Methane Emissions from Abandoned Oil and Gas Wells in California

California hosts ∼124,000 abandoned and plugged (AP) oil and gas wells, ∼38,000 idle wells, and ∼63,000 active wells, whose methane (CH4) emissions remain largely unquantified at levels below ∼2 kg CH4 h–1. We sampled 121 wells using two methods: a rapid mobile plume integration method (detection ∼0...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science & technology 2020-11, Vol.54 (22), p.14617-14626
Hauptverfasser: Lebel, Eric D, Lu, Harmony S, Vielstädte, Lisa, Kang, Mary, Banner, Peter, Fischer, Marc L, Jackson, Robert B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 14626
container_issue 22
container_start_page 14617
container_title Environmental science & technology
container_volume 54
creator Lebel, Eric D
Lu, Harmony S
Vielstädte, Lisa
Kang, Mary
Banner, Peter
Fischer, Marc L
Jackson, Robert B
description California hosts ∼124,000 abandoned and plugged (AP) oil and gas wells, ∼38,000 idle wells, and ∼63,000 active wells, whose methane (CH4) emissions remain largely unquantified at levels below ∼2 kg CH4 h–1. We sampled 121 wells using two methods: a rapid mobile plume integration method (detection ∼0.5 g CH4 h–1) and a more sensitive static flux chamber (detection ∼1 × 10–6 g CH4 h–1). We measured small but detectable methane emissions from 34 of 97 AP wells (mean emission: 0.286 g CH4 h–1). In contrast, we found emissions from 11 of 17 idle wellswhich are not currently producing (mean: 35.4 g CH4 h–1)4 of 6 active wells (mean: 189.7 g CH4 h–1), and one unplugged wellan open casing with no infrastructure present (10.9 g CH4 h–1). Our results support previous findings that emissions from plugged wells are low but are more substantial from idle wells. In addition, our smaller sample of active wells suggests that their reported emissions are consistent with previous studies and deserve further attention. Due to limited access, we could not measure wells in most major active oil and gas fields in California; therefore, we recommend additional data collection from all types of wells but especially active and idle wells.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.est.0c05279
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2465807470</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2465807470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-5f8509fddf82683d8ee2e8dee0449d7324cdbe6a5635b38297e14b863733902e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwsyFLjCjt2Y4dZ6OqSkEq6gKCzXLii0iVj2K3A_8eVy3dmO6G531P9xByy2DMgLOJLcMYw3YMJUie5WdkyCSHRGrJzskQgIkkF-pzQK5CWAMAF6AvyUAIxiVnakgeX3H7ZTuk87YOoe67QCvft3Ra2M71HTq6qhsad7qwgX5g0wRad3Rmm7rqfVfba3JR2SbgzXGOyPvT_G32nCxXi5fZdJlYodg2kZWWkFfOVZorLZxG5KgdIqRp7jLB09IVqKxUQhZC8zxDlhZaiUyIHDiKEbk_9G58_72LP5t1v_NdPGl4qqSGLM0gUpMDVfo-BI-V2fi6tf7HMDB7YyYaM_v00VhM3B17d0WL7sT_KYrAwwHYJ083_6v7BT9LdJc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2465807470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methane Emissions from Abandoned Oil and Gas Wells in California</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Chemical Society Journals</source><creator>Lebel, Eric D ; Lu, Harmony S ; Vielstädte, Lisa ; Kang, Mary ; Banner, Peter ; Fischer, Marc L ; Jackson, Robert B</creator><creatorcontrib>Lebel, Eric D ; Lu, Harmony S ; Vielstädte, Lisa ; Kang, Mary ; Banner, Peter ; Fischer, Marc L ; Jackson, Robert B</creatorcontrib><description>California hosts ∼124,000 abandoned and plugged (AP) oil and gas wells, ∼38,000 idle wells, and ∼63,000 active wells, whose methane (CH4) emissions remain largely unquantified at levels below ∼2 kg CH4 h–1. We sampled 121 wells using two methods: a rapid mobile plume integration method (detection ∼0.5 g CH4 h–1) and a more sensitive static flux chamber (detection ∼1 × 10–6 g CH4 h–1). We measured small but detectable methane emissions from 34 of 97 AP wells (mean emission: 0.286 g CH4 h–1). In contrast, we found emissions from 11 of 17 idle wellswhich are not currently producing (mean: 35.4 g CH4 h–1)4 of 6 active wells (mean: 189.7 g CH4 h–1), and one unplugged wellan open casing with no infrastructure present (10.9 g CH4 h–1). Our results support previous findings that emissions from plugged wells are low but are more substantial from idle wells. In addition, our smaller sample of active wells suggests that their reported emissions are consistent with previous studies and deserve further attention. Due to limited access, we could not measure wells in most major active oil and gas fields in California; therefore, we recommend additional data collection from all types of wells but especially active and idle wells.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c05279</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33125216</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Air Pollutants - analysis ; California ; Data collection ; Emission measurements ; Emissions ; Energy and Climate ; Gas wells ; Idling ; Methane ; Methane - analysis ; Oil ; Oil and Gas Fields ; Water Wells ; Wells</subject><ispartof>Environmental science &amp; technology, 2020-11, Vol.54 (22), p.14617-14626</ispartof><rights>2020 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Nov 17, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-5f8509fddf82683d8ee2e8dee0449d7324cdbe6a5635b38297e14b863733902e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-5f8509fddf82683d8ee2e8dee0449d7324cdbe6a5635b38297e14b863733902e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7956-2361 ; 0000-0001-5255-6893</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.est.0c05279$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.0c05279$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2765,27076,27924,27925,56738,56788</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33125216$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lebel, Eric D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Harmony S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vielstädte, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banner, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Marc L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Robert B</creatorcontrib><title>Methane Emissions from Abandoned Oil and Gas Wells in California</title><title>Environmental science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>California hosts ∼124,000 abandoned and plugged (AP) oil and gas wells, ∼38,000 idle wells, and ∼63,000 active wells, whose methane (CH4) emissions remain largely unquantified at levels below ∼2 kg CH4 h–1. We sampled 121 wells using two methods: a rapid mobile plume integration method (detection ∼0.5 g CH4 h–1) and a more sensitive static flux chamber (detection ∼1 × 10–6 g CH4 h–1). We measured small but detectable methane emissions from 34 of 97 AP wells (mean emission: 0.286 g CH4 h–1). In contrast, we found emissions from 11 of 17 idle wellswhich are not currently producing (mean: 35.4 g CH4 h–1)4 of 6 active wells (mean: 189.7 g CH4 h–1), and one unplugged wellan open casing with no infrastructure present (10.9 g CH4 h–1). Our results support previous findings that emissions from plugged wells are low but are more substantial from idle wells. In addition, our smaller sample of active wells suggests that their reported emissions are consistent with previous studies and deserve further attention. Due to limited access, we could not measure wells in most major active oil and gas fields in California; therefore, we recommend additional data collection from all types of wells but especially active and idle wells.</description><subject>Air Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Emission measurements</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Energy and Climate</subject><subject>Gas wells</subject><subject>Idling</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Methane - analysis</subject><subject>Oil</subject><subject>Oil and Gas Fields</subject><subject>Water Wells</subject><subject>Wells</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwsyFLjCjt2Y4dZ6OqSkEq6gKCzXLii0iVj2K3A_8eVy3dmO6G531P9xByy2DMgLOJLcMYw3YMJUie5WdkyCSHRGrJzskQgIkkF-pzQK5CWAMAF6AvyUAIxiVnakgeX3H7ZTuk87YOoe67QCvft3Ra2M71HTq6qhsad7qwgX5g0wRad3Rmm7rqfVfba3JR2SbgzXGOyPvT_G32nCxXi5fZdJlYodg2kZWWkFfOVZorLZxG5KgdIqRp7jLB09IVqKxUQhZC8zxDlhZaiUyIHDiKEbk_9G58_72LP5t1v_NdPGl4qqSGLM0gUpMDVfo-BI-V2fi6tf7HMDB7YyYaM_v00VhM3B17d0WL7sT_KYrAwwHYJ083_6v7BT9LdJc</recordid><startdate>20201117</startdate><enddate>20201117</enddate><creator>Lebel, Eric D</creator><creator>Lu, Harmony S</creator><creator>Vielstädte, Lisa</creator><creator>Kang, Mary</creator><creator>Banner, Peter</creator><creator>Fischer, Marc L</creator><creator>Jackson, Robert B</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7956-2361</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5255-6893</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201117</creationdate><title>Methane Emissions from Abandoned Oil and Gas Wells in California</title><author>Lebel, Eric D ; Lu, Harmony S ; Vielstädte, Lisa ; Kang, Mary ; Banner, Peter ; Fischer, Marc L ; Jackson, Robert B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-5f8509fddf82683d8ee2e8dee0449d7324cdbe6a5635b38297e14b863733902e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Air Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Emission measurements</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Energy and Climate</topic><topic>Gas wells</topic><topic>Idling</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Methane - analysis</topic><topic>Oil</topic><topic>Oil and Gas Fields</topic><topic>Water Wells</topic><topic>Wells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lebel, Eric D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Harmony S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vielstädte, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banner, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Marc L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Robert B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lebel, Eric D</au><au>Lu, Harmony S</au><au>Vielstädte, Lisa</au><au>Kang, Mary</au><au>Banner, Peter</au><au>Fischer, Marc L</au><au>Jackson, Robert B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methane Emissions from Abandoned Oil and Gas Wells in California</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2020-11-17</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>14617</spage><epage>14626</epage><pages>14617-14626</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><abstract>California hosts ∼124,000 abandoned and plugged (AP) oil and gas wells, ∼38,000 idle wells, and ∼63,000 active wells, whose methane (CH4) emissions remain largely unquantified at levels below ∼2 kg CH4 h–1. We sampled 121 wells using two methods: a rapid mobile plume integration method (detection ∼0.5 g CH4 h–1) and a more sensitive static flux chamber (detection ∼1 × 10–6 g CH4 h–1). We measured small but detectable methane emissions from 34 of 97 AP wells (mean emission: 0.286 g CH4 h–1). In contrast, we found emissions from 11 of 17 idle wellswhich are not currently producing (mean: 35.4 g CH4 h–1)4 of 6 active wells (mean: 189.7 g CH4 h–1), and one unplugged wellan open casing with no infrastructure present (10.9 g CH4 h–1). Our results support previous findings that emissions from plugged wells are low but are more substantial from idle wells. In addition, our smaller sample of active wells suggests that their reported emissions are consistent with previous studies and deserve further attention. Due to limited access, we could not measure wells in most major active oil and gas fields in California; therefore, we recommend additional data collection from all types of wells but especially active and idle wells.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>33125216</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.est.0c05279</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7956-2361</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5255-6893</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-936X
ispartof Environmental science & technology, 2020-11, Vol.54 (22), p.14617-14626
issn 0013-936X
1520-5851
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2465807470
source MEDLINE; American Chemical Society Journals
subjects Air Pollutants - analysis
California
Data collection
Emission measurements
Emissions
Energy and Climate
Gas wells
Idling
Methane
Methane - analysis
Oil
Oil and Gas Fields
Water Wells
Wells
title Methane Emissions from Abandoned Oil and Gas Wells in California
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T17%3A45%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methane%20Emissions%20from%20Abandoned%20Oil%20and%20Gas%20Wells%20in%20California&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Lebel,%20Eric%20D&rft.date=2020-11-17&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=14617&rft.epage=14626&rft.pages=14617-14626&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.est.0c05279&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2465807470%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2465807470&rft_id=info:pmid/33125216&rfr_iscdi=true