Impacts of changes in the watershed partitioning level and optimization algorithm on runoff simulation: decomposition of uncertainties

Hydrological modeling has provided key insights into the mechanisms of model state, such as the watershed partitioning level and optimization algorithm, and their impacts on the hydrological process, but the uncertainty of this impact is poorly understood. To this end, in this study, the effects of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment 2020-11, Vol.34 (11), p.1909-1923
Hauptverfasser: Zhou, Shuai, Wang, Yimin, Guo, Aijun, Li, Ziyan, Chang, Jianxia, Meng, Dongdong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1923
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1909
container_title Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment
container_volume 34
creator Zhou, Shuai
Wang, Yimin
Guo, Aijun
Li, Ziyan
Chang, Jianxia
Meng, Dongdong
description Hydrological modeling has provided key insights into the mechanisms of model state, such as the watershed partitioning level and optimization algorithm, and their impacts on the hydrological process, but the uncertainty of this impact is poorly understood. To this end, in this study, the effects of the watershed partitioning level and optimization algorithm for hydrological simulation uncertainty were assessed based on the semi-distributed TOPMODEL model, i.e., six watershed partitioning levels and three intelligent global optimization algorithms were used in the source region of the Yellow River. Meanwhile, the uncertainty contribution of the individual and interaction of the watershed partitioning levels and optimization algorithms on the hydrological process were dynamically evaluated using the variance decomposition method based on subsampling. Results showed that the impacts of the watershed partitioning level and optimization algorithm on the runoff simulation were particularly obvious for different characteristic periods. In the flood period, the optimization algorithm was the dominant factor affecting the runoff simulation uncertainty, with the proportion of up to 0.50, whereas the contribution of the watershed partitioning level was only 0.22. In the non-flood period, they contributed substantially to the uncertainty of the runoff simulation, accounting for about 0.30. Moreover, the interactions between the watershed partitioning level and optimization algorithm had a strong influence throughout the year, especially in the non-flood period, which may be because the hydrological model amplifies the output error and increases the interaction effect. Generally, the results shed important insight into reducing the uncertainty of the runoff simulation in future research.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00477-020-01852-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2471624185</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2471624185</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e274b6e08647f8c3048d0b1547876d3c2aee089a83122ac10a48c75cf9495f783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOIzzAq4Crqu5tUndyeBlYMCNrkMmTWcibVKTVNEH8LnNTEV3rs45_JcDHwDnGF1ihPhVRIhxXiCCCoRFSQp-BGaY0aqgpKyPf3eGTsEiRrvJoZLWNUYz8LXqB6VThL6Feqfc1kRoHUw7A99VMiHuTAMHFZJN1jvrtrAzb6aDyjXQD8n29lPtFai6rQ827XqYjzA637Yw2n7sDvI1bIz2_eDjoWf_bXTahKSsS9bEM3DSqi6axc-cg-e726flQ7F-vF8tb9aFpqJMhSGcbSqDRMV4KzRFTDRog0vGBa8aqokyWayVoJgQpTFSTGhe6rZmddlyQefgYuodgn8dTUzyxY_B5ZeSMI4rwjLA7CKTSwcfYzCtHILtVfiQGMk9cjkhlxm5PCCXPIfoFIrZnDmGv-p_Ut9Looap</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2471624185</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impacts of changes in the watershed partitioning level and optimization algorithm on runoff simulation: decomposition of uncertainties</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Zhou, Shuai ; Wang, Yimin ; Guo, Aijun ; Li, Ziyan ; Chang, Jianxia ; Meng, Dongdong</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Shuai ; Wang, Yimin ; Guo, Aijun ; Li, Ziyan ; Chang, Jianxia ; Meng, Dongdong</creatorcontrib><description>Hydrological modeling has provided key insights into the mechanisms of model state, such as the watershed partitioning level and optimization algorithm, and their impacts on the hydrological process, but the uncertainty of this impact is poorly understood. To this end, in this study, the effects of the watershed partitioning level and optimization algorithm for hydrological simulation uncertainty were assessed based on the semi-distributed TOPMODEL model, i.e., six watershed partitioning levels and three intelligent global optimization algorithms were used in the source region of the Yellow River. Meanwhile, the uncertainty contribution of the individual and interaction of the watershed partitioning levels and optimization algorithms on the hydrological process were dynamically evaluated using the variance decomposition method based on subsampling. Results showed that the impacts of the watershed partitioning level and optimization algorithm on the runoff simulation were particularly obvious for different characteristic periods. In the flood period, the optimization algorithm was the dominant factor affecting the runoff simulation uncertainty, with the proportion of up to 0.50, whereas the contribution of the watershed partitioning level was only 0.22. In the non-flood period, they contributed substantially to the uncertainty of the runoff simulation, accounting for about 0.30. Moreover, the interactions between the watershed partitioning level and optimization algorithm had a strong influence throughout the year, especially in the non-flood period, which may be because the hydrological model amplifies the output error and increases the interaction effect. Generally, the results shed important insight into reducing the uncertainty of the runoff simulation in future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1436-3240</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-3259</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00477-020-01852-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Aquatic Pollution ; Chemistry and Earth Sciences ; Computational Intelligence ; Computer Science ; Decomposition ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Environment ; Floods ; Global optimization ; Hydrologic models ; Hydrology ; Math. Appl. in Environmental Science ; Optimization algorithms ; Original Paper ; Partitioning ; Physics ; Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes ; Runoff ; Simulation ; Statistics for Engineering ; Uncertainty ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment, 2020-11, Vol.34 (11), p.1909-1923</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e274b6e08647f8c3048d0b1547876d3c2aee089a83122ac10a48c75cf9495f783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e274b6e08647f8c3048d0b1547876d3c2aee089a83122ac10a48c75cf9495f783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00477-020-01852-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00477-020-01852-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Shuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Aijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ziyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Jianxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meng, Dongdong</creatorcontrib><title>Impacts of changes in the watershed partitioning level and optimization algorithm on runoff simulation: decomposition of uncertainties</title><title>Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment</title><addtitle>Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess</addtitle><description>Hydrological modeling has provided key insights into the mechanisms of model state, such as the watershed partitioning level and optimization algorithm, and their impacts on the hydrological process, but the uncertainty of this impact is poorly understood. To this end, in this study, the effects of the watershed partitioning level and optimization algorithm for hydrological simulation uncertainty were assessed based on the semi-distributed TOPMODEL model, i.e., six watershed partitioning levels and three intelligent global optimization algorithms were used in the source region of the Yellow River. Meanwhile, the uncertainty contribution of the individual and interaction of the watershed partitioning levels and optimization algorithms on the hydrological process were dynamically evaluated using the variance decomposition method based on subsampling. Results showed that the impacts of the watershed partitioning level and optimization algorithm on the runoff simulation were particularly obvious for different characteristic periods. In the flood period, the optimization algorithm was the dominant factor affecting the runoff simulation uncertainty, with the proportion of up to 0.50, whereas the contribution of the watershed partitioning level was only 0.22. In the non-flood period, they contributed substantially to the uncertainty of the runoff simulation, accounting for about 0.30. Moreover, the interactions between the watershed partitioning level and optimization algorithm had a strong influence throughout the year, especially in the non-flood period, which may be because the hydrological model amplifies the output error and increases the interaction effect. Generally, the results shed important insight into reducing the uncertainty of the runoff simulation in future research.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Computational Intelligence</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Global optimization</subject><subject>Hydrologic models</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Math. Appl. in Environmental Science</subject><subject>Optimization algorithms</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Partitioning</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Statistics for Engineering</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>1436-3240</issn><issn>1436-3259</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOIzzAq4Crqu5tUndyeBlYMCNrkMmTWcibVKTVNEH8LnNTEV3rs45_JcDHwDnGF1ihPhVRIhxXiCCCoRFSQp-BGaY0aqgpKyPf3eGTsEiRrvJoZLWNUYz8LXqB6VThL6Feqfc1kRoHUw7A99VMiHuTAMHFZJN1jvrtrAzb6aDyjXQD8n29lPtFai6rQ827XqYjzA637Yw2n7sDvI1bIz2_eDjoWf_bXTahKSsS9bEM3DSqi6axc-cg-e726flQ7F-vF8tb9aFpqJMhSGcbSqDRMV4KzRFTDRog0vGBa8aqokyWayVoJgQpTFSTGhe6rZmddlyQefgYuodgn8dTUzyxY_B5ZeSMI4rwjLA7CKTSwcfYzCtHILtVfiQGMk9cjkhlxm5PCCXPIfoFIrZnDmGv-p_Ut9Looap</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Zhou, Shuai</creator><creator>Wang, Yimin</creator><creator>Guo, Aijun</creator><creator>Li, Ziyan</creator><creator>Chang, Jianxia</creator><creator>Meng, Dongdong</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0W</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Impacts of changes in the watershed partitioning level and optimization algorithm on runoff simulation: decomposition of uncertainties</title><author>Zhou, Shuai ; Wang, Yimin ; Guo, Aijun ; Li, Ziyan ; Chang, Jianxia ; Meng, Dongdong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e274b6e08647f8c3048d0b1547876d3c2aee089a83122ac10a48c75cf9495f783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Computational Intelligence</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Global optimization</topic><topic>Hydrologic models</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Math. Appl. in Environmental Science</topic><topic>Optimization algorithms</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Partitioning</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Statistics for Engineering</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Shuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Aijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ziyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Jianxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meng, Dongdong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DELNET Engineering &amp; Technology Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhou, Shuai</au><au>Wang, Yimin</au><au>Guo, Aijun</au><au>Li, Ziyan</au><au>Chang, Jianxia</au><au>Meng, Dongdong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impacts of changes in the watershed partitioning level and optimization algorithm on runoff simulation: decomposition of uncertainties</atitle><jtitle>Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment</jtitle><stitle>Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess</stitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1909</spage><epage>1923</epage><pages>1909-1923</pages><issn>1436-3240</issn><eissn>1436-3259</eissn><abstract>Hydrological modeling has provided key insights into the mechanisms of model state, such as the watershed partitioning level and optimization algorithm, and their impacts on the hydrological process, but the uncertainty of this impact is poorly understood. To this end, in this study, the effects of the watershed partitioning level and optimization algorithm for hydrological simulation uncertainty were assessed based on the semi-distributed TOPMODEL model, i.e., six watershed partitioning levels and three intelligent global optimization algorithms were used in the source region of the Yellow River. Meanwhile, the uncertainty contribution of the individual and interaction of the watershed partitioning levels and optimization algorithms on the hydrological process were dynamically evaluated using the variance decomposition method based on subsampling. Results showed that the impacts of the watershed partitioning level and optimization algorithm on the runoff simulation were particularly obvious for different characteristic periods. In the flood period, the optimization algorithm was the dominant factor affecting the runoff simulation uncertainty, with the proportion of up to 0.50, whereas the contribution of the watershed partitioning level was only 0.22. In the non-flood period, they contributed substantially to the uncertainty of the runoff simulation, accounting for about 0.30. Moreover, the interactions between the watershed partitioning level and optimization algorithm had a strong influence throughout the year, especially in the non-flood period, which may be because the hydrological model amplifies the output error and increases the interaction effect. Generally, the results shed important insight into reducing the uncertainty of the runoff simulation in future research.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00477-020-01852-7</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1436-3240
ispartof Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment, 2020-11, Vol.34 (11), p.1909-1923
issn 1436-3240
1436-3259
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2471624185
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Algorithms
Aquatic Pollution
Chemistry and Earth Sciences
Computational Intelligence
Computer Science
Decomposition
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Environment
Floods
Global optimization
Hydrologic models
Hydrology
Math. Appl. in Environmental Science
Optimization algorithms
Original Paper
Partitioning
Physics
Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes
Runoff
Simulation
Statistics for Engineering
Uncertainty
Waste Water Technology
Water Management
Water Pollution Control
Watersheds
title Impacts of changes in the watershed partitioning level and optimization algorithm on runoff simulation: decomposition of uncertainties
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T18%3A03%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impacts%20of%20changes%20in%20the%20watershed%20partitioning%20level%20and%20optimization%20algorithm%20on%20runoff%20simulation:%20decomposition%20of%20uncertainties&rft.jtitle=Stochastic%20environmental%20research%20and%20risk%20assessment&rft.au=Zhou,%20Shuai&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1909&rft.epage=1923&rft.pages=1909-1923&rft.issn=1436-3240&rft.eissn=1436-3259&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00477-020-01852-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2471624185%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2471624185&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true