Positional Information and the Measurement of Specificity
Philosophical discussions of information and specificity in biology are now commonplace, but no consensus exists about whether the privileging of genetic causation in investigation and explanation is justified. However, little effort has been expended on understanding practices when scientists exper...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Philosophy of science 2020-12, Vol.87 (5), p.1061-1072 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1072 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1061 |
container_title | Philosophy of science |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | Love, Alan C. |
description | Philosophical discussions of information and specificity in biology are now commonplace, but no consensus exists about whether the privileging of genetic causation in investigation and explanation is justified. However, little effort has been expended on understanding practices when scientists experimentally measure information or causal specificity. An example of this type of practice—measuring positional information in gene expression during pattern formation in embryogenesis—shows that biologists are unconcerned with comparing the amount of information in genes with that of other factors. Instead, they focus on whether the measured causal specificity explains the phenomenon under scrutiny. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/710617 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2470546184</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2470546184</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-9c7933ffb6f1ead384cd86a11e3b5a3153786e2a3ec47d7af02e3630781aad9e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0F9LwzAUBfAgCs6pn6Gg-FbNbbIkfZThP5goqOBbuUtvXMbW1KR92Le3owOfLhd-HA6HsUvgt8CNutPAFegjNoGZKHOt9Pcxm3AuIDeFNKfsLKU15wCGmwkr30PynQ8NbrKXxoW4xf2XYVNn3YqyV8LUR9pS02XBZR8tWe-89d3unJ043CS6ONwp-3p8-Jw_54u3p5f5_SK3hRRdXlpdCuHcUjkgrIWRtjYKAUgsZyiGjtooKlCQlbrW6HhBQgmuDSDWJYkpuxpz2xh-e0pdtQ59HPqmqpCaz6QCIwd1MyobQ0qRXNVGv8W4q4BX-1mqcZYBXo-wtytv8Se0kVL6zzywP-MbYDY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2470546184</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Positional Information and the Measurement of Specificity</title><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Love, Alan C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Love, Alan C.</creatorcontrib><description>Philosophical discussions of information and specificity in biology are now commonplace, but no consensus exists about whether the privileging of genetic causation in investigation and explanation is justified. However, little effort has been expended on understanding practices when scientists experimentally measure information or causal specificity. An example of this type of practice—measuring positional information in gene expression during pattern formation in embryogenesis—shows that biologists are unconcerned with comparing the amount of information in genes with that of other factors. Instead, they focus on whether the measured causal specificity explains the phenomenon under scrutiny.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-8248</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-767X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/710617</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Biologists ; Biology ; Causality ; Causation ; Embryogenesis ; Embryonic growth stage ; Gene expression ; Genes ; Measurement ; Pattern formation ; Scrutiny</subject><ispartof>Philosophy of science, 2020-12, Vol.87 (5), p.1061-1072</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2020 by the Philosophy of Science Association. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Dec 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-9c7933ffb6f1ead384cd86a11e3b5a3153786e2a3ec47d7af02e3630781aad9e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Love, Alan C.</creatorcontrib><title>Positional Information and the Measurement of Specificity</title><title>Philosophy of science</title><description>Philosophical discussions of information and specificity in biology are now commonplace, but no consensus exists about whether the privileging of genetic causation in investigation and explanation is justified. However, little effort has been expended on understanding practices when scientists experimentally measure information or causal specificity. An example of this type of practice—measuring positional information in gene expression during pattern formation in embryogenesis—shows that biologists are unconcerned with comparing the amount of information in genes with that of other factors. Instead, they focus on whether the measured causal specificity explains the phenomenon under scrutiny.</description><subject>Biologists</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Causation</subject><subject>Embryogenesis</subject><subject>Embryonic growth stage</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Pattern formation</subject><subject>Scrutiny</subject><issn>0031-8248</issn><issn>1539-767X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpF0F9LwzAUBfAgCs6pn6Gg-FbNbbIkfZThP5goqOBbuUtvXMbW1KR92Le3owOfLhd-HA6HsUvgt8CNutPAFegjNoGZKHOt9Pcxm3AuIDeFNKfsLKU15wCGmwkr30PynQ8NbrKXxoW4xf2XYVNn3YqyV8LUR9pS02XBZR8tWe-89d3unJ043CS6ONwp-3p8-Jw_54u3p5f5_SK3hRRdXlpdCuHcUjkgrIWRtjYKAUgsZyiGjtooKlCQlbrW6HhBQgmuDSDWJYkpuxpz2xh-e0pdtQ59HPqmqpCaz6QCIwd1MyobQ0qRXNVGv8W4q4BX-1mqcZYBXo-wtytv8Se0kVL6zzywP-MbYDY</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Love, Alan C.</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Positional Information and the Measurement of Specificity</title><author>Love, Alan C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-9c7933ffb6f1ead384cd86a11e3b5a3153786e2a3ec47d7af02e3630781aad9e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Biologists</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Causation</topic><topic>Embryogenesis</topic><topic>Embryonic growth stage</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Pattern formation</topic><topic>Scrutiny</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Love, Alan C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Philosophy of science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Love, Alan C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Positional Information and the Measurement of Specificity</atitle><jtitle>Philosophy of science</jtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1061</spage><epage>1072</epage><pages>1061-1072</pages><issn>0031-8248</issn><eissn>1539-767X</eissn><abstract>Philosophical discussions of information and specificity in biology are now commonplace, but no consensus exists about whether the privileging of genetic causation in investigation and explanation is justified. However, little effort has been expended on understanding practices when scientists experimentally measure information or causal specificity. An example of this type of practice—measuring positional information in gene expression during pattern formation in embryogenesis—shows that biologists are unconcerned with comparing the amount of information in genes with that of other factors. Instead, they focus on whether the measured causal specificity explains the phenomenon under scrutiny.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/710617</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-8248 |
ispartof | Philosophy of science, 2020-12, Vol.87 (5), p.1061-1072 |
issn | 0031-8248 1539-767X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2470546184 |
source | Cambridge Journals |
subjects | Biologists Biology Causality Causation Embryogenesis Embryonic growth stage Gene expression Genes Measurement Pattern formation Scrutiny |
title | Positional Information and the Measurement of Specificity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T08%3A34%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Positional%20Information%20and%20the%20Measurement%20of%20Specificity&rft.jtitle=Philosophy%20of%20science&rft.au=Love,%20Alan%20C.&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1061&rft.epage=1072&rft.pages=1061-1072&rft.issn=0031-8248&rft.eissn=1539-767X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/710617&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2470546184%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2470546184&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |