Anatomical region identification in medical X-ray computed tomography (CT) scans: development and comparison of alternative data analysis and vision-based methods
Many medical image processing applications rely on targeted regions of interest within a larger volumetric image. Whole-body scans represent an extreme case in which large volumes must be broken into smaller sub-volumes for regional analysis. In this work, we sought automatic solutions to divide med...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neural computing & applications 2020-12, Vol.32 (23), p.17519-17531 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 17531 |
---|---|
container_issue | 23 |
container_start_page | 17519 |
container_title | Neural computing & applications |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Salman, Odai S. Klein, Ran |
description | Many medical image processing applications rely on targeted regions of interest within a larger volumetric image. Whole-body scans represent an extreme case in which large volumes must be broken into smaller sub-volumes for regional analysis. In this work, we sought automatic solutions to divide medical X-ray computed tomography (CT) images into six main anatomical regions: head, neck, chest, abdomen, pelvis and legs. We implemented and compared three methods: (1) an analytical approach which does not require training and solely relies on utilizing critical points in image intensity profiles to derive cut-planes that divide the scan into the mentioned regions, (2) a classical convolutional neural network (CNN) approach, which classifies each transaxial 2D plane independently and then concatenates classification results, and (3) CNN followed by a context-based correction algorithm (CBCA) which improves the CNN classification using positional relationships between all CT slices. The analytical approach achieved acceptable accuracy for anatomical region segmentation without the need for explicit data labeling and was effective for batch labeling whole-body CTs, greatly reducing manual labeling efforts. CNNs achieved superior accuracy and allowed for rapid development and training, but required labeled data and were susceptible to produce discontinuous anatomical regions and therefore ambiguous anatomical boundaries. Post hoc correction of CNN results using CBCA overcame these limitations, achieving nearly perfect CT slice labeling and anatomical region segmentation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00521-020-04923-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2471600193</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2471600193</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-dc381c4e7109606dea04440fb261d88eb34b14f620d4d91a801eb8a7112e6d093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFq3DAQhkVJoZs0L5CToJf2oHRkabV2bmFJm0KglxR6E2NrvFGwLUfSLuzr9Emregu55SQkff83Az9jVxKuJcDmawJYV1JABQJ0Uylh3rGV1EoJBev6jK2g0eXbaPWBnaf0DADa1OsV-3M7YQ6j73DgkXY-TNw7mrLvy1NerhMfyS3AbxHxyLswzvtMjpdc2EWcn4788_bxC08dTumGOzrQEOaxWDhObuEx-lRcoec4ZIplpj8Qd5ixIDgck08Le_CpzBQtpuIfKT8Flz6y9z0OiS7_nxfs17e7x-29ePj5_cf29kF0SjZZuE7VstO0kdAYMI4QtNbQt5WRrq6pVbqVujcVOO0aiTVIamvcSFmRcdCoC_bp5J1jeNlTyvY57MuqQ7KV3kgDIBtVqOpEdTGkFKm3c_QjxqOVYP91YU9d2NKFXbqwpoTUKZQKPO0ovqrfSP0FHhGPCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2471600193</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anatomical region identification in medical X-ray computed tomography (CT) scans: development and comparison of alternative data analysis and vision-based methods</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Salman, Odai S. ; Klein, Ran</creator><creatorcontrib>Salman, Odai S. ; Klein, Ran</creatorcontrib><description>Many medical image processing applications rely on targeted regions of interest within a larger volumetric image. Whole-body scans represent an extreme case in which large volumes must be broken into smaller sub-volumes for regional analysis. In this work, we sought automatic solutions to divide medical X-ray computed tomography (CT) images into six main anatomical regions: head, neck, chest, abdomen, pelvis and legs. We implemented and compared three methods: (1) an analytical approach which does not require training and solely relies on utilizing critical points in image intensity profiles to derive cut-planes that divide the scan into the mentioned regions, (2) a classical convolutional neural network (CNN) approach, which classifies each transaxial 2D plane independently and then concatenates classification results, and (3) CNN followed by a context-based correction algorithm (CBCA) which improves the CNN classification using positional relationships between all CT slices. The analytical approach achieved acceptable accuracy for anatomical region segmentation without the need for explicit data labeling and was effective for batch labeling whole-body CTs, greatly reducing manual labeling efforts. CNNs achieved superior accuracy and allowed for rapid development and training, but required labeled data and were susceptible to produce discontinuous anatomical regions and therefore ambiguous anatomical boundaries. Post hoc correction of CNN results using CBCA overcame these limitations, achieving nearly perfect CT slice labeling and anatomical region segmentation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-0643</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-3058</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00521-020-04923-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Artificial Intelligence ; Artificial neural networks ; Classification ; Computational Biology/Bioinformatics ; Computational Science and Engineering ; Computed tomography ; Computer Science ; Critical point ; Data analysis ; Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery ; Image processing ; Image Processing and Computer Vision ; Image segmentation ; Labeling ; Medical imaging ; Original Article ; Pelvis ; Probability and Statistics in Computer Science ; Regional analysis ; Regions ; Tomography ; Training</subject><ispartof>Neural computing & applications, 2020-12, Vol.32 (23), p.17519-17531</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-dc381c4e7109606dea04440fb261d88eb34b14f620d4d91a801eb8a7112e6d093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-dc381c4e7109606dea04440fb261d88eb34b14f620d4d91a801eb8a7112e6d093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00521-020-04923-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00521-020-04923-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salman, Odai S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Ran</creatorcontrib><title>Anatomical region identification in medical X-ray computed tomography (CT) scans: development and comparison of alternative data analysis and vision-based methods</title><title>Neural computing & applications</title><addtitle>Neural Comput & Applic</addtitle><description>Many medical image processing applications rely on targeted regions of interest within a larger volumetric image. Whole-body scans represent an extreme case in which large volumes must be broken into smaller sub-volumes for regional analysis. In this work, we sought automatic solutions to divide medical X-ray computed tomography (CT) images into six main anatomical regions: head, neck, chest, abdomen, pelvis and legs. We implemented and compared three methods: (1) an analytical approach which does not require training and solely relies on utilizing critical points in image intensity profiles to derive cut-planes that divide the scan into the mentioned regions, (2) a classical convolutional neural network (CNN) approach, which classifies each transaxial 2D plane independently and then concatenates classification results, and (3) CNN followed by a context-based correction algorithm (CBCA) which improves the CNN classification using positional relationships between all CT slices. The analytical approach achieved acceptable accuracy for anatomical region segmentation without the need for explicit data labeling and was effective for batch labeling whole-body CTs, greatly reducing manual labeling efforts. CNNs achieved superior accuracy and allowed for rapid development and training, but required labeled data and were susceptible to produce discontinuous anatomical regions and therefore ambiguous anatomical boundaries. Post hoc correction of CNN results using CBCA overcame these limitations, achieving nearly perfect CT slice labeling and anatomical region segmentation.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Computational Biology/Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Computational Science and Engineering</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Critical point</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Image Processing and Computer Vision</subject><subject>Image segmentation</subject><subject>Labeling</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pelvis</subject><subject>Probability and Statistics in Computer Science</subject><subject>Regional analysis</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0941-0643</issn><issn>1433-3058</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFq3DAQhkVJoZs0L5CToJf2oHRkabV2bmFJm0KglxR6E2NrvFGwLUfSLuzr9Emregu55SQkff83Az9jVxKuJcDmawJYV1JABQJ0Uylh3rGV1EoJBev6jK2g0eXbaPWBnaf0DADa1OsV-3M7YQ6j73DgkXY-TNw7mrLvy1NerhMfyS3AbxHxyLswzvtMjpdc2EWcn4788_bxC08dTumGOzrQEOaxWDhObuEx-lRcoec4ZIplpj8Qd5ixIDgck08Le_CpzBQtpuIfKT8Flz6y9z0OiS7_nxfs17e7x-29ePj5_cf29kF0SjZZuE7VstO0kdAYMI4QtNbQt5WRrq6pVbqVujcVOO0aiTVIamvcSFmRcdCoC_bp5J1jeNlTyvY57MuqQ7KV3kgDIBtVqOpEdTGkFKm3c_QjxqOVYP91YU9d2NKFXbqwpoTUKZQKPO0ovqrfSP0FHhGPCw</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Salman, Odai S.</creator><creator>Klein, Ran</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Anatomical region identification in medical X-ray computed tomography (CT) scans: development and comparison of alternative data analysis and vision-based methods</title><author>Salman, Odai S. ; Klein, Ran</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-dc381c4e7109606dea04440fb261d88eb34b14f620d4d91a801eb8a7112e6d093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Computational Biology/Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Computational Science and Engineering</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Critical point</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Image Processing and Computer Vision</topic><topic>Image segmentation</topic><topic>Labeling</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pelvis</topic><topic>Probability and Statistics in Computer Science</topic><topic>Regional analysis</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salman, Odai S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Ran</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Neural computing & applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salman, Odai S.</au><au>Klein, Ran</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anatomical region identification in medical X-ray computed tomography (CT) scans: development and comparison of alternative data analysis and vision-based methods</atitle><jtitle>Neural computing & applications</jtitle><stitle>Neural Comput & Applic</stitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>17519</spage><epage>17531</epage><pages>17519-17531</pages><issn>0941-0643</issn><eissn>1433-3058</eissn><abstract>Many medical image processing applications rely on targeted regions of interest within a larger volumetric image. Whole-body scans represent an extreme case in which large volumes must be broken into smaller sub-volumes for regional analysis. In this work, we sought automatic solutions to divide medical X-ray computed tomography (CT) images into six main anatomical regions: head, neck, chest, abdomen, pelvis and legs. We implemented and compared three methods: (1) an analytical approach which does not require training and solely relies on utilizing critical points in image intensity profiles to derive cut-planes that divide the scan into the mentioned regions, (2) a classical convolutional neural network (CNN) approach, which classifies each transaxial 2D plane independently and then concatenates classification results, and (3) CNN followed by a context-based correction algorithm (CBCA) which improves the CNN classification using positional relationships between all CT slices. The analytical approach achieved acceptable accuracy for anatomical region segmentation without the need for explicit data labeling and was effective for batch labeling whole-body CTs, greatly reducing manual labeling efforts. CNNs achieved superior accuracy and allowed for rapid development and training, but required labeled data and were susceptible to produce discontinuous anatomical regions and therefore ambiguous anatomical boundaries. Post hoc correction of CNN results using CBCA overcame these limitations, achieving nearly perfect CT slice labeling and anatomical region segmentation.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><doi>10.1007/s00521-020-04923-6</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0941-0643 |
ispartof | Neural computing & applications, 2020-12, Vol.32 (23), p.17519-17531 |
issn | 0941-0643 1433-3058 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2471600193 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Algorithms Artificial Intelligence Artificial neural networks Classification Computational Biology/Bioinformatics Computational Science and Engineering Computed tomography Computer Science Critical point Data analysis Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Image processing Image Processing and Computer Vision Image segmentation Labeling Medical imaging Original Article Pelvis Probability and Statistics in Computer Science Regional analysis Regions Tomography Training |
title | Anatomical region identification in medical X-ray computed tomography (CT) scans: development and comparison of alternative data analysis and vision-based methods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A17%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anatomical%20region%20identification%20in%20medical%20X-ray%20computed%20tomography%20(CT)%20scans:%20development%20and%20comparison%20of%20alternative%20data%20analysis%20and%20vision-based%20methods&rft.jtitle=Neural%20computing%20&%20applications&rft.au=Salman,%20Odai%20S.&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=17519&rft.epage=17531&rft.pages=17519-17531&rft.issn=0941-0643&rft.eissn=1433-3058&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00521-020-04923-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2471600193%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2471600193&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |