Four Mīmāṃsā Views Concerning the Self's Perception of Itself

The article concerns a mediaeval Indian debate over whether, and if so how, we can know that a self (ātman) exists, understood here as a subject of cognition (jñātṛ) that outlives individual cognitions, being their common substrate. A passage that has not yet been translated from Sanskrit into a Eur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Indian philosophy 2020-11, Vol.48 (5), p.889-914
1. Verfasser: Watson, Alex
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 914
container_issue 5
container_start_page 889
container_title Journal of Indian philosophy
container_volume 48
creator Watson, Alex
description The article concerns a mediaeval Indian debate over whether, and if so how, we can know that a self (ātman) exists, understood here as a subject of cognition (jñātṛ) that outlives individual cognitions, being their common substrate. A passage that has not yet been translated from Sanskrit into a European language, from Jayanta Bhaṭṭa's Nyāyamañjarĩ (c. 890 CE), 'Blossoms of Reasoning', is examined. This rich passage reveals something not yet noted in secondary literature, namely that Mīmāṃsakas advanced four different models of what happens when the self perceives itself. The article clarifies the differences between the four, and the historical and logical relationships between them. It also hypothesizes pressures that constituted the need for the creation of the newer views, i.e. perceived problems with the earlier views, which the proponents of the newer views saw themselves as overcoming.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10781-020-09446-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2473373807</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45382639</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45382639</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-787cb1267ad5e26eeff3a23039b34de1bac18d189d8ae42adc37e146246c01aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsv4Cog4ip6cplJZqnFaqGi4GUb0kymTmlnajLFuiw-jk_gvi_imxgdQVeuDhz-yzkfQvsUjimAPAkUpKIEGBDIhEjJcgN1aCI5AZ4lm6gDwBihMqPbaCeECQBkKhEddNavFx5frd9m69XH-2tYr_BD6Z4D7tWVdb4qqzFuHh2-ddPiKOAb562bN2Vd4brAgybE9S7aKsw0uL2f2UX3_fO73iUZXl8MeqdDYrnIGiKVtCPKUmnyxLHUuaLghvF434iL3NGRsVTlVGW5Mk4wk1suHRUpE6kFagzvooM2d-7rp4ULjZ7E26tYqZmQnEuuQEYVa1XW1yF4V-i5L2fGv2gK-ouVblnpyEp_s9LLaOKtKURxNXb-N_pf12HrmoSm9n974ltSi4QrlvKMfwIkTHpe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473373807</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Four Mīmāṃsā Views Concerning the Self's Perception of Itself</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Watson, Alex</creator><creatorcontrib>Watson, Alex</creatorcontrib><description>The article concerns a mediaeval Indian debate over whether, and if so how, we can know that a self (ātman) exists, understood here as a subject of cognition (jñātṛ) that outlives individual cognitions, being their common substrate. A passage that has not yet been translated from Sanskrit into a European language, from Jayanta Bhaṭṭa's Nyāyamañjarĩ (c. 890 CE), 'Blossoms of Reasoning', is examined. This rich passage reveals something not yet noted in secondary literature, namely that Mīmāṃsakas advanced four different models of what happens when the self perceives itself. The article clarifies the differences between the four, and the historical and logical relationships between them. It also hypothesizes pressures that constituted the need for the creation of the newer views, i.e. perceived problems with the earlier views, which the proponents of the newer views saw themselves as overcoming.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0395</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10781-020-09446-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Buddhism ; Buddhists ; Cognition ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Consciousness ; Education ; European languages ; Literary translation ; Non-Western Philosophy ; Perceptions ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Religion ; Reasoning ; Religious Studies ; Sanskrit</subject><ispartof>Journal of Indian philosophy, 2020-11, Vol.48 (5), p.889-914</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-787cb1267ad5e26eeff3a23039b34de1bac18d189d8ae42adc37e146246c01aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-787cb1267ad5e26eeff3a23039b34de1bac18d189d8ae42adc37e146246c01aa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2496-5571</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45382639$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45382639$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Watson, Alex</creatorcontrib><title>Four Mīmāṃsā Views Concerning the Self's Perception of Itself</title><title>Journal of Indian philosophy</title><addtitle>J Indian Philos</addtitle><description>The article concerns a mediaeval Indian debate over whether, and if so how, we can know that a self (ātman) exists, understood here as a subject of cognition (jñātṛ) that outlives individual cognitions, being their common substrate. A passage that has not yet been translated from Sanskrit into a European language, from Jayanta Bhaṭṭa's Nyāyamañjarĩ (c. 890 CE), 'Blossoms of Reasoning', is examined. This rich passage reveals something not yet noted in secondary literature, namely that Mīmāṃsakas advanced four different models of what happens when the self perceives itself. The article clarifies the differences between the four, and the historical and logical relationships between them. It also hypothesizes pressures that constituted the need for the creation of the newer views, i.e. perceived problems with the earlier views, which the proponents of the newer views saw themselves as overcoming.</description><subject>Buddhism</subject><subject>Buddhists</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Consciousness</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>European languages</subject><subject>Literary translation</subject><subject>Non-Western Philosophy</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Religion</subject><subject>Reasoning</subject><subject>Religious Studies</subject><subject>Sanskrit</subject><issn>0022-1791</issn><issn>1573-0395</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsv4Cog4ip6cplJZqnFaqGi4GUb0kymTmlnajLFuiw-jk_gvi_imxgdQVeuDhz-yzkfQvsUjimAPAkUpKIEGBDIhEjJcgN1aCI5AZ4lm6gDwBihMqPbaCeECQBkKhEddNavFx5frd9m69XH-2tYr_BD6Z4D7tWVdb4qqzFuHh2-ddPiKOAb562bN2Vd4brAgybE9S7aKsw0uL2f2UX3_fO73iUZXl8MeqdDYrnIGiKVtCPKUmnyxLHUuaLghvF434iL3NGRsVTlVGW5Mk4wk1suHRUpE6kFagzvooM2d-7rp4ULjZ7E26tYqZmQnEuuQEYVa1XW1yF4V-i5L2fGv2gK-ouVblnpyEp_s9LLaOKtKURxNXb-N_pf12HrmoSm9n974ltSi4QrlvKMfwIkTHpe</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Watson, Alex</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2496-5571</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Four Mīmāṃsā Views Concerning the Self's Perception of Itself</title><author>Watson, Alex</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-787cb1267ad5e26eeff3a23039b34de1bac18d189d8ae42adc37e146246c01aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Buddhism</topic><topic>Buddhists</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Consciousness</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>European languages</topic><topic>Literary translation</topic><topic>Non-Western Philosophy</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Religion</topic><topic>Reasoning</topic><topic>Religious Studies</topic><topic>Sanskrit</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Watson, Alex</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences &amp; Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Indian philosophy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Watson, Alex</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Four Mīmāṃsā Views Concerning the Self's Perception of Itself</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Indian philosophy</jtitle><stitle>J Indian Philos</stitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>889</spage><epage>914</epage><pages>889-914</pages><issn>0022-1791</issn><eissn>1573-0395</eissn><abstract>The article concerns a mediaeval Indian debate over whether, and if so how, we can know that a self (ātman) exists, understood here as a subject of cognition (jñātṛ) that outlives individual cognitions, being their common substrate. A passage that has not yet been translated from Sanskrit into a European language, from Jayanta Bhaṭṭa's Nyāyamañjarĩ (c. 890 CE), 'Blossoms of Reasoning', is examined. This rich passage reveals something not yet noted in secondary literature, namely that Mīmāṃsakas advanced four different models of what happens when the self perceives itself. The article clarifies the differences between the four, and the historical and logical relationships between them. It also hypothesizes pressures that constituted the need for the creation of the newer views, i.e. perceived problems with the earlier views, which the proponents of the newer views saw themselves as overcoming.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10781-020-09446-x</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2496-5571</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1791
ispartof Journal of Indian philosophy, 2020-11, Vol.48 (5), p.889-914
issn 0022-1791
1573-0395
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2473373807
source Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Buddhism
Buddhists
Cognition
Cognition & reasoning
Consciousness
Education
European languages
Literary translation
Non-Western Philosophy
Perceptions
Philosophy
Philosophy of Religion
Reasoning
Religious Studies
Sanskrit
title Four Mīmāṃsā Views Concerning the Self's Perception of Itself
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T18%3A46%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Four%20M%C4%ABm%C4%81%E1%B9%83s%C4%81%20Views%20Concerning%20the%20Self's%20Perception%20of%20Itself&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Indian%20philosophy&rft.au=Watson,%20Alex&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=889&rft.epage=914&rft.pages=889-914&rft.issn=0022-1791&rft.eissn=1573-0395&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10781-020-09446-x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45382639%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473373807&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=45382639&rfr_iscdi=true