Safe Habitats: Does the Association Between Neighborhood Crime and Walking Differ by Neighborhood Disadvantage?
Interrelationships between neighborhood walkability, area disadvantage, and crime may contribute to the inconsistent associations between crime and walking. We examined associations between crime and walking, and tested for differences by neighborhood disadvantage while addressing these additional c...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environment and behavior 2021-01, Vol.53 (1), p.3-39 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 39 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 3 |
| container_title | Environment and behavior |
| container_volume | 53 |
| creator | Foster, Sarah Hooper, Paula Burton, Nicola W. Brown, Wendy J. Giles-Corti, Billie Rachele, Jerome N. Turrell, Gavin |
| description | Interrelationships between neighborhood walkability, area disadvantage, and crime may contribute to the inconsistent associations between crime and walking. We examined associations between crime and walking, and tested for differences by neighborhood disadvantage while addressing these additional complexities. Participants (n = 6,680) from 200 neighborhoods spanning the most and least disadvantaged in Brisbane, Australia, completed a questionnaire and objective measures were generated for the individual-level 1,000-m neighborhood. Multilevel models examined associations between crime (perceived and objective) and walking (recreational and transport), and interactions tested for differences by neighborhood disadvantage. High perceived crime was associated with reduced odds of transport walking, whereas high objective crime was associated with increased odds of transport walking. Patterns did not differ by neighborhood disadvantage. In disadvantaged neighborhoods, the “negative” criminogenic attributes were insufficient to outweigh the “positive” walkability attributes, producing similar walking patterns to advantaged neighborhoods where residents were dislocated from local destinations but buffered from crime. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0013916519853300 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2470865619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0013916519853300</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2470865619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-9889fc95c08ddb2698ee22420551c48f130091617c732a5d6c702a8456d8ddef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKt3jwHPq0l2s5t4kdqqFYoeVPS2ZLOTNrVuapIq_femVBAFT8Mw33vDewgdU3JKaVWdEUJzSUtOpeB5TsgO6lHOWZZL8rKLeptztrnvo4MQ5iTtQvAecg_KAB6rxkYVwzkeOQg4zgAPQnDaqmhdhy8hfgJ0-A7sdNY4P3OuxUNv3wCrrsXPavFquykeWWPA42b9GxzZoNoP1UU1hYtDtGfUIsDR9-yjp-urx-E4m9zf3A4Hk0znlYyZFEIaLbkmom0bVkoBwFjBCOdUF8LQlDCloZWucqZ4W-qKMCUKXrZJACbvo5Ot79K79xWEWM_dynfpZc2KioiSl1Qmimwp7V0IHky9TKmUX9eU1Jta67-1Jkm2lYQU58f0X_4LqEF2Yg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2470865619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safe Habitats: Does the Association Between Neighborhood Crime and Walking Differ by Neighborhood Disadvantage?</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Foster, Sarah ; Hooper, Paula ; Burton, Nicola W. ; Brown, Wendy J. ; Giles-Corti, Billie ; Rachele, Jerome N. ; Turrell, Gavin</creator><creatorcontrib>Foster, Sarah ; Hooper, Paula ; Burton, Nicola W. ; Brown, Wendy J. ; Giles-Corti, Billie ; Rachele, Jerome N. ; Turrell, Gavin</creatorcontrib><description>Interrelationships between neighborhood walkability, area disadvantage, and crime may contribute to the inconsistent associations between crime and walking. We examined associations between crime and walking, and tested for differences by neighborhood disadvantage while addressing these additional complexities. Participants (n = 6,680) from 200 neighborhoods spanning the most and least disadvantaged in Brisbane, Australia, completed a questionnaire and objective measures were generated for the individual-level 1,000-m neighborhood. Multilevel models examined associations between crime (perceived and objective) and walking (recreational and transport), and interactions tested for differences by neighborhood disadvantage. High perceived crime was associated with reduced odds of transport walking, whereas high objective crime was associated with increased odds of transport walking. Patterns did not differ by neighborhood disadvantage. In disadvantaged neighborhoods, the “negative” criminogenic attributes were insufficient to outweigh the “positive” walkability attributes, producing similar walking patterns to advantaged neighborhoods where residents were dislocated from local destinations but buffered from crime.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-9165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-390X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0013916519853300</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Attributes ; Crime ; Crime prevention ; Destinations ; Disadvantaged ; Individual differences ; Neighborhoods ; Transportation ; Walking</subject><ispartof>Environment and behavior, 2021-01, Vol.53 (1), p.3-39</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-9889fc95c08ddb2698ee22420551c48f130091617c732a5d6c702a8456d8ddef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-9889fc95c08ddb2698ee22420551c48f130091617c732a5d6c702a8456d8ddef3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8624-4908</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0013916519853300$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0013916519853300$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,30999,33774,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Foster, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooper, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, Nicola W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Wendy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giles-Corti, Billie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rachele, Jerome N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turrell, Gavin</creatorcontrib><title>Safe Habitats: Does the Association Between Neighborhood Crime and Walking Differ by Neighborhood Disadvantage?</title><title>Environment and behavior</title><description>Interrelationships between neighborhood walkability, area disadvantage, and crime may contribute to the inconsistent associations between crime and walking. We examined associations between crime and walking, and tested for differences by neighborhood disadvantage while addressing these additional complexities. Participants (n = 6,680) from 200 neighborhoods spanning the most and least disadvantaged in Brisbane, Australia, completed a questionnaire and objective measures were generated for the individual-level 1,000-m neighborhood. Multilevel models examined associations between crime (perceived and objective) and walking (recreational and transport), and interactions tested for differences by neighborhood disadvantage. High perceived crime was associated with reduced odds of transport walking, whereas high objective crime was associated with increased odds of transport walking. Patterns did not differ by neighborhood disadvantage. In disadvantaged neighborhoods, the “negative” criminogenic attributes were insufficient to outweigh the “positive” walkability attributes, producing similar walking patterns to advantaged neighborhoods where residents were dislocated from local destinations but buffered from crime.</description><subject>Attributes</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Crime prevention</subject><subject>Destinations</subject><subject>Disadvantaged</subject><subject>Individual differences</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>0013-9165</issn><issn>1552-390X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKt3jwHPq0l2s5t4kdqqFYoeVPS2ZLOTNrVuapIq_femVBAFT8Mw33vDewgdU3JKaVWdEUJzSUtOpeB5TsgO6lHOWZZL8rKLeptztrnvo4MQ5iTtQvAecg_KAB6rxkYVwzkeOQg4zgAPQnDaqmhdhy8hfgJ0-A7sdNY4P3OuxUNv3wCrrsXPavFquykeWWPA42b9GxzZoNoP1UU1hYtDtGfUIsDR9-yjp-urx-E4m9zf3A4Hk0znlYyZFEIaLbkmom0bVkoBwFjBCOdUF8LQlDCloZWucqZ4W-qKMCUKXrZJACbvo5Ot79K79xWEWM_dynfpZc2KioiSl1Qmimwp7V0IHky9TKmUX9eU1Jta67-1Jkm2lYQU58f0X_4LqEF2Yg</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Foster, Sarah</creator><creator>Hooper, Paula</creator><creator>Burton, Nicola W.</creator><creator>Brown, Wendy J.</creator><creator>Giles-Corti, Billie</creator><creator>Rachele, Jerome N.</creator><creator>Turrell, Gavin</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8624-4908</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Safe Habitats: Does the Association Between Neighborhood Crime and Walking Differ by Neighborhood Disadvantage?</title><author>Foster, Sarah ; Hooper, Paula ; Burton, Nicola W. ; Brown, Wendy J. ; Giles-Corti, Billie ; Rachele, Jerome N. ; Turrell, Gavin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-9889fc95c08ddb2698ee22420551c48f130091617c732a5d6c702a8456d8ddef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Attributes</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Crime prevention</topic><topic>Destinations</topic><topic>Disadvantaged</topic><topic>Individual differences</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Foster, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooper, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, Nicola W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Wendy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giles-Corti, Billie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rachele, Jerome N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turrell, Gavin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Environment and behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Foster, Sarah</au><au>Hooper, Paula</au><au>Burton, Nicola W.</au><au>Brown, Wendy J.</au><au>Giles-Corti, Billie</au><au>Rachele, Jerome N.</au><au>Turrell, Gavin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safe Habitats: Does the Association Between Neighborhood Crime and Walking Differ by Neighborhood Disadvantage?</atitle><jtitle>Environment and behavior</jtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>3-39</pages><issn>0013-9165</issn><eissn>1552-390X</eissn><abstract>Interrelationships between neighborhood walkability, area disadvantage, and crime may contribute to the inconsistent associations between crime and walking. We examined associations between crime and walking, and tested for differences by neighborhood disadvantage while addressing these additional complexities. Participants (n = 6,680) from 200 neighborhoods spanning the most and least disadvantaged in Brisbane, Australia, completed a questionnaire and objective measures were generated for the individual-level 1,000-m neighborhood. Multilevel models examined associations between crime (perceived and objective) and walking (recreational and transport), and interactions tested for differences by neighborhood disadvantage. High perceived crime was associated with reduced odds of transport walking, whereas high objective crime was associated with increased odds of transport walking. Patterns did not differ by neighborhood disadvantage. In disadvantaged neighborhoods, the “negative” criminogenic attributes were insufficient to outweigh the “positive” walkability attributes, producing similar walking patterns to advantaged neighborhoods where residents were dislocated from local destinations but buffered from crime.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0013916519853300</doi><tpages>37</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8624-4908</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0013-9165 |
| ispartof | Environment and behavior, 2021-01, Vol.53 (1), p.3-39 |
| issn | 0013-9165 1552-390X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2470865619 |
| source | SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Attributes Crime Crime prevention Destinations Disadvantaged Individual differences Neighborhoods Transportation Walking |
| title | Safe Habitats: Does the Association Between Neighborhood Crime and Walking Differ by Neighborhood Disadvantage? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T19%3A05%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safe%20Habitats:%20Does%20the%20Association%20Between%20Neighborhood%20Crime%20and%20Walking%20Differ%20by%20Neighborhood%20Disadvantage?&rft.jtitle=Environment%20and%20behavior&rft.au=Foster,%20Sarah&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=3-39&rft.issn=0013-9165&rft.eissn=1552-390X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0013916519853300&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2470865619%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2470865619&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0013916519853300&rfr_iscdi=true |