Flexible polyurethane foams reinforced with organic and inorganic nanofillers
The effect of three different types of cellulose nanofillers on the morphology, mechanical, and thermal properties of flexible polyurethane foam was studied. Cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), cellulose nanofibrils (CNF), and cellulose filaments (CelFil) were used as fillers at 0.1–0.8 wt% loading levels...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied polymer science 2021-03, Vol.138 (10), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of applied polymer science |
container_volume | 138 |
creator | Ghasemi, Shokoofeh Amini, Ezatollah Nima Tajvidi, Mehdi Kiziltas, Alper Mielewski, Deborah F. Gardner, Douglas J. |
description | The effect of three different types of cellulose nanofillers on the morphology, mechanical, and thermal properties of flexible polyurethane foam was studied. Cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), cellulose nanofibrils (CNF), and cellulose filaments (CelFil) were used as fillers at 0.1–0.8 wt% loading levels. The comparison of the results showed that smaller loading levels resulted in foams with better performance in almost all cases. In the next step, the properties of foams containing CNC, CNF, or CelFil at 0.025%–0.1% loading levels were compared with those made with inorganic nanofillers including nanosilica (nSi), reduced graphene oxide, and halloysite nanotubes (HNT). Among all the properties evaluated, the tensile modulus of the foams was improved up to 40% by adding HNT at 0.05 wt% loading level whereas the addition of CNF resulted in a 44% increase in the compressive modulus of the foams at 0.1 wt% loading level.
In this work the influence of different organic and inorganic fillers on the mechanical and thermal properties of flexible polyurethane foams was compared. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/app.49983 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2465684976</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2465684976</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3343-a1f4fcc3ebbfa727c32a2953400891800f802ca6fa108ac3ce9ccd2d188b4e4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8iMTGk9VcSe6wqWpCK6ACzdXFs6iq1g92q9N8TCIxMp9M9977Sg9AtwROCMZ1C1024lIKdoRHBssp5ScU5GvU3kgspi0t0ldIWY0IKXI7Q86I1n65uTdaF9nSIZr8BbzIbYJeyaJy3IWrTZEe332QhvoN3OgPfZM7_bR58sK5tTUzX6MJCm8zN7xyjt8XD6_wxX70sn-azVa4Z4ywHYrnVmpm6tlDRSjMKVBaMYywkERhbgamG0gLBAjTTRmrd0IYIUXPDgY3R3ZDbxfBxMGmvtuEQfV-pKC-LUnBZlT11P1A6hpSisaqLbgfxpAhW37ZUb0v92OrZ6cAeXWtO_4Nqtl4PH18kX2zq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2465684976</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flexible polyurethane foams reinforced with organic and inorganic nanofillers</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Ghasemi, Shokoofeh ; Amini, Ezatollah Nima ; Tajvidi, Mehdi ; Kiziltas, Alper ; Mielewski, Deborah F. ; Gardner, Douglas J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ghasemi, Shokoofeh ; Amini, Ezatollah Nima ; Tajvidi, Mehdi ; Kiziltas, Alper ; Mielewski, Deborah F. ; Gardner, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><description>The effect of three different types of cellulose nanofillers on the morphology, mechanical, and thermal properties of flexible polyurethane foam was studied. Cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), cellulose nanofibrils (CNF), and cellulose filaments (CelFil) were used as fillers at 0.1–0.8 wt% loading levels. The comparison of the results showed that smaller loading levels resulted in foams with better performance in almost all cases. In the next step, the properties of foams containing CNC, CNF, or CelFil at 0.025%–0.1% loading levels were compared with those made with inorganic nanofillers including nanosilica (nSi), reduced graphene oxide, and halloysite nanotubes (HNT). Among all the properties evaluated, the tensile modulus of the foams was improved up to 40% by adding HNT at 0.05 wt% loading level whereas the addition of CNF resulted in a 44% increase in the compressive modulus of the foams at 0.1 wt% loading level.
In this work the influence of different organic and inorganic fillers on the mechanical and thermal properties of flexible polyurethane foams was compared.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/app.49983</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Cellulose ; cellulose and other wood products ; composites ; Filaments ; foams ; Graphene ; Materials science ; Modulus of elasticity ; Morphology ; Nanocrystals ; nanoparticles ; nanowhiskers ; Plastic foam ; Polymers ; polyurethane ; Polyurethane foam ; Thermodynamic properties</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied polymer science, 2021-03, Vol.138 (10), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3343-a1f4fcc3ebbfa727c32a2953400891800f802ca6fa108ac3ce9ccd2d188b4e4a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3343-a1f4fcc3ebbfa727c32a2953400891800f802ca6fa108ac3ce9ccd2d188b4e4a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2111-6013</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fapp.49983$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fapp.49983$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ghasemi, Shokoofeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amini, Ezatollah Nima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tajvidi, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiziltas, Alper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mielewski, Deborah F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><title>Flexible polyurethane foams reinforced with organic and inorganic nanofillers</title><title>Journal of applied polymer science</title><description>The effect of three different types of cellulose nanofillers on the morphology, mechanical, and thermal properties of flexible polyurethane foam was studied. Cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), cellulose nanofibrils (CNF), and cellulose filaments (CelFil) were used as fillers at 0.1–0.8 wt% loading levels. The comparison of the results showed that smaller loading levels resulted in foams with better performance in almost all cases. In the next step, the properties of foams containing CNC, CNF, or CelFil at 0.025%–0.1% loading levels were compared with those made with inorganic nanofillers including nanosilica (nSi), reduced graphene oxide, and halloysite nanotubes (HNT). Among all the properties evaluated, the tensile modulus of the foams was improved up to 40% by adding HNT at 0.05 wt% loading level whereas the addition of CNF resulted in a 44% increase in the compressive modulus of the foams at 0.1 wt% loading level.
In this work the influence of different organic and inorganic fillers on the mechanical and thermal properties of flexible polyurethane foams was compared.</description><subject>Cellulose</subject><subject>cellulose and other wood products</subject><subject>composites</subject><subject>Filaments</subject><subject>foams</subject><subject>Graphene</subject><subject>Materials science</subject><subject>Modulus of elasticity</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Nanocrystals</subject><subject>nanoparticles</subject><subject>nanowhiskers</subject><subject>Plastic foam</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>polyurethane</subject><subject>Polyurethane foam</subject><subject>Thermodynamic properties</subject><issn>0021-8995</issn><issn>1097-4628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8iMTGk9VcSe6wqWpCK6ACzdXFs6iq1g92q9N8TCIxMp9M9977Sg9AtwROCMZ1C1024lIKdoRHBssp5ScU5GvU3kgspi0t0ldIWY0IKXI7Q86I1n65uTdaF9nSIZr8BbzIbYJeyaJy3IWrTZEe332QhvoN3OgPfZM7_bR58sK5tTUzX6MJCm8zN7xyjt8XD6_wxX70sn-azVa4Z4ywHYrnVmpm6tlDRSjMKVBaMYywkERhbgamG0gLBAjTTRmrd0IYIUXPDgY3R3ZDbxfBxMGmvtuEQfV-pKC-LUnBZlT11P1A6hpSisaqLbgfxpAhW37ZUb0v92OrZ6cAeXWtO_4Nqtl4PH18kX2zq</recordid><startdate>20210310</startdate><enddate>20210310</enddate><creator>Ghasemi, Shokoofeh</creator><creator>Amini, Ezatollah Nima</creator><creator>Tajvidi, Mehdi</creator><creator>Kiziltas, Alper</creator><creator>Mielewski, Deborah F.</creator><creator>Gardner, Douglas J.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2111-6013</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210310</creationdate><title>Flexible polyurethane foams reinforced with organic and inorganic nanofillers</title><author>Ghasemi, Shokoofeh ; Amini, Ezatollah Nima ; Tajvidi, Mehdi ; Kiziltas, Alper ; Mielewski, Deborah F. ; Gardner, Douglas J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3343-a1f4fcc3ebbfa727c32a2953400891800f802ca6fa108ac3ce9ccd2d188b4e4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cellulose</topic><topic>cellulose and other wood products</topic><topic>composites</topic><topic>Filaments</topic><topic>foams</topic><topic>Graphene</topic><topic>Materials science</topic><topic>Modulus of elasticity</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Nanocrystals</topic><topic>nanoparticles</topic><topic>nanowhiskers</topic><topic>Plastic foam</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>polyurethane</topic><topic>Polyurethane foam</topic><topic>Thermodynamic properties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ghasemi, Shokoofeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amini, Ezatollah Nima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tajvidi, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiziltas, Alper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mielewski, Deborah F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied polymer science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ghasemi, Shokoofeh</au><au>Amini, Ezatollah Nima</au><au>Tajvidi, Mehdi</au><au>Kiziltas, Alper</au><au>Mielewski, Deborah F.</au><au>Gardner, Douglas J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flexible polyurethane foams reinforced with organic and inorganic nanofillers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied polymer science</jtitle><date>2021-03-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>138</volume><issue>10</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0021-8995</issn><eissn>1097-4628</eissn><abstract>The effect of three different types of cellulose nanofillers on the morphology, mechanical, and thermal properties of flexible polyurethane foam was studied. Cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), cellulose nanofibrils (CNF), and cellulose filaments (CelFil) were used as fillers at 0.1–0.8 wt% loading levels. The comparison of the results showed that smaller loading levels resulted in foams with better performance in almost all cases. In the next step, the properties of foams containing CNC, CNF, or CelFil at 0.025%–0.1% loading levels were compared with those made with inorganic nanofillers including nanosilica (nSi), reduced graphene oxide, and halloysite nanotubes (HNT). Among all the properties evaluated, the tensile modulus of the foams was improved up to 40% by adding HNT at 0.05 wt% loading level whereas the addition of CNF resulted in a 44% increase in the compressive modulus of the foams at 0.1 wt% loading level.
In this work the influence of different organic and inorganic fillers on the mechanical and thermal properties of flexible polyurethane foams was compared.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/app.49983</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2111-6013</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8995 |
ispartof | Journal of applied polymer science, 2021-03, Vol.138 (10), p.n/a |
issn | 0021-8995 1097-4628 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2465684976 |
source | Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Cellulose cellulose and other wood products composites Filaments foams Graphene Materials science Modulus of elasticity Morphology Nanocrystals nanoparticles nanowhiskers Plastic foam Polymers polyurethane Polyurethane foam Thermodynamic properties |
title | Flexible polyurethane foams reinforced with organic and inorganic nanofillers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T21%3A13%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flexible%20polyurethane%20foams%20reinforced%20with%20organic%20and%20inorganic%20nanofillers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20polymer%20science&rft.au=Ghasemi,%20Shokoofeh&rft.date=2021-03-10&rft.volume=138&rft.issue=10&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0021-8995&rft.eissn=1097-4628&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/app.49983&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2465684976%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2465684976&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |