Studies into Fungal Decay of Wood In Ground Contact—Part 1: The Influence of Water-Holding Capacity, Moisture Content, and Temperature of Soil Substrates on Fungal Decay of Selected Timbers
This article presents the results from two separate studies investigating the decay of wood in ground contact using adapted versions of laboratory-based terrestrial microcosm (TMC) tests according to CEN/TS 15083-2:2005. The first study (A) sought to isolate the effect of soil water-holding capacity...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Forests 2020-12, Vol.11 (12), p.1284 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1284 |
container_title | Forests |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Marais, Brendan Nicholas Brischke, Christian Militz, Holger Peters, Johann Hinrich Reinhardt, Lena |
description | This article presents the results from two separate studies investigating the decay of wood in ground contact using adapted versions of laboratory-based terrestrial microcosm (TMC) tests according to CEN/TS 15083-2:2005. The first study (A) sought to isolate the effect of soil water-holding capacity (WHCsoil [%]) and soil moisture content (MCsoil [%WHCsoil]) on the decay of five commercially important wood species; European beech (Fagus sylvatica), English oak heartwood (Quercus robur), Norway spruce (Picea abies), Douglas-fir heartwood (Pseudotsuga menziesii), and Scots pine sapwood (Pinus sylvestris), while keeping soil temperature (Tsoil) constant. Combinations of soil mixtures with WHCsoil of 30%, 60%, and 90%, and MCsoil of 30%, 70%, and 95%WHCsoil were utilized. A general trend showed higher wood decay, measured in oven-dry mass loss (MLwood [%]), for specimens of all species incubated in soils with WHCsoil of 60% and 90% compared to 30%. Furthermore, drier soils (MCsoil of 30 and 70%WHCsoil) showed higher MLwood compared to wetter soils (95%WHCsoil). The second study (B) built on the first’s findings, and sought to isolate the effect of Tsoil and MCsoil on the decay of European beech wood, while keeping WHCsoil constant. The study used constant incubation temperature intervals (Tsoil), 5–40 °C, and alternating intervals of 10/20, 10/30, and 20/30 °C. A general trend showed drier MCsoil (60%WHCsoil), and Tsoil of 20–40 °C, delivered high wood decay (MLwood > 20%). Higher MCsoil (90%WHCsoil) and Tsoil of 5–10 °C, delivered low wood decay (MLwood < 5%). Alternating Tsoil generally delivered less MLwood compared to their mean constant Tsoil counterparts (15, 20, 25 °C). The results suggest that differences in wood species and inoculum potential (WHCsoil) between sites, as well as changes in MCsoil and Tsoil attributed to daily and seasonal weather patterns can influence in-ground wood decay rate. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/f11121284 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2466676581</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2466676581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-879991030da93278a855b663daef37203a503bb44ef8bf3979b5bc4410f881cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUc1KAzEQXkTBUnvwDQKehK4mm_1JvEm1P1BRaMXjks1O6pZtUpPsoTcfwvfxXXwSYxURnMsMM9_3zTBfFJ0SfEEpx5eKEJKQhKUHUY9wzuOU4-LwT30cDZxb4xBZwXiS9qL3he_qBhxqtDdo3OmVaNENSLFDRqEnY2o002hiTadrNDLaC-k_Xt8ehPWIXKHlM4S5ajvQEvYM4cHGU9PWjV6hkdgK2fjdEN2ZxvnOwl4DtB8iEQSXsNmCFftBIC9M06JFVzkfeuEmo_9dtIAWpIdAbTYVWHcSHSnROhj85H70OL5djqbx_H4yG13PY5nwxMesCC8gmOJacJoUTLAsq_Kc1gIULRJMRYZpVaUpKFYpygteZZVMU4IVY0RK2o_OvnW31rx04Hy5Np3VYWWZpHmeF3nGSECdf6OkNc5ZUOXWNhthdyXB5ZdF5a9F9BPRTIS1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2466676581</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Studies into Fungal Decay of Wood In Ground Contact—Part 1: The Influence of Water-Holding Capacity, Moisture Content, and Temperature of Soil Substrates on Fungal Decay of Selected Timbers</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Marais, Brendan Nicholas ; Brischke, Christian ; Militz, Holger ; Peters, Johann Hinrich ; Reinhardt, Lena</creator><creatorcontrib>Marais, Brendan Nicholas ; Brischke, Christian ; Militz, Holger ; Peters, Johann Hinrich ; Reinhardt, Lena</creatorcontrib><description>This article presents the results from two separate studies investigating the decay of wood in ground contact using adapted versions of laboratory-based terrestrial microcosm (TMC) tests according to CEN/TS 15083-2:2005. The first study (A) sought to isolate the effect of soil water-holding capacity (WHCsoil [%]) and soil moisture content (MCsoil [%WHCsoil]) on the decay of five commercially important wood species; European beech (Fagus sylvatica), English oak heartwood (Quercus robur), Norway spruce (Picea abies), Douglas-fir heartwood (Pseudotsuga menziesii), and Scots pine sapwood (Pinus sylvestris), while keeping soil temperature (Tsoil) constant. Combinations of soil mixtures with WHCsoil of 30%, 60%, and 90%, and MCsoil of 30%, 70%, and 95%WHCsoil were utilized. A general trend showed higher wood decay, measured in oven-dry mass loss (MLwood [%]), for specimens of all species incubated in soils with WHCsoil of 60% and 90% compared to 30%. Furthermore, drier soils (MCsoil of 30 and 70%WHCsoil) showed higher MLwood compared to wetter soils (95%WHCsoil). The second study (B) built on the first’s findings, and sought to isolate the effect of Tsoil and MCsoil on the decay of European beech wood, while keeping WHCsoil constant. The study used constant incubation temperature intervals (Tsoil), 5–40 °C, and alternating intervals of 10/20, 10/30, and 20/30 °C. A general trend showed drier MCsoil (60%WHCsoil), and Tsoil of 20–40 °C, delivered high wood decay (MLwood > 20%). Higher MCsoil (90%WHCsoil) and Tsoil of 5–10 °C, delivered low wood decay (MLwood < 5%). Alternating Tsoil generally delivered less MLwood compared to their mean constant Tsoil counterparts (15, 20, 25 °C). The results suggest that differences in wood species and inoculum potential (WHCsoil) between sites, as well as changes in MCsoil and Tsoil attributed to daily and seasonal weather patterns can influence in-ground wood decay rate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1999-4907</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1999-4907</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/f11121284</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Beech ; Decay ; Decay rate ; Drying ovens ; Experiments ; Fagus sylvatica ; Fungi ; Horticulture ; Inoculum ; Inoculum potential ; Intervals ; Moisture content ; Outdoors ; Physiology ; Picea abies ; Pine trees ; Pinus sylvestris ; Pseudotsuga menziesii ; Quercus robur ; Research methodology ; Soil mixtures ; Soil moisture ; Soil temperature ; Soil water ; Substrates ; Terrestrial environments ; Water content ; Weather ; Weather patterns ; Wood</subject><ispartof>Forests, 2020-12, Vol.11 (12), p.1284</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-879991030da93278a855b663daef37203a503bb44ef8bf3979b5bc4410f881cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-879991030da93278a855b663daef37203a503bb44ef8bf3979b5bc4410f881cc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4652-825X ; 0000-0002-6727-2030</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marais, Brendan Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brischke, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Militz, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Johann Hinrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinhardt, Lena</creatorcontrib><title>Studies into Fungal Decay of Wood In Ground Contact—Part 1: The Influence of Water-Holding Capacity, Moisture Content, and Temperature of Soil Substrates on Fungal Decay of Selected Timbers</title><title>Forests</title><description>This article presents the results from two separate studies investigating the decay of wood in ground contact using adapted versions of laboratory-based terrestrial microcosm (TMC) tests according to CEN/TS 15083-2:2005. The first study (A) sought to isolate the effect of soil water-holding capacity (WHCsoil [%]) and soil moisture content (MCsoil [%WHCsoil]) on the decay of five commercially important wood species; European beech (Fagus sylvatica), English oak heartwood (Quercus robur), Norway spruce (Picea abies), Douglas-fir heartwood (Pseudotsuga menziesii), and Scots pine sapwood (Pinus sylvestris), while keeping soil temperature (Tsoil) constant. Combinations of soil mixtures with WHCsoil of 30%, 60%, and 90%, and MCsoil of 30%, 70%, and 95%WHCsoil were utilized. A general trend showed higher wood decay, measured in oven-dry mass loss (MLwood [%]), for specimens of all species incubated in soils with WHCsoil of 60% and 90% compared to 30%. Furthermore, drier soils (MCsoil of 30 and 70%WHCsoil) showed higher MLwood compared to wetter soils (95%WHCsoil). The second study (B) built on the first’s findings, and sought to isolate the effect of Tsoil and MCsoil on the decay of European beech wood, while keeping WHCsoil constant. The study used constant incubation temperature intervals (Tsoil), 5–40 °C, and alternating intervals of 10/20, 10/30, and 20/30 °C. A general trend showed drier MCsoil (60%WHCsoil), and Tsoil of 20–40 °C, delivered high wood decay (MLwood > 20%). Higher MCsoil (90%WHCsoil) and Tsoil of 5–10 °C, delivered low wood decay (MLwood < 5%). Alternating Tsoil generally delivered less MLwood compared to their mean constant Tsoil counterparts (15, 20, 25 °C). The results suggest that differences in wood species and inoculum potential (WHCsoil) between sites, as well as changes in MCsoil and Tsoil attributed to daily and seasonal weather patterns can influence in-ground wood decay rate.</description><subject>Beech</subject><subject>Decay</subject><subject>Decay rate</subject><subject>Drying ovens</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fagus sylvatica</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Horticulture</subject><subject>Inoculum</subject><subject>Inoculum potential</subject><subject>Intervals</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Outdoors</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Picea abies</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Pinus sylvestris</subject><subject>Pseudotsuga menziesii</subject><subject>Quercus robur</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Soil mixtures</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Soil temperature</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>Water content</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Weather patterns</subject><subject>Wood</subject><issn>1999-4907</issn><issn>1999-4907</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNplUc1KAzEQXkTBUnvwDQKehK4mm_1JvEm1P1BRaMXjks1O6pZtUpPsoTcfwvfxXXwSYxURnMsMM9_3zTBfFJ0SfEEpx5eKEJKQhKUHUY9wzuOU4-LwT30cDZxb4xBZwXiS9qL3he_qBhxqtDdo3OmVaNENSLFDRqEnY2o002hiTadrNDLaC-k_Xt8ehPWIXKHlM4S5ajvQEvYM4cHGU9PWjV6hkdgK2fjdEN2ZxvnOwl4DtB8iEQSXsNmCFftBIC9M06JFVzkfeuEmo_9dtIAWpIdAbTYVWHcSHSnROhj85H70OL5djqbx_H4yG13PY5nwxMesCC8gmOJacJoUTLAsq_Kc1gIULRJMRYZpVaUpKFYpygteZZVMU4IVY0RK2o_OvnW31rx04Hy5Np3VYWWZpHmeF3nGSECdf6OkNc5ZUOXWNhthdyXB5ZdF5a9F9BPRTIS1</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Marais, Brendan Nicholas</creator><creator>Brischke, Christian</creator><creator>Militz, Holger</creator><creator>Peters, Johann Hinrich</creator><creator>Reinhardt, Lena</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4652-825X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6727-2030</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Studies into Fungal Decay of Wood In Ground Contact—Part 1: The Influence of Water-Holding Capacity, Moisture Content, and Temperature of Soil Substrates on Fungal Decay of Selected Timbers</title><author>Marais, Brendan Nicholas ; Brischke, Christian ; Militz, Holger ; Peters, Johann Hinrich ; Reinhardt, Lena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-879991030da93278a855b663daef37203a503bb44ef8bf3979b5bc4410f881cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Beech</topic><topic>Decay</topic><topic>Decay rate</topic><topic>Drying ovens</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fagus sylvatica</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Horticulture</topic><topic>Inoculum</topic><topic>Inoculum potential</topic><topic>Intervals</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Outdoors</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Picea abies</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Pinus sylvestris</topic><topic>Pseudotsuga menziesii</topic><topic>Quercus robur</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Soil mixtures</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Soil temperature</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>Water content</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Weather patterns</topic><topic>Wood</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marais, Brendan Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brischke, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Militz, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Johann Hinrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinhardt, Lena</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Forests</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marais, Brendan Nicholas</au><au>Brischke, Christian</au><au>Militz, Holger</au><au>Peters, Johann Hinrich</au><au>Reinhardt, Lena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Studies into Fungal Decay of Wood In Ground Contact—Part 1: The Influence of Water-Holding Capacity, Moisture Content, and Temperature of Soil Substrates on Fungal Decay of Selected Timbers</atitle><jtitle>Forests</jtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1284</spage><pages>1284-</pages><issn>1999-4907</issn><eissn>1999-4907</eissn><abstract>This article presents the results from two separate studies investigating the decay of wood in ground contact using adapted versions of laboratory-based terrestrial microcosm (TMC) tests according to CEN/TS 15083-2:2005. The first study (A) sought to isolate the effect of soil water-holding capacity (WHCsoil [%]) and soil moisture content (MCsoil [%WHCsoil]) on the decay of five commercially important wood species; European beech (Fagus sylvatica), English oak heartwood (Quercus robur), Norway spruce (Picea abies), Douglas-fir heartwood (Pseudotsuga menziesii), and Scots pine sapwood (Pinus sylvestris), while keeping soil temperature (Tsoil) constant. Combinations of soil mixtures with WHCsoil of 30%, 60%, and 90%, and MCsoil of 30%, 70%, and 95%WHCsoil were utilized. A general trend showed higher wood decay, measured in oven-dry mass loss (MLwood [%]), for specimens of all species incubated in soils with WHCsoil of 60% and 90% compared to 30%. Furthermore, drier soils (MCsoil of 30 and 70%WHCsoil) showed higher MLwood compared to wetter soils (95%WHCsoil). The second study (B) built on the first’s findings, and sought to isolate the effect of Tsoil and MCsoil on the decay of European beech wood, while keeping WHCsoil constant. The study used constant incubation temperature intervals (Tsoil), 5–40 °C, and alternating intervals of 10/20, 10/30, and 20/30 °C. A general trend showed drier MCsoil (60%WHCsoil), and Tsoil of 20–40 °C, delivered high wood decay (MLwood > 20%). Higher MCsoil (90%WHCsoil) and Tsoil of 5–10 °C, delivered low wood decay (MLwood < 5%). Alternating Tsoil generally delivered less MLwood compared to their mean constant Tsoil counterparts (15, 20, 25 °C). The results suggest that differences in wood species and inoculum potential (WHCsoil) between sites, as well as changes in MCsoil and Tsoil attributed to daily and seasonal weather patterns can influence in-ground wood decay rate.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/f11121284</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4652-825X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6727-2030</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1999-4907 |
ispartof | Forests, 2020-12, Vol.11 (12), p.1284 |
issn | 1999-4907 1999-4907 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2466676581 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
subjects | Beech Decay Decay rate Drying ovens Experiments Fagus sylvatica Fungi Horticulture Inoculum Inoculum potential Intervals Moisture content Outdoors Physiology Picea abies Pine trees Pinus sylvestris Pseudotsuga menziesii Quercus robur Research methodology Soil mixtures Soil moisture Soil temperature Soil water Substrates Terrestrial environments Water content Weather Weather patterns Wood |
title | Studies into Fungal Decay of Wood In Ground Contact—Part 1: The Influence of Water-Holding Capacity, Moisture Content, and Temperature of Soil Substrates on Fungal Decay of Selected Timbers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T01%3A50%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Studies%20into%20Fungal%20Decay%20of%20Wood%20In%20Ground%20Contact%E2%80%94Part%201:%20The%20Influence%20of%20Water-Holding%20Capacity,%20Moisture%20Content,%20and%20Temperature%20of%20Soil%20Substrates%20on%20Fungal%20Decay%20of%20Selected%20Timbers&rft.jtitle=Forests&rft.au=Marais,%20Brendan%20Nicholas&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1284&rft.pages=1284-&rft.issn=1999-4907&rft.eissn=1999-4907&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/f11121284&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2466676581%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2466676581&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |