Unraveling the complexity of human–tiger conflicts in the Leuser Ecosystem, Sumatra

Conserving large carnivores that live in close proximity to people depends on a variety of socio‐economic, political and biological factors. These include local tolerance toward potentially dangerous animals, efficacy of human–carnivore conflict mitigation schemes, and identifying and then addressin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Animal conservation 2020-12, Vol.23 (6), p.741-749
Hauptverfasser: Lubis, M. I., Pusparini, W., Prabowo, S. A., Marthy, W., Tarmizi, Andayani, N., Linkie, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 749
container_issue 6
container_start_page 741
container_title Animal conservation
container_volume 23
creator Lubis, M. I.
Pusparini, W.
Prabowo, S. A.
Marthy, W.
Tarmizi
Andayani, N.
Linkie, M.
description Conserving large carnivores that live in close proximity to people depends on a variety of socio‐economic, political and biological factors. These include local tolerance toward potentially dangerous animals, efficacy of human–carnivore conflict mitigation schemes, and identifying and then addressing the underlying causes of conflict. The Leuser Ecosystem is the largest contiguous forest habitat for the critically endangered Sumatran tiger. Its extensive forest edge is abutted by farming communities and we predict that spatial variation in human–tiger conflict (HTC) would be a function of habitat conversion, livestock abundance, and poaching of tiger and its wild prey. To investigate which of these potential drivers of conflict, as well as other biophysical factors, best explain the observed patterns, we used resource selection function (RSF) technique to develop a predictive spatially explicit model of HTC. From 148 conflict incidences recorded from 2008 to 2018 across the Leuser Ecosystem, the areas that were closer to villages and with lower occurrence of wild prey were most susceptible to tiger attacks. From 18 districts monitored, 6 stood out for having disproportionately high levels of HTC. We recommend that these areas be prioritized with increased support from conflict mitigation teams to prevent further injuries to people, livestock or tigers; district governments address one underlying cause of HTC by supporting improved animal husbandry practices, such as tiger‐proof livestock pen construction; and, an increase in ranger patrol effort to recover wild prey populations. This type of priority setting approach has wide application for better determining the required management response to reduce conflicts between people and large carnivores in both tropical and temporal landscapes. This study used a decade of human‐tiger conflict (HTC) field data that was systematically collected from the 2.5 million hectare Leuser Ecosystem, one of the largest tiger landscapes in Asia. Investigating the drivers of HTC revealed that conflict was highest in areas that were closer to villages and with lower occurrence of wild prey. We used this information to develop a spatially‐explicit model and formulate three key management recommendations to prevent future conflicts. These were increased support from conflict mitigation teams to prevent further injuries to people, livestock or tigers; improved animal husbandry practices, such as tiger‐proof livestock pen construc
doi_str_mv 10.1111/acv.12591
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2469250287</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2469250287</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2971-9baee4b667798e0d1ecf175bd1ba3de34c32f762d4f4595cf9f7b1c3bc5a9b373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtOwzAQhi0EEqWw4AaRWCGRNraTuF5WVXlIlVhA2FqOM25d5VHspJAdd-CGnAS3YctsZjTz_TOaH6FrHE2wj6lU-wkmCccnaITjlIeY8eTU1zRlIY9pdI4unNtGESYzikcoy2or91Caeh20GwhUU-1K-DRtHzQ62HSVrH--vluzButntS6Nal1g6iO8gs75_lI1rnctVHfBixe0Vl6iMy1LB1d_eYyy--Xr4jFcPT88LearUBHOcMhzCRDnacoYn0FUYFAasyQvcC5pATRWlGiWkiLWccITpblmOVY0V4nkOWV0jG6GvTvbvHfgWrFtOlv7k4L450kSkdmBuh0oZRvnLGixs6aSthc4EgfXhHdNHF3z7HRgP0wJ_f-gmC_eBsUvzSxwRw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2469250287</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unraveling the complexity of human–tiger conflicts in the Leuser Ecosystem, Sumatra</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Lubis, M. I. ; Pusparini, W. ; Prabowo, S. A. ; Marthy, W. ; Tarmizi ; Andayani, N. ; Linkie, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lubis, M. I. ; Pusparini, W. ; Prabowo, S. A. ; Marthy, W. ; Tarmizi ; Andayani, N. ; Linkie, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Conserving large carnivores that live in close proximity to people depends on a variety of socio‐economic, political and biological factors. These include local tolerance toward potentially dangerous animals, efficacy of human–carnivore conflict mitigation schemes, and identifying and then addressing the underlying causes of conflict. The Leuser Ecosystem is the largest contiguous forest habitat for the critically endangered Sumatran tiger. Its extensive forest edge is abutted by farming communities and we predict that spatial variation in human–tiger conflict (HTC) would be a function of habitat conversion, livestock abundance, and poaching of tiger and its wild prey. To investigate which of these potential drivers of conflict, as well as other biophysical factors, best explain the observed patterns, we used resource selection function (RSF) technique to develop a predictive spatially explicit model of HTC. From 148 conflict incidences recorded from 2008 to 2018 across the Leuser Ecosystem, the areas that were closer to villages and with lower occurrence of wild prey were most susceptible to tiger attacks. From 18 districts monitored, 6 stood out for having disproportionately high levels of HTC. We recommend that these areas be prioritized with increased support from conflict mitigation teams to prevent further injuries to people, livestock or tigers; district governments address one underlying cause of HTC by supporting improved animal husbandry practices, such as tiger‐proof livestock pen construction; and, an increase in ranger patrol effort to recover wild prey populations. This type of priority setting approach has wide application for better determining the required management response to reduce conflicts between people and large carnivores in both tropical and temporal landscapes. This study used a decade of human‐tiger conflict (HTC) field data that was systematically collected from the 2.5 million hectare Leuser Ecosystem, one of the largest tiger landscapes in Asia. Investigating the drivers of HTC revealed that conflict was highest in areas that were closer to villages and with lower occurrence of wild prey. We used this information to develop a spatially‐explicit model and formulate three key management recommendations to prevent future conflicts. These were increased support from conflict mitigation teams to prevent further injuries to people, livestock or tigers; improved animal husbandry practices, such as tiger‐proof livestock pen construction; and increase in ranger patrol effort to recover wild prey populations. The modeling approach used in this study has wide application for understanding the drivers of conflict involving other highly threatened carnivores or other large mammals, from which to formulate enhanced conservation strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1367-9430</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-1795</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/acv.12591</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animal husbandry ; Carnivores ; Carnivorous animals ; Conflicts ; Economic conditions ; Economics ; Ecosystems ; Endangered species ; Habitats ; human–tiger conflict ; Injury prevention ; large carnivore ; Livestock ; Mitigation ; Panthera ; Poaching ; Political factors ; Prey ; research‐implementation gap ; retaliatory killing ; Rural communities ; Spatial variations ; Tropical climate</subject><ispartof>Animal conservation, 2020-12, Vol.23 (6), p.741-749</ispartof><rights>2020 The Zoological Society of London</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Zoological Society of London</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2971-9baee4b667798e0d1ecf175bd1ba3de34c32f762d4f4595cf9f7b1c3bc5a9b373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2971-9baee4b667798e0d1ecf175bd1ba3de34c32f762d4f4595cf9f7b1c3bc5a9b373</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0679-3684 ; 0000-0003-0710-8076</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Facv.12591$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Facv.12591$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lubis, M. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pusparini, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prabowo, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marthy, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarmizi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andayani, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linkie, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Unraveling the complexity of human–tiger conflicts in the Leuser Ecosystem, Sumatra</title><title>Animal conservation</title><description>Conserving large carnivores that live in close proximity to people depends on a variety of socio‐economic, political and biological factors. These include local tolerance toward potentially dangerous animals, efficacy of human–carnivore conflict mitigation schemes, and identifying and then addressing the underlying causes of conflict. The Leuser Ecosystem is the largest contiguous forest habitat for the critically endangered Sumatran tiger. Its extensive forest edge is abutted by farming communities and we predict that spatial variation in human–tiger conflict (HTC) would be a function of habitat conversion, livestock abundance, and poaching of tiger and its wild prey. To investigate which of these potential drivers of conflict, as well as other biophysical factors, best explain the observed patterns, we used resource selection function (RSF) technique to develop a predictive spatially explicit model of HTC. From 148 conflict incidences recorded from 2008 to 2018 across the Leuser Ecosystem, the areas that were closer to villages and with lower occurrence of wild prey were most susceptible to tiger attacks. From 18 districts monitored, 6 stood out for having disproportionately high levels of HTC. We recommend that these areas be prioritized with increased support from conflict mitigation teams to prevent further injuries to people, livestock or tigers; district governments address one underlying cause of HTC by supporting improved animal husbandry practices, such as tiger‐proof livestock pen construction; and, an increase in ranger patrol effort to recover wild prey populations. This type of priority setting approach has wide application for better determining the required management response to reduce conflicts between people and large carnivores in both tropical and temporal landscapes. This study used a decade of human‐tiger conflict (HTC) field data that was systematically collected from the 2.5 million hectare Leuser Ecosystem, one of the largest tiger landscapes in Asia. Investigating the drivers of HTC revealed that conflict was highest in areas that were closer to villages and with lower occurrence of wild prey. We used this information to develop a spatially‐explicit model and formulate three key management recommendations to prevent future conflicts. These were increased support from conflict mitigation teams to prevent further injuries to people, livestock or tigers; improved animal husbandry practices, such as tiger‐proof livestock pen construction; and increase in ranger patrol effort to recover wild prey populations. The modeling approach used in this study has wide application for understanding the drivers of conflict involving other highly threatened carnivores or other large mammals, from which to formulate enhanced conservation strategy.</description><subject>Animal husbandry</subject><subject>Carnivores</subject><subject>Carnivorous animals</subject><subject>Conflicts</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Endangered species</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>human–tiger conflict</subject><subject>Injury prevention</subject><subject>large carnivore</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Panthera</subject><subject>Poaching</subject><subject>Political factors</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>research‐implementation gap</subject><subject>retaliatory killing</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Spatial variations</subject><subject>Tropical climate</subject><issn>1367-9430</issn><issn>1469-1795</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtOwzAQhi0EEqWw4AaRWCGRNraTuF5WVXlIlVhA2FqOM25d5VHspJAdd-CGnAS3YctsZjTz_TOaH6FrHE2wj6lU-wkmCccnaITjlIeY8eTU1zRlIY9pdI4unNtGESYzikcoy2or91Caeh20GwhUU-1K-DRtHzQ62HSVrH--vluzButntS6Nal1g6iO8gs75_lI1rnctVHfBixe0Vl6iMy1LB1d_eYyy--Xr4jFcPT88LearUBHOcMhzCRDnacoYn0FUYFAasyQvcC5pATRWlGiWkiLWccITpblmOVY0V4nkOWV0jG6GvTvbvHfgWrFtOlv7k4L450kSkdmBuh0oZRvnLGixs6aSthc4EgfXhHdNHF3z7HRgP0wJ_f-gmC_eBsUvzSxwRw</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Lubis, M. I.</creator><creator>Pusparini, W.</creator><creator>Prabowo, S. A.</creator><creator>Marthy, W.</creator><creator>Tarmizi</creator><creator>Andayani, N.</creator><creator>Linkie, M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0679-3684</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0710-8076</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Unraveling the complexity of human–tiger conflicts in the Leuser Ecosystem, Sumatra</title><author>Lubis, M. I. ; Pusparini, W. ; Prabowo, S. A. ; Marthy, W. ; Tarmizi ; Andayani, N. ; Linkie, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2971-9baee4b667798e0d1ecf175bd1ba3de34c32f762d4f4595cf9f7b1c3bc5a9b373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animal husbandry</topic><topic>Carnivores</topic><topic>Carnivorous animals</topic><topic>Conflicts</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Endangered species</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>human–tiger conflict</topic><topic>Injury prevention</topic><topic>large carnivore</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Panthera</topic><topic>Poaching</topic><topic>Political factors</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>research‐implementation gap</topic><topic>retaliatory killing</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Spatial variations</topic><topic>Tropical climate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lubis, M. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pusparini, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prabowo, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marthy, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarmizi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andayani, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linkie, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Animal conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lubis, M. I.</au><au>Pusparini, W.</au><au>Prabowo, S. A.</au><au>Marthy, W.</au><au>Tarmizi</au><au>Andayani, N.</au><au>Linkie, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unraveling the complexity of human–tiger conflicts in the Leuser Ecosystem, Sumatra</atitle><jtitle>Animal conservation</jtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>741</spage><epage>749</epage><pages>741-749</pages><issn>1367-9430</issn><eissn>1469-1795</eissn><abstract>Conserving large carnivores that live in close proximity to people depends on a variety of socio‐economic, political and biological factors. These include local tolerance toward potentially dangerous animals, efficacy of human–carnivore conflict mitigation schemes, and identifying and then addressing the underlying causes of conflict. The Leuser Ecosystem is the largest contiguous forest habitat for the critically endangered Sumatran tiger. Its extensive forest edge is abutted by farming communities and we predict that spatial variation in human–tiger conflict (HTC) would be a function of habitat conversion, livestock abundance, and poaching of tiger and its wild prey. To investigate which of these potential drivers of conflict, as well as other biophysical factors, best explain the observed patterns, we used resource selection function (RSF) technique to develop a predictive spatially explicit model of HTC. From 148 conflict incidences recorded from 2008 to 2018 across the Leuser Ecosystem, the areas that were closer to villages and with lower occurrence of wild prey were most susceptible to tiger attacks. From 18 districts monitored, 6 stood out for having disproportionately high levels of HTC. We recommend that these areas be prioritized with increased support from conflict mitigation teams to prevent further injuries to people, livestock or tigers; district governments address one underlying cause of HTC by supporting improved animal husbandry practices, such as tiger‐proof livestock pen construction; and, an increase in ranger patrol effort to recover wild prey populations. This type of priority setting approach has wide application for better determining the required management response to reduce conflicts between people and large carnivores in both tropical and temporal landscapes. This study used a decade of human‐tiger conflict (HTC) field data that was systematically collected from the 2.5 million hectare Leuser Ecosystem, one of the largest tiger landscapes in Asia. Investigating the drivers of HTC revealed that conflict was highest in areas that were closer to villages and with lower occurrence of wild prey. We used this information to develop a spatially‐explicit model and formulate three key management recommendations to prevent future conflicts. These were increased support from conflict mitigation teams to prevent further injuries to people, livestock or tigers; improved animal husbandry practices, such as tiger‐proof livestock pen construction; and increase in ranger patrol effort to recover wild prey populations. The modeling approach used in this study has wide application for understanding the drivers of conflict involving other highly threatened carnivores or other large mammals, from which to formulate enhanced conservation strategy.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/acv.12591</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0679-3684</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0710-8076</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1367-9430
ispartof Animal conservation, 2020-12, Vol.23 (6), p.741-749
issn 1367-9430
1469-1795
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2469250287
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animal husbandry
Carnivores
Carnivorous animals
Conflicts
Economic conditions
Economics
Ecosystems
Endangered species
Habitats
human–tiger conflict
Injury prevention
large carnivore
Livestock
Mitigation
Panthera
Poaching
Political factors
Prey
research‐implementation gap
retaliatory killing
Rural communities
Spatial variations
Tropical climate
title Unraveling the complexity of human–tiger conflicts in the Leuser Ecosystem, Sumatra
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T22%3A25%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unraveling%20the%20complexity%20of%20human%E2%80%93tiger%20conflicts%20in%20the%20Leuser%20Ecosystem,%20Sumatra&rft.jtitle=Animal%20conservation&rft.au=Lubis,%20M.%20I.&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=741&rft.epage=749&rft.pages=741-749&rft.issn=1367-9430&rft.eissn=1469-1795&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/acv.12591&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2469250287%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2469250287&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true