Feasibility of replacement of nuclear power with other energy sources in the Czech republic
The feasibility and consequences of replacing nuclear power plants (NPP) in the Czech Republic with other energy sources are discussed. The NPP produced about one-third of electricity in the Czech Republic in 2017. Renewable energy sources such as hydropower, wind and solar power plants and biomass/...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Thermal science 2020, Vol.24 (6 Part A), p.3543-3553 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 3553 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 Part A |
| container_start_page | 3543 |
| container_title | Thermal science |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Charvat, Pavel Klimes, Lubomir Pospisil, Jiri Klemes, Jiri Varbanov, Petar |
| description | The feasibility and consequences of replacing nuclear power plants (NPP) in the Czech Republic with other energy sources are discussed. The NPP produced about one-third of electricity in the Czech Republic in 2017. Renewable energy sources such as hydropower, wind and solar power plants and biomass/biogas burning power plants produced about 11% of electricity in 2017. Due to the geographical and other constraints (intermittency, land footprint, and public acceptance), the renewables do not have the potential to entirely replace the capacity of the NPP. The only feasible technologies that could replace NPP in the Czech Republic in the near future are the power plants using fossil fuels. The combined cycle power plants running on natural gas (NGCC) are technically and environmentally fea-sible alternative for NPP at the moment. However, the natural gas imports would increase by two-thirds and the total greenhouse gas emissions would go up by about 10% if the power production of the NPP was entirely replaced by NGCC in the Czech Republic. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2298/TSCI200323275C |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2466752543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2466752543</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-1742869c659f9e7dee35622e340eb04edcbe8c7581a0cec1bbed06a9d4d393773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM1Lw0AQxRdRsFavnhc8p2529itHCVYLBQ_Wk4ew2UzsljSJuwml_vWm1IunefP48WZ4hNynbMF5Zh437_mKMwYcuJb5BZlxAJHoVMElmTGQIskMqGtyE-OOMaWM0TPyuUQbfekbPxxpV9OAfWMd7rEdTms7ugZtoH13wEAPftjSbthOElsMX0cauzE4jNS3dLJp_oNue8oYy8a7W3JV2ybi3d-ck4_l8yZ_TdZvL6v8aZ04YHpIUi24UZlTMqsz1BUiSMU5gmBYMoGVK9E4LU1qmUOXliVWTNmsEhVkoDXMycM5tw_d94hxKHbTW-10suBCKS25FDBRizPlQhdjwLrog9_bcCxSVpwKLP4XCL_xxGQx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2466752543</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility of replacement of nuclear power with other energy sources in the Czech republic</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Charvat, Pavel ; Klimes, Lubomir ; Pospisil, Jiri ; Klemes, Jiri ; Varbanov, Petar</creator><creatorcontrib>Charvat, Pavel ; Klimes, Lubomir ; Pospisil, Jiri ; Klemes, Jiri ; Varbanov, Petar</creatorcontrib><description>The feasibility and consequences of replacing nuclear power plants (NPP) in the Czech Republic with other energy sources are discussed. The NPP produced about one-third of electricity in the Czech Republic in 2017. Renewable energy sources such as hydropower, wind and solar power plants and biomass/biogas burning power plants produced about 11% of electricity in 2017. Due to the geographical and other constraints (intermittency, land footprint, and public acceptance), the renewables do not have the potential to entirely replace the capacity of the NPP. The only feasible technologies that could replace NPP in the Czech Republic in the near future are the power plants using fossil fuels. The combined cycle power plants running on natural gas (NGCC) are technically and environmentally fea-sible alternative for NPP at the moment. However, the natural gas imports would increase by two-thirds and the total greenhouse gas emissions would go up by about 10% if the power production of the NPP was entirely replaced by NGCC in the Czech Republic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0354-9836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2334-7163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2298/TSCI200323275C</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Belgrade: Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia</publisher><subject>Alternative energy sources ; Biogas ; Biomass burning ; Combined cycle power generation ; Energy resources ; Feasibility ; Finite element method ; Fossil fuels ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Hydroelectric power ; Natural gas ; Nuclear energy ; Nuclear fuels ; Nuclear power plants ; Renewable energy sources</subject><ispartof>Thermal science, 2020, Vol.24 (6 Part A), p.3543-3553</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-1742869c659f9e7dee35622e340eb04edcbe8c7581a0cec1bbed06a9d4d393773</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Charvat, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klimes, Lubomir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pospisil, Jiri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klemes, Jiri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varbanov, Petar</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility of replacement of nuclear power with other energy sources in the Czech republic</title><title>Thermal science</title><description>The feasibility and consequences of replacing nuclear power plants (NPP) in the Czech Republic with other energy sources are discussed. The NPP produced about one-third of electricity in the Czech Republic in 2017. Renewable energy sources such as hydropower, wind and solar power plants and biomass/biogas burning power plants produced about 11% of electricity in 2017. Due to the geographical and other constraints (intermittency, land footprint, and public acceptance), the renewables do not have the potential to entirely replace the capacity of the NPP. The only feasible technologies that could replace NPP in the Czech Republic in the near future are the power plants using fossil fuels. The combined cycle power plants running on natural gas (NGCC) are technically and environmentally fea-sible alternative for NPP at the moment. However, the natural gas imports would increase by two-thirds and the total greenhouse gas emissions would go up by about 10% if the power production of the NPP was entirely replaced by NGCC in the Czech Republic.</description><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Biogas</subject><subject>Biomass burning</subject><subject>Combined cycle power generation</subject><subject>Energy resources</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Hydroelectric power</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Nuclear energy</subject><subject>Nuclear fuels</subject><subject>Nuclear power plants</subject><subject>Renewable energy sources</subject><issn>0354-9836</issn><issn>2334-7163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkM1Lw0AQxRdRsFavnhc8p2529itHCVYLBQ_Wk4ew2UzsljSJuwml_vWm1IunefP48WZ4hNynbMF5Zh437_mKMwYcuJb5BZlxAJHoVMElmTGQIskMqGtyE-OOMaWM0TPyuUQbfekbPxxpV9OAfWMd7rEdTms7ugZtoH13wEAPftjSbthOElsMX0cauzE4jNS3dLJp_oNue8oYy8a7W3JV2ybi3d-ck4_l8yZ_TdZvL6v8aZ04YHpIUi24UZlTMqsz1BUiSMU5gmBYMoGVK9E4LU1qmUOXliVWTNmsEhVkoDXMycM5tw_d94hxKHbTW-10suBCKS25FDBRizPlQhdjwLrog9_bcCxSVpwKLP4XCL_xxGQx</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Charvat, Pavel</creator><creator>Klimes, Lubomir</creator><creator>Pospisil, Jiri</creator><creator>Klemes, Jiri</creator><creator>Varbanov, Petar</creator><general>Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Feasibility of replacement of nuclear power with other energy sources in the Czech republic</title><author>Charvat, Pavel ; Klimes, Lubomir ; Pospisil, Jiri ; Klemes, Jiri ; Varbanov, Petar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-1742869c659f9e7dee35622e340eb04edcbe8c7581a0cec1bbed06a9d4d393773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Biogas</topic><topic>Biomass burning</topic><topic>Combined cycle power generation</topic><topic>Energy resources</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Hydroelectric power</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Nuclear energy</topic><topic>Nuclear fuels</topic><topic>Nuclear power plants</topic><topic>Renewable energy sources</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Charvat, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klimes, Lubomir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pospisil, Jiri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klemes, Jiri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varbanov, Petar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Thermal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Charvat, Pavel</au><au>Klimes, Lubomir</au><au>Pospisil, Jiri</au><au>Klemes, Jiri</au><au>Varbanov, Petar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility of replacement of nuclear power with other energy sources in the Czech republic</atitle><jtitle>Thermal science</jtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>6 Part A</issue><spage>3543</spage><epage>3553</epage><pages>3543-3553</pages><issn>0354-9836</issn><eissn>2334-7163</eissn><abstract>The feasibility and consequences of replacing nuclear power plants (NPP) in the Czech Republic with other energy sources are discussed. The NPP produced about one-third of electricity in the Czech Republic in 2017. Renewable energy sources such as hydropower, wind and solar power plants and biomass/biogas burning power plants produced about 11% of electricity in 2017. Due to the geographical and other constraints (intermittency, land footprint, and public acceptance), the renewables do not have the potential to entirely replace the capacity of the NPP. The only feasible technologies that could replace NPP in the Czech Republic in the near future are the power plants using fossil fuels. The combined cycle power plants running on natural gas (NGCC) are technically and environmentally fea-sible alternative for NPP at the moment. However, the natural gas imports would increase by two-thirds and the total greenhouse gas emissions would go up by about 10% if the power production of the NPP was entirely replaced by NGCC in the Czech Republic.</abstract><cop>Belgrade</cop><pub>Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia</pub><doi>10.2298/TSCI200323275C</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0354-9836 |
| ispartof | Thermal science, 2020, Vol.24 (6 Part A), p.3543-3553 |
| issn | 0354-9836 2334-7163 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2466752543 |
| source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Alternative energy sources Biogas Biomass burning Combined cycle power generation Energy resources Feasibility Finite element method Fossil fuels Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Hydroelectric power Natural gas Nuclear energy Nuclear fuels Nuclear power plants Renewable energy sources |
| title | Feasibility of replacement of nuclear power with other energy sources in the Czech republic |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T06%3A26%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20of%20replacement%20of%20nuclear%20power%20with%20other%20energy%20sources%20in%20the%20Czech%20republic&rft.jtitle=Thermal%20science&rft.au=Charvat,%20Pavel&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=6%20Part%20A&rft.spage=3543&rft.epage=3553&rft.pages=3543-3553&rft.issn=0354-9836&rft.eissn=2334-7163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2298/TSCI200323275C&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2466752543%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2466752543&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |