Flexible polyurethane foams reinforced with organic and inorganic nanofillers

The effect of three different types of cellulose nanofillers on the morphology, mechanical, and thermal properties of flexible polyurethane foam was studied. Cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), cellulose nanofibrils (CNF), and cellulose filaments (CelFil) were used as fillers at 0.1–0.8 wt% loading levels...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied polymer science 2021-03, Vol.138 (10), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Ghasemi, Shokoofeh, Amini, Ezatollah Nima, Tajvidi, Mehdi, Kiziltas, Alper, Mielewski, Deborah F., Gardner, Douglas J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 10
container_start_page
container_title Journal of applied polymer science
container_volume 138
creator Ghasemi, Shokoofeh
Amini, Ezatollah Nima
Tajvidi, Mehdi
Kiziltas, Alper
Mielewski, Deborah F.
Gardner, Douglas J.
description The effect of three different types of cellulose nanofillers on the morphology, mechanical, and thermal properties of flexible polyurethane foam was studied. Cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), cellulose nanofibrils (CNF), and cellulose filaments (CelFil) were used as fillers at 0.1–0.8 wt% loading levels. The comparison of the results showed that smaller loading levels resulted in foams with better performance in almost all cases. In the next step, the properties of foams containing CNC, CNF, or CelFil at 0.025%–0.1% loading levels were compared with those made with inorganic nanofillers including nanosilica (nSi), reduced graphene oxide, and halloysite nanotubes (HNT). Among all the properties evaluated, the tensile modulus of the foams was improved up to 40% by adding HNT at 0.05 wt% loading level whereas the addition of CNF resulted in a 44% increase in the compressive modulus of the foams at 0.1 wt% loading level. In this work the influence of different organic and inorganic fillers on the mechanical and thermal properties of flexible polyurethane foams was compared.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/app.49983
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2465684976</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2465684976</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3343-a1f4fcc3ebbfa727c32a2953400891800f802ca6fa108ac3ce9ccd2d188b4e4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8iMTGk9VcSe6wqWpCK6ACzdXFs6iq1g92q9N8TCIxMp9M9977Sg9AtwROCMZ1C1024lIKdoRHBssp5ScU5GvU3kgspi0t0ldIWY0IKXI7Q86I1n65uTdaF9nSIZr8BbzIbYJeyaJy3IWrTZEe332QhvoN3OgPfZM7_bR58sK5tTUzX6MJCm8zN7xyjt8XD6_wxX70sn-azVa4Z4ywHYrnVmpm6tlDRSjMKVBaMYywkERhbgamG0gLBAjTTRmrd0IYIUXPDgY3R3ZDbxfBxMGmvtuEQfV-pKC-LUnBZlT11P1A6hpSisaqLbgfxpAhW37ZUb0v92OrZ6cAeXWtO_4Nqtl4PH18kX2zq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2465684976</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flexible polyurethane foams reinforced with organic and inorganic nanofillers</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Ghasemi, Shokoofeh ; Amini, Ezatollah Nima ; Tajvidi, Mehdi ; Kiziltas, Alper ; Mielewski, Deborah F. ; Gardner, Douglas J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ghasemi, Shokoofeh ; Amini, Ezatollah Nima ; Tajvidi, Mehdi ; Kiziltas, Alper ; Mielewski, Deborah F. ; Gardner, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><description>The effect of three different types of cellulose nanofillers on the morphology, mechanical, and thermal properties of flexible polyurethane foam was studied. Cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), cellulose nanofibrils (CNF), and cellulose filaments (CelFil) were used as fillers at 0.1–0.8 wt% loading levels. The comparison of the results showed that smaller loading levels resulted in foams with better performance in almost all cases. In the next step, the properties of foams containing CNC, CNF, or CelFil at 0.025%–0.1% loading levels were compared with those made with inorganic nanofillers including nanosilica (nSi), reduced graphene oxide, and halloysite nanotubes (HNT). Among all the properties evaluated, the tensile modulus of the foams was improved up to 40% by adding HNT at 0.05 wt% loading level whereas the addition of CNF resulted in a 44% increase in the compressive modulus of the foams at 0.1 wt% loading level. In this work the influence of different organic and inorganic fillers on the mechanical and thermal properties of flexible polyurethane foams was compared.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/app.49983</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Cellulose ; cellulose and other wood products ; composites ; Filaments ; foams ; Graphene ; Materials science ; Modulus of elasticity ; Morphology ; Nanocrystals ; nanoparticles ; nanowhiskers ; Plastic foam ; Polymers ; polyurethane ; Polyurethane foam ; Thermodynamic properties</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied polymer science, 2021-03, Vol.138 (10), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3343-a1f4fcc3ebbfa727c32a2953400891800f802ca6fa108ac3ce9ccd2d188b4e4a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3343-a1f4fcc3ebbfa727c32a2953400891800f802ca6fa108ac3ce9ccd2d188b4e4a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2111-6013</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fapp.49983$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fapp.49983$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ghasemi, Shokoofeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amini, Ezatollah Nima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tajvidi, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiziltas, Alper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mielewski, Deborah F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><title>Flexible polyurethane foams reinforced with organic and inorganic nanofillers</title><title>Journal of applied polymer science</title><description>The effect of three different types of cellulose nanofillers on the morphology, mechanical, and thermal properties of flexible polyurethane foam was studied. Cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), cellulose nanofibrils (CNF), and cellulose filaments (CelFil) were used as fillers at 0.1–0.8 wt% loading levels. The comparison of the results showed that smaller loading levels resulted in foams with better performance in almost all cases. In the next step, the properties of foams containing CNC, CNF, or CelFil at 0.025%–0.1% loading levels were compared with those made with inorganic nanofillers including nanosilica (nSi), reduced graphene oxide, and halloysite nanotubes (HNT). Among all the properties evaluated, the tensile modulus of the foams was improved up to 40% by adding HNT at 0.05 wt% loading level whereas the addition of CNF resulted in a 44% increase in the compressive modulus of the foams at 0.1 wt% loading level. In this work the influence of different organic and inorganic fillers on the mechanical and thermal properties of flexible polyurethane foams was compared.</description><subject>Cellulose</subject><subject>cellulose and other wood products</subject><subject>composites</subject><subject>Filaments</subject><subject>foams</subject><subject>Graphene</subject><subject>Materials science</subject><subject>Modulus of elasticity</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Nanocrystals</subject><subject>nanoparticles</subject><subject>nanowhiskers</subject><subject>Plastic foam</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>polyurethane</subject><subject>Polyurethane foam</subject><subject>Thermodynamic properties</subject><issn>0021-8995</issn><issn>1097-4628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8iMTGk9VcSe6wqWpCK6ACzdXFs6iq1g92q9N8TCIxMp9M9977Sg9AtwROCMZ1C1024lIKdoRHBssp5ScU5GvU3kgspi0t0ldIWY0IKXI7Q86I1n65uTdaF9nSIZr8BbzIbYJeyaJy3IWrTZEe332QhvoN3OgPfZM7_bR58sK5tTUzX6MJCm8zN7xyjt8XD6_wxX70sn-azVa4Z4ywHYrnVmpm6tlDRSjMKVBaMYywkERhbgamG0gLBAjTTRmrd0IYIUXPDgY3R3ZDbxfBxMGmvtuEQfV-pKC-LUnBZlT11P1A6hpSisaqLbgfxpAhW37ZUb0v92OrZ6cAeXWtO_4Nqtl4PH18kX2zq</recordid><startdate>20210310</startdate><enddate>20210310</enddate><creator>Ghasemi, Shokoofeh</creator><creator>Amini, Ezatollah Nima</creator><creator>Tajvidi, Mehdi</creator><creator>Kiziltas, Alper</creator><creator>Mielewski, Deborah F.</creator><creator>Gardner, Douglas J.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2111-6013</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210310</creationdate><title>Flexible polyurethane foams reinforced with organic and inorganic nanofillers</title><author>Ghasemi, Shokoofeh ; Amini, Ezatollah Nima ; Tajvidi, Mehdi ; Kiziltas, Alper ; Mielewski, Deborah F. ; Gardner, Douglas J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3343-a1f4fcc3ebbfa727c32a2953400891800f802ca6fa108ac3ce9ccd2d188b4e4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cellulose</topic><topic>cellulose and other wood products</topic><topic>composites</topic><topic>Filaments</topic><topic>foams</topic><topic>Graphene</topic><topic>Materials science</topic><topic>Modulus of elasticity</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Nanocrystals</topic><topic>nanoparticles</topic><topic>nanowhiskers</topic><topic>Plastic foam</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>polyurethane</topic><topic>Polyurethane foam</topic><topic>Thermodynamic properties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ghasemi, Shokoofeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amini, Ezatollah Nima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tajvidi, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiziltas, Alper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mielewski, Deborah F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied polymer science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ghasemi, Shokoofeh</au><au>Amini, Ezatollah Nima</au><au>Tajvidi, Mehdi</au><au>Kiziltas, Alper</au><au>Mielewski, Deborah F.</au><au>Gardner, Douglas J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flexible polyurethane foams reinforced with organic and inorganic nanofillers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied polymer science</jtitle><date>2021-03-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>138</volume><issue>10</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0021-8995</issn><eissn>1097-4628</eissn><abstract>The effect of three different types of cellulose nanofillers on the morphology, mechanical, and thermal properties of flexible polyurethane foam was studied. Cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), cellulose nanofibrils (CNF), and cellulose filaments (CelFil) were used as fillers at 0.1–0.8 wt% loading levels. The comparison of the results showed that smaller loading levels resulted in foams with better performance in almost all cases. In the next step, the properties of foams containing CNC, CNF, or CelFil at 0.025%–0.1% loading levels were compared with those made with inorganic nanofillers including nanosilica (nSi), reduced graphene oxide, and halloysite nanotubes (HNT). Among all the properties evaluated, the tensile modulus of the foams was improved up to 40% by adding HNT at 0.05 wt% loading level whereas the addition of CNF resulted in a 44% increase in the compressive modulus of the foams at 0.1 wt% loading level. In this work the influence of different organic and inorganic fillers on the mechanical and thermal properties of flexible polyurethane foams was compared.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/app.49983</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2111-6013</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8995
ispartof Journal of applied polymer science, 2021-03, Vol.138 (10), p.n/a
issn 0021-8995
1097-4628
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2465684976
source Wiley Online Library
subjects Cellulose
cellulose and other wood products
composites
Filaments
foams
Graphene
Materials science
Modulus of elasticity
Morphology
Nanocrystals
nanoparticles
nanowhiskers
Plastic foam
Polymers
polyurethane
Polyurethane foam
Thermodynamic properties
title Flexible polyurethane foams reinforced with organic and inorganic nanofillers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T21%3A13%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flexible%20polyurethane%20foams%20reinforced%20with%20organic%20and%20inorganic%20nanofillers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20polymer%20science&rft.au=Ghasemi,%20Shokoofeh&rft.date=2021-03-10&rft.volume=138&rft.issue=10&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0021-8995&rft.eissn=1097-4628&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/app.49983&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2465684976%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2465684976&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true