Hook selectivity and catch efficiency in two sport fishing sectors in the Strait of Istanbul, Turkey: Classic handline fishing and Light Rock Fishing (LRF)
In this study, the efficiency of two fishing methods (a) traditional handline commonly used in the Strait of Istanbul and (b) light rock fishing (LRF), which is beginning to spread in recent years, were investigated by monthly sampling between September 2014 and September 2015. One classic handline...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied ichthyology 2020-12, Vol.36 (6), p.893-900 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 900 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 893 |
container_title | Journal of applied ichthyology |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Peksu, Murat Uzer, Uğur Yildiz, Taner Ayaz, Adnan Karakulak, F. Saadet |
description | In this study, the efficiency of two fishing methods (a) traditional handline commonly used in the Strait of Istanbul and (b) light rock fishing (LRF), which is beginning to spread in recent years, were investigated by monthly sampling between September 2014 and September 2015. One classic handline fishing tackle and one LRF fishing tackle were used in the test fishing exercise. In addition, the effects of the hook sizes (numbers 6, 8 and 10) used in the handline fishery on the size selectivity for horse mackerels were also studied. Catches using both types of fishing gear were mainly composed of Trachurus mediterraneus (89.60%), Scorpeana porcus (5.12%), Sardina pilchardus (1.98%), Atherina boyeri (0.99%), Liza aurata (0.66%), Scorpaena scrofa (0.50%), Pomatomus saltatrix (0.33%), Sprattus sprattus (0.33%) and a few other species. The frequency distributions of horse mackerel caught using handlines and LRF were slightly different and ranged between 6.1–19.0 cm and 9.0–16.0 cm, respectively. Of all the handlines, LRF yielded the highest catch per unit effort (CPUE), 1.295 kg/10 hooks/hour. The log normal model selectivity curve gave the best fit for the T. mediterraneus by using the SELECT method. The modal lengths of horse mackerel caught by handline hook sizes no.10 and no. 8 hook were calculated as 13.4 cm and 17.7 cm, respectively. In addition, the spread values were determined with 3.58 and 4.74, respectively. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jai.14140 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2471277187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2471277187</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3320-7e5050418a10387b8d424c787f62ae88c9e07293623e5b685f269a8a7d0dea553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMoOKcPfoOALw7slqR_kvo2hnOTgjDnc8nSZM1Wm5mkjn4Wv6zdJr55Xy7c-zvnwAHgFqMh7ma04XqIIxyhM9DDUZgGKCLJOeghTOOAJXF6Ca6c2yCEGE2THvieGbOFTlZSeP2lfQt5XUDBvSihVEoLLWvRQl1DvzfQ7Yz1UGlX6nrdqYQ31h2fpYRv3nLtoVFw7jyvV031AJeN3cr2EU4q7pwWsOzcK13LP49DWqbXpYcLI7Zw-nu-zxbTwTW4ULxy8uZ398H79Gk5mQXZ6_N8Ms4CEYYEBVTGKEYRZhyjkNEVKyISCcqoSgiXjIlUIkrSMCGhjFcJixVJUs44LVAheRyHfXB38t1Z89lI5_ONaWzdReYkophQihntqMGJEtY4Z6XKd1Z_cNvmGOWH7vOu-_zYfceOTuxeV7L9H8xfxvOT4gffMIV9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2471277187</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hook selectivity and catch efficiency in two sport fishing sectors in the Strait of Istanbul, Turkey: Classic handline fishing and Light Rock Fishing (LRF)</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Peksu, Murat ; Uzer, Uğur ; Yildiz, Taner ; Ayaz, Adnan ; Karakulak, F. Saadet</creator><creatorcontrib>Peksu, Murat ; Uzer, Uğur ; Yildiz, Taner ; Ayaz, Adnan ; Karakulak, F. Saadet</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, the efficiency of two fishing methods (a) traditional handline commonly used in the Strait of Istanbul and (b) light rock fishing (LRF), which is beginning to spread in recent years, were investigated by monthly sampling between September 2014 and September 2015. One classic handline fishing tackle and one LRF fishing tackle were used in the test fishing exercise. In addition, the effects of the hook sizes (numbers 6, 8 and 10) used in the handline fishery on the size selectivity for horse mackerels were also studied. Catches using both types of fishing gear were mainly composed of Trachurus mediterraneus (89.60%), Scorpeana porcus (5.12%), Sardina pilchardus (1.98%), Atherina boyeri (0.99%), Liza aurata (0.66%), Scorpaena scrofa (0.50%), Pomatomus saltatrix (0.33%), Sprattus sprattus (0.33%) and a few other species. The frequency distributions of horse mackerel caught using handlines and LRF were slightly different and ranged between 6.1–19.0 cm and 9.0–16.0 cm, respectively. Of all the handlines, LRF yielded the highest catch per unit effort (CPUE), 1.295 kg/10 hooks/hour. The log normal model selectivity curve gave the best fit for the T. mediterraneus by using the SELECT method. The modal lengths of horse mackerel caught by handline hook sizes no.10 and no. 8 hook were calculated as 13.4 cm and 17.7 cm, respectively. In addition, the spread values were determined with 3.58 and 4.74, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0175-8659</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0426</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jai.14140</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Carangid fisheries ; Catch per unit effort ; Fisheries ; Fishing ; Fishing gear ; Fishing methods ; Fishing tackle ; Hooks ; Mackerel ; Marine fishes ; Rocks ; Selectivity ; Sport fishing</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied ichthyology, 2020-12, Vol.36 (6), p.893-900</ispartof><rights>2020 Istanbul University, Faculty of Aquatic Sciences (Turkey)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3320-7e5050418a10387b8d424c787f62ae88c9e07293623e5b685f269a8a7d0dea553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3320-7e5050418a10387b8d424c787f62ae88c9e07293623e5b685f269a8a7d0dea553</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3140-5118 ; 0000-0002-7038-6469 ; 0000-0003-4839-9244 ; 0000-0002-6053-5256</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjai.14140$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjai.14140$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peksu, Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uzer, Uğur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yildiz, Taner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayaz, Adnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karakulak, F. Saadet</creatorcontrib><title>Hook selectivity and catch efficiency in two sport fishing sectors in the Strait of Istanbul, Turkey: Classic handline fishing and Light Rock Fishing (LRF)</title><title>Journal of applied ichthyology</title><description>In this study, the efficiency of two fishing methods (a) traditional handline commonly used in the Strait of Istanbul and (b) light rock fishing (LRF), which is beginning to spread in recent years, were investigated by monthly sampling between September 2014 and September 2015. One classic handline fishing tackle and one LRF fishing tackle were used in the test fishing exercise. In addition, the effects of the hook sizes (numbers 6, 8 and 10) used in the handline fishery on the size selectivity for horse mackerels were also studied. Catches using both types of fishing gear were mainly composed of Trachurus mediterraneus (89.60%), Scorpeana porcus (5.12%), Sardina pilchardus (1.98%), Atherina boyeri (0.99%), Liza aurata (0.66%), Scorpaena scrofa (0.50%), Pomatomus saltatrix (0.33%), Sprattus sprattus (0.33%) and a few other species. The frequency distributions of horse mackerel caught using handlines and LRF were slightly different and ranged between 6.1–19.0 cm and 9.0–16.0 cm, respectively. Of all the handlines, LRF yielded the highest catch per unit effort (CPUE), 1.295 kg/10 hooks/hour. The log normal model selectivity curve gave the best fit for the T. mediterraneus by using the SELECT method. The modal lengths of horse mackerel caught by handline hook sizes no.10 and no. 8 hook were calculated as 13.4 cm and 17.7 cm, respectively. In addition, the spread values were determined with 3.58 and 4.74, respectively.</description><subject>Carangid fisheries</subject><subject>Catch per unit effort</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Fishing gear</subject><subject>Fishing methods</subject><subject>Fishing tackle</subject><subject>Hooks</subject><subject>Mackerel</subject><subject>Marine fishes</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Selectivity</subject><subject>Sport fishing</subject><issn>0175-8659</issn><issn>1439-0426</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMoOKcPfoOALw7slqR_kvo2hnOTgjDnc8nSZM1Wm5mkjn4Wv6zdJr55Xy7c-zvnwAHgFqMh7ma04XqIIxyhM9DDUZgGKCLJOeghTOOAJXF6Ca6c2yCEGE2THvieGbOFTlZSeP2lfQt5XUDBvSihVEoLLWvRQl1DvzfQ7Yz1UGlX6nrdqYQ31h2fpYRv3nLtoVFw7jyvV031AJeN3cr2EU4q7pwWsOzcK13LP49DWqbXpYcLI7Zw-nu-zxbTwTW4ULxy8uZ398H79Gk5mQXZ6_N8Ms4CEYYEBVTGKEYRZhyjkNEVKyISCcqoSgiXjIlUIkrSMCGhjFcJixVJUs44LVAheRyHfXB38t1Z89lI5_ONaWzdReYkophQihntqMGJEtY4Z6XKd1Z_cNvmGOWH7vOu-_zYfceOTuxeV7L9H8xfxvOT4gffMIV9</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Peksu, Murat</creator><creator>Uzer, Uğur</creator><creator>Yildiz, Taner</creator><creator>Ayaz, Adnan</creator><creator>Karakulak, F. Saadet</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3140-5118</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7038-6469</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4839-9244</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6053-5256</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Hook selectivity and catch efficiency in two sport fishing sectors in the Strait of Istanbul, Turkey: Classic handline fishing and Light Rock Fishing (LRF)</title><author>Peksu, Murat ; Uzer, Uğur ; Yildiz, Taner ; Ayaz, Adnan ; Karakulak, F. Saadet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3320-7e5050418a10387b8d424c787f62ae88c9e07293623e5b685f269a8a7d0dea553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Carangid fisheries</topic><topic>Catch per unit effort</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Fishing gear</topic><topic>Fishing methods</topic><topic>Fishing tackle</topic><topic>Hooks</topic><topic>Mackerel</topic><topic>Marine fishes</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Selectivity</topic><topic>Sport fishing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peksu, Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uzer, Uğur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yildiz, Taner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayaz, Adnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karakulak, F. Saadet</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied ichthyology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peksu, Murat</au><au>Uzer, Uğur</au><au>Yildiz, Taner</au><au>Ayaz, Adnan</au><au>Karakulak, F. Saadet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hook selectivity and catch efficiency in two sport fishing sectors in the Strait of Istanbul, Turkey: Classic handline fishing and Light Rock Fishing (LRF)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied ichthyology</jtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>893</spage><epage>900</epage><pages>893-900</pages><issn>0175-8659</issn><eissn>1439-0426</eissn><abstract>In this study, the efficiency of two fishing methods (a) traditional handline commonly used in the Strait of Istanbul and (b) light rock fishing (LRF), which is beginning to spread in recent years, were investigated by monthly sampling between September 2014 and September 2015. One classic handline fishing tackle and one LRF fishing tackle were used in the test fishing exercise. In addition, the effects of the hook sizes (numbers 6, 8 and 10) used in the handline fishery on the size selectivity for horse mackerels were also studied. Catches using both types of fishing gear were mainly composed of Trachurus mediterraneus (89.60%), Scorpeana porcus (5.12%), Sardina pilchardus (1.98%), Atherina boyeri (0.99%), Liza aurata (0.66%), Scorpaena scrofa (0.50%), Pomatomus saltatrix (0.33%), Sprattus sprattus (0.33%) and a few other species. The frequency distributions of horse mackerel caught using handlines and LRF were slightly different and ranged between 6.1–19.0 cm and 9.0–16.0 cm, respectively. Of all the handlines, LRF yielded the highest catch per unit effort (CPUE), 1.295 kg/10 hooks/hour. The log normal model selectivity curve gave the best fit for the T. mediterraneus by using the SELECT method. The modal lengths of horse mackerel caught by handline hook sizes no.10 and no. 8 hook were calculated as 13.4 cm and 17.7 cm, respectively. In addition, the spread values were determined with 3.58 and 4.74, respectively.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/jai.14140</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3140-5118</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7038-6469</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4839-9244</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6053-5256</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0175-8659 |
ispartof | Journal of applied ichthyology, 2020-12, Vol.36 (6), p.893-900 |
issn | 0175-8659 1439-0426 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2471277187 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Carangid fisheries Catch per unit effort Fisheries Fishing Fishing gear Fishing methods Fishing tackle Hooks Mackerel Marine fishes Rocks Selectivity Sport fishing |
title | Hook selectivity and catch efficiency in two sport fishing sectors in the Strait of Istanbul, Turkey: Classic handline fishing and Light Rock Fishing (LRF) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T00%3A18%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hook%20selectivity%20and%20catch%20efficiency%20in%20two%20sport%20fishing%20sectors%20in%20the%20Strait%20of%20Istanbul,%20Turkey:%20Classic%20handline%20fishing%20and%20Light%20Rock%20Fishing%20(LRF)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20ichthyology&rft.au=Peksu,%20Murat&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=893&rft.epage=900&rft.pages=893-900&rft.issn=0175-8659&rft.eissn=1439-0426&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jai.14140&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2471277187%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2471277187&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |