Optimisation of polymer spur gear pairs with experimental validation

This study aims to present a procedure for optimisation of polymer gear pairs, along with the rough design guidelines. Multi-objective optimisation of polymer spur gear pairs was carried out. The gear pair module, face width, pinion number of teeth, and profile shift coefficients of both gears serve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Structural and multidisciplinary optimization 2020-12, Vol.62 (6), p.3271-3285
Hauptverfasser: Miler, Daniel, Hoić, Matija, Škec, Stanko, Žeželj, Dragan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3285
container_issue 6
container_start_page 3271
container_title Structural and multidisciplinary optimization
container_volume 62
creator Miler, Daniel
Hoić, Matija
Škec, Stanko
Žeželj, Dragan
description This study aims to present a procedure for optimisation of polymer gear pairs, along with the rough design guidelines. Multi-objective optimisation of polymer spur gear pairs was carried out. The gear pair module, face width, pinion number of teeth, and profile shift coefficients of both gears served as design variables. Two objective functions were used to rate the designs—volume and frictional power losses. Compared with well-researched steel gear pair optimisation, additional boundary conditions were necessary: tooth flank and root temperatures, abrasion wear, and tooth addendum displacement. Two arbitrary datasets were used as examples, each made of polyoxymethylene. For each of the sets, a Pareto optimal solution was manufactured to enable the experimental validation. For this purpose, an open-circuit experimental rig was designed. As no literature was found on the polymer gear pair optimisation, results were compared with ones for steel gear pairs. The results have shown that changes in macro-geometry affect polymer gears significantly different. The lower volume pairs made of polymer had greater face widths, while the opposite was observed in steel gears. The differences between the analytical and experimental results were up to 21%.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00158-020-02686-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2473356721</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2473356721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-93a15f88a007fe1a3a5e36d8eff3ddcdf92ed5232b158fcb663e38e0983b197b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwBThF4lxwkjVNj2j8lSbtAhK3KG2dkalrQ9IB-_aEFcGNg2Uf3s9-foScM7hkAMVVBGC5yoBDKqlkxg7IhEmWZ2ym1OHvXLwck5MY1wCgYFZOyM3SD27johlc39HeUt-3uw0GGv020BWaQL1xIdIPN7xS_PQY3Aa7wbT03bSu2XOn5MiaNuLZT5-S57vbp_lDtljeP86vF1ktWDlkpTAst0qZ5NgiM8LkKGSj0FrRNHVjS45NzgWv0i-2rqQUKBRCqUTFyqISU3Ix7vWhf9tiHPS634YundR8VgiRy4KzpOKjqg59jAGt9smzCTvNQH-npce0dEpL79PS35AYoZjE3QrD3-p_qC9J5G3s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473356721</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimisation of polymer spur gear pairs with experimental validation</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Miler, Daniel ; Hoić, Matija ; Škec, Stanko ; Žeželj, Dragan</creator><creatorcontrib>Miler, Daniel ; Hoić, Matija ; Škec, Stanko ; Žeželj, Dragan</creatorcontrib><description>This study aims to present a procedure for optimisation of polymer gear pairs, along with the rough design guidelines. Multi-objective optimisation of polymer spur gear pairs was carried out. The gear pair module, face width, pinion number of teeth, and profile shift coefficients of both gears served as design variables. Two objective functions were used to rate the designs—volume and frictional power losses. Compared with well-researched steel gear pair optimisation, additional boundary conditions were necessary: tooth flank and root temperatures, abrasion wear, and tooth addendum displacement. Two arbitrary datasets were used as examples, each made of polyoxymethylene. For each of the sets, a Pareto optimal solution was manufactured to enable the experimental validation. For this purpose, an open-circuit experimental rig was designed. As no literature was found on the polymer gear pair optimisation, results were compared with ones for steel gear pairs. The results have shown that changes in macro-geometry affect polymer gears significantly different. The lower volume pairs made of polymer had greater face widths, while the opposite was observed in steel gears. The differences between the analytical and experimental results were up to 21%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1615-147X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-1488</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00158-020-02686-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Abrasion ; Boundary conditions ; Circuit design ; Computational Mathematics and Numerical Analysis ; Design ; Design optimization ; Engineering ; Engineering Design ; Gear teeth ; Mathematical analysis ; Multiple objective analysis ; Pareto optimization ; Polymers ; Research Paper ; Spur gears ; Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</subject><ispartof>Structural and multidisciplinary optimization, 2020-12, Vol.62 (6), p.3271-3285</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-93a15f88a007fe1a3a5e36d8eff3ddcdf92ed5232b158fcb663e38e0983b197b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-93a15f88a007fe1a3a5e36d8eff3ddcdf92ed5232b158fcb663e38e0983b197b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8813-1926</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00158-020-02686-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00158-020-02686-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miler, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoić, Matija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Škec, Stanko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Žeželj, Dragan</creatorcontrib><title>Optimisation of polymer spur gear pairs with experimental validation</title><title>Structural and multidisciplinary optimization</title><addtitle>Struct Multidisc Optim</addtitle><description>This study aims to present a procedure for optimisation of polymer gear pairs, along with the rough design guidelines. Multi-objective optimisation of polymer spur gear pairs was carried out. The gear pair module, face width, pinion number of teeth, and profile shift coefficients of both gears served as design variables. Two objective functions were used to rate the designs—volume and frictional power losses. Compared with well-researched steel gear pair optimisation, additional boundary conditions were necessary: tooth flank and root temperatures, abrasion wear, and tooth addendum displacement. Two arbitrary datasets were used as examples, each made of polyoxymethylene. For each of the sets, a Pareto optimal solution was manufactured to enable the experimental validation. For this purpose, an open-circuit experimental rig was designed. As no literature was found on the polymer gear pair optimisation, results were compared with ones for steel gear pairs. The results have shown that changes in macro-geometry affect polymer gears significantly different. The lower volume pairs made of polymer had greater face widths, while the opposite was observed in steel gears. The differences between the analytical and experimental results were up to 21%.</description><subject>Abrasion</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Circuit design</subject><subject>Computational Mathematics and Numerical Analysis</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering Design</subject><subject>Gear teeth</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Multiple objective analysis</subject><subject>Pareto optimization</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Spur gears</subject><subject>Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</subject><issn>1615-147X</issn><issn>1615-1488</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwBThF4lxwkjVNj2j8lSbtAhK3KG2dkalrQ9IB-_aEFcGNg2Uf3s9-foScM7hkAMVVBGC5yoBDKqlkxg7IhEmWZ2ym1OHvXLwck5MY1wCgYFZOyM3SD27johlc39HeUt-3uw0GGv020BWaQL1xIdIPN7xS_PQY3Aa7wbT03bSu2XOn5MiaNuLZT5-S57vbp_lDtljeP86vF1ktWDlkpTAst0qZ5NgiM8LkKGSj0FrRNHVjS45NzgWv0i-2rqQUKBRCqUTFyqISU3Ix7vWhf9tiHPS634YundR8VgiRy4KzpOKjqg59jAGt9smzCTvNQH-npce0dEpL79PS35AYoZjE3QrD3-p_qC9J5G3s</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Miler, Daniel</creator><creator>Hoić, Matija</creator><creator>Škec, Stanko</creator><creator>Žeželj, Dragan</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8813-1926</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Optimisation of polymer spur gear pairs with experimental validation</title><author>Miler, Daniel ; Hoić, Matija ; Škec, Stanko ; Žeželj, Dragan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-93a15f88a007fe1a3a5e36d8eff3ddcdf92ed5232b158fcb663e38e0983b197b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abrasion</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Circuit design</topic><topic>Computational Mathematics and Numerical Analysis</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering Design</topic><topic>Gear teeth</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Multiple objective analysis</topic><topic>Pareto optimization</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Spur gears</topic><topic>Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miler, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoić, Matija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Škec, Stanko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Žeželj, Dragan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Structural and multidisciplinary optimization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miler, Daniel</au><au>Hoić, Matija</au><au>Škec, Stanko</au><au>Žeželj, Dragan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimisation of polymer spur gear pairs with experimental validation</atitle><jtitle>Structural and multidisciplinary optimization</jtitle><stitle>Struct Multidisc Optim</stitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3271</spage><epage>3285</epage><pages>3271-3285</pages><issn>1615-147X</issn><eissn>1615-1488</eissn><abstract>This study aims to present a procedure for optimisation of polymer gear pairs, along with the rough design guidelines. Multi-objective optimisation of polymer spur gear pairs was carried out. The gear pair module, face width, pinion number of teeth, and profile shift coefficients of both gears served as design variables. Two objective functions were used to rate the designs—volume and frictional power losses. Compared with well-researched steel gear pair optimisation, additional boundary conditions were necessary: tooth flank and root temperatures, abrasion wear, and tooth addendum displacement. Two arbitrary datasets were used as examples, each made of polyoxymethylene. For each of the sets, a Pareto optimal solution was manufactured to enable the experimental validation. For this purpose, an open-circuit experimental rig was designed. As no literature was found on the polymer gear pair optimisation, results were compared with ones for steel gear pairs. The results have shown that changes in macro-geometry affect polymer gears significantly different. The lower volume pairs made of polymer had greater face widths, while the opposite was observed in steel gears. The differences between the analytical and experimental results were up to 21%.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00158-020-02686-1</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8813-1926</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1615-147X
ispartof Structural and multidisciplinary optimization, 2020-12, Vol.62 (6), p.3271-3285
issn 1615-147X
1615-1488
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2473356721
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Abrasion
Boundary conditions
Circuit design
Computational Mathematics and Numerical Analysis
Design
Design optimization
Engineering
Engineering Design
Gear teeth
Mathematical analysis
Multiple objective analysis
Pareto optimization
Polymers
Research Paper
Spur gears
Theoretical and Applied Mechanics
title Optimisation of polymer spur gear pairs with experimental validation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T10%3A57%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimisation%20of%20polymer%20spur%20gear%20pairs%20with%20experimental%20validation&rft.jtitle=Structural%20and%20multidisciplinary%20optimization&rft.au=Miler,%20Daniel&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3271&rft.epage=3285&rft.pages=3271-3285&rft.issn=1615-147X&rft.eissn=1615-1488&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00158-020-02686-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2473356721%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473356721&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true