Bio-economics of Indian hybrid Bt cotton and farmer suicides

Background The implementation of hybrid Bt cotton unique to India has been heralded as a grand success by government agencies, seed companies and other proponents, and yet yields have stagnated at low levels and production costs have risen 2.5–3-fold. The low-yield hybrid cotton system of India cont...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental sciences Europe 2020-12, Vol.32 (1), Article 139
Hauptverfasser: Gutierrez, Andrew Paul, Ponti, Luigi, Kranthi, Keshav R., Baumgärtner, Johann, Kenmore, Peter. E., Gilioli, Gianni, Boggia, Antonio, Cure, Jose Ricardo, Rodríguez, Daniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Environmental sciences Europe
container_volume 32
creator Gutierrez, Andrew Paul
Ponti, Luigi
Kranthi, Keshav R.
Baumgärtner, Johann
Kenmore, Peter. E.
Gilioli, Gianni
Boggia, Antonio
Cure, Jose Ricardo
Rodríguez, Daniel
description Background The implementation of hybrid Bt cotton unique to India has been heralded as a grand success by government agencies, seed companies and other proponents, and yet yields have stagnated at low levels and production costs have risen 2.5–3-fold. The low-yield hybrid cotton system of India contributes thousands of farmer suicides to the annual national toll. Conceptual and methodological barriers have hindered bioeconomic analysis of the ecological and social sustainability of such cross-scale agro-ecological problems in time and geographic space, under global technology and climate change. As a paradigm shift, we use conceptually simple, parameter-sparse, theoretically based, mechanistic, weather-driven physiologically based demographic models (PBDMs) to deconstruct the bio-economics of the Indian cotton system. Results Our analysis of Indian hybrid cotton system explains some extant ecological and economic problems, and suggests a viable solution. Specifically, the model accurately captured the age-stage mass dynamics of rainfed and irrigated cotton growth/development and the interactions with the key pest pink bollworm across five south-central Indian states, and enabled identification of proximate bioeconomic factors responsible for low yield and their relationship to farmer suicides. The results are reinforced by analysis of Ministry of Agriculture annual state-level data. We explain why short-season, high-density non-GM cotton is a highly viable solution for Indian cotton farmers in rainfed and irrigated cotton areas of the five states, and possibly nationally. The transition from a theoretical bioeconomic construct to a real-world regional bioeconomic analysis proved seamless. Conclusions The hybrid long-season Bt technology for rainfed and irrigated cotton is unique to India, and is a value capture mechanism. This technology is suboptimal leading to stagnant yields, high input costs, increased insecticide use, and low farmer incomes that increase economic distress that is a proximate cause of cotton farmer suicides. The current GM Bt technology adds costs in rainfed cotton without commensurate increases in yield. Non-GM pure-line high-density short-season varieties could double rainfed cotton yield, reduce costs, decrease insecticide use, and help ameliorate suicides. The GM hybrid technology is inappropriate for incorporation in short-season high-density varieties.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12302-020-00406-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2471891015</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2471891015</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-97b8cd175e99941b9cb65724e449398c310290d2491298f8c2e3e95663ecceec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPAzEQhC0EEhHkD1BZojasn2dLNCTiESkSDdTWnc8Hjogd7EuRf4_hEHRss1vMzGo-hC4oXFGq1XWhjAMjwIAACFBEHaEZowaIaKg8_r2hOUXzUjZQRzLdCDlDN4uQiHcppm1wBacBr2If2ojfDl0OPV6M2KVxTBG3scdDm7c-47IPLvS-nKOToX0vfv6zz9DL_d3z8pGsnx5Wy9s1cYKpkZim066njfTGGEE74zolGya8EIYb7TgFZqBnwlBm9KAd89wbqRT3znnv-Bm6nHJ3OX3sfRntJu1zrC8tqxW1oUBlVbFJ5XIqJfvB7nLYtvlgKdgvUHYCZSso-w3Kqmrik6lUcXz1-S_6H9cndh1oxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2471891015</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bio-economics of Indian hybrid Bt cotton and farmer suicides</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</source><creator>Gutierrez, Andrew Paul ; Ponti, Luigi ; Kranthi, Keshav R. ; Baumgärtner, Johann ; Kenmore, Peter. E. ; Gilioli, Gianni ; Boggia, Antonio ; Cure, Jose Ricardo ; Rodríguez, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Gutierrez, Andrew Paul ; Ponti, Luigi ; Kranthi, Keshav R. ; Baumgärtner, Johann ; Kenmore, Peter. E. ; Gilioli, Gianni ; Boggia, Antonio ; Cure, Jose Ricardo ; Rodríguez, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>Background The implementation of hybrid Bt cotton unique to India has been heralded as a grand success by government agencies, seed companies and other proponents, and yet yields have stagnated at low levels and production costs have risen 2.5–3-fold. The low-yield hybrid cotton system of India contributes thousands of farmer suicides to the annual national toll. Conceptual and methodological barriers have hindered bioeconomic analysis of the ecological and social sustainability of such cross-scale agro-ecological problems in time and geographic space, under global technology and climate change. As a paradigm shift, we use conceptually simple, parameter-sparse, theoretically based, mechanistic, weather-driven physiologically based demographic models (PBDMs) to deconstruct the bio-economics of the Indian cotton system. Results Our analysis of Indian hybrid cotton system explains some extant ecological and economic problems, and suggests a viable solution. Specifically, the model accurately captured the age-stage mass dynamics of rainfed and irrigated cotton growth/development and the interactions with the key pest pink bollworm across five south-central Indian states, and enabled identification of proximate bioeconomic factors responsible for low yield and their relationship to farmer suicides. The results are reinforced by analysis of Ministry of Agriculture annual state-level data. We explain why short-season, high-density non-GM cotton is a highly viable solution for Indian cotton farmers in rainfed and irrigated cotton areas of the five states, and possibly nationally. The transition from a theoretical bioeconomic construct to a real-world regional bioeconomic analysis proved seamless. Conclusions The hybrid long-season Bt technology for rainfed and irrigated cotton is unique to India, and is a value capture mechanism. This technology is suboptimal leading to stagnant yields, high input costs, increased insecticide use, and low farmer incomes that increase economic distress that is a proximate cause of cotton farmer suicides. The current GM Bt technology adds costs in rainfed cotton without commensurate increases in yield. Non-GM pure-line high-density short-season varieties could double rainfed cotton yield, reduce costs, decrease insecticide use, and help ameliorate suicides. The GM hybrid technology is inappropriate for incorporation in short-season high-density varieties.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2190-4707</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2190-4715</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12302-020-00406-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Age ; Agricultural economics ; Climate change ; Climate models ; Cotton ; Crop yield ; Density ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Economic analysis ; Economic models ; Economics ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Farming ; Government agencies ; Hybrid systems ; Insecticides ; Pollution ; Production costs ; Sustainability ; Technology ; Weather</subject><ispartof>Environmental sciences Europe, 2020-12, Vol.32 (1), Article 139</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. corrected publication 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. corrected publication 2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-97b8cd175e99941b9cb65724e449398c310290d2491298f8c2e3e95663ecceec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-97b8cd175e99941b9cb65724e449398c310290d2491298f8c2e3e95663ecceec3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7773-1715</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-020-00406-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1186/s12302-020-00406-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902,41096,41464,42165,42533,51294,51551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gutierrez, Andrew Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponti, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kranthi, Keshav R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumgärtner, Johann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenmore, Peter. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilioli, Gianni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boggia, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cure, Jose Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Bio-economics of Indian hybrid Bt cotton and farmer suicides</title><title>Environmental sciences Europe</title><addtitle>Environ Sci Eur</addtitle><description>Background The implementation of hybrid Bt cotton unique to India has been heralded as a grand success by government agencies, seed companies and other proponents, and yet yields have stagnated at low levels and production costs have risen 2.5–3-fold. The low-yield hybrid cotton system of India contributes thousands of farmer suicides to the annual national toll. Conceptual and methodological barriers have hindered bioeconomic analysis of the ecological and social sustainability of such cross-scale agro-ecological problems in time and geographic space, under global technology and climate change. As a paradigm shift, we use conceptually simple, parameter-sparse, theoretically based, mechanistic, weather-driven physiologically based demographic models (PBDMs) to deconstruct the bio-economics of the Indian cotton system. Results Our analysis of Indian hybrid cotton system explains some extant ecological and economic problems, and suggests a viable solution. Specifically, the model accurately captured the age-stage mass dynamics of rainfed and irrigated cotton growth/development and the interactions with the key pest pink bollworm across five south-central Indian states, and enabled identification of proximate bioeconomic factors responsible for low yield and their relationship to farmer suicides. The results are reinforced by analysis of Ministry of Agriculture annual state-level data. We explain why short-season, high-density non-GM cotton is a highly viable solution for Indian cotton farmers in rainfed and irrigated cotton areas of the five states, and possibly nationally. The transition from a theoretical bioeconomic construct to a real-world regional bioeconomic analysis proved seamless. Conclusions The hybrid long-season Bt technology for rainfed and irrigated cotton is unique to India, and is a value capture mechanism. This technology is suboptimal leading to stagnant yields, high input costs, increased insecticide use, and low farmer incomes that increase economic distress that is a proximate cause of cotton farmer suicides. The current GM Bt technology adds costs in rainfed cotton without commensurate increases in yield. Non-GM pure-line high-density short-season varieties could double rainfed cotton yield, reduce costs, decrease insecticide use, and help ameliorate suicides. The GM hybrid technology is inappropriate for incorporation in short-season high-density varieties.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Hybrid systems</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Production costs</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Weather</subject><issn>2190-4707</issn><issn>2190-4715</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDtPAzEQhC0EEhHkD1BZojasn2dLNCTiESkSDdTWnc8Hjogd7EuRf4_hEHRss1vMzGo-hC4oXFGq1XWhjAMjwIAACFBEHaEZowaIaKg8_r2hOUXzUjZQRzLdCDlDN4uQiHcppm1wBacBr2If2ojfDl0OPV6M2KVxTBG3scdDm7c-47IPLvS-nKOToX0vfv6zz9DL_d3z8pGsnx5Wy9s1cYKpkZim066njfTGGEE74zolGya8EIYb7TgFZqBnwlBm9KAd89wbqRT3znnv-Bm6nHJ3OX3sfRntJu1zrC8tqxW1oUBlVbFJ5XIqJfvB7nLYtvlgKdgvUHYCZSso-w3Kqmrik6lUcXz1-S_6H9cndh1oxQ</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Gutierrez, Andrew Paul</creator><creator>Ponti, Luigi</creator><creator>Kranthi, Keshav R.</creator><creator>Baumgärtner, Johann</creator><creator>Kenmore, Peter. E.</creator><creator>Gilioli, Gianni</creator><creator>Boggia, Antonio</creator><creator>Cure, Jose Ricardo</creator><creator>Rodríguez, Daniel</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7773-1715</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Bio-economics of Indian hybrid Bt cotton and farmer suicides</title><author>Gutierrez, Andrew Paul ; Ponti, Luigi ; Kranthi, Keshav R. ; Baumgärtner, Johann ; Kenmore, Peter. E. ; Gilioli, Gianni ; Boggia, Antonio ; Cure, Jose Ricardo ; Rodríguez, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-97b8cd175e99941b9cb65724e449398c310290d2491298f8c2e3e95663ecceec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Hybrid systems</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Production costs</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Weather</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gutierrez, Andrew Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponti, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kranthi, Keshav R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumgärtner, Johann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenmore, Peter. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilioli, Gianni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boggia, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cure, Jose Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Environmental sciences Europe</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gutierrez, Andrew Paul</au><au>Ponti, Luigi</au><au>Kranthi, Keshav R.</au><au>Baumgärtner, Johann</au><au>Kenmore, Peter. E.</au><au>Gilioli, Gianni</au><au>Boggia, Antonio</au><au>Cure, Jose Ricardo</au><au>Rodríguez, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bio-economics of Indian hybrid Bt cotton and farmer suicides</atitle><jtitle>Environmental sciences Europe</jtitle><stitle>Environ Sci Eur</stitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><artnum>139</artnum><issn>2190-4707</issn><eissn>2190-4715</eissn><abstract>Background The implementation of hybrid Bt cotton unique to India has been heralded as a grand success by government agencies, seed companies and other proponents, and yet yields have stagnated at low levels and production costs have risen 2.5–3-fold. The low-yield hybrid cotton system of India contributes thousands of farmer suicides to the annual national toll. Conceptual and methodological barriers have hindered bioeconomic analysis of the ecological and social sustainability of such cross-scale agro-ecological problems in time and geographic space, under global technology and climate change. As a paradigm shift, we use conceptually simple, parameter-sparse, theoretically based, mechanistic, weather-driven physiologically based demographic models (PBDMs) to deconstruct the bio-economics of the Indian cotton system. Results Our analysis of Indian hybrid cotton system explains some extant ecological and economic problems, and suggests a viable solution. Specifically, the model accurately captured the age-stage mass dynamics of rainfed and irrigated cotton growth/development and the interactions with the key pest pink bollworm across five south-central Indian states, and enabled identification of proximate bioeconomic factors responsible for low yield and their relationship to farmer suicides. The results are reinforced by analysis of Ministry of Agriculture annual state-level data. We explain why short-season, high-density non-GM cotton is a highly viable solution for Indian cotton farmers in rainfed and irrigated cotton areas of the five states, and possibly nationally. The transition from a theoretical bioeconomic construct to a real-world regional bioeconomic analysis proved seamless. Conclusions The hybrid long-season Bt technology for rainfed and irrigated cotton is unique to India, and is a value capture mechanism. This technology is suboptimal leading to stagnant yields, high input costs, increased insecticide use, and low farmer incomes that increase economic distress that is a proximate cause of cotton farmer suicides. The current GM Bt technology adds costs in rainfed cotton without commensurate increases in yield. Non-GM pure-line high-density short-season varieties could double rainfed cotton yield, reduce costs, decrease insecticide use, and help ameliorate suicides. The GM hybrid technology is inappropriate for incorporation in short-season high-density varieties.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1186/s12302-020-00406-6</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7773-1715</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2190-4707
ispartof Environmental sciences Europe, 2020-12, Vol.32 (1), Article 139
issn 2190-4707
2190-4715
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2471891015
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SpringerLink Journals; Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
subjects Age
Agricultural economics
Climate change
Climate models
Cotton
Crop yield
Density
Earth and Environmental Science
Economic analysis
Economic models
Economics
Ecotoxicology
Environment
Farming
Government agencies
Hybrid systems
Insecticides
Pollution
Production costs
Sustainability
Technology
Weather
title Bio-economics of Indian hybrid Bt cotton and farmer suicides
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T04%3A05%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bio-economics%20of%20Indian%20hybrid%20Bt%20cotton%20and%20farmer%20suicides&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20sciences%20Europe&rft.au=Gutierrez,%20Andrew%20Paul&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.artnum=139&rft.issn=2190-4707&rft.eissn=2190-4715&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12302-020-00406-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2471891015%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2471891015&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true