for%20CANS%20Validation&rft.jtitle=Juvenile%20&%20family%20court%20journal&rft.au=Kraus,%20David%20R.&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=63-69&rft.issn=0161-7109&rft.eissn=1755-6988&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jfcj.12188&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2473422545%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473422545&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |