Predicting gully densities at sub‐continental scales: a case study for the Horn of Africa

Despite its environmental and scientific significance, predicting gully erosion remains problematic. This is especially so in strongly contrasting and degraded regions such as the Horn of Africa. Machine learning algorithms such as random forests (RF) offer great potential to deal with the complex,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Earth surface processes and landforms 2020-12, Vol.45 (15), p.3763-3779
Hauptverfasser: Vanmaercke, Matthias, Chen, Yixian, Haregeweyn, Nigussie, De Geeter, Sofie, Campforts, Benjamin, Heyndrickx, Wouter, Tsunekawa, Atsushi, Poesen, Jean
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3779
container_issue 15
container_start_page 3763
container_title Earth surface processes and landforms
container_volume 45
creator Vanmaercke, Matthias
Chen, Yixian
Haregeweyn, Nigussie
De Geeter, Sofie
Campforts, Benjamin
Heyndrickx, Wouter
Tsunekawa, Atsushi
Poesen, Jean
description Despite its environmental and scientific significance, predicting gully erosion remains problematic. This is especially so in strongly contrasting and degraded regions such as the Horn of Africa. Machine learning algorithms such as random forests (RF) offer great potential to deal with the complex, often non‐linear, nature of factors controlling gully erosion. Nonetheless, their applicability at regional to continental scales remains largely untested. Moreover, such algorithms require large amounts of observations for model training and testing. Collecting such data remains an important bottleneck. Here we help to address these gaps by developing and testing a methodology to simulate gully densities across Ethiopia, Eritrea and Djibouti (total area: 1.2 million km2). We propose a methodology to quickly assess the gully head density (GHD) for representative 1 km2 study sites by visually scoring the presence of gullies in Google Earth and then converting these scores to realistic estimates of GHD. Based on this approach, we compiled GHD observations for 1,700 sites. We used these data to train sets of RF regression models that simulate GHD at a 1 km2 resolution, based on topographic/geomorphic, land cover, soil and rainfall conditions. Our approach also accounts for uncertainties in GHD observations. Independent validations showed generally acceptable simulations of regional GHD patterns. We further show that: (i) model performance strongly depends on the amount of training data used, (ii) large prediction errors mainly occur in areas where also the predicted uncertainty is large and (iii) collecting additional training data for these areas results in more drastic model performance improvements. Analyses of the feature importance of predictor variables further showed that patterns of GHD across the Horn of Africa strongly depend on NDVI and annual rainfall, but also on normalized steepness index (ksn) and distance to rivers. Overall, our work opens promising perspectives to assess gully densities at continental scales. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. We present a new approach to predict gully head density at a subcontinental scale in the Horn of Africa, by combining gully mapping for representative observation sites with random forest regressions.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/esp.4999
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2469685412</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2469685412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3939-ab8c8c4d6ad53ace6647ec360a1d9f6c40e8493e566dacee30cf7715cae65d413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MFKAzEQgOEgCtYq-AgBL162Jk02u_FWSmuFggX15CGkyWxNWTc1ySJ78xF8Rp_ErfXqaQ7zMQM_QpeUjCgh4xuIuxGXUh6hASVSZLJkxTEaECqLTDJWnKKzGLeEUMpLOUAvqwDWmeSaDd60dd1hC010yUHEOuHYrr8_v4xvegBN0jWORtcQb7HGRkfAMbW2w5UPOL0CXvjQYF_hSRWc0efopNJ1hIu_OUTP89nTdJEtH-7up5NlZphkMtPr0pSGW6FtzrQBIXgBhgmiqZWVMJxAySWDXAjbr4ERUxUFzY0GkVtO2RBdHe7ugn9vISa19W1o-pdqzIUUZc7puFfXB2WCjzFApXbBvenQKUrUPp3q06l9up5mB_rhauj-dWr2uPr1P97VcXc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2469685412</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting gully densities at sub‐continental scales: a case study for the Horn of Africa</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Vanmaercke, Matthias ; Chen, Yixian ; Haregeweyn, Nigussie ; De Geeter, Sofie ; Campforts, Benjamin ; Heyndrickx, Wouter ; Tsunekawa, Atsushi ; Poesen, Jean</creator><creatorcontrib>Vanmaercke, Matthias ; Chen, Yixian ; Haregeweyn, Nigussie ; De Geeter, Sofie ; Campforts, Benjamin ; Heyndrickx, Wouter ; Tsunekawa, Atsushi ; Poesen, Jean</creatorcontrib><description>Despite its environmental and scientific significance, predicting gully erosion remains problematic. This is especially so in strongly contrasting and degraded regions such as the Horn of Africa. Machine learning algorithms such as random forests (RF) offer great potential to deal with the complex, often non‐linear, nature of factors controlling gully erosion. Nonetheless, their applicability at regional to continental scales remains largely untested. Moreover, such algorithms require large amounts of observations for model training and testing. Collecting such data remains an important bottleneck. Here we help to address these gaps by developing and testing a methodology to simulate gully densities across Ethiopia, Eritrea and Djibouti (total area: 1.2 million km2). We propose a methodology to quickly assess the gully head density (GHD) for representative 1 km2 study sites by visually scoring the presence of gullies in Google Earth and then converting these scores to realistic estimates of GHD. Based on this approach, we compiled GHD observations for 1,700 sites. We used these data to train sets of RF regression models that simulate GHD at a 1 km2 resolution, based on topographic/geomorphic, land cover, soil and rainfall conditions. Our approach also accounts for uncertainties in GHD observations. Independent validations showed generally acceptable simulations of regional GHD patterns. We further show that: (i) model performance strongly depends on the amount of training data used, (ii) large prediction errors mainly occur in areas where also the predicted uncertainty is large and (iii) collecting additional training data for these areas results in more drastic model performance improvements. Analyses of the feature importance of predictor variables further showed that patterns of GHD across the Horn of Africa strongly depend on NDVI and annual rainfall, but also on normalized steepness index (ksn) and distance to rivers. Overall, our work opens promising perspectives to assess gully densities at continental scales. © 2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. We present a new approach to predict gully head density at a subcontinental scale in the Horn of Africa, by combining gully mapping for representative observation sites with random forest regressions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-9337</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9837</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/esp.4999</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Annual rainfall ; Arid region ; Data ; Djibouti ; Eritrea ; Erosion control ; Ethiopia ; Geomorphology ; Google Earth ; Gullies ; Gully erosion ; Land cover ; Land degradation ; Learning algorithms ; Machine learning ; Methods ; Model testing ; Predictions ; Rain ; Random forests ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Rivers ; Simulation ; Slopes ; Soil ; Soil conditions ; Testing ; Training ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Earth surface processes and landforms, 2020-12, Vol.45 (15), p.3763-3779</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3939-ab8c8c4d6ad53ace6647ec360a1d9f6c40e8493e566dacee30cf7715cae65d413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3939-ab8c8c4d6ad53ace6647ec360a1d9f6c40e8493e566dacee30cf7715cae65d413</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2138-9073 ; 0000-0002-7710-580X ; 0000-0001-5699-6714 ; 0000-0001-6218-8967</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fesp.4999$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fesp.4999$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vanmaercke, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yixian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haregeweyn, Nigussie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Geeter, Sofie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campforts, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heyndrickx, Wouter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsunekawa, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poesen, Jean</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting gully densities at sub‐continental scales: a case study for the Horn of Africa</title><title>Earth surface processes and landforms</title><description>Despite its environmental and scientific significance, predicting gully erosion remains problematic. This is especially so in strongly contrasting and degraded regions such as the Horn of Africa. Machine learning algorithms such as random forests (RF) offer great potential to deal with the complex, often non‐linear, nature of factors controlling gully erosion. Nonetheless, their applicability at regional to continental scales remains largely untested. Moreover, such algorithms require large amounts of observations for model training and testing. Collecting such data remains an important bottleneck. Here we help to address these gaps by developing and testing a methodology to simulate gully densities across Ethiopia, Eritrea and Djibouti (total area: 1.2 million km2). We propose a methodology to quickly assess the gully head density (GHD) for representative 1 km2 study sites by visually scoring the presence of gullies in Google Earth and then converting these scores to realistic estimates of GHD. Based on this approach, we compiled GHD observations for 1,700 sites. We used these data to train sets of RF regression models that simulate GHD at a 1 km2 resolution, based on topographic/geomorphic, land cover, soil and rainfall conditions. Our approach also accounts for uncertainties in GHD observations. Independent validations showed generally acceptable simulations of regional GHD patterns. We further show that: (i) model performance strongly depends on the amount of training data used, (ii) large prediction errors mainly occur in areas where also the predicted uncertainty is large and (iii) collecting additional training data for these areas results in more drastic model performance improvements. Analyses of the feature importance of predictor variables further showed that patterns of GHD across the Horn of Africa strongly depend on NDVI and annual rainfall, but also on normalized steepness index (ksn) and distance to rivers. Overall, our work opens promising perspectives to assess gully densities at continental scales. © 2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. We present a new approach to predict gully head density at a subcontinental scale in the Horn of Africa, by combining gully mapping for representative observation sites with random forest regressions.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Annual rainfall</subject><subject>Arid region</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Djibouti</subject><subject>Eritrea</subject><subject>Erosion control</subject><subject>Ethiopia</subject><subject>Geomorphology</subject><subject>Google Earth</subject><subject>Gullies</subject><subject>Gully erosion</subject><subject>Land cover</subject><subject>Land degradation</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Model testing</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Random forests</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Slopes</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil conditions</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0197-9337</issn><issn>1096-9837</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10MFKAzEQgOEgCtYq-AgBL162Jk02u_FWSmuFggX15CGkyWxNWTc1ySJ78xF8Rp_ErfXqaQ7zMQM_QpeUjCgh4xuIuxGXUh6hASVSZLJkxTEaECqLTDJWnKKzGLeEUMpLOUAvqwDWmeSaDd60dd1hC010yUHEOuHYrr8_v4xvegBN0jWORtcQb7HGRkfAMbW2w5UPOL0CXvjQYF_hSRWc0efopNJ1hIu_OUTP89nTdJEtH-7up5NlZphkMtPr0pSGW6FtzrQBIXgBhgmiqZWVMJxAySWDXAjbr4ERUxUFzY0GkVtO2RBdHe7ugn9vISa19W1o-pdqzIUUZc7puFfXB2WCjzFApXbBvenQKUrUPp3q06l9up5mB_rhauj-dWr2uPr1P97VcXc</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Vanmaercke, Matthias</creator><creator>Chen, Yixian</creator><creator>Haregeweyn, Nigussie</creator><creator>De Geeter, Sofie</creator><creator>Campforts, Benjamin</creator><creator>Heyndrickx, Wouter</creator><creator>Tsunekawa, Atsushi</creator><creator>Poesen, Jean</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2138-9073</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7710-580X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5699-6714</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6218-8967</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Predicting gully densities at sub‐continental scales: a case study for the Horn of Africa</title><author>Vanmaercke, Matthias ; Chen, Yixian ; Haregeweyn, Nigussie ; De Geeter, Sofie ; Campforts, Benjamin ; Heyndrickx, Wouter ; Tsunekawa, Atsushi ; Poesen, Jean</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3939-ab8c8c4d6ad53ace6647ec360a1d9f6c40e8493e566dacee30cf7715cae65d413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Annual rainfall</topic><topic>Arid region</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Djibouti</topic><topic>Eritrea</topic><topic>Erosion control</topic><topic>Ethiopia</topic><topic>Geomorphology</topic><topic>Google Earth</topic><topic>Gullies</topic><topic>Gully erosion</topic><topic>Land cover</topic><topic>Land degradation</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Model testing</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Random forests</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Slopes</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil conditions</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vanmaercke, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yixian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haregeweyn, Nigussie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Geeter, Sofie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campforts, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heyndrickx, Wouter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsunekawa, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poesen, Jean</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Earth surface processes and landforms</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vanmaercke, Matthias</au><au>Chen, Yixian</au><au>Haregeweyn, Nigussie</au><au>De Geeter, Sofie</au><au>Campforts, Benjamin</au><au>Heyndrickx, Wouter</au><au>Tsunekawa, Atsushi</au><au>Poesen, Jean</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting gully densities at sub‐continental scales: a case study for the Horn of Africa</atitle><jtitle>Earth surface processes and landforms</jtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>3763</spage><epage>3779</epage><pages>3763-3779</pages><issn>0197-9337</issn><eissn>1096-9837</eissn><abstract>Despite its environmental and scientific significance, predicting gully erosion remains problematic. This is especially so in strongly contrasting and degraded regions such as the Horn of Africa. Machine learning algorithms such as random forests (RF) offer great potential to deal with the complex, often non‐linear, nature of factors controlling gully erosion. Nonetheless, their applicability at regional to continental scales remains largely untested. Moreover, such algorithms require large amounts of observations for model training and testing. Collecting such data remains an important bottleneck. Here we help to address these gaps by developing and testing a methodology to simulate gully densities across Ethiopia, Eritrea and Djibouti (total area: 1.2 million km2). We propose a methodology to quickly assess the gully head density (GHD) for representative 1 km2 study sites by visually scoring the presence of gullies in Google Earth and then converting these scores to realistic estimates of GHD. Based on this approach, we compiled GHD observations for 1,700 sites. We used these data to train sets of RF regression models that simulate GHD at a 1 km2 resolution, based on topographic/geomorphic, land cover, soil and rainfall conditions. Our approach also accounts for uncertainties in GHD observations. Independent validations showed generally acceptable simulations of regional GHD patterns. We further show that: (i) model performance strongly depends on the amount of training data used, (ii) large prediction errors mainly occur in areas where also the predicted uncertainty is large and (iii) collecting additional training data for these areas results in more drastic model performance improvements. Analyses of the feature importance of predictor variables further showed that patterns of GHD across the Horn of Africa strongly depend on NDVI and annual rainfall, but also on normalized steepness index (ksn) and distance to rivers. Overall, our work opens promising perspectives to assess gully densities at continental scales. © 2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. We present a new approach to predict gully head density at a subcontinental scale in the Horn of Africa, by combining gully mapping for representative observation sites with random forest regressions.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/esp.4999</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2138-9073</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7710-580X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5699-6714</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6218-8967</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0197-9337
ispartof Earth surface processes and landforms, 2020-12, Vol.45 (15), p.3763-3779
issn 0197-9337
1096-9837
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2469685412
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Algorithms
Annual rainfall
Arid region
Data
Djibouti
Eritrea
Erosion control
Ethiopia
Geomorphology
Google Earth
Gullies
Gully erosion
Land cover
Land degradation
Learning algorithms
Machine learning
Methods
Model testing
Predictions
Rain
Random forests
Regression analysis
Regression models
Rivers
Simulation
Slopes
Soil
Soil conditions
Testing
Training
Uncertainty
title Predicting gully densities at sub‐continental scales: a case study for the Horn of Africa
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T11%3A46%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20gully%20densities%20at%20sub%E2%80%90continental%20scales:%20a%20case%20study%20for%20the%20Horn%20of%20Africa&rft.jtitle=Earth%20surface%20processes%20and%20landforms&rft.au=Vanmaercke,%20Matthias&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=3763&rft.epage=3779&rft.pages=3763-3779&rft.issn=0197-9337&rft.eissn=1096-9837&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/esp.4999&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2469685412%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2469685412&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true