Classification of complex environments using pixel level fusion of satellite data
The present study reports classification and analysis of composite land features using fusion images obtained by fusing two original hyperspectral and multispectral datasets. The high spatial-spectral resolution, multi-instrument and multi-period satellite images were used for fusion. Three pixel le...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Multimedia tools and applications 2020-12, Vol.79 (47-48), p.34737-34769 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 34769 |
---|---|
container_issue | 47-48 |
container_start_page | 34737 |
container_title | Multimedia tools and applications |
container_volume | 79 |
creator | Vibhute, Amol D. Kale, Karbhari V. Gaikwad, Sandeep V. Dhumal, Rajesh K. Nagne, Ajay D. Varpe, Amarsinh B. Nalawade, Dhananjay B. Mehrotra, Suresh C. |
description | The present study reports classification and analysis of composite land features using fusion images obtained by fusing two original hyperspectral and multispectral datasets. The high spatial-spectral resolution, multi-instrument and multi-period satellite images were used for fusion. Three pixel level fusion based techniques, Color Normalized Spectral Sharpening (CNSS), Principal Component Spectral Sharpening Transform (PCSST) and Gram-Schmidt Transform (GST), were implemented on the datasets. Performance evaluations of three fusion algorithms were done using classification results. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Gaussian Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC) were used for classification using five types of images, viz. hyperspectral, multispectral and three fused images. Number of classes considered was eight. Sufficient number of ground field data for each class has also been acquired which was needed for supervise based classification. The accuracy was improved from 74.44 to 97.65% when the fused images were considered with SVM classifier. Similarly, the results were improved from 69.25 to 94.61% with original and fused data using MLC classifier. The fusion image technique was found to be superior to the single original image and the SVM is better than the MLC method. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11042-020-08978-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2473386005</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2473386005</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-4b6a55d40d8b1268e853c886360969aa8b1c392ee3e32a5c804006e7baf5ac3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKv_gKcFz9HJd_YoxS8QRNBzSNPZkrLdXZNtqf-90RW8eZkZHu-9gR8hlwyuGYC5yYyB5BQ4ULC1sVQekRlTRlBjODsut7BAjQJ2Ss5y3gAwrbickddF63OOTQx-jH1X9U0V-u3Q4qHCbh9T322xG3O1y7FbV0M8YFu1uC-zKdIUyH7Eto0jVis_-nNy0vg248XvnpP3-7u3xSN9fnl4Wtw-0yBYPVK51F6plYSVXTKuLVolgrVaaKh17X1Rg6g5okDBvQoWJIBGs_SN8kE0Yk6upt4h9R87zKPb9LvUlZeOSyOE1QCquPjkCqnPOWHjhhS3Pn06Bu4bnZvQuYLO_aBzsoTEFMrF3K0x_VX_k_oCLnRxww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473386005</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Classification of complex environments using pixel level fusion of satellite data</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Vibhute, Amol D. ; Kale, Karbhari V. ; Gaikwad, Sandeep V. ; Dhumal, Rajesh K. ; Nagne, Ajay D. ; Varpe, Amarsinh B. ; Nalawade, Dhananjay B. ; Mehrotra, Suresh C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vibhute, Amol D. ; Kale, Karbhari V. ; Gaikwad, Sandeep V. ; Dhumal, Rajesh K. ; Nagne, Ajay D. ; Varpe, Amarsinh B. ; Nalawade, Dhananjay B. ; Mehrotra, Suresh C.</creatorcontrib><description>The present study reports classification and analysis of composite land features using fusion images obtained by fusing two original hyperspectral and multispectral datasets. The high spatial-spectral resolution, multi-instrument and multi-period satellite images were used for fusion. Three pixel level fusion based techniques, Color Normalized Spectral Sharpening (CNSS), Principal Component Spectral Sharpening Transform (PCSST) and Gram-Schmidt Transform (GST), were implemented on the datasets. Performance evaluations of three fusion algorithms were done using classification results. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Gaussian Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC) were used for classification using five types of images, viz. hyperspectral, multispectral and three fused images. Number of classes considered was eight. Sufficient number of ground field data for each class has also been acquired which was needed for supervise based classification. The accuracy was improved from 74.44 to 97.65% when the fused images were considered with SVM classifier. Similarly, the results were improved from 69.25 to 94.61% with original and fused data using MLC classifier. The fusion image technique was found to be superior to the single original image and the SVM is better than the MLC method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1380-7501</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7721</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11042-020-08978-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Classification ; Classifiers ; Computer Communication Networks ; Computer Science ; Data integration ; Data Structures and Information Theory ; Datasets ; Image classification ; Multimedia Information Systems ; Performance evaluation ; Pixels ; Satellite imagery ; Sharpening ; Special Purpose and Application-Based Systems ; Spectra ; Spectral resolution ; Support vector machines</subject><ispartof>Multimedia tools and applications, 2020-12, Vol.79 (47-48), p.34737-34769</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-4b6a55d40d8b1268e853c886360969aa8b1c392ee3e32a5c804006e7baf5ac3f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-4b6a55d40d8b1268e853c886360969aa8b1c392ee3e32a5c804006e7baf5ac3f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3605-7450</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11042-020-08978-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11042-020-08978-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vibhute, Amol D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kale, Karbhari V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaikwad, Sandeep V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhumal, Rajesh K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagne, Ajay D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varpe, Amarsinh B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nalawade, Dhananjay B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehrotra, Suresh C.</creatorcontrib><title>Classification of complex environments using pixel level fusion of satellite data</title><title>Multimedia tools and applications</title><addtitle>Multimed Tools Appl</addtitle><description>The present study reports classification and analysis of composite land features using fusion images obtained by fusing two original hyperspectral and multispectral datasets. The high spatial-spectral resolution, multi-instrument and multi-period satellite images were used for fusion. Three pixel level fusion based techniques, Color Normalized Spectral Sharpening (CNSS), Principal Component Spectral Sharpening Transform (PCSST) and Gram-Schmidt Transform (GST), were implemented on the datasets. Performance evaluations of three fusion algorithms were done using classification results. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Gaussian Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC) were used for classification using five types of images, viz. hyperspectral, multispectral and three fused images. Number of classes considered was eight. Sufficient number of ground field data for each class has also been acquired which was needed for supervise based classification. The accuracy was improved from 74.44 to 97.65% when the fused images were considered with SVM classifier. Similarly, the results were improved from 69.25 to 94.61% with original and fused data using MLC classifier. The fusion image technique was found to be superior to the single original image and the SVM is better than the MLC method.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Classifiers</subject><subject>Computer Communication Networks</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Data integration</subject><subject>Data Structures and Information Theory</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Image classification</subject><subject>Multimedia Information Systems</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Pixels</subject><subject>Satellite imagery</subject><subject>Sharpening</subject><subject>Special Purpose and Application-Based Systems</subject><subject>Spectra</subject><subject>Spectral resolution</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><issn>1380-7501</issn><issn>1573-7721</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKv_gKcFz9HJd_YoxS8QRNBzSNPZkrLdXZNtqf-90RW8eZkZHu-9gR8hlwyuGYC5yYyB5BQ4ULC1sVQekRlTRlBjODsut7BAjQJ2Ss5y3gAwrbickddF63OOTQx-jH1X9U0V-u3Q4qHCbh9T322xG3O1y7FbV0M8YFu1uC-zKdIUyH7Eto0jVis_-nNy0vg248XvnpP3-7u3xSN9fnl4Wtw-0yBYPVK51F6plYSVXTKuLVolgrVaaKh17X1Rg6g5okDBvQoWJIBGs_SN8kE0Yk6upt4h9R87zKPb9LvUlZeOSyOE1QCquPjkCqnPOWHjhhS3Pn06Bu4bnZvQuYLO_aBzsoTEFMrF3K0x_VX_k_oCLnRxww</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Vibhute, Amol D.</creator><creator>Kale, Karbhari V.</creator><creator>Gaikwad, Sandeep V.</creator><creator>Dhumal, Rajesh K.</creator><creator>Nagne, Ajay D.</creator><creator>Varpe, Amarsinh B.</creator><creator>Nalawade, Dhananjay B.</creator><creator>Mehrotra, Suresh C.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3605-7450</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Classification of complex environments using pixel level fusion of satellite data</title><author>Vibhute, Amol D. ; Kale, Karbhari V. ; Gaikwad, Sandeep V. ; Dhumal, Rajesh K. ; Nagne, Ajay D. ; Varpe, Amarsinh B. ; Nalawade, Dhananjay B. ; Mehrotra, Suresh C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-4b6a55d40d8b1268e853c886360969aa8b1c392ee3e32a5c804006e7baf5ac3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Classifiers</topic><topic>Computer Communication Networks</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Data integration</topic><topic>Data Structures and Information Theory</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Image classification</topic><topic>Multimedia Information Systems</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Pixels</topic><topic>Satellite imagery</topic><topic>Sharpening</topic><topic>Special Purpose and Application-Based Systems</topic><topic>Spectra</topic><topic>Spectral resolution</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vibhute, Amol D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kale, Karbhari V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaikwad, Sandeep V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhumal, Rajesh K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagne, Ajay D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varpe, Amarsinh B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nalawade, Dhananjay B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehrotra, Suresh C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Multimedia tools and applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vibhute, Amol D.</au><au>Kale, Karbhari V.</au><au>Gaikwad, Sandeep V.</au><au>Dhumal, Rajesh K.</au><au>Nagne, Ajay D.</au><au>Varpe, Amarsinh B.</au><au>Nalawade, Dhananjay B.</au><au>Mehrotra, Suresh C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Classification of complex environments using pixel level fusion of satellite data</atitle><jtitle>Multimedia tools and applications</jtitle><stitle>Multimed Tools Appl</stitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>47-48</issue><spage>34737</spage><epage>34769</epage><pages>34737-34769</pages><issn>1380-7501</issn><eissn>1573-7721</eissn><abstract>The present study reports classification and analysis of composite land features using fusion images obtained by fusing two original hyperspectral and multispectral datasets. The high spatial-spectral resolution, multi-instrument and multi-period satellite images were used for fusion. Three pixel level fusion based techniques, Color Normalized Spectral Sharpening (CNSS), Principal Component Spectral Sharpening Transform (PCSST) and Gram-Schmidt Transform (GST), were implemented on the datasets. Performance evaluations of three fusion algorithms were done using classification results. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Gaussian Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC) were used for classification using five types of images, viz. hyperspectral, multispectral and three fused images. Number of classes considered was eight. Sufficient number of ground field data for each class has also been acquired which was needed for supervise based classification. The accuracy was improved from 74.44 to 97.65% when the fused images were considered with SVM classifier. Similarly, the results were improved from 69.25 to 94.61% with original and fused data using MLC classifier. The fusion image technique was found to be superior to the single original image and the SVM is better than the MLC method.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11042-020-08978-4</doi><tpages>33</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3605-7450</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1380-7501 |
ispartof | Multimedia tools and applications, 2020-12, Vol.79 (47-48), p.34737-34769 |
issn | 1380-7501 1573-7721 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2473386005 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Algorithms Classification Classifiers Computer Communication Networks Computer Science Data integration Data Structures and Information Theory Datasets Image classification Multimedia Information Systems Performance evaluation Pixels Satellite imagery Sharpening Special Purpose and Application-Based Systems Spectra Spectral resolution Support vector machines |
title | Classification of complex environments using pixel level fusion of satellite data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T16%3A30%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Classification%20of%20complex%20environments%20using%20pixel%20level%20fusion%20of%20satellite%20data&rft.jtitle=Multimedia%20tools%20and%20applications&rft.au=Vibhute,%20Amol%20D.&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=47-48&rft.spage=34737&rft.epage=34769&rft.pages=34737-34769&rft.issn=1380-7501&rft.eissn=1573-7721&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11042-020-08978-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2473386005%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473386005&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |