Detection of clostebol in sports: Accidental doping?

The detection of clostebol misuse in sports has been growing recently, especially in Italy, due to the ample availability of pharmaceutical formulations containing clostebol acetate (Trofodermin®) and the use of more sensitive instrumentation by the antidoping laboratories. Most of these cases have...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Drug testing and analysis 2020-11, Vol.12 (11-12), p.1561-1569
Hauptverfasser: Torre, Xavier, Colamonici, Cristiana, Iannone, Michele, Jardines, Daniel, Molaioni, Francesco, Botrè, Francesco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1569
container_issue 11-12
container_start_page 1561
container_title Drug testing and analysis
container_volume 12
creator Torre, Xavier
Colamonici, Cristiana
Iannone, Michele
Jardines, Daniel
Molaioni, Francesco
Botrè, Francesco
description The detection of clostebol misuse in sports has been growing recently, especially in Italy, due to the ample availability of pharmaceutical formulations containing clostebol acetate (Trofodermin®) and the use of more sensitive instrumentation by the antidoping laboratories. Most of these cases have been claimed to be related to a nonconscious use of the drug or through contact with relatives or teammates using it. We have investigated, through the application of the well‐known and currently used gas chromatographic mass spectrometric procedures, the likelihood of these allegations and have demonstrated that after a single transdermal administration of 5 mg of clostebol acetate and a transient contact with the application area, it is possible to generate adverse analytical findings in antidoping controls. We have reviewed the Phase I and Phase II clostebol metabolism in order to generate evidences that may help the sport authorities reviewing these cases. The main clostebol metabolite (4‐chloro‐androst‐4‐en‐3α‐ol‐17‐one, M1) generally used at the screening level as well as other three metabolites (M2–M4) are mainly excreted as glucuronides, whereas M5 (4ζ‐chloro‐5ζ‐androstan‐3β‐ol‐17‐one) is predominantly excreted as sulfate. Neither the 5α‐reductases activity (impaired by the presence of the chlorine in C4) nor specific sulfotransferases present in the skin allowed a clear distinction of the administration route. Studies with a larger number of volunteers and probably investigating another physiological fluid allowed in antidoping such as blood are needed for a deeper investigation. It is not unreasonable to establish a reporting level for M1, maybe creating some false negatives but excluding nonintentional doping scenarios. Clostebol cases increased in the last years in specific countries because of a widespread use of Trofodermin®, a cream containing clostebol acetate. Incidental contact with the skin where the cream is applied may produce adverse analytical findings in doping analyses. Investigations aiming to produce evidences to help the results management of these cases are necessary. We report some metabolic approaches based on urine analyses, but most probably the use of other matrices as blood are needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/dta.2951
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2470030804</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2456419587</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3491-2d17e95434862cf10f06e1cc325c619ee64c2aa86c7937916028bb696e833b903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1L3EAUhgdpUauCv0ACvRFK7DnzlZneyLL2CwRv9DokkxMZyWbWzATx3ztb1y0IhV6dc_G8Ly8PY6cIFwjAv3apueBW4R47RCt5WWnED7sfxAH7FOMDgJZcqH12IASitVodMnlFiVzyYSxCX7ghxERtGAo_FnEdphS_FQvnfEdjaoaiC2s_3l8es499M0Q62d4jdvfj--3yV3l98_P3cnFdOiEtlrzDiqySQhrNXY_QgyZ0TnDlNFoiLR1vGqNdZUVlUQM3bautJiNEa0EcsfPX3vUUHmeKqV756GgYmpHCHGsulZZolaky-vkd-hDmaczrMlUBCDAg_xa6KcQ4UV-vJ79qpucaod6YrLPJemMyo2fbwrldUbcD39RlwLwCT1lYH52n0dEOAwBlhDJa5Q9w6VOzkbwM85hy9Mv_RzNdbmk_0PM_F9dXt4s_y18AinmZsg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2470030804</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection of clostebol in sports: Accidental doping?</title><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Torre, Xavier ; Colamonici, Cristiana ; Iannone, Michele ; Jardines, Daniel ; Molaioni, Francesco ; Botrè, Francesco</creator><creatorcontrib>Torre, Xavier ; Colamonici, Cristiana ; Iannone, Michele ; Jardines, Daniel ; Molaioni, Francesco ; Botrè, Francesco</creatorcontrib><description>The detection of clostebol misuse in sports has been growing recently, especially in Italy, due to the ample availability of pharmaceutical formulations containing clostebol acetate (Trofodermin®) and the use of more sensitive instrumentation by the antidoping laboratories. Most of these cases have been claimed to be related to a nonconscious use of the drug or through contact with relatives or teammates using it. We have investigated, through the application of the well‐known and currently used gas chromatographic mass spectrometric procedures, the likelihood of these allegations and have demonstrated that after a single transdermal administration of 5 mg of clostebol acetate and a transient contact with the application area, it is possible to generate adverse analytical findings in antidoping controls. We have reviewed the Phase I and Phase II clostebol metabolism in order to generate evidences that may help the sport authorities reviewing these cases. The main clostebol metabolite (4‐chloro‐androst‐4‐en‐3α‐ol‐17‐one, M1) generally used at the screening level as well as other three metabolites (M2–M4) are mainly excreted as glucuronides, whereas M5 (4ζ‐chloro‐5ζ‐androstan‐3β‐ol‐17‐one) is predominantly excreted as sulfate. Neither the 5α‐reductases activity (impaired by the presence of the chlorine in C4) nor specific sulfotransferases present in the skin allowed a clear distinction of the administration route. Studies with a larger number of volunteers and probably investigating another physiological fluid allowed in antidoping such as blood are needed for a deeper investigation. It is not unreasonable to establish a reporting level for M1, maybe creating some false negatives but excluding nonintentional doping scenarios. Clostebol cases increased in the last years in specific countries because of a widespread use of Trofodermin®, a cream containing clostebol acetate. Incidental contact with the skin where the cream is applied may produce adverse analytical findings in doping analyses. Investigations aiming to produce evidences to help the results management of these cases are necessary. We report some metabolic approaches based on urine analyses, but most probably the use of other matrices as blood are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1942-7603</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-7611</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/dta.2951</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33119965</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>HOBOKEN: Wiley</publisher><subject>Biochemical Research Methods ; Biochemistry &amp; Molecular Biology ; Chemistry ; Chemistry, Analytical ; clostebol ; doping ; Drugs &amp; sports ; incidental contact ; Investigations ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; metabolism ; Pharmacology &amp; Pharmacy ; Physical Sciences ; Science &amp; Technology ; Trofodermin</subject><ispartof>Drug testing and analysis, 2020-11, Vol.12 (11-12), p.1561-1569</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>11</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000583586500001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3491-2d17e95434862cf10f06e1cc325c619ee64c2aa86c7937916028bb696e833b903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3491-2d17e95434862cf10f06e1cc325c619ee64c2aa86c7937916028bb696e833b903</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5296-8126 ; 0000-0001-8037-6750 ; 0000-0003-0845-1597</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fdta.2951$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fdta.2951$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,28255,45581,45582</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33119965$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Torre, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colamonici, Cristiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iannone, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardines, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molaioni, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botrè, Francesco</creatorcontrib><title>Detection of clostebol in sports: Accidental doping?</title><title>Drug testing and analysis</title><addtitle>DRUG TEST ANAL</addtitle><addtitle>Drug Test Anal</addtitle><description>The detection of clostebol misuse in sports has been growing recently, especially in Italy, due to the ample availability of pharmaceutical formulations containing clostebol acetate (Trofodermin®) and the use of more sensitive instrumentation by the antidoping laboratories. Most of these cases have been claimed to be related to a nonconscious use of the drug or through contact with relatives or teammates using it. We have investigated, through the application of the well‐known and currently used gas chromatographic mass spectrometric procedures, the likelihood of these allegations and have demonstrated that after a single transdermal administration of 5 mg of clostebol acetate and a transient contact with the application area, it is possible to generate adverse analytical findings in antidoping controls. We have reviewed the Phase I and Phase II clostebol metabolism in order to generate evidences that may help the sport authorities reviewing these cases. The main clostebol metabolite (4‐chloro‐androst‐4‐en‐3α‐ol‐17‐one, M1) generally used at the screening level as well as other three metabolites (M2–M4) are mainly excreted as glucuronides, whereas M5 (4ζ‐chloro‐5ζ‐androstan‐3β‐ol‐17‐one) is predominantly excreted as sulfate. Neither the 5α‐reductases activity (impaired by the presence of the chlorine in C4) nor specific sulfotransferases present in the skin allowed a clear distinction of the administration route. Studies with a larger number of volunteers and probably investigating another physiological fluid allowed in antidoping such as blood are needed for a deeper investigation. It is not unreasonable to establish a reporting level for M1, maybe creating some false negatives but excluding nonintentional doping scenarios. Clostebol cases increased in the last years in specific countries because of a widespread use of Trofodermin®, a cream containing clostebol acetate. Incidental contact with the skin where the cream is applied may produce adverse analytical findings in doping analyses. Investigations aiming to produce evidences to help the results management of these cases are necessary. We report some metabolic approaches based on urine analyses, but most probably the use of other matrices as blood are needed.</description><subject>Biochemical Research Methods</subject><subject>Biochemistry &amp; Molecular Biology</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry, Analytical</subject><subject>clostebol</subject><subject>doping</subject><subject>Drugs &amp; sports</subject><subject>incidental contact</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>metabolism</subject><subject>Pharmacology &amp; Pharmacy</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Trofodermin</subject><issn>1942-7603</issn><issn>1942-7611</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkF1L3EAUhgdpUauCv0ACvRFK7DnzlZneyLL2CwRv9DokkxMZyWbWzATx3ztb1y0IhV6dc_G8Ly8PY6cIFwjAv3apueBW4R47RCt5WWnED7sfxAH7FOMDgJZcqH12IASitVodMnlFiVzyYSxCX7ghxERtGAo_FnEdphS_FQvnfEdjaoaiC2s_3l8es499M0Q62d4jdvfj--3yV3l98_P3cnFdOiEtlrzDiqySQhrNXY_QgyZ0TnDlNFoiLR1vGqNdZUVlUQM3bautJiNEa0EcsfPX3vUUHmeKqV756GgYmpHCHGsulZZolaky-vkd-hDmaczrMlUBCDAg_xa6KcQ4UV-vJ79qpucaod6YrLPJemMyo2fbwrldUbcD39RlwLwCT1lYH52n0dEOAwBlhDJa5Q9w6VOzkbwM85hy9Mv_RzNdbmk_0PM_F9dXt4s_y18AinmZsg</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Torre, Xavier</creator><creator>Colamonici, Cristiana</creator><creator>Iannone, Michele</creator><creator>Jardines, Daniel</creator><creator>Molaioni, Francesco</creator><creator>Botrè, Francesco</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5296-8126</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8037-6750</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0845-1597</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>Detection of clostebol in sports: Accidental doping?</title><author>Torre, Xavier ; Colamonici, Cristiana ; Iannone, Michele ; Jardines, Daniel ; Molaioni, Francesco ; Botrè, Francesco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3491-2d17e95434862cf10f06e1cc325c619ee64c2aa86c7937916028bb696e833b903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Biochemical Research Methods</topic><topic>Biochemistry &amp; Molecular Biology</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry, Analytical</topic><topic>clostebol</topic><topic>doping</topic><topic>Drugs &amp; sports</topic><topic>incidental contact</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>metabolism</topic><topic>Pharmacology &amp; Pharmacy</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Trofodermin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Torre, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colamonici, Cristiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iannone, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardines, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molaioni, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botrè, Francesco</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Drug testing and analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Torre, Xavier</au><au>Colamonici, Cristiana</au><au>Iannone, Michele</au><au>Jardines, Daniel</au><au>Molaioni, Francesco</au><au>Botrè, Francesco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detection of clostebol in sports: Accidental doping?</atitle><jtitle>Drug testing and analysis</jtitle><stitle>DRUG TEST ANAL</stitle><addtitle>Drug Test Anal</addtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>11-12</issue><spage>1561</spage><epage>1569</epage><pages>1561-1569</pages><issn>1942-7603</issn><eissn>1942-7611</eissn><abstract>The detection of clostebol misuse in sports has been growing recently, especially in Italy, due to the ample availability of pharmaceutical formulations containing clostebol acetate (Trofodermin®) and the use of more sensitive instrumentation by the antidoping laboratories. Most of these cases have been claimed to be related to a nonconscious use of the drug or through contact with relatives or teammates using it. We have investigated, through the application of the well‐known and currently used gas chromatographic mass spectrometric procedures, the likelihood of these allegations and have demonstrated that after a single transdermal administration of 5 mg of clostebol acetate and a transient contact with the application area, it is possible to generate adverse analytical findings in antidoping controls. We have reviewed the Phase I and Phase II clostebol metabolism in order to generate evidences that may help the sport authorities reviewing these cases. The main clostebol metabolite (4‐chloro‐androst‐4‐en‐3α‐ol‐17‐one, M1) generally used at the screening level as well as other three metabolites (M2–M4) are mainly excreted as glucuronides, whereas M5 (4ζ‐chloro‐5ζ‐androstan‐3β‐ol‐17‐one) is predominantly excreted as sulfate. Neither the 5α‐reductases activity (impaired by the presence of the chlorine in C4) nor specific sulfotransferases present in the skin allowed a clear distinction of the administration route. Studies with a larger number of volunteers and probably investigating another physiological fluid allowed in antidoping such as blood are needed for a deeper investigation. It is not unreasonable to establish a reporting level for M1, maybe creating some false negatives but excluding nonintentional doping scenarios. Clostebol cases increased in the last years in specific countries because of a widespread use of Trofodermin®, a cream containing clostebol acetate. Incidental contact with the skin where the cream is applied may produce adverse analytical findings in doping analyses. Investigations aiming to produce evidences to help the results management of these cases are necessary. We report some metabolic approaches based on urine analyses, but most probably the use of other matrices as blood are needed.</abstract><cop>HOBOKEN</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>33119965</pmid><doi>10.1002/dta.2951</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5296-8126</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8037-6750</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0845-1597</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1942-7603
ispartof Drug testing and analysis, 2020-11, Vol.12 (11-12), p.1561-1569
issn 1942-7603
1942-7611
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2470030804
source Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Biochemical Research Methods
Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Chemistry
Chemistry, Analytical
clostebol
doping
Drugs & sports
incidental contact
Investigations
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
metabolism
Pharmacology & Pharmacy
Physical Sciences
Science & Technology
Trofodermin
title Detection of clostebol in sports: Accidental doping?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T21%3A09%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20of%20clostebol%20in%20sports:%20Accidental%20doping?&rft.jtitle=Drug%20testing%20and%20analysis&rft.au=Torre,%20Xavier&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=11-12&rft.spage=1561&rft.epage=1569&rft.pages=1561-1569&rft.issn=1942-7603&rft.eissn=1942-7611&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/dta.2951&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2456419587%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2470030804&rft_id=info:pmid/33119965&rfr_iscdi=true