Hybridization of Fossil‐ and CO2‐Based Routes for Ethylene Production using Renewable Energy

Carbon capture and utilization (CCU) has recently gained broad interest in the chemical industry. Direct electro‐ and thermocatalytic technologies are currently the focus of intense research, where the former employs electricity directly to reduce the CO2 molecule, while the latter comprises hydroge...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ChemSusChem 2020-12, Vol.13 (23), p.6370-6380
Hauptverfasser: Ioannou, Iasonas, D'Angelo, Sebastiano C., Martín, Antonio J., Pérez‐Ramírez, Javier, Guillén‐Gosálbez, Gonzalo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6380
container_issue 23
container_start_page 6370
container_title ChemSusChem
container_volume 13
creator Ioannou, Iasonas
D'Angelo, Sebastiano C.
Martín, Antonio J.
Pérez‐Ramírez, Javier
Guillén‐Gosálbez, Gonzalo
description Carbon capture and utilization (CCU) has recently gained broad interest in the chemical industry. Direct electro‐ and thermocatalytic technologies are currently the focus of intense research, where the former employs electricity directly to reduce the CO2 molecule, while the latter comprises hydrogenation of CO2 in tandem with electrocatalytic water splitting. So far, it remains unclear which of the two is superior, yet this information is considered critical. Focusing on the platform chemical ethylene, the two CCU routes were compared using state‐of‐the‐art performances with the fossil technology considering different power and CO2 sources. The thermo‐route was found to be, at present, economically and environmentally better, yet under the same electrolyzer efficiencies, the electro‐route would become superior. CCU routes could substantially improve the carbon footprint of the fossil ethylene (by 236 %) while decreasing at the same time impacts on human health, ecosystem quality, and resources (64, 140, and 80 %, respectively). However, they are economically unattractive even when considering externalities (indirect cost of environmental impacts), that is, 1.7‐ to 3.9‐fold more expensive compared to the current fossil‐based analogue. Acknowledging this limitation, the concept of hybridization was applied as a means to smooth the transition towards more sustainable chemicals. Accordingly, it was found that an optimal hybrid plant could produce carbon‐neutral (cradle‐to‐gate) ethylene with a premium of only 30 % over the current market prices by judiciously combining CCU routes with fossil technologies. A closer look: The direct electroreduction of CO2 and the “green” methanol dehydration toward ethylene (where methanol is produced via CO2 hydrogenation) are compared with the fossil‐based technology for a range of power and CO2 sources. A hybrid ethylene plant combining fossil and CCU technologies is revealed as an optimal strategy to smooth the transition toward a decarbonized chemical industry.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cssc.202001312
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2467599817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2467599817</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g3642-1bbc11e662cf2a718496f08c71743d57b840e56bc9c87df323d889c3255d58b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1Kw0AUhQdRsFa3rgdcp85_JksN_REKlVbB3ZjMTGpKzNSZhBJXPoLP6JOYWunqnns551z4ALjGaIQRIrc6BD0iiCCEKSYnYIClYBEX7OX0qCk-BxchbBASKBFiAF5nXe5LU35mTelq6Ao4cSGU1c_XN8xqA9MF6eV9FqyBS9c2NsDCeThu3rrK1hY-emda_ZdtQ1mv4bK_7rK8snBcW7_uLsFZkVXBXv3PIXiejJ_SWTRfTB_Su3m0poKRCOe5xtgKQXRBshhLlogCSR3jmFHD41wyZLnIdaJlbApKqJEy0ZRwbrjMGR2Cm0Pv1ruP1oZGbVzr6_6lIkzEPEkkjntXcnDtysp2auvL98x3CiO1R6j2CNURoUpXq_S40V_LY2jz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2467599817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hybridization of Fossil‐ and CO2‐Based Routes for Ethylene Production using Renewable Energy</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ioannou, Iasonas ; D'Angelo, Sebastiano C. ; Martín, Antonio J. ; Pérez‐Ramírez, Javier ; Guillén‐Gosálbez, Gonzalo</creator><creatorcontrib>Ioannou, Iasonas ; D'Angelo, Sebastiano C. ; Martín, Antonio J. ; Pérez‐Ramírez, Javier ; Guillén‐Gosálbez, Gonzalo</creatorcontrib><description>Carbon capture and utilization (CCU) has recently gained broad interest in the chemical industry. Direct electro‐ and thermocatalytic technologies are currently the focus of intense research, where the former employs electricity directly to reduce the CO2 molecule, while the latter comprises hydrogenation of CO2 in tandem with electrocatalytic water splitting. So far, it remains unclear which of the two is superior, yet this information is considered critical. Focusing on the platform chemical ethylene, the two CCU routes were compared using state‐of‐the‐art performances with the fossil technology considering different power and CO2 sources. The thermo‐route was found to be, at present, economically and environmentally better, yet under the same electrolyzer efficiencies, the electro‐route would become superior. CCU routes could substantially improve the carbon footprint of the fossil ethylene (by 236 %) while decreasing at the same time impacts on human health, ecosystem quality, and resources (64, 140, and 80 %, respectively). However, they are economically unattractive even when considering externalities (indirect cost of environmental impacts), that is, 1.7‐ to 3.9‐fold more expensive compared to the current fossil‐based analogue. Acknowledging this limitation, the concept of hybridization was applied as a means to smooth the transition towards more sustainable chemicals. Accordingly, it was found that an optimal hybrid plant could produce carbon‐neutral (cradle‐to‐gate) ethylene with a premium of only 30 % over the current market prices by judiciously combining CCU routes with fossil technologies. A closer look: The direct electroreduction of CO2 and the “green” methanol dehydration toward ethylene (where methanol is produced via CO2 hydrogenation) are compared with the fossil‐based technology for a range of power and CO2 sources. A hybrid ethylene plant combining fossil and CCU technologies is revealed as an optimal strategy to smooth the transition toward a decarbonized chemical industry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1864-5631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1864-564X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202001312</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Carbon ; carbon capture and utilization ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon sequestration ; Chemical industry ; Environmental impact ; Ethylene ; hybridization ; Pricing ; renewable resources ; sustainable chemistry ; Water splitting</subject><ispartof>ChemSusChem, 2020-12, Vol.13 (23), p.6370-6380</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley‐VCH GmbH</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-6074-8473 ; 0000-0002-1152-5086 ; 0000-0003-0686-2800 ; 0000-0002-5805-7355 ; 0000-0003-3482-8829</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcssc.202001312$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcssc.202001312$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ioannou, Iasonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Angelo, Sebastiano C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín, Antonio J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez‐Ramírez, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillén‐Gosálbez, Gonzalo</creatorcontrib><title>Hybridization of Fossil‐ and CO2‐Based Routes for Ethylene Production using Renewable Energy</title><title>ChemSusChem</title><description>Carbon capture and utilization (CCU) has recently gained broad interest in the chemical industry. Direct electro‐ and thermocatalytic technologies are currently the focus of intense research, where the former employs electricity directly to reduce the CO2 molecule, while the latter comprises hydrogenation of CO2 in tandem with electrocatalytic water splitting. So far, it remains unclear which of the two is superior, yet this information is considered critical. Focusing on the platform chemical ethylene, the two CCU routes were compared using state‐of‐the‐art performances with the fossil technology considering different power and CO2 sources. The thermo‐route was found to be, at present, economically and environmentally better, yet under the same electrolyzer efficiencies, the electro‐route would become superior. CCU routes could substantially improve the carbon footprint of the fossil ethylene (by 236 %) while decreasing at the same time impacts on human health, ecosystem quality, and resources (64, 140, and 80 %, respectively). However, they are economically unattractive even when considering externalities (indirect cost of environmental impacts), that is, 1.7‐ to 3.9‐fold more expensive compared to the current fossil‐based analogue. Acknowledging this limitation, the concept of hybridization was applied as a means to smooth the transition towards more sustainable chemicals. Accordingly, it was found that an optimal hybrid plant could produce carbon‐neutral (cradle‐to‐gate) ethylene with a premium of only 30 % over the current market prices by judiciously combining CCU routes with fossil technologies. A closer look: The direct electroreduction of CO2 and the “green” methanol dehydration toward ethylene (where methanol is produced via CO2 hydrogenation) are compared with the fossil‐based technology for a range of power and CO2 sources. A hybrid ethylene plant combining fossil and CCU technologies is revealed as an optimal strategy to smooth the transition toward a decarbonized chemical industry.</description><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>carbon capture and utilization</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Chemical industry</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Ethylene</subject><subject>hybridization</subject><subject>Pricing</subject><subject>renewable resources</subject><subject>sustainable chemistry</subject><subject>Water splitting</subject><issn>1864-5631</issn><issn>1864-564X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM1Kw0AUhQdRsFa3rgdcp85_JksN_REKlVbB3ZjMTGpKzNSZhBJXPoLP6JOYWunqnns551z4ALjGaIQRIrc6BD0iiCCEKSYnYIClYBEX7OX0qCk-BxchbBASKBFiAF5nXe5LU35mTelq6Ao4cSGU1c_XN8xqA9MF6eV9FqyBS9c2NsDCeThu3rrK1hY-emda_ZdtQ1mv4bK_7rK8snBcW7_uLsFZkVXBXv3PIXiejJ_SWTRfTB_Su3m0poKRCOe5xtgKQXRBshhLlogCSR3jmFHD41wyZLnIdaJlbApKqJEy0ZRwbrjMGR2Cm0Pv1ruP1oZGbVzr6_6lIkzEPEkkjntXcnDtysp2auvL98x3CiO1R6j2CNURoUpXq_S40V_LY2jz</recordid><startdate>20201207</startdate><enddate>20201207</enddate><creator>Ioannou, Iasonas</creator><creator>D'Angelo, Sebastiano C.</creator><creator>Martín, Antonio J.</creator><creator>Pérez‐Ramírez, Javier</creator><creator>Guillén‐Gosálbez, Gonzalo</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K9.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6074-8473</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1152-5086</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0686-2800</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5805-7355</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3482-8829</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201207</creationdate><title>Hybridization of Fossil‐ and CO2‐Based Routes for Ethylene Production using Renewable Energy</title><author>Ioannou, Iasonas ; D'Angelo, Sebastiano C. ; Martín, Antonio J. ; Pérez‐Ramírez, Javier ; Guillén‐Gosálbez, Gonzalo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g3642-1bbc11e662cf2a718496f08c71743d57b840e56bc9c87df323d889c3255d58b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>carbon capture and utilization</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Chemical industry</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Ethylene</topic><topic>hybridization</topic><topic>Pricing</topic><topic>renewable resources</topic><topic>sustainable chemistry</topic><topic>Water splitting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ioannou, Iasonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Angelo, Sebastiano C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín, Antonio J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez‐Ramírez, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillén‐Gosálbez, Gonzalo</creatorcontrib><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>ChemSusChem</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ioannou, Iasonas</au><au>D'Angelo, Sebastiano C.</au><au>Martín, Antonio J.</au><au>Pérez‐Ramírez, Javier</au><au>Guillén‐Gosálbez, Gonzalo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hybridization of Fossil‐ and CO2‐Based Routes for Ethylene Production using Renewable Energy</atitle><jtitle>ChemSusChem</jtitle><date>2020-12-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>6370</spage><epage>6380</epage><pages>6370-6380</pages><issn>1864-5631</issn><eissn>1864-564X</eissn><abstract>Carbon capture and utilization (CCU) has recently gained broad interest in the chemical industry. Direct electro‐ and thermocatalytic technologies are currently the focus of intense research, where the former employs electricity directly to reduce the CO2 molecule, while the latter comprises hydrogenation of CO2 in tandem with electrocatalytic water splitting. So far, it remains unclear which of the two is superior, yet this information is considered critical. Focusing on the platform chemical ethylene, the two CCU routes were compared using state‐of‐the‐art performances with the fossil technology considering different power and CO2 sources. The thermo‐route was found to be, at present, economically and environmentally better, yet under the same electrolyzer efficiencies, the electro‐route would become superior. CCU routes could substantially improve the carbon footprint of the fossil ethylene (by 236 %) while decreasing at the same time impacts on human health, ecosystem quality, and resources (64, 140, and 80 %, respectively). However, they are economically unattractive even when considering externalities (indirect cost of environmental impacts), that is, 1.7‐ to 3.9‐fold more expensive compared to the current fossil‐based analogue. Acknowledging this limitation, the concept of hybridization was applied as a means to smooth the transition towards more sustainable chemicals. Accordingly, it was found that an optimal hybrid plant could produce carbon‐neutral (cradle‐to‐gate) ethylene with a premium of only 30 % over the current market prices by judiciously combining CCU routes with fossil technologies. A closer look: The direct electroreduction of CO2 and the “green” methanol dehydration toward ethylene (where methanol is produced via CO2 hydrogenation) are compared with the fossil‐based technology for a range of power and CO2 sources. A hybrid ethylene plant combining fossil and CCU technologies is revealed as an optimal strategy to smooth the transition toward a decarbonized chemical industry.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/cssc.202001312</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6074-8473</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1152-5086</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0686-2800</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5805-7355</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3482-8829</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1864-5631
ispartof ChemSusChem, 2020-12, Vol.13 (23), p.6370-6380
issn 1864-5631
1864-564X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2467599817
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Carbon
carbon capture and utilization
Carbon dioxide
Carbon sequestration
Chemical industry
Environmental impact
Ethylene
hybridization
Pricing
renewable resources
sustainable chemistry
Water splitting
title Hybridization of Fossil‐ and CO2‐Based Routes for Ethylene Production using Renewable Energy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T11%3A55%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hybridization%20of%20Fossil%E2%80%90%20and%20CO2%E2%80%90Based%20Routes%20for%20Ethylene%20Production%20using%20Renewable%20Energy&rft.jtitle=ChemSusChem&rft.au=Ioannou,%20Iasonas&rft.date=2020-12-07&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=6370&rft.epage=6380&rft.pages=6370-6380&rft.issn=1864-5631&rft.eissn=1864-564X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cssc.202001312&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2467599817%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2467599817&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true