UN Women’s feminist engagement with governance by indicators in the Millennium and Sustainable Development Goals

The rise of evidence-based policy has brought with it an increase in the use of indicators and data-driven global projects. The United Nations System has used the indicator-based Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) projects to govern policy from above. Of par...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global social policy 2020-12, Vol.20 (3), p.352-366
1. Verfasser: Rose Taylor, Sara
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 366
container_issue 3
container_start_page 352
container_title Global social policy
container_volume 20
creator Rose Taylor, Sara
description The rise of evidence-based policy has brought with it an increase in the use of indicators and data-driven global projects. The United Nations System has used the indicator-based Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) projects to govern policy from above. Of particular interest in this article is how indicators are used to govern gender equality initiatives within the Goals. By using ‘governance by indicators’ as a framework for understanding global policy processes, we can better understand how the power of indicators can help or hinder progress towards gender equality depending on the extent to which it renders gendered concerns visible. Studying indicators in this forum also illuminates spaces of contestation, where policy actors can debate indicators and reshape meaning. Based on this framework, this article explores UN Women’s feminist critique of measurement and knowledge production in the MDGs and SDGs. Looking through their feminist lens applied to this form of knowledge production can yield a better understanding of the use of indicators in shaping evidence-based policy from the global level. In recognizing the value of quantification and data-driven evidence in policy, this article speaks to the tension between feminist critique of quantitative knowledge production and the feminist approach’s welcoming of multiple ways of knowing.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1468018120931696
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2470865374</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1468018120931696</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2470865374</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-e07d1fabc4fc1e3031ad6d1447ab7d40c6705a544bd2358cceab99a5dcc4c3ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LwzAYLqLgnN49BjxXkyZN2qNMncLUgw6PJU3ebhltOpNsspt_w7_nLzFzgiB4eh7e5wPeJ0lOCT4nRIgLwniBSUEyXFLCS76XDIhgJM0KTPcjj3K61Q-TI-8XGGcZ5nyQuOkDeuk7sJ_vHx410BlrfEBgZ3IG8RzQmwlzNOvX4Ky0ClC9QcZqo2TonY8UhTmge9O2YK1ZdUhajZ5WPkhjZd0CuoI1tP3yu2vcy9YfJwdNBDj5wWEyvbl-Ht2mk8fx3ehykirKspACFpo0slasUQQopkRqrgljQtZCM6y4wLnMGat1RvNCKZB1WcpcK8UUVZIOk7Nd79L1ryvwoVr0q_hE66uMCVzwnAoWXXjnUq733kFTLZ3ppNtUBFfbZau_y8ZIuov4uNFv6b_-L_u7e1E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2470865374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>UN Women’s feminist engagement with governance by indicators in the Millennium and Sustainable Development Goals</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Rose Taylor, Sara</creator><creatorcontrib>Rose Taylor, Sara</creatorcontrib><description>The rise of evidence-based policy has brought with it an increase in the use of indicators and data-driven global projects. The United Nations System has used the indicator-based Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) projects to govern policy from above. Of particular interest in this article is how indicators are used to govern gender equality initiatives within the Goals. By using ‘governance by indicators’ as a framework for understanding global policy processes, we can better understand how the power of indicators can help or hinder progress towards gender equality depending on the extent to which it renders gendered concerns visible. Studying indicators in this forum also illuminates spaces of contestation, where policy actors can debate indicators and reshape meaning. Based on this framework, this article explores UN Women’s feminist critique of measurement and knowledge production in the MDGs and SDGs. Looking through their feminist lens applied to this form of knowledge production can yield a better understanding of the use of indicators in shaping evidence-based policy from the global level. In recognizing the value of quantification and data-driven evidence in policy, this article speaks to the tension between feminist critique of quantitative knowledge production and the feminist approach’s welcoming of multiple ways of knowing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1468-0181</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-2803</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1468018120931696</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Debates ; Equality ; Feminism ; Gender ; Gender equity ; Gender inequality ; Governance ; Knowledge ; Objectives ; Production ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>Global social policy, 2020-12, Vol.20 (3), p.352-366</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-e07d1fabc4fc1e3031ad6d1447ab7d40c6705a544bd2358cceab99a5dcc4c3ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-e07d1fabc4fc1e3031ad6d1447ab7d40c6705a544bd2358cceab99a5dcc4c3ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9466-6166</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1468018120931696$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1468018120931696$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27866,27924,27925,33774,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rose Taylor, Sara</creatorcontrib><title>UN Women’s feminist engagement with governance by indicators in the Millennium and Sustainable Development Goals</title><title>Global social policy</title><description>The rise of evidence-based policy has brought with it an increase in the use of indicators and data-driven global projects. The United Nations System has used the indicator-based Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) projects to govern policy from above. Of particular interest in this article is how indicators are used to govern gender equality initiatives within the Goals. By using ‘governance by indicators’ as a framework for understanding global policy processes, we can better understand how the power of indicators can help or hinder progress towards gender equality depending on the extent to which it renders gendered concerns visible. Studying indicators in this forum also illuminates spaces of contestation, where policy actors can debate indicators and reshape meaning. Based on this framework, this article explores UN Women’s feminist critique of measurement and knowledge production in the MDGs and SDGs. Looking through their feminist lens applied to this form of knowledge production can yield a better understanding of the use of indicators in shaping evidence-based policy from the global level. In recognizing the value of quantification and data-driven evidence in policy, this article speaks to the tension between feminist critique of quantitative knowledge production and the feminist approach’s welcoming of multiple ways of knowing.</description><subject>Debates</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender equity</subject><subject>Gender inequality</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>1468-0181</issn><issn>1741-2803</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LwzAYLqLgnN49BjxXkyZN2qNMncLUgw6PJU3ebhltOpNsspt_w7_nLzFzgiB4eh7e5wPeJ0lOCT4nRIgLwniBSUEyXFLCS76XDIhgJM0KTPcjj3K61Q-TI-8XGGcZ5nyQuOkDeuk7sJ_vHx410BlrfEBgZ3IG8RzQmwlzNOvX4Ky0ClC9QcZqo2TonY8UhTmge9O2YK1ZdUhajZ5WPkhjZd0CuoI1tP3yu2vcy9YfJwdNBDj5wWEyvbl-Ht2mk8fx3ehykirKspACFpo0slasUQQopkRqrgljQtZCM6y4wLnMGat1RvNCKZB1WcpcK8UUVZIOk7Nd79L1ryvwoVr0q_hE66uMCVzwnAoWXXjnUq733kFTLZ3ppNtUBFfbZau_y8ZIuov4uNFv6b_-L_u7e1E</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Rose Taylor, Sara</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9466-6166</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>UN Women’s feminist engagement with governance by indicators in the Millennium and Sustainable Development Goals</title><author>Rose Taylor, Sara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-e07d1fabc4fc1e3031ad6d1447ab7d40c6705a544bd2358cceab99a5dcc4c3ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Debates</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender equity</topic><topic>Gender inequality</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rose Taylor, Sara</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Global social policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rose Taylor, Sara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>UN Women’s feminist engagement with governance by indicators in the Millennium and Sustainable Development Goals</atitle><jtitle>Global social policy</jtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>352</spage><epage>366</epage><pages>352-366</pages><issn>1468-0181</issn><eissn>1741-2803</eissn><abstract>The rise of evidence-based policy has brought with it an increase in the use of indicators and data-driven global projects. The United Nations System has used the indicator-based Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) projects to govern policy from above. Of particular interest in this article is how indicators are used to govern gender equality initiatives within the Goals. By using ‘governance by indicators’ as a framework for understanding global policy processes, we can better understand how the power of indicators can help or hinder progress towards gender equality depending on the extent to which it renders gendered concerns visible. Studying indicators in this forum also illuminates spaces of contestation, where policy actors can debate indicators and reshape meaning. Based on this framework, this article explores UN Women’s feminist critique of measurement and knowledge production in the MDGs and SDGs. Looking through their feminist lens applied to this form of knowledge production can yield a better understanding of the use of indicators in shaping evidence-based policy from the global level. In recognizing the value of quantification and data-driven evidence in policy, this article speaks to the tension between feminist critique of quantitative knowledge production and the feminist approach’s welcoming of multiple ways of knowing.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1468018120931696</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9466-6166</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1468-0181
ispartof Global social policy, 2020-12, Vol.20 (3), p.352-366
issn 1468-0181
1741-2803
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2470865374
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Debates
Equality
Feminism
Gender
Gender equity
Gender inequality
Governance
Knowledge
Objectives
Production
Sustainable development
title UN Women’s feminist engagement with governance by indicators in the Millennium and Sustainable Development Goals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A32%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=UN%20Women%E2%80%99s%20feminist%20engagement%20with%20governance%20by%20indicators%20in%20the%20Millennium%20and%20Sustainable%20Development%20Goals&rft.jtitle=Global%20social%20policy&rft.au=Rose%20Taylor,%20Sara&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=352&rft.epage=366&rft.pages=352-366&rft.issn=1468-0181&rft.eissn=1741-2803&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1468018120931696&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2470865374%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2470865374&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1468018120931696&rfr_iscdi=true