Submerged photocatalytic membrane reactor with suspended and immobilized N-doped TiO2 under visible irradiation for diclofenac removal from wastewater

•Photocatalytic membrane reactors with suspended and immobilized N-TiO2 were used for diclofenac removal.•Coupling H2O2 with the photocatalytic process could enhance the DCF removal efficiency.•Coupling H2O2 with the photocatalytic process yielded higher resistant permeate flux rates. A submerged ph...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Process safety and environmental protection 2020-10, Vol.142, p.229-237
Hauptverfasser: Nguyen, Van-Huy, Tran, Quoc Ba, Nguyen, Xuan Cuong, Hai, Le Thanh, Ho, Thi Thanh Tam, Shokouhimehr, Mohammadreza, Vo, Dai-Viet N., Lam, Su Shiung, Nguyen, Hai Phong, Hoang, Cong Tin, Ly, Quang Viet, Peng, Wanxi, Kim, Soo Young, Tung, Tra Van, Van Le, Quyet
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 237
container_issue
container_start_page 229
container_title Process safety and environmental protection
container_volume 142
creator Nguyen, Van-Huy
Tran, Quoc Ba
Nguyen, Xuan Cuong
Hai, Le Thanh
Ho, Thi Thanh Tam
Shokouhimehr, Mohammadreza
Vo, Dai-Viet N.
Lam, Su Shiung
Nguyen, Hai Phong
Hoang, Cong Tin
Ly, Quang Viet
Peng, Wanxi
Kim, Soo Young
Tung, Tra Van
Van Le, Quyet
description •Photocatalytic membrane reactors with suspended and immobilized N-TiO2 were used for diclofenac removal.•Coupling H2O2 with the photocatalytic process could enhance the DCF removal efficiency.•Coupling H2O2 with the photocatalytic process yielded higher resistant permeate flux rates. A submerged photocatalytic membrane reactor (SPMR) was used with suspended and immobilized N–TiO2 under visible irradiation for diclofenac (DCF) removal from wastewater. The effects of initial N–TiO2 concentrations for the SPMR with suspended N–TiO2 were determined for batch processes. Hydrogen peroxide was also coupled with the photocatalytic process. In continuous conditions, a reverse osmosis (RO) membrane was combined with the SPMR for enhancing effluent quality. DCF removal by the SPMR with suspended and immobilized N–TiO2 at a low N–TiO2 dosage (0.5g/L) was not much different between the two systems, but increased with higher N–TiO2 dosages for the reactor with suspended N–TiO2. Coupling H2O2 with the photocatalytic process under visible irradiation enhanced the DCF removal efficiency. In continuous conditions, DCF concentrations in the photoreactor increased during the reaction time, while those in the effluent (RO permeate) were steady for both systems and both processes. The permeate flux in the reactor with suspended N–TiO2 declined faster than in the reactor with the immobilized N–TiO2. Coupling H2O2 with the photocatalytic process yielded more resistant permeate flux rates. The cake layer formed on the microfiltration membrane of the SPMR with suspended N–TiO2 under visible irradiation was denser than others after completing the process.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.psep.2020.05.041
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2466059793</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0957582020307175</els_id><sourcerecordid>2466059793</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-9ed3222ad6049be240eda3ff19d303a4598eefb242101564a1344cb49ce552a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9r3DAQxUVpodttvkBOgpzt6K8dQy4htEkhNIemZzGWxo0W23IkeZfkg-TzVsv23NNj4L03Mz9CzjmrOePN5a5eEi61YILVTNdM8Q9kw1ulKqm7q49kwzrdVvpKsM_kS0o7xhgXLd-Q919rP2H8g44uzyEHCxnG1-wtnXDqI8xII4LNIdKDz880rWnB2RU7zI76aQq9H_1bmX9WLixFn_yjoGuxRLr3yfcjUh8jOA_Zh5kOpcl5O4YBZ7ClfAp7GOkQw0QPkDIeIGP8Sj4NMCY8-6db8vv7t6fb--rh8e7H7c1DZWXb5qpDJ4UQ4Bqmuh6FYuhADgPvnGQSVPkdceiFEoWSbhRwqZTtVWdRawFabsnFqXeJ4WXFlM0urHEuK41QTcN013ayuMTJZWNIKeJglugniK-GM3Pkb3bmyN8c-RumTeFfQtenEJb79x6jSdbjbNH5iDYbF_z_4n8B3uOSIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2466059793</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Submerged photocatalytic membrane reactor with suspended and immobilized N-doped TiO2 under visible irradiation for diclofenac removal from wastewater</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Nguyen, Van-Huy ; Tran, Quoc Ba ; Nguyen, Xuan Cuong ; Hai, Le Thanh ; Ho, Thi Thanh Tam ; Shokouhimehr, Mohammadreza ; Vo, Dai-Viet N. ; Lam, Su Shiung ; Nguyen, Hai Phong ; Hoang, Cong Tin ; Ly, Quang Viet ; Peng, Wanxi ; Kim, Soo Young ; Tung, Tra Van ; Van Le, Quyet</creator><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Van-Huy ; Tran, Quoc Ba ; Nguyen, Xuan Cuong ; Hai, Le Thanh ; Ho, Thi Thanh Tam ; Shokouhimehr, Mohammadreza ; Vo, Dai-Viet N. ; Lam, Su Shiung ; Nguyen, Hai Phong ; Hoang, Cong Tin ; Ly, Quang Viet ; Peng, Wanxi ; Kim, Soo Young ; Tung, Tra Van ; Van Le, Quyet</creatorcontrib><description>•Photocatalytic membrane reactors with suspended and immobilized N-TiO2 were used for diclofenac removal.•Coupling H2O2 with the photocatalytic process could enhance the DCF removal efficiency.•Coupling H2O2 with the photocatalytic process yielded higher resistant permeate flux rates. A submerged photocatalytic membrane reactor (SPMR) was used with suspended and immobilized N–TiO2 under visible irradiation for diclofenac (DCF) removal from wastewater. The effects of initial N–TiO2 concentrations for the SPMR with suspended N–TiO2 were determined for batch processes. Hydrogen peroxide was also coupled with the photocatalytic process. In continuous conditions, a reverse osmosis (RO) membrane was combined with the SPMR for enhancing effluent quality. DCF removal by the SPMR with suspended and immobilized N–TiO2 at a low N–TiO2 dosage (0.5g/L) was not much different between the two systems, but increased with higher N–TiO2 dosages for the reactor with suspended N–TiO2. Coupling H2O2 with the photocatalytic process under visible irradiation enhanced the DCF removal efficiency. In continuous conditions, DCF concentrations in the photoreactor increased during the reaction time, while those in the effluent (RO permeate) were steady for both systems and both processes. The permeate flux in the reactor with suspended N–TiO2 declined faster than in the reactor with the immobilized N–TiO2. Coupling H2O2 with the photocatalytic process yielded more resistant permeate flux rates. The cake layer formed on the microfiltration membrane of the SPMR with suspended N–TiO2 under visible irradiation was denser than others after completing the process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-5820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-3598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.05.041</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rugby: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Batch processes ; Batch processing ; Coupling ; Diclofenac ; Effluents ; Hydrogen peroxide ; Immobilized N-TiO2 ; Irradiation ; Membrane reactors ; Membranes ; Microfiltration ; Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs ; Photocatalysis ; Radiation ; Reaction time ; Reactors ; Reverse osmosis ; SPMR ; Suspended N-TiO2 ; Titanium dioxide ; Vis/N-TiO2 ; Vis/N–TiO2/H2O2 ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment</subject><ispartof>Process safety and environmental protection, 2020-10, Vol.142, p.229-237</ispartof><rights>2020 Institution of Chemical Engineers</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-9ed3222ad6049be240eda3ff19d303a4598eefb242101564a1344cb49ce552a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-9ed3222ad6049be240eda3ff19d303a4598eefb242101564a1344cb49ce552a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.05.041$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Van-Huy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Quoc Ba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Xuan Cuong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hai, Le Thanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Thi Thanh Tam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shokouhimehr, Mohammadreza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vo, Dai-Viet N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Su Shiung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Hai Phong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoang, Cong Tin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ly, Quang Viet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Wanxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Soo Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tung, Tra Van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Le, Quyet</creatorcontrib><title>Submerged photocatalytic membrane reactor with suspended and immobilized N-doped TiO2 under visible irradiation for diclofenac removal from wastewater</title><title>Process safety and environmental protection</title><description>•Photocatalytic membrane reactors with suspended and immobilized N-TiO2 were used for diclofenac removal.•Coupling H2O2 with the photocatalytic process could enhance the DCF removal efficiency.•Coupling H2O2 with the photocatalytic process yielded higher resistant permeate flux rates. A submerged photocatalytic membrane reactor (SPMR) was used with suspended and immobilized N–TiO2 under visible irradiation for diclofenac (DCF) removal from wastewater. The effects of initial N–TiO2 concentrations for the SPMR with suspended N–TiO2 were determined for batch processes. Hydrogen peroxide was also coupled with the photocatalytic process. In continuous conditions, a reverse osmosis (RO) membrane was combined with the SPMR for enhancing effluent quality. DCF removal by the SPMR with suspended and immobilized N–TiO2 at a low N–TiO2 dosage (0.5g/L) was not much different between the two systems, but increased with higher N–TiO2 dosages for the reactor with suspended N–TiO2. Coupling H2O2 with the photocatalytic process under visible irradiation enhanced the DCF removal efficiency. In continuous conditions, DCF concentrations in the photoreactor increased during the reaction time, while those in the effluent (RO permeate) were steady for both systems and both processes. The permeate flux in the reactor with suspended N–TiO2 declined faster than in the reactor with the immobilized N–TiO2. Coupling H2O2 with the photocatalytic process yielded more resistant permeate flux rates. The cake layer formed on the microfiltration membrane of the SPMR with suspended N–TiO2 under visible irradiation was denser than others after completing the process.</description><subject>Batch processes</subject><subject>Batch processing</subject><subject>Coupling</subject><subject>Diclofenac</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Hydrogen peroxide</subject><subject>Immobilized N-TiO2</subject><subject>Irradiation</subject><subject>Membrane reactors</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Microfiltration</subject><subject>Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs</subject><subject>Photocatalysis</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Reaction time</subject><subject>Reactors</subject><subject>Reverse osmosis</subject><subject>SPMR</subject><subject>Suspended N-TiO2</subject><subject>Titanium dioxide</subject><subject>Vis/N-TiO2</subject><subject>Vis/N–TiO2/H2O2</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><issn>0957-5820</issn><issn>1744-3598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9r3DAQxUVpodttvkBOgpzt6K8dQy4htEkhNIemZzGWxo0W23IkeZfkg-TzVsv23NNj4L03Mz9CzjmrOePN5a5eEi61YILVTNdM8Q9kw1ulKqm7q49kwzrdVvpKsM_kS0o7xhgXLd-Q919rP2H8g44uzyEHCxnG1-wtnXDqI8xII4LNIdKDz880rWnB2RU7zI76aQq9H_1bmX9WLixFn_yjoGuxRLr3yfcjUh8jOA_Zh5kOpcl5O4YBZ7ClfAp7GOkQw0QPkDIeIGP8Sj4NMCY8-6db8vv7t6fb--rh8e7H7c1DZWXb5qpDJ4UQ4Bqmuh6FYuhADgPvnGQSVPkdceiFEoWSbhRwqZTtVWdRawFabsnFqXeJ4WXFlM0urHEuK41QTcN013ayuMTJZWNIKeJglugniK-GM3Pkb3bmyN8c-RumTeFfQtenEJb79x6jSdbjbNH5iDYbF_z_4n8B3uOSIQ</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Nguyen, Van-Huy</creator><creator>Tran, Quoc Ba</creator><creator>Nguyen, Xuan Cuong</creator><creator>Hai, Le Thanh</creator><creator>Ho, Thi Thanh Tam</creator><creator>Shokouhimehr, Mohammadreza</creator><creator>Vo, Dai-Viet N.</creator><creator>Lam, Su Shiung</creator><creator>Nguyen, Hai Phong</creator><creator>Hoang, Cong Tin</creator><creator>Ly, Quang Viet</creator><creator>Peng, Wanxi</creator><creator>Kim, Soo Young</creator><creator>Tung, Tra Van</creator><creator>Van Le, Quyet</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Submerged photocatalytic membrane reactor with suspended and immobilized N-doped TiO2 under visible irradiation for diclofenac removal from wastewater</title><author>Nguyen, Van-Huy ; Tran, Quoc Ba ; Nguyen, Xuan Cuong ; Hai, Le Thanh ; Ho, Thi Thanh Tam ; Shokouhimehr, Mohammadreza ; Vo, Dai-Viet N. ; Lam, Su Shiung ; Nguyen, Hai Phong ; Hoang, Cong Tin ; Ly, Quang Viet ; Peng, Wanxi ; Kim, Soo Young ; Tung, Tra Van ; Van Le, Quyet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-9ed3222ad6049be240eda3ff19d303a4598eefb242101564a1344cb49ce552a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Batch processes</topic><topic>Batch processing</topic><topic>Coupling</topic><topic>Diclofenac</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Hydrogen peroxide</topic><topic>Immobilized N-TiO2</topic><topic>Irradiation</topic><topic>Membrane reactors</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Microfiltration</topic><topic>Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs</topic><topic>Photocatalysis</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Reaction time</topic><topic>Reactors</topic><topic>Reverse osmosis</topic><topic>SPMR</topic><topic>Suspended N-TiO2</topic><topic>Titanium dioxide</topic><topic>Vis/N-TiO2</topic><topic>Vis/N–TiO2/H2O2</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Van-Huy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Quoc Ba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Xuan Cuong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hai, Le Thanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Thi Thanh Tam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shokouhimehr, Mohammadreza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vo, Dai-Viet N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Su Shiung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Hai Phong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoang, Cong Tin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ly, Quang Viet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Wanxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Soo Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tung, Tra Van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Le, Quyet</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Process safety and environmental protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nguyen, Van-Huy</au><au>Tran, Quoc Ba</au><au>Nguyen, Xuan Cuong</au><au>Hai, Le Thanh</au><au>Ho, Thi Thanh Tam</au><au>Shokouhimehr, Mohammadreza</au><au>Vo, Dai-Viet N.</au><au>Lam, Su Shiung</au><au>Nguyen, Hai Phong</au><au>Hoang, Cong Tin</au><au>Ly, Quang Viet</au><au>Peng, Wanxi</au><au>Kim, Soo Young</au><au>Tung, Tra Van</au><au>Van Le, Quyet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Submerged photocatalytic membrane reactor with suspended and immobilized N-doped TiO2 under visible irradiation for diclofenac removal from wastewater</atitle><jtitle>Process safety and environmental protection</jtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>142</volume><spage>229</spage><epage>237</epage><pages>229-237</pages><issn>0957-5820</issn><eissn>1744-3598</eissn><abstract>•Photocatalytic membrane reactors with suspended and immobilized N-TiO2 were used for diclofenac removal.•Coupling H2O2 with the photocatalytic process could enhance the DCF removal efficiency.•Coupling H2O2 with the photocatalytic process yielded higher resistant permeate flux rates. A submerged photocatalytic membrane reactor (SPMR) was used with suspended and immobilized N–TiO2 under visible irradiation for diclofenac (DCF) removal from wastewater. The effects of initial N–TiO2 concentrations for the SPMR with suspended N–TiO2 were determined for batch processes. Hydrogen peroxide was also coupled with the photocatalytic process. In continuous conditions, a reverse osmosis (RO) membrane was combined with the SPMR for enhancing effluent quality. DCF removal by the SPMR with suspended and immobilized N–TiO2 at a low N–TiO2 dosage (0.5g/L) was not much different between the two systems, but increased with higher N–TiO2 dosages for the reactor with suspended N–TiO2. Coupling H2O2 with the photocatalytic process under visible irradiation enhanced the DCF removal efficiency. In continuous conditions, DCF concentrations in the photoreactor increased during the reaction time, while those in the effluent (RO permeate) were steady for both systems and both processes. The permeate flux in the reactor with suspended N–TiO2 declined faster than in the reactor with the immobilized N–TiO2. Coupling H2O2 with the photocatalytic process yielded more resistant permeate flux rates. The cake layer formed on the microfiltration membrane of the SPMR with suspended N–TiO2 under visible irradiation was denser than others after completing the process.</abstract><cop>Rugby</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.psep.2020.05.041</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0957-5820
ispartof Process safety and environmental protection, 2020-10, Vol.142, p.229-237
issn 0957-5820
1744-3598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2466059793
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Batch processes
Batch processing
Coupling
Diclofenac
Effluents
Hydrogen peroxide
Immobilized N-TiO2
Irradiation
Membrane reactors
Membranes
Microfiltration
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Photocatalysis
Radiation
Reaction time
Reactors
Reverse osmosis
SPMR
Suspended N-TiO2
Titanium dioxide
Vis/N-TiO2
Vis/N–TiO2/H2O2
Wastewater
Wastewater treatment
title Submerged photocatalytic membrane reactor with suspended and immobilized N-doped TiO2 under visible irradiation for diclofenac removal from wastewater
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T02%3A40%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Submerged%20photocatalytic%20membrane%20reactor%20with%20suspended%20and%20immobilized%20N-doped%20TiO2%20under%20visible%20irradiation%20for%20diclofenac%20removal%20from%20wastewater&rft.jtitle=Process%20safety%20and%20environmental%20protection&rft.au=Nguyen,%20Van-Huy&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=142&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=237&rft.pages=229-237&rft.issn=0957-5820&rft.eissn=1744-3598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.psep.2020.05.041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2466059793%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2466059793&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0957582020307175&rfr_iscdi=true