Response to Welborne et al.’s Review of Muslims in a Post-9/11 America: A Survey of Attitudes and Beliefs and their Implications for U.S. National Security Policy
Per the authors’ preference for more specified measures that identify the source of discrimination, in my chapter focusing on Muslim Americans’ relationship with law enforcement, I use a measure specifically designed to capture respondents’ expectations for whether law enforcement will treat a crimi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Perspectives on politics 2020-12, Vol.18 (4), p.1172-1173 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1173 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1172 |
container_title | Perspectives on politics |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Gillum, Rachel M. |
description | Per the authors’ preference for more specified measures that identify the source of discrimination, in my chapter focusing on Muslim Americans’ relationship with law enforcement, I use a measure specifically designed to capture respondents’ expectations for whether law enforcement will treat a criminal suspect fairly, mirroring the work of Tom Tyler on procedural justice. [...]the authors note that my findings as they relate to Black Muslims deserve further investigation, especially in light of the Black Lives Matter movement. Consistent with my survey findings, mainstream Black interviewees felt their “know-how” and history of political activism could be helpful to immigrant Muslims under federal scrutiny, whereas immigrants, especially noncitizens, were more fearful of engaging with law enforcement due in part to their more vulnerable status in the country. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1537592720003631 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2470583586</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1537592720003631</cupid><sourcerecordid>2470583586</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-82f3da5c6157b4a8214023e06fd98e0a1d755b9ca7aeff176bc1c682788b3453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UctO4zAUjRAj8Rg-gN2VWKf4EccOu4J4ScCMWhDLyEmuwSipi-0UdTe_Mfv5Mr6ElFZigWZ1j-49jyudJDmkZEQJlcdTKrgUBZOMEMJzTreSXSoympJC5dsrzGW6uu8keyG8EMIYJ2o3-TfBMHezgBAdPGJbOT9DwAi6Hb3_-RtggguLb-AM3PahtV0AOwMNv12IaXFMKYw79LbWJzCGae8XuFxxxzHa2DcYQM8aOMXWolnj-IzWw3U3bwdRtEM0GOfhYTQdwd3nQrcwxbr3Ni6HmIG2_Jn8MLoNeLCZ-8n9xfn92VV68-vy-mx8k9YsL2KqmOGNFnVOhawyrRjNCONIctMUCommjRSiKmotNRpDZV7VtM4Vk0pVPBN8Pzla2869e-0xxPLF9X74J5Qsk0QoLlQ-sOiaVXsXgkdTzr3ttF-WlJSrLspvXQwavtHorvK2ecIv6_-rPgDZ_IvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2470583586</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response to Welborne et al.’s Review of Muslims in a Post-9/11 America: A Survey of Attitudes and Beliefs and their Implications for U.S. National Security Policy</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Gillum, Rachel M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gillum, Rachel M.</creatorcontrib><description>Per the authors’ preference for more specified measures that identify the source of discrimination, in my chapter focusing on Muslim Americans’ relationship with law enforcement, I use a measure specifically designed to capture respondents’ expectations for whether law enforcement will treat a criminal suspect fairly, mirroring the work of Tom Tyler on procedural justice. [...]the authors note that my findings as they relate to Black Muslims deserve further investigation, especially in light of the Black Lives Matter movement. Consistent with my survey findings, mainstream Black interviewees felt their “know-how” and history of political activism could be helpful to immigrant Muslims under federal scrutiny, whereas immigrants, especially noncitizens, were more fearful of engaging with law enforcement due in part to their more vulnerable status in the country.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1537-5927</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1537592720003631</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Activism ; Black Lives Matter movement ; Black Muslims ; Criminal justice ; Critical Dialogue ; Discrimination ; Immigrants ; Law enforcement ; Mirroring ; Muslim Americans ; Muslims ; National security ; Noncitizens ; Official misconduct ; Political participation ; Polls & surveys ; Procedural justice ; Respondents ; Scrutiny ; September 11 terrorist attacks-2001 ; Society ; Terrorism</subject><ispartof>Perspectives on politics, 2020-12, Vol.18 (4), p.1172-1173</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1537592720003631/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,12825,27903,27904,55606</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gillum, Rachel M.</creatorcontrib><title>Response to Welborne et al.’s Review of Muslims in a Post-9/11 America: A Survey of Attitudes and Beliefs and their Implications for U.S. National Security Policy</title><title>Perspectives on politics</title><addtitle>Perspect. polit</addtitle><description>Per the authors’ preference for more specified measures that identify the source of discrimination, in my chapter focusing on Muslim Americans’ relationship with law enforcement, I use a measure specifically designed to capture respondents’ expectations for whether law enforcement will treat a criminal suspect fairly, mirroring the work of Tom Tyler on procedural justice. [...]the authors note that my findings as they relate to Black Muslims deserve further investigation, especially in light of the Black Lives Matter movement. Consistent with my survey findings, mainstream Black interviewees felt their “know-how” and history of political activism could be helpful to immigrant Muslims under federal scrutiny, whereas immigrants, especially noncitizens, were more fearful of engaging with law enforcement due in part to their more vulnerable status in the country.</description><subject>Activism</subject><subject>Black Lives Matter movement</subject><subject>Black Muslims</subject><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Critical Dialogue</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Immigrants</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Mirroring</subject><subject>Muslim Americans</subject><subject>Muslims</subject><subject>National security</subject><subject>Noncitizens</subject><subject>Official misconduct</subject><subject>Political participation</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Procedural justice</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Scrutiny</subject><subject>September 11 terrorist attacks-2001</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><issn>1537-5927</issn><issn>1541-0986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UctO4zAUjRAj8Rg-gN2VWKf4EccOu4J4ScCMWhDLyEmuwSipi-0UdTe_Mfv5Mr6ElFZigWZ1j-49jyudJDmkZEQJlcdTKrgUBZOMEMJzTreSXSoympJC5dsrzGW6uu8keyG8EMIYJ2o3-TfBMHezgBAdPGJbOT9DwAi6Hb3_-RtggguLb-AM3PahtV0AOwMNv12IaXFMKYw79LbWJzCGae8XuFxxxzHa2DcYQM8aOMXWolnj-IzWw3U3bwdRtEM0GOfhYTQdwd3nQrcwxbr3Ni6HmIG2_Jn8MLoNeLCZ-8n9xfn92VV68-vy-mx8k9YsL2KqmOGNFnVOhawyrRjNCONIctMUCommjRSiKmotNRpDZV7VtM4Vk0pVPBN8Pzla2869e-0xxPLF9X74J5Qsk0QoLlQ-sOiaVXsXgkdTzr3ttF-WlJSrLspvXQwavtHorvK2ecIv6_-rPgDZ_IvQ</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Gillum, Rachel M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Response to Welborne et al.’s Review of Muslims in a Post-9/11 America: A Survey of Attitudes and Beliefs and their Implications for U.S. National Security Policy</title><author>Gillum, Rachel M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-82f3da5c6157b4a8214023e06fd98e0a1d755b9ca7aeff176bc1c682788b3453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Activism</topic><topic>Black Lives Matter movement</topic><topic>Black Muslims</topic><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Critical Dialogue</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Immigrants</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Mirroring</topic><topic>Muslim Americans</topic><topic>Muslims</topic><topic>National security</topic><topic>Noncitizens</topic><topic>Official misconduct</topic><topic>Political participation</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Procedural justice</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Scrutiny</topic><topic>September 11 terrorist attacks-2001</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gillum, Rachel M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Perspectives on politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gillum, Rachel M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response to Welborne et al.’s Review of Muslims in a Post-9/11 America: A Survey of Attitudes and Beliefs and their Implications for U.S. National Security Policy</atitle><jtitle>Perspectives on politics</jtitle><addtitle>Perspect. polit</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1172</spage><epage>1173</epage><pages>1172-1173</pages><issn>1537-5927</issn><eissn>1541-0986</eissn><abstract>Per the authors’ preference for more specified measures that identify the source of discrimination, in my chapter focusing on Muslim Americans’ relationship with law enforcement, I use a measure specifically designed to capture respondents’ expectations for whether law enforcement will treat a criminal suspect fairly, mirroring the work of Tom Tyler on procedural justice. [...]the authors note that my findings as they relate to Black Muslims deserve further investigation, especially in light of the Black Lives Matter movement. Consistent with my survey findings, mainstream Black interviewees felt their “know-how” and history of political activism could be helpful to immigrant Muslims under federal scrutiny, whereas immigrants, especially noncitizens, were more fearful of engaging with law enforcement due in part to their more vulnerable status in the country.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1537592720003631</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1537-5927 |
ispartof | Perspectives on politics, 2020-12, Vol.18 (4), p.1172-1173 |
issn | 1537-5927 1541-0986 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2470583586 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Activism Black Lives Matter movement Black Muslims Criminal justice Critical Dialogue Discrimination Immigrants Law enforcement Mirroring Muslim Americans Muslims National security Noncitizens Official misconduct Political participation Polls & surveys Procedural justice Respondents Scrutiny September 11 terrorist attacks-2001 Society Terrorism |
title | Response to Welborne et al.’s Review of Muslims in a Post-9/11 America: A Survey of Attitudes and Beliefs and their Implications for U.S. National Security Policy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T22%3A59%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20to%20Welborne%20et%20al.%E2%80%99s%20Review%20of%20Muslims%20in%20a%20Post-9/11%20America:%20A%20Survey%20of%20Attitudes%20and%20Beliefs%20and%20their%20Implications%20for%20U.S.%20National%20Security%20Policy&rft.jtitle=Perspectives%20on%20politics&rft.au=Gillum,%20Rachel%20M.&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1172&rft.epage=1173&rft.pages=1172-1173&rft.issn=1537-5927&rft.eissn=1541-0986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1537592720003631&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2470583586%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2470583586&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1537592720003631&rfr_iscdi=true |