UN Women’s feminist engagement with governance by indicators in the Millennium and Sustainable Development Goals
The rise of evidence-based policy has brought with it an increase in the use of indicators and data-driven global projects. The United Nations System has used the indicator-based Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) projects to govern policy from above. Of par...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global social policy 2020-12, Vol.20 (3), p.352-366 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 366 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 352 |
container_title | Global social policy |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Rose Taylor, Sara |
description | The rise of evidence-based policy has brought with it an increase in the use of indicators and data-driven global projects. The United Nations System has used the indicator-based Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) projects to govern policy from above. Of particular interest in this article is how indicators are used to govern gender equality initiatives within the Goals. By using ‘governance by indicators’ as a framework for understanding global policy processes, we can better understand how the power of indicators can help or hinder progress towards gender equality depending on the extent to which it renders gendered concerns visible. Studying indicators in this forum also illuminates spaces of contestation, where policy actors can debate indicators and reshape meaning. Based on this framework, this article explores UN Women’s feminist critique of measurement and knowledge production in the MDGs and SDGs. Looking through their feminist lens applied to this form of knowledge production can yield a better understanding of the use of indicators in shaping evidence-based policy from the global level. In recognizing the value of quantification and data-driven evidence in policy, this article speaks to the tension between feminist critique of quantitative knowledge production and the feminist approach’s welcoming of multiple ways of knowing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1468018120931696 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2470865374</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1468018120931696</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2470865374</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-e07d1fabc4fc1e3031ad6d1447ab7d40c6705a544bd2358cceab99a5dcc4c3ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LwzAYLqLgnN49BjxXkyZN2qNMncLUgw6PJU3ebhltOpNsspt_w7_nLzFzgiB4eh7e5wPeJ0lOCT4nRIgLwniBSUEyXFLCS76XDIhgJM0KTPcjj3K61Q-TI-8XGGcZ5nyQuOkDeuk7sJ_vHx410BlrfEBgZ3IG8RzQmwlzNOvX4Ky0ClC9QcZqo2TonY8UhTmge9O2YK1ZdUhajZ5WPkhjZd0CuoI1tP3yu2vcy9YfJwdNBDj5wWEyvbl-Ht2mk8fx3ehykirKspACFpo0slasUQQopkRqrgljQtZCM6y4wLnMGat1RvNCKZB1WcpcK8UUVZIOk7Nd79L1ryvwoVr0q_hE66uMCVzwnAoWXXjnUq733kFTLZ3ppNtUBFfbZau_y8ZIuov4uNFv6b_-L_u7e1E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2470865374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>UN Women’s feminist engagement with governance by indicators in the Millennium and Sustainable Development Goals</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Rose Taylor, Sara</creator><creatorcontrib>Rose Taylor, Sara</creatorcontrib><description>The rise of evidence-based policy has brought with it an increase in the use of indicators and data-driven global projects. The United Nations System has used the indicator-based Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) projects to govern policy from above. Of particular interest in this article is how indicators are used to govern gender equality initiatives within the Goals. By using ‘governance by indicators’ as a framework for understanding global policy processes, we can better understand how the power of indicators can help or hinder progress towards gender equality depending on the extent to which it renders gendered concerns visible. Studying indicators in this forum also illuminates spaces of contestation, where policy actors can debate indicators and reshape meaning. Based on this framework, this article explores UN Women’s feminist critique of measurement and knowledge production in the MDGs and SDGs. Looking through their feminist lens applied to this form of knowledge production can yield a better understanding of the use of indicators in shaping evidence-based policy from the global level. In recognizing the value of quantification and data-driven evidence in policy, this article speaks to the tension between feminist critique of quantitative knowledge production and the feminist approach’s welcoming of multiple ways of knowing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1468-0181</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-2803</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1468018120931696</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Debates ; Equality ; Feminism ; Gender ; Gender equity ; Gender inequality ; Governance ; Knowledge ; Objectives ; Production ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>Global social policy, 2020-12, Vol.20 (3), p.352-366</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-e07d1fabc4fc1e3031ad6d1447ab7d40c6705a544bd2358cceab99a5dcc4c3ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-e07d1fabc4fc1e3031ad6d1447ab7d40c6705a544bd2358cceab99a5dcc4c3ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9466-6166</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1468018120931696$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1468018120931696$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27866,27924,27925,33774,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rose Taylor, Sara</creatorcontrib><title>UN Women’s feminist engagement with governance by indicators in the Millennium and Sustainable Development Goals</title><title>Global social policy</title><description>The rise of evidence-based policy has brought with it an increase in the use of indicators and data-driven global projects. The United Nations System has used the indicator-based Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) projects to govern policy from above. Of particular interest in this article is how indicators are used to govern gender equality initiatives within the Goals. By using ‘governance by indicators’ as a framework for understanding global policy processes, we can better understand how the power of indicators can help or hinder progress towards gender equality depending on the extent to which it renders gendered concerns visible. Studying indicators in this forum also illuminates spaces of contestation, where policy actors can debate indicators and reshape meaning. Based on this framework, this article explores UN Women’s feminist critique of measurement and knowledge production in the MDGs and SDGs. Looking through their feminist lens applied to this form of knowledge production can yield a better understanding of the use of indicators in shaping evidence-based policy from the global level. In recognizing the value of quantification and data-driven evidence in policy, this article speaks to the tension between feminist critique of quantitative knowledge production and the feminist approach’s welcoming of multiple ways of knowing.</description><subject>Debates</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender equity</subject><subject>Gender inequality</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>1468-0181</issn><issn>1741-2803</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LwzAYLqLgnN49BjxXkyZN2qNMncLUgw6PJU3ebhltOpNsspt_w7_nLzFzgiB4eh7e5wPeJ0lOCT4nRIgLwniBSUEyXFLCS76XDIhgJM0KTPcjj3K61Q-TI-8XGGcZ5nyQuOkDeuk7sJ_vHx410BlrfEBgZ3IG8RzQmwlzNOvX4Ky0ClC9QcZqo2TonY8UhTmge9O2YK1ZdUhajZ5WPkhjZd0CuoI1tP3yu2vcy9YfJwdNBDj5wWEyvbl-Ht2mk8fx3ehykirKspACFpo0slasUQQopkRqrgljQtZCM6y4wLnMGat1RvNCKZB1WcpcK8UUVZIOk7Nd79L1ryvwoVr0q_hE66uMCVzwnAoWXXjnUq733kFTLZ3ppNtUBFfbZau_y8ZIuov4uNFv6b_-L_u7e1E</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Rose Taylor, Sara</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9466-6166</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>UN Women’s feminist engagement with governance by indicators in the Millennium and Sustainable Development Goals</title><author>Rose Taylor, Sara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-e07d1fabc4fc1e3031ad6d1447ab7d40c6705a544bd2358cceab99a5dcc4c3ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Debates</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender equity</topic><topic>Gender inequality</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rose Taylor, Sara</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Global social policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rose Taylor, Sara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>UN Women’s feminist engagement with governance by indicators in the Millennium and Sustainable Development Goals</atitle><jtitle>Global social policy</jtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>352</spage><epage>366</epage><pages>352-366</pages><issn>1468-0181</issn><eissn>1741-2803</eissn><abstract>The rise of evidence-based policy has brought with it an increase in the use of indicators and data-driven global projects. The United Nations System has used the indicator-based Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) projects to govern policy from above. Of particular interest in this article is how indicators are used to govern gender equality initiatives within the Goals. By using ‘governance by indicators’ as a framework for understanding global policy processes, we can better understand how the power of indicators can help or hinder progress towards gender equality depending on the extent to which it renders gendered concerns visible. Studying indicators in this forum also illuminates spaces of contestation, where policy actors can debate indicators and reshape meaning. Based on this framework, this article explores UN Women’s feminist critique of measurement and knowledge production in the MDGs and SDGs. Looking through their feminist lens applied to this form of knowledge production can yield a better understanding of the use of indicators in shaping evidence-based policy from the global level. In recognizing the value of quantification and data-driven evidence in policy, this article speaks to the tension between feminist critique of quantitative knowledge production and the feminist approach’s welcoming of multiple ways of knowing.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1468018120931696</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9466-6166</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1468-0181 |
ispartof | Global social policy, 2020-12, Vol.20 (3), p.352-366 |
issn | 1468-0181 1741-2803 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2470865374 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Debates Equality Feminism Gender Gender equity Gender inequality Governance Knowledge Objectives Production Sustainable development |
title | UN Women’s feminist engagement with governance by indicators in the Millennium and Sustainable Development Goals |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A32%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=UN%20Women%E2%80%99s%20feminist%20engagement%20with%20governance%20by%20indicators%20in%20the%20Millennium%20and%20Sustainable%20Development%20Goals&rft.jtitle=Global%20social%20policy&rft.au=Rose%20Taylor,%20Sara&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=352&rft.epage=366&rft.pages=352-366&rft.issn=1468-0181&rft.eissn=1741-2803&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1468018120931696&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2470865374%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2470865374&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1468018120931696&rfr_iscdi=true |