Response to Welborne et al.’s Review of Muslims in a Post-9/11 America: A Survey of Attitudes and Beliefs and their Implications for U.S. National Security Policy

Per the authors’ preference for more specified measures that identify the source of discrimination, in my chapter focusing on Muslim Americans’ relationship with law enforcement, I use a measure specifically designed to capture respondents’ expectations for whether law enforcement will treat a crimi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Perspectives on politics 2020-12, Vol.18 (4), p.1172-1173
1. Verfasser: Gillum, Rachel M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1173
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1172
container_title Perspectives on politics
container_volume 18
creator Gillum, Rachel M.
description Per the authors’ preference for more specified measures that identify the source of discrimination, in my chapter focusing on Muslim Americans’ relationship with law enforcement, I use a measure specifically designed to capture respondents’ expectations for whether law enforcement will treat a criminal suspect fairly, mirroring the work of Tom Tyler on procedural justice. [...]the authors note that my findings as they relate to Black Muslims deserve further investigation, especially in light of the Black Lives Matter movement. Consistent with my survey findings, mainstream Black interviewees felt their “know-how” and history of political activism could be helpful to immigrant Muslims under federal scrutiny, whereas immigrants, especially noncitizens, were more fearful of engaging with law enforcement due in part to their more vulnerable status in the country.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1537592720003631
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2470583586</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1537592720003631</cupid><sourcerecordid>2470583586</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-82f3da5c6157b4a8214023e06fd98e0a1d755b9ca7aeff176bc1c682788b3453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UctO4zAUjRAj8Rg-gN2VWKf4EccOu4J4ScCMWhDLyEmuwSipi-0UdTe_Mfv5Mr6ElFZigWZ1j-49jyudJDmkZEQJlcdTKrgUBZOMEMJzTreSXSoympJC5dsrzGW6uu8keyG8EMIYJ2o3-TfBMHezgBAdPGJbOT9DwAi6Hb3_-RtggguLb-AM3PahtV0AOwMNv12IaXFMKYw79LbWJzCGae8XuFxxxzHa2DcYQM8aOMXWolnj-IzWw3U3bwdRtEM0GOfhYTQdwd3nQrcwxbr3Ni6HmIG2_Jn8MLoNeLCZ-8n9xfn92VV68-vy-mx8k9YsL2KqmOGNFnVOhawyrRjNCONIctMUCommjRSiKmotNRpDZV7VtM4Vk0pVPBN8Pzla2869e-0xxPLF9X74J5Qsk0QoLlQ-sOiaVXsXgkdTzr3ttF-WlJSrLspvXQwavtHorvK2ecIv6_-rPgDZ_IvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2470583586</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response to Welborne et al.’s Review of Muslims in a Post-9/11 America: A Survey of Attitudes and Beliefs and their Implications for U.S. National Security Policy</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Gillum, Rachel M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gillum, Rachel M.</creatorcontrib><description>Per the authors’ preference for more specified measures that identify the source of discrimination, in my chapter focusing on Muslim Americans’ relationship with law enforcement, I use a measure specifically designed to capture respondents’ expectations for whether law enforcement will treat a criminal suspect fairly, mirroring the work of Tom Tyler on procedural justice. [...]the authors note that my findings as they relate to Black Muslims deserve further investigation, especially in light of the Black Lives Matter movement. Consistent with my survey findings, mainstream Black interviewees felt their “know-how” and history of political activism could be helpful to immigrant Muslims under federal scrutiny, whereas immigrants, especially noncitizens, were more fearful of engaging with law enforcement due in part to their more vulnerable status in the country.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1537-5927</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1537592720003631</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Activism ; Black Lives Matter movement ; Black Muslims ; Criminal justice ; Critical Dialogue ; Discrimination ; Immigrants ; Law enforcement ; Mirroring ; Muslim Americans ; Muslims ; National security ; Noncitizens ; Official misconduct ; Political participation ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Procedural justice ; Respondents ; Scrutiny ; September 11 terrorist attacks-2001 ; Society ; Terrorism</subject><ispartof>Perspectives on politics, 2020-12, Vol.18 (4), p.1172-1173</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1537592720003631/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,12825,27903,27904,55606</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gillum, Rachel M.</creatorcontrib><title>Response to Welborne et al.’s Review of Muslims in a Post-9/11 America: A Survey of Attitudes and Beliefs and their Implications for U.S. National Security Policy</title><title>Perspectives on politics</title><addtitle>Perspect. polit</addtitle><description>Per the authors’ preference for more specified measures that identify the source of discrimination, in my chapter focusing on Muslim Americans’ relationship with law enforcement, I use a measure specifically designed to capture respondents’ expectations for whether law enforcement will treat a criminal suspect fairly, mirroring the work of Tom Tyler on procedural justice. [...]the authors note that my findings as they relate to Black Muslims deserve further investigation, especially in light of the Black Lives Matter movement. Consistent with my survey findings, mainstream Black interviewees felt their “know-how” and history of political activism could be helpful to immigrant Muslims under federal scrutiny, whereas immigrants, especially noncitizens, were more fearful of engaging with law enforcement due in part to their more vulnerable status in the country.</description><subject>Activism</subject><subject>Black Lives Matter movement</subject><subject>Black Muslims</subject><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Critical Dialogue</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Immigrants</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Mirroring</subject><subject>Muslim Americans</subject><subject>Muslims</subject><subject>National security</subject><subject>Noncitizens</subject><subject>Official misconduct</subject><subject>Political participation</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Procedural justice</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Scrutiny</subject><subject>September 11 terrorist attacks-2001</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><issn>1537-5927</issn><issn>1541-0986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UctO4zAUjRAj8Rg-gN2VWKf4EccOu4J4ScCMWhDLyEmuwSipi-0UdTe_Mfv5Mr6ElFZigWZ1j-49jyudJDmkZEQJlcdTKrgUBZOMEMJzTreSXSoympJC5dsrzGW6uu8keyG8EMIYJ2o3-TfBMHezgBAdPGJbOT9DwAi6Hb3_-RtggguLb-AM3PahtV0AOwMNv12IaXFMKYw79LbWJzCGae8XuFxxxzHa2DcYQM8aOMXWolnj-IzWw3U3bwdRtEM0GOfhYTQdwd3nQrcwxbr3Ni6HmIG2_Jn8MLoNeLCZ-8n9xfn92VV68-vy-mx8k9YsL2KqmOGNFnVOhawyrRjNCONIctMUCommjRSiKmotNRpDZV7VtM4Vk0pVPBN8Pzla2869e-0xxPLF9X74J5Qsk0QoLlQ-sOiaVXsXgkdTzr3ttF-WlJSrLspvXQwavtHorvK2ecIv6_-rPgDZ_IvQ</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Gillum, Rachel M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Response to Welborne et al.’s Review of Muslims in a Post-9/11 America: A Survey of Attitudes and Beliefs and their Implications for U.S. National Security Policy</title><author>Gillum, Rachel M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-82f3da5c6157b4a8214023e06fd98e0a1d755b9ca7aeff176bc1c682788b3453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Activism</topic><topic>Black Lives Matter movement</topic><topic>Black Muslims</topic><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Critical Dialogue</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Immigrants</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Mirroring</topic><topic>Muslim Americans</topic><topic>Muslims</topic><topic>National security</topic><topic>Noncitizens</topic><topic>Official misconduct</topic><topic>Political participation</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Procedural justice</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Scrutiny</topic><topic>September 11 terrorist attacks-2001</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gillum, Rachel M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Perspectives on politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gillum, Rachel M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response to Welborne et al.’s Review of Muslims in a Post-9/11 America: A Survey of Attitudes and Beliefs and their Implications for U.S. National Security Policy</atitle><jtitle>Perspectives on politics</jtitle><addtitle>Perspect. polit</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1172</spage><epage>1173</epage><pages>1172-1173</pages><issn>1537-5927</issn><eissn>1541-0986</eissn><abstract>Per the authors’ preference for more specified measures that identify the source of discrimination, in my chapter focusing on Muslim Americans’ relationship with law enforcement, I use a measure specifically designed to capture respondents’ expectations for whether law enforcement will treat a criminal suspect fairly, mirroring the work of Tom Tyler on procedural justice. [...]the authors note that my findings as they relate to Black Muslims deserve further investigation, especially in light of the Black Lives Matter movement. Consistent with my survey findings, mainstream Black interviewees felt their “know-how” and history of political activism could be helpful to immigrant Muslims under federal scrutiny, whereas immigrants, especially noncitizens, were more fearful of engaging with law enforcement due in part to their more vulnerable status in the country.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1537592720003631</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1537-5927
ispartof Perspectives on politics, 2020-12, Vol.18 (4), p.1172-1173
issn 1537-5927
1541-0986
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2470583586
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Activism
Black Lives Matter movement
Black Muslims
Criminal justice
Critical Dialogue
Discrimination
Immigrants
Law enforcement
Mirroring
Muslim Americans
Muslims
National security
Noncitizens
Official misconduct
Political participation
Polls & surveys
Procedural justice
Respondents
Scrutiny
September 11 terrorist attacks-2001
Society
Terrorism
title Response to Welborne et al.’s Review of Muslims in a Post-9/11 America: A Survey of Attitudes and Beliefs and their Implications for U.S. National Security Policy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T22%3A59%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20to%20Welborne%20et%20al.%E2%80%99s%20Review%20of%20Muslims%20in%20a%20Post-9/11%20America:%20A%20Survey%20of%20Attitudes%20and%20Beliefs%20and%20their%20Implications%20for%20U.S.%20National%20Security%20Policy&rft.jtitle=Perspectives%20on%20politics&rft.au=Gillum,%20Rachel%20M.&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1172&rft.epage=1173&rft.pages=1172-1173&rft.issn=1537-5927&rft.eissn=1541-0986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1537592720003631&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2470583586%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2470583586&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1537592720003631&rfr_iscdi=true