Optimisation of polymer spur gear pairs with experimental validation
This study aims to present a procedure for optimisation of polymer gear pairs, along with the rough design guidelines. Multi-objective optimisation of polymer spur gear pairs was carried out. The gear pair module, face width, pinion number of teeth, and profile shift coefficients of both gears serve...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Structural and multidisciplinary optimization 2020-12, Vol.62 (6), p.3271-3285 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3285 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 3271 |
container_title | Structural and multidisciplinary optimization |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Miler, Daniel Hoić, Matija Škec, Stanko Žeželj, Dragan |
description | This study aims to present a procedure for optimisation of polymer gear pairs, along with the rough design guidelines. Multi-objective optimisation of polymer spur gear pairs was carried out. The gear pair module, face width, pinion number of teeth, and profile shift coefficients of both gears served as design variables. Two objective functions were used to rate the designs—volume and frictional power losses. Compared with well-researched steel gear pair optimisation, additional boundary conditions were necessary: tooth flank and root temperatures, abrasion wear, and tooth addendum displacement. Two arbitrary datasets were used as examples, each made of polyoxymethylene. For each of the sets, a Pareto optimal solution was manufactured to enable the experimental validation. For this purpose, an open-circuit experimental rig was designed. As no literature was found on the polymer gear pair optimisation, results were compared with ones for steel gear pairs. The results have shown that changes in macro-geometry affect polymer gears significantly different. The lower volume pairs made of polymer had greater face widths, while the opposite was observed in steel gears. The differences between the analytical and experimental results were up to 21%. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00158-020-02686-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2473356721</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2473356721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-93a15f88a007fe1a3a5e36d8eff3ddcdf92ed5232b158fcb663e38e0983b197b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwBThF4lxwkjVNj2j8lSbtAhK3KG2dkalrQ9IB-_aEFcGNg2Uf3s9-foScM7hkAMVVBGC5yoBDKqlkxg7IhEmWZ2ym1OHvXLwck5MY1wCgYFZOyM3SD27johlc39HeUt-3uw0GGv020BWaQL1xIdIPN7xS_PQY3Aa7wbT03bSu2XOn5MiaNuLZT5-S57vbp_lDtljeP86vF1ktWDlkpTAst0qZ5NgiM8LkKGSj0FrRNHVjS45NzgWv0i-2rqQUKBRCqUTFyqISU3Ix7vWhf9tiHPS634YundR8VgiRy4KzpOKjqg59jAGt9smzCTvNQH-npce0dEpL79PS35AYoZjE3QrD3-p_qC9J5G3s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473356721</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimisation of polymer spur gear pairs with experimental validation</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Miler, Daniel ; Hoić, Matija ; Škec, Stanko ; Žeželj, Dragan</creator><creatorcontrib>Miler, Daniel ; Hoić, Matija ; Škec, Stanko ; Žeželj, Dragan</creatorcontrib><description>This study aims to present a procedure for optimisation of polymer gear pairs, along with the rough design guidelines. Multi-objective optimisation of polymer spur gear pairs was carried out. The gear pair module, face width, pinion number of teeth, and profile shift coefficients of both gears served as design variables. Two objective functions were used to rate the designs—volume and frictional power losses. Compared with well-researched steel gear pair optimisation, additional boundary conditions were necessary: tooth flank and root temperatures, abrasion wear, and tooth addendum displacement. Two arbitrary datasets were used as examples, each made of polyoxymethylene. For each of the sets, a Pareto optimal solution was manufactured to enable the experimental validation. For this purpose, an open-circuit experimental rig was designed. As no literature was found on the polymer gear pair optimisation, results were compared with ones for steel gear pairs. The results have shown that changes in macro-geometry affect polymer gears significantly different. The lower volume pairs made of polymer had greater face widths, while the opposite was observed in steel gears. The differences between the analytical and experimental results were up to 21%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1615-147X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-1488</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00158-020-02686-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Abrasion ; Boundary conditions ; Circuit design ; Computational Mathematics and Numerical Analysis ; Design ; Design optimization ; Engineering ; Engineering Design ; Gear teeth ; Mathematical analysis ; Multiple objective analysis ; Pareto optimization ; Polymers ; Research Paper ; Spur gears ; Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</subject><ispartof>Structural and multidisciplinary optimization, 2020-12, Vol.62 (6), p.3271-3285</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-93a15f88a007fe1a3a5e36d8eff3ddcdf92ed5232b158fcb663e38e0983b197b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-93a15f88a007fe1a3a5e36d8eff3ddcdf92ed5232b158fcb663e38e0983b197b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8813-1926</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00158-020-02686-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00158-020-02686-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miler, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoić, Matija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Škec, Stanko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Žeželj, Dragan</creatorcontrib><title>Optimisation of polymer spur gear pairs with experimental validation</title><title>Structural and multidisciplinary optimization</title><addtitle>Struct Multidisc Optim</addtitle><description>This study aims to present a procedure for optimisation of polymer gear pairs, along with the rough design guidelines. Multi-objective optimisation of polymer spur gear pairs was carried out. The gear pair module, face width, pinion number of teeth, and profile shift coefficients of both gears served as design variables. Two objective functions were used to rate the designs—volume and frictional power losses. Compared with well-researched steel gear pair optimisation, additional boundary conditions were necessary: tooth flank and root temperatures, abrasion wear, and tooth addendum displacement. Two arbitrary datasets were used as examples, each made of polyoxymethylene. For each of the sets, a Pareto optimal solution was manufactured to enable the experimental validation. For this purpose, an open-circuit experimental rig was designed. As no literature was found on the polymer gear pair optimisation, results were compared with ones for steel gear pairs. The results have shown that changes in macro-geometry affect polymer gears significantly different. The lower volume pairs made of polymer had greater face widths, while the opposite was observed in steel gears. The differences between the analytical and experimental results were up to 21%.</description><subject>Abrasion</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Circuit design</subject><subject>Computational Mathematics and Numerical Analysis</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering Design</subject><subject>Gear teeth</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Multiple objective analysis</subject><subject>Pareto optimization</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Spur gears</subject><subject>Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</subject><issn>1615-147X</issn><issn>1615-1488</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwBThF4lxwkjVNj2j8lSbtAhK3KG2dkalrQ9IB-_aEFcGNg2Uf3s9-foScM7hkAMVVBGC5yoBDKqlkxg7IhEmWZ2ym1OHvXLwck5MY1wCgYFZOyM3SD27johlc39HeUt-3uw0GGv020BWaQL1xIdIPN7xS_PQY3Aa7wbT03bSu2XOn5MiaNuLZT5-S57vbp_lDtljeP86vF1ktWDlkpTAst0qZ5NgiM8LkKGSj0FrRNHVjS45NzgWv0i-2rqQUKBRCqUTFyqISU3Ix7vWhf9tiHPS634YundR8VgiRy4KzpOKjqg59jAGt9smzCTvNQH-npce0dEpL79PS35AYoZjE3QrD3-p_qC9J5G3s</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Miler, Daniel</creator><creator>Hoić, Matija</creator><creator>Škec, Stanko</creator><creator>Žeželj, Dragan</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8813-1926</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Optimisation of polymer spur gear pairs with experimental validation</title><author>Miler, Daniel ; Hoić, Matija ; Škec, Stanko ; Žeželj, Dragan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-93a15f88a007fe1a3a5e36d8eff3ddcdf92ed5232b158fcb663e38e0983b197b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abrasion</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Circuit design</topic><topic>Computational Mathematics and Numerical Analysis</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering Design</topic><topic>Gear teeth</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Multiple objective analysis</topic><topic>Pareto optimization</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Spur gears</topic><topic>Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miler, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoić, Matija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Škec, Stanko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Žeželj, Dragan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Structural and multidisciplinary optimization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miler, Daniel</au><au>Hoić, Matija</au><au>Škec, Stanko</au><au>Žeželj, Dragan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimisation of polymer spur gear pairs with experimental validation</atitle><jtitle>Structural and multidisciplinary optimization</jtitle><stitle>Struct Multidisc Optim</stitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3271</spage><epage>3285</epage><pages>3271-3285</pages><issn>1615-147X</issn><eissn>1615-1488</eissn><abstract>This study aims to present a procedure for optimisation of polymer gear pairs, along with the rough design guidelines. Multi-objective optimisation of polymer spur gear pairs was carried out. The gear pair module, face width, pinion number of teeth, and profile shift coefficients of both gears served as design variables. Two objective functions were used to rate the designs—volume and frictional power losses. Compared with well-researched steel gear pair optimisation, additional boundary conditions were necessary: tooth flank and root temperatures, abrasion wear, and tooth addendum displacement. Two arbitrary datasets were used as examples, each made of polyoxymethylene. For each of the sets, a Pareto optimal solution was manufactured to enable the experimental validation. For this purpose, an open-circuit experimental rig was designed. As no literature was found on the polymer gear pair optimisation, results were compared with ones for steel gear pairs. The results have shown that changes in macro-geometry affect polymer gears significantly different. The lower volume pairs made of polymer had greater face widths, while the opposite was observed in steel gears. The differences between the analytical and experimental results were up to 21%.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00158-020-02686-1</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8813-1926</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1615-147X |
ispartof | Structural and multidisciplinary optimization, 2020-12, Vol.62 (6), p.3271-3285 |
issn | 1615-147X 1615-1488 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2473356721 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Abrasion Boundary conditions Circuit design Computational Mathematics and Numerical Analysis Design Design optimization Engineering Engineering Design Gear teeth Mathematical analysis Multiple objective analysis Pareto optimization Polymers Research Paper Spur gears Theoretical and Applied Mechanics |
title | Optimisation of polymer spur gear pairs with experimental validation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T10%3A57%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimisation%20of%20polymer%20spur%20gear%20pairs%20with%20experimental%20validation&rft.jtitle=Structural%20and%20multidisciplinary%20optimization&rft.au=Miler,%20Daniel&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3271&rft.epage=3285&rft.pages=3271-3285&rft.issn=1615-147X&rft.eissn=1615-1488&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00158-020-02686-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2473356721%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473356721&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |