Unraveling the complexity of human–tiger conflicts in the Leuser Ecosystem, Sumatra
Conserving large carnivores that live in close proximity to people depends on a variety of socio‐economic, political and biological factors. These include local tolerance toward potentially dangerous animals, efficacy of human–carnivore conflict mitigation schemes, and identifying and then addressin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Animal conservation 2020-12, Vol.23 (6), p.741-749 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 749 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 741 |
container_title | Animal conservation |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Lubis, M. I. Pusparini, W. Prabowo, S. A. Marthy, W. Tarmizi Andayani, N. Linkie, M. |
description | Conserving large carnivores that live in close proximity to people depends on a variety of socio‐economic, political and biological factors. These include local tolerance toward potentially dangerous animals, efficacy of human–carnivore conflict mitigation schemes, and identifying and then addressing the underlying causes of conflict. The Leuser Ecosystem is the largest contiguous forest habitat for the critically endangered Sumatran tiger. Its extensive forest edge is abutted by farming communities and we predict that spatial variation in human–tiger conflict (HTC) would be a function of habitat conversion, livestock abundance, and poaching of tiger and its wild prey. To investigate which of these potential drivers of conflict, as well as other biophysical factors, best explain the observed patterns, we used resource selection function (RSF) technique to develop a predictive spatially explicit model of HTC. From 148 conflict incidences recorded from 2008 to 2018 across the Leuser Ecosystem, the areas that were closer to villages and with lower occurrence of wild prey were most susceptible to tiger attacks. From 18 districts monitored, 6 stood out for having disproportionately high levels of HTC. We recommend that these areas be prioritized with increased support from conflict mitigation teams to prevent further injuries to people, livestock or tigers; district governments address one underlying cause of HTC by supporting improved animal husbandry practices, such as tiger‐proof livestock pen construction; and, an increase in ranger patrol effort to recover wild prey populations. This type of priority setting approach has wide application for better determining the required management response to reduce conflicts between people and large carnivores in both tropical and temporal landscapes.
This study used a decade of human‐tiger conflict (HTC) field data that was systematically collected from the 2.5 million hectare Leuser Ecosystem, one of the largest tiger landscapes in Asia. Investigating the drivers of HTC revealed that conflict was highest in areas that were closer to villages and with lower occurrence of wild prey. We used this information to develop a spatially‐explicit model and formulate three key management recommendations to prevent future conflicts. These were increased support from conflict mitigation teams to prevent further injuries to people, livestock or tigers; improved animal husbandry practices, such as tiger‐proof livestock pen construc |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/acv.12591 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2469250287</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2469250287</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2971-9baee4b667798e0d1ecf175bd1ba3de34c32f762d4f4595cf9f7b1c3bc5a9b373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtOwzAQhi0EEqWw4AaRWCGRNraTuF5WVXlIlVhA2FqOM25d5VHspJAdd-CGnAS3YctsZjTz_TOaH6FrHE2wj6lU-wkmCccnaITjlIeY8eTU1zRlIY9pdI4unNtGESYzikcoy2or91Caeh20GwhUU-1K-DRtHzQ62HSVrH--vluzButntS6Nal1g6iO8gs75_lI1rnctVHfBixe0Vl6iMy1LB1d_eYyy--Xr4jFcPT88LearUBHOcMhzCRDnacoYn0FUYFAasyQvcC5pATRWlGiWkiLWccITpblmOVY0V4nkOWV0jG6GvTvbvHfgWrFtOlv7k4L450kSkdmBuh0oZRvnLGixs6aSthc4EgfXhHdNHF3z7HRgP0wJ_f-gmC_eBsUvzSxwRw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2469250287</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unraveling the complexity of human–tiger conflicts in the Leuser Ecosystem, Sumatra</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Lubis, M. I. ; Pusparini, W. ; Prabowo, S. A. ; Marthy, W. ; Tarmizi ; Andayani, N. ; Linkie, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lubis, M. I. ; Pusparini, W. ; Prabowo, S. A. ; Marthy, W. ; Tarmizi ; Andayani, N. ; Linkie, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Conserving large carnivores that live in close proximity to people depends on a variety of socio‐economic, political and biological factors. These include local tolerance toward potentially dangerous animals, efficacy of human–carnivore conflict mitigation schemes, and identifying and then addressing the underlying causes of conflict. The Leuser Ecosystem is the largest contiguous forest habitat for the critically endangered Sumatran tiger. Its extensive forest edge is abutted by farming communities and we predict that spatial variation in human–tiger conflict (HTC) would be a function of habitat conversion, livestock abundance, and poaching of tiger and its wild prey. To investigate which of these potential drivers of conflict, as well as other biophysical factors, best explain the observed patterns, we used resource selection function (RSF) technique to develop a predictive spatially explicit model of HTC. From 148 conflict incidences recorded from 2008 to 2018 across the Leuser Ecosystem, the areas that were closer to villages and with lower occurrence of wild prey were most susceptible to tiger attacks. From 18 districts monitored, 6 stood out for having disproportionately high levels of HTC. We recommend that these areas be prioritized with increased support from conflict mitigation teams to prevent further injuries to people, livestock or tigers; district governments address one underlying cause of HTC by supporting improved animal husbandry practices, such as tiger‐proof livestock pen construction; and, an increase in ranger patrol effort to recover wild prey populations. This type of priority setting approach has wide application for better determining the required management response to reduce conflicts between people and large carnivores in both tropical and temporal landscapes.
This study used a decade of human‐tiger conflict (HTC) field data that was systematically collected from the 2.5 million hectare Leuser Ecosystem, one of the largest tiger landscapes in Asia. Investigating the drivers of HTC revealed that conflict was highest in areas that were closer to villages and with lower occurrence of wild prey. We used this information to develop a spatially‐explicit model and formulate three key management recommendations to prevent future conflicts. These were increased support from conflict mitigation teams to prevent further injuries to people, livestock or tigers; improved animal husbandry practices, such as tiger‐proof livestock pen construction; and increase in ranger patrol effort to recover wild prey populations. The modeling approach used in this study has wide application for understanding the drivers of conflict involving other highly threatened carnivores or other large mammals, from which to formulate enhanced conservation strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1367-9430</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-1795</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/acv.12591</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animal husbandry ; Carnivores ; Carnivorous animals ; Conflicts ; Economic conditions ; Economics ; Ecosystems ; Endangered species ; Habitats ; human–tiger conflict ; Injury prevention ; large carnivore ; Livestock ; Mitigation ; Panthera ; Poaching ; Political factors ; Prey ; research‐implementation gap ; retaliatory killing ; Rural communities ; Spatial variations ; Tropical climate</subject><ispartof>Animal conservation, 2020-12, Vol.23 (6), p.741-749</ispartof><rights>2020 The Zoological Society of London</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Zoological Society of London</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2971-9baee4b667798e0d1ecf175bd1ba3de34c32f762d4f4595cf9f7b1c3bc5a9b373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2971-9baee4b667798e0d1ecf175bd1ba3de34c32f762d4f4595cf9f7b1c3bc5a9b373</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0679-3684 ; 0000-0003-0710-8076</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Facv.12591$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Facv.12591$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lubis, M. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pusparini, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prabowo, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marthy, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarmizi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andayani, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linkie, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Unraveling the complexity of human–tiger conflicts in the Leuser Ecosystem, Sumatra</title><title>Animal conservation</title><description>Conserving large carnivores that live in close proximity to people depends on a variety of socio‐economic, political and biological factors. These include local tolerance toward potentially dangerous animals, efficacy of human–carnivore conflict mitigation schemes, and identifying and then addressing the underlying causes of conflict. The Leuser Ecosystem is the largest contiguous forest habitat for the critically endangered Sumatran tiger. Its extensive forest edge is abutted by farming communities and we predict that spatial variation in human–tiger conflict (HTC) would be a function of habitat conversion, livestock abundance, and poaching of tiger and its wild prey. To investigate which of these potential drivers of conflict, as well as other biophysical factors, best explain the observed patterns, we used resource selection function (RSF) technique to develop a predictive spatially explicit model of HTC. From 148 conflict incidences recorded from 2008 to 2018 across the Leuser Ecosystem, the areas that were closer to villages and with lower occurrence of wild prey were most susceptible to tiger attacks. From 18 districts monitored, 6 stood out for having disproportionately high levels of HTC. We recommend that these areas be prioritized with increased support from conflict mitigation teams to prevent further injuries to people, livestock or tigers; district governments address one underlying cause of HTC by supporting improved animal husbandry practices, such as tiger‐proof livestock pen construction; and, an increase in ranger patrol effort to recover wild prey populations. This type of priority setting approach has wide application for better determining the required management response to reduce conflicts between people and large carnivores in both tropical and temporal landscapes.
This study used a decade of human‐tiger conflict (HTC) field data that was systematically collected from the 2.5 million hectare Leuser Ecosystem, one of the largest tiger landscapes in Asia. Investigating the drivers of HTC revealed that conflict was highest in areas that were closer to villages and with lower occurrence of wild prey. We used this information to develop a spatially‐explicit model and formulate three key management recommendations to prevent future conflicts. These were increased support from conflict mitigation teams to prevent further injuries to people, livestock or tigers; improved animal husbandry practices, such as tiger‐proof livestock pen construction; and increase in ranger patrol effort to recover wild prey populations. The modeling approach used in this study has wide application for understanding the drivers of conflict involving other highly threatened carnivores or other large mammals, from which to formulate enhanced conservation strategy.</description><subject>Animal husbandry</subject><subject>Carnivores</subject><subject>Carnivorous animals</subject><subject>Conflicts</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Endangered species</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>human–tiger conflict</subject><subject>Injury prevention</subject><subject>large carnivore</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Panthera</subject><subject>Poaching</subject><subject>Political factors</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>research‐implementation gap</subject><subject>retaliatory killing</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Spatial variations</subject><subject>Tropical climate</subject><issn>1367-9430</issn><issn>1469-1795</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtOwzAQhi0EEqWw4AaRWCGRNraTuF5WVXlIlVhA2FqOM25d5VHspJAdd-CGnAS3YctsZjTz_TOaH6FrHE2wj6lU-wkmCccnaITjlIeY8eTU1zRlIY9pdI4unNtGESYzikcoy2or91Caeh20GwhUU-1K-DRtHzQ62HSVrH--vluzButntS6Nal1g6iO8gs75_lI1rnctVHfBixe0Vl6iMy1LB1d_eYyy--Xr4jFcPT88LearUBHOcMhzCRDnacoYn0FUYFAasyQvcC5pATRWlGiWkiLWccITpblmOVY0V4nkOWV0jG6GvTvbvHfgWrFtOlv7k4L450kSkdmBuh0oZRvnLGixs6aSthc4EgfXhHdNHF3z7HRgP0wJ_f-gmC_eBsUvzSxwRw</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Lubis, M. I.</creator><creator>Pusparini, W.</creator><creator>Prabowo, S. A.</creator><creator>Marthy, W.</creator><creator>Tarmizi</creator><creator>Andayani, N.</creator><creator>Linkie, M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0679-3684</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0710-8076</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Unraveling the complexity of human–tiger conflicts in the Leuser Ecosystem, Sumatra</title><author>Lubis, M. I. ; Pusparini, W. ; Prabowo, S. A. ; Marthy, W. ; Tarmizi ; Andayani, N. ; Linkie, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2971-9baee4b667798e0d1ecf175bd1ba3de34c32f762d4f4595cf9f7b1c3bc5a9b373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animal husbandry</topic><topic>Carnivores</topic><topic>Carnivorous animals</topic><topic>Conflicts</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Endangered species</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>human–tiger conflict</topic><topic>Injury prevention</topic><topic>large carnivore</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Panthera</topic><topic>Poaching</topic><topic>Political factors</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>research‐implementation gap</topic><topic>retaliatory killing</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Spatial variations</topic><topic>Tropical climate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lubis, M. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pusparini, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prabowo, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marthy, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarmizi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andayani, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linkie, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Animal conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lubis, M. I.</au><au>Pusparini, W.</au><au>Prabowo, S. A.</au><au>Marthy, W.</au><au>Tarmizi</au><au>Andayani, N.</au><au>Linkie, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unraveling the complexity of human–tiger conflicts in the Leuser Ecosystem, Sumatra</atitle><jtitle>Animal conservation</jtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>741</spage><epage>749</epage><pages>741-749</pages><issn>1367-9430</issn><eissn>1469-1795</eissn><abstract>Conserving large carnivores that live in close proximity to people depends on a variety of socio‐economic, political and biological factors. These include local tolerance toward potentially dangerous animals, efficacy of human–carnivore conflict mitigation schemes, and identifying and then addressing the underlying causes of conflict. The Leuser Ecosystem is the largest contiguous forest habitat for the critically endangered Sumatran tiger. Its extensive forest edge is abutted by farming communities and we predict that spatial variation in human–tiger conflict (HTC) would be a function of habitat conversion, livestock abundance, and poaching of tiger and its wild prey. To investigate which of these potential drivers of conflict, as well as other biophysical factors, best explain the observed patterns, we used resource selection function (RSF) technique to develop a predictive spatially explicit model of HTC. From 148 conflict incidences recorded from 2008 to 2018 across the Leuser Ecosystem, the areas that were closer to villages and with lower occurrence of wild prey were most susceptible to tiger attacks. From 18 districts monitored, 6 stood out for having disproportionately high levels of HTC. We recommend that these areas be prioritized with increased support from conflict mitigation teams to prevent further injuries to people, livestock or tigers; district governments address one underlying cause of HTC by supporting improved animal husbandry practices, such as tiger‐proof livestock pen construction; and, an increase in ranger patrol effort to recover wild prey populations. This type of priority setting approach has wide application for better determining the required management response to reduce conflicts between people and large carnivores in both tropical and temporal landscapes.
This study used a decade of human‐tiger conflict (HTC) field data that was systematically collected from the 2.5 million hectare Leuser Ecosystem, one of the largest tiger landscapes in Asia. Investigating the drivers of HTC revealed that conflict was highest in areas that were closer to villages and with lower occurrence of wild prey. We used this information to develop a spatially‐explicit model and formulate three key management recommendations to prevent future conflicts. These were increased support from conflict mitigation teams to prevent further injuries to people, livestock or tigers; improved animal husbandry practices, such as tiger‐proof livestock pen construction; and increase in ranger patrol effort to recover wild prey populations. The modeling approach used in this study has wide application for understanding the drivers of conflict involving other highly threatened carnivores or other large mammals, from which to formulate enhanced conservation strategy.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/acv.12591</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0679-3684</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0710-8076</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1367-9430 |
ispartof | Animal conservation, 2020-12, Vol.23 (6), p.741-749 |
issn | 1367-9430 1469-1795 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2469250287 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Animal husbandry Carnivores Carnivorous animals Conflicts Economic conditions Economics Ecosystems Endangered species Habitats human–tiger conflict Injury prevention large carnivore Livestock Mitigation Panthera Poaching Political factors Prey research‐implementation gap retaliatory killing Rural communities Spatial variations Tropical climate |
title | Unraveling the complexity of human–tiger conflicts in the Leuser Ecosystem, Sumatra |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T22%3A25%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unraveling%20the%20complexity%20of%20human%E2%80%93tiger%20conflicts%20in%20the%20Leuser%20Ecosystem,%20Sumatra&rft.jtitle=Animal%20conservation&rft.au=Lubis,%20M.%20I.&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=741&rft.epage=749&rft.pages=741-749&rft.issn=1367-9430&rft.eissn=1469-1795&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/acv.12591&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2469250287%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2469250287&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |