Field experiments and public policy: festina lente

The current state of the art in field experiments does not give me any confidence that we should be assuming that we have anything worth scaling, assuming we really care about the expected welfare of those about to receive the instant intervention. At the very least, we should be honest and explicit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioural Public Policy 2021-01, Vol.5 (1), p.117-124
1. Verfasser: HARRISON, GLENN W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 124
container_issue 1
container_start_page 117
container_title Behavioural Public Policy
container_volume 5
creator HARRISON, GLENN W.
description The current state of the art in field experiments does not give me any confidence that we should be assuming that we have anything worth scaling, assuming we really care about the expected welfare of those about to receive the instant intervention. At the very least, we should be honest and explicit about the need for strong priors about the welfare effects of changes in averages of observables to warrant scaling. What we need is a healthy dose of theory and the implied econometrics.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/bpp.2020.28
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2472009002</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2472009002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-d5fdc344aa808364d820643ed61fec1b87bc92972afdb30ad32ec3ded2ee7ad73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMFKxDAQhoMouKx78gUKHqXrZFKb1JssrgoLXhS8hTSZQJfaxqQF9-3NsuJlZg4fM_98jF1zWHPg8q4NYY2AsEZ1xhYoGlVCXanz_1l8XrJVSnsA4A2vK5QLhtuOelfQT6DYfdEwpcIMrghz23e2CGOuh4fCU5q6wRR9BuiKXXjTJ1r99SX72D69b17K3dvz6-ZxV1qs-VS6e--sqCpjFChRV05hjiPI1dyT5a2SrW2wkWi8awUYJ5CscOSQSBonxZLdnPaGOH7POYHej3Mc8kmNlUSABgAzdXuibBxTiuR1yI-YeNAc9NGLzl700YtGJX4BrxlVYg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2472009002</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Field experiments and public policy: festina lente</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>HARRISON, GLENN W.</creator><creatorcontrib>HARRISON, GLENN W.</creatorcontrib><description>The current state of the art in field experiments does not give me any confidence that we should be assuming that we have anything worth scaling, assuming we really care about the expected welfare of those about to receive the instant intervention. At the very least, we should be honest and explicit about the need for strong priors about the welfare effects of changes in averages of observables to warrant scaling. What we need is a healthy dose of theory and the implied econometrics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2398-063X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2398-0648</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2020.28</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Experiments ; Intervention ; Public policy ; Research methodology ; Semantics</subject><ispartof>Behavioural Public Policy, 2021-01, Vol.5 (1), p.117-124</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-d5fdc344aa808364d820643ed61fec1b87bc92972afdb30ad32ec3ded2ee7ad73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-d5fdc344aa808364d820643ed61fec1b87bc92972afdb30ad32ec3ded2ee7ad73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>HARRISON, GLENN W.</creatorcontrib><title>Field experiments and public policy: festina lente</title><title>Behavioural Public Policy</title><description>The current state of the art in field experiments does not give me any confidence that we should be assuming that we have anything worth scaling, assuming we really care about the expected welfare of those about to receive the instant intervention. At the very least, we should be honest and explicit about the need for strong priors about the welfare effects of changes in averages of observables to warrant scaling. What we need is a healthy dose of theory and the implied econometrics.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><issn>2398-063X</issn><issn>2398-0648</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMFKxDAQhoMouKx78gUKHqXrZFKb1JssrgoLXhS8hTSZQJfaxqQF9-3NsuJlZg4fM_98jF1zWHPg8q4NYY2AsEZ1xhYoGlVCXanz_1l8XrJVSnsA4A2vK5QLhtuOelfQT6DYfdEwpcIMrghz23e2CGOuh4fCU5q6wRR9BuiKXXjTJ1r99SX72D69b17K3dvz6-ZxV1qs-VS6e--sqCpjFChRV05hjiPI1dyT5a2SrW2wkWi8awUYJ5CscOSQSBonxZLdnPaGOH7POYHej3Mc8kmNlUSABgAzdXuibBxTiuR1yI-YeNAc9NGLzl700YtGJX4BrxlVYg</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>HARRISON, GLENN W.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Field experiments and public policy: festina lente</title><author>HARRISON, GLENN W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-d5fdc344aa808364d820643ed61fec1b87bc92972afdb30ad32ec3ded2ee7ad73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HARRISON, GLENN W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Behavioural Public Policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HARRISON, GLENN W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Field experiments and public policy: festina lente</atitle><jtitle>Behavioural Public Policy</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>117</spage><epage>124</epage><pages>117-124</pages><issn>2398-063X</issn><eissn>2398-0648</eissn><abstract>The current state of the art in field experiments does not give me any confidence that we should be assuming that we have anything worth scaling, assuming we really care about the expected welfare of those about to receive the instant intervention. At the very least, we should be honest and explicit about the need for strong priors about the welfare effects of changes in averages of observables to warrant scaling. What we need is a healthy dose of theory and the implied econometrics.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/bpp.2020.28</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2398-063X
ispartof Behavioural Public Policy, 2021-01, Vol.5 (1), p.117-124
issn 2398-063X
2398-0648
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2472009002
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Behavior
Experiments
Intervention
Public policy
Research methodology
Semantics
title Field experiments and public policy: festina lente
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T03%3A09%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Field%20experiments%20and%20public%20policy:%20festina%20lente&rft.jtitle=Behavioural%20Public%20Policy&rft.au=HARRISON,%20GLENN%20W.&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=124&rft.pages=117-124&rft.issn=2398-063X&rft.eissn=2398-0648&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/bpp.2020.28&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2472009002%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2472009002&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true