Four Mīmāṃsā Views Concerning the Self's Perception of Itself
The article concerns a mediaeval Indian debate over whether, and if so how, we can know that a self (ātman) exists, understood here as a subject of cognition (jñātṛ) that outlives individual cognitions, being their common substrate. A passage that has not yet been translated from Sanskrit into a Eur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Indian philosophy 2020-11, Vol.48 (5), p.889-914 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 914 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 889 |
container_title | Journal of Indian philosophy |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Watson, Alex |
description | The article concerns a mediaeval Indian debate over whether, and if so how, we can know that a self (ātman) exists, understood here as a subject of cognition (jñātṛ) that outlives individual cognitions, being their common substrate. A passage that has not yet been translated from Sanskrit into a European language, from Jayanta Bhaṭṭa's Nyāyamañjarĩ (c. 890 CE), 'Blossoms of Reasoning', is examined. This rich passage reveals something not yet noted in secondary literature, namely that Mīmāṃsakas advanced four different models of what happens when the self perceives itself. The article clarifies the differences between the four, and the historical and logical relationships between them. It also hypothesizes pressures that constituted the need for the creation of the newer views, i.e. perceived problems with the earlier views, which the proponents of the newer views saw themselves as overcoming. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10781-020-09446-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2473373807</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45382639</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45382639</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-787cb1267ad5e26eeff3a23039b34de1bac18d189d8ae42adc37e146246c01aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsv4Cog4ip6cplJZqnFaqGi4GUb0kymTmlnajLFuiw-jk_gvi_imxgdQVeuDhz-yzkfQvsUjimAPAkUpKIEGBDIhEjJcgN1aCI5AZ4lm6gDwBihMqPbaCeECQBkKhEddNavFx5frd9m69XH-2tYr_BD6Z4D7tWVdb4qqzFuHh2-ddPiKOAb562bN2Vd4brAgybE9S7aKsw0uL2f2UX3_fO73iUZXl8MeqdDYrnIGiKVtCPKUmnyxLHUuaLghvF434iL3NGRsVTlVGW5Mk4wk1suHRUpE6kFagzvooM2d-7rp4ULjZ7E26tYqZmQnEuuQEYVa1XW1yF4V-i5L2fGv2gK-ouVblnpyEp_s9LLaOKtKURxNXb-N_pf12HrmoSm9n974ltSi4QrlvKMfwIkTHpe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473373807</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Four Mīmāṃsā Views Concerning the Self's Perception of Itself</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Watson, Alex</creator><creatorcontrib>Watson, Alex</creatorcontrib><description>The article concerns a mediaeval Indian debate over whether, and if so how, we can know that a self (ātman) exists, understood here as a subject of cognition (jñātṛ) that outlives individual cognitions, being their common substrate. A passage that has not yet been translated from Sanskrit into a European language, from Jayanta Bhaṭṭa's Nyāyamañjarĩ (c. 890 CE), 'Blossoms of Reasoning', is examined. This rich passage reveals something not yet noted in secondary literature, namely that Mīmāṃsakas advanced four different models of what happens when the self perceives itself. The article clarifies the differences between the four, and the historical and logical relationships between them. It also hypothesizes pressures that constituted the need for the creation of the newer views, i.e. perceived problems with the earlier views, which the proponents of the newer views saw themselves as overcoming.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0395</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10781-020-09446-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Buddhism ; Buddhists ; Cognition ; Cognition & reasoning ; Consciousness ; Education ; European languages ; Literary translation ; Non-Western Philosophy ; Perceptions ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Religion ; Reasoning ; Religious Studies ; Sanskrit</subject><ispartof>Journal of Indian philosophy, 2020-11, Vol.48 (5), p.889-914</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-787cb1267ad5e26eeff3a23039b34de1bac18d189d8ae42adc37e146246c01aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-787cb1267ad5e26eeff3a23039b34de1bac18d189d8ae42adc37e146246c01aa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2496-5571</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45382639$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45382639$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Watson, Alex</creatorcontrib><title>Four Mīmāṃsā Views Concerning the Self's Perception of Itself</title><title>Journal of Indian philosophy</title><addtitle>J Indian Philos</addtitle><description>The article concerns a mediaeval Indian debate over whether, and if so how, we can know that a self (ātman) exists, understood here as a subject of cognition (jñātṛ) that outlives individual cognitions, being their common substrate. A passage that has not yet been translated from Sanskrit into a European language, from Jayanta Bhaṭṭa's Nyāyamañjarĩ (c. 890 CE), 'Blossoms of Reasoning', is examined. This rich passage reveals something not yet noted in secondary literature, namely that Mīmāṃsakas advanced four different models of what happens when the self perceives itself. The article clarifies the differences between the four, and the historical and logical relationships between them. It also hypothesizes pressures that constituted the need for the creation of the newer views, i.e. perceived problems with the earlier views, which the proponents of the newer views saw themselves as overcoming.</description><subject>Buddhism</subject><subject>Buddhists</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Consciousness</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>European languages</subject><subject>Literary translation</subject><subject>Non-Western Philosophy</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Religion</subject><subject>Reasoning</subject><subject>Religious Studies</subject><subject>Sanskrit</subject><issn>0022-1791</issn><issn>1573-0395</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsv4Cog4ip6cplJZqnFaqGi4GUb0kymTmlnajLFuiw-jk_gvi_imxgdQVeuDhz-yzkfQvsUjimAPAkUpKIEGBDIhEjJcgN1aCI5AZ4lm6gDwBihMqPbaCeECQBkKhEddNavFx5frd9m69XH-2tYr_BD6Z4D7tWVdb4qqzFuHh2-ddPiKOAb562bN2Vd4brAgybE9S7aKsw0uL2f2UX3_fO73iUZXl8MeqdDYrnIGiKVtCPKUmnyxLHUuaLghvF434iL3NGRsVTlVGW5Mk4wk1suHRUpE6kFagzvooM2d-7rp4ULjZ7E26tYqZmQnEuuQEYVa1XW1yF4V-i5L2fGv2gK-ouVblnpyEp_s9LLaOKtKURxNXb-N_pf12HrmoSm9n974ltSi4QrlvKMfwIkTHpe</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Watson, Alex</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2496-5571</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Four Mīmāṃsā Views Concerning the Self's Perception of Itself</title><author>Watson, Alex</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-787cb1267ad5e26eeff3a23039b34de1bac18d189d8ae42adc37e146246c01aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Buddhism</topic><topic>Buddhists</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Consciousness</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>European languages</topic><topic>Literary translation</topic><topic>Non-Western Philosophy</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Religion</topic><topic>Reasoning</topic><topic>Religious Studies</topic><topic>Sanskrit</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Watson, Alex</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Indian philosophy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Watson, Alex</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Four Mīmāṃsā Views Concerning the Self's Perception of Itself</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Indian philosophy</jtitle><stitle>J Indian Philos</stitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>889</spage><epage>914</epage><pages>889-914</pages><issn>0022-1791</issn><eissn>1573-0395</eissn><abstract>The article concerns a mediaeval Indian debate over whether, and if so how, we can know that a self (ātman) exists, understood here as a subject of cognition (jñātṛ) that outlives individual cognitions, being their common substrate. A passage that has not yet been translated from Sanskrit into a European language, from Jayanta Bhaṭṭa's Nyāyamañjarĩ (c. 890 CE), 'Blossoms of Reasoning', is examined. This rich passage reveals something not yet noted in secondary literature, namely that Mīmāṃsakas advanced four different models of what happens when the self perceives itself. The article clarifies the differences between the four, and the historical and logical relationships between them. It also hypothesizes pressures that constituted the need for the creation of the newer views, i.e. perceived problems with the earlier views, which the proponents of the newer views saw themselves as overcoming.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10781-020-09446-x</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2496-5571</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1791 |
ispartof | Journal of Indian philosophy, 2020-11, Vol.48 (5), p.889-914 |
issn | 0022-1791 1573-0395 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2473373807 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Buddhism Buddhists Cognition Cognition & reasoning Consciousness Education European languages Literary translation Non-Western Philosophy Perceptions Philosophy Philosophy of Religion Reasoning Religious Studies Sanskrit |
title | Four Mīmāṃsā Views Concerning the Self's Perception of Itself |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T18%3A46%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Four%20M%C4%ABm%C4%81%E1%B9%83s%C4%81%20Views%20Concerning%20the%20Self's%20Perception%20of%20Itself&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Indian%20philosophy&rft.au=Watson,%20Alex&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=889&rft.epage=914&rft.pages=889-914&rft.issn=0022-1791&rft.eissn=1573-0395&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10781-020-09446-x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45382639%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473373807&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=45382639&rfr_iscdi=true |