Social fidelity in virtual agents: Impacts on presence and learning

Teaching and training are increasingly moving from real world venues to computerized environments, with human instructors often being replaced or joined by virtual pedagogical agents. While system fidelity and immersive properties of virtual learning environments are frequently discussed in the lite...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computers in human behavior 2021-01, Vol.114, p.106562, Article 106562
Hauptverfasser: Sinatra, Anne M., Pollard, Kimberly A., Files, Benjamin T., Oiknine, Ashley H., Ericson, Mark, Khooshabeh, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 106562
container_title Computers in human behavior
container_volume 114
creator Sinatra, Anne M.
Pollard, Kimberly A.
Files, Benjamin T.
Oiknine, Ashley H.
Ericson, Mark
Khooshabeh, Peter
description Teaching and training are increasingly moving from real world venues to computerized environments, with human instructors often being replaced or joined by virtual pedagogical agents. While system fidelity and immersive properties of virtual learning environments are frequently discussed in the literature, less often addressed is the fidelity of the social components of teaching and their inclusion in pedagogical agent design. Teaching is inherently a social process, making the social fidelity of virtual agents a potential factor affecting learning outcomes. In this paper, we explore the concept of social fidelity as it pertains to the teaching effectiveness of pedagogical agents. We define the term, distinguish two subcategories, and discuss representative examples of research in these domains. Promising avenues for improving learning outcomes with social fidelity include personalized language, politeness, personality, attention, feedback, social memory, and gestures. Key conclusions are that: Social fidelity is important to learning in non-social domains, tradeoffs exist when implementing certain forms of social fidelity, individual user differences need to be more widely considered, and more focused studies are needed to compare different levels of social fidelity to uncover how they impact learning outcomes. •We suggest that Social Fidelity has two divisions: Functional and Physical.•Social Fidelity may impact teaching effectiveness of pedagogical agents in non-social domains.•Tradeoffs exist when implementing some forms of Social Fidelity in pedagogical agents.•Personalized language, politeness, personality, and gestures in pedagogical agents have had positive learning impacts.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106562
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2465481801</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0747563220303113</els_id><sourcerecordid>2465481801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-46ad5c9db0193f38202af37d918102c511a55fb3af61faf592047e84c372caef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAewssU7xI7YTWKGKR6VKLIC15fpRHKVOsJ1K_XsShTWr0YzunblzALjFaIUR5vfNSn_vVgSRqeeMkzOwwJWgheA1OQcLJEpRME7JJbhKqUEIMYb4Aqw_Ou1VC503tvX5BH2ARx_zMM7U3oacHuDm0CudE-wC7KNNNmgLVTCwtSoGH_bX4MKpNtmbv7oEXy_Pn-u3Yvv-ulk_bQtNeZWLkivDdG12CNfU0WoMqxwVpsYVRkQzjBVjbkeV49gpx2qCSmGrUlNBtLKOLsHdvLeP3c9gU5ZNN8QwnpSk5KyscIXwqMKzSscupWid7KM_qHiSGMmJlWzkyEpOrOTMavQ8zh47xj96G2XSfvrT-Gh1lqbz_7h_AdtGcEI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2465481801</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social fidelity in virtual agents: Impacts on presence and learning</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Sinatra, Anne M. ; Pollard, Kimberly A. ; Files, Benjamin T. ; Oiknine, Ashley H. ; Ericson, Mark ; Khooshabeh, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Sinatra, Anne M. ; Pollard, Kimberly A. ; Files, Benjamin T. ; Oiknine, Ashley H. ; Ericson, Mark ; Khooshabeh, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Teaching and training are increasingly moving from real world venues to computerized environments, with human instructors often being replaced or joined by virtual pedagogical agents. While system fidelity and immersive properties of virtual learning environments are frequently discussed in the literature, less often addressed is the fidelity of the social components of teaching and their inclusion in pedagogical agent design. Teaching is inherently a social process, making the social fidelity of virtual agents a potential factor affecting learning outcomes. In this paper, we explore the concept of social fidelity as it pertains to the teaching effectiveness of pedagogical agents. We define the term, distinguish two subcategories, and discuss representative examples of research in these domains. Promising avenues for improving learning outcomes with social fidelity include personalized language, politeness, personality, attention, feedback, social memory, and gestures. Key conclusions are that: Social fidelity is important to learning in non-social domains, tradeoffs exist when implementing certain forms of social fidelity, individual user differences need to be more widely considered, and more focused studies are needed to compare different levels of social fidelity to uncover how they impact learning outcomes. •We suggest that Social Fidelity has two divisions: Functional and Physical.•Social Fidelity may impact teaching effectiveness of pedagogical agents in non-social domains.•Tradeoffs exist when implementing some forms of Social Fidelity in pedagogical agents.•Personalized language, politeness, personality, and gestures in pedagogical agents have had positive learning impacts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0747-5632</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106562</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elmsford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; CAI ; Computer assisted instruction ; Domains ; Learning ; Pedagogy ; Social fidelity ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Virtual characters ; Virtual environments</subject><ispartof>Computers in human behavior, 2021-01, Vol.114, p.106562, Article 106562</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jan 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-46ad5c9db0193f38202af37d918102c511a55fb3af61faf592047e84c372caef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-46ad5c9db0193f38202af37d918102c511a55fb3af61faf592047e84c372caef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106562$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sinatra, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollard, Kimberly A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Files, Benjamin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oiknine, Ashley H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ericson, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khooshabeh, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Social fidelity in virtual agents: Impacts on presence and learning</title><title>Computers in human behavior</title><description>Teaching and training are increasingly moving from real world venues to computerized environments, with human instructors often being replaced or joined by virtual pedagogical agents. While system fidelity and immersive properties of virtual learning environments are frequently discussed in the literature, less often addressed is the fidelity of the social components of teaching and their inclusion in pedagogical agent design. Teaching is inherently a social process, making the social fidelity of virtual agents a potential factor affecting learning outcomes. In this paper, we explore the concept of social fidelity as it pertains to the teaching effectiveness of pedagogical agents. We define the term, distinguish two subcategories, and discuss representative examples of research in these domains. Promising avenues for improving learning outcomes with social fidelity include personalized language, politeness, personality, attention, feedback, social memory, and gestures. Key conclusions are that: Social fidelity is important to learning in non-social domains, tradeoffs exist when implementing certain forms of social fidelity, individual user differences need to be more widely considered, and more focused studies are needed to compare different levels of social fidelity to uncover how they impact learning outcomes. •We suggest that Social Fidelity has two divisions: Functional and Physical.•Social Fidelity may impact teaching effectiveness of pedagogical agents in non-social domains.•Tradeoffs exist when implementing some forms of Social Fidelity in pedagogical agents.•Personalized language, politeness, personality, and gestures in pedagogical agents have had positive learning impacts.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>CAI</subject><subject>Computer assisted instruction</subject><subject>Domains</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Social fidelity</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Virtual characters</subject><subject>Virtual environments</subject><issn>0747-5632</issn><issn>1873-7692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAewssU7xI7YTWKGKR6VKLIC15fpRHKVOsJ1K_XsShTWr0YzunblzALjFaIUR5vfNSn_vVgSRqeeMkzOwwJWgheA1OQcLJEpRME7JJbhKqUEIMYb4Aqw_Ou1VC503tvX5BH2ARx_zMM7U3oacHuDm0CudE-wC7KNNNmgLVTCwtSoGH_bX4MKpNtmbv7oEXy_Pn-u3Yvv-ulk_bQtNeZWLkivDdG12CNfU0WoMqxwVpsYVRkQzjBVjbkeV49gpx2qCSmGrUlNBtLKOLsHdvLeP3c9gU5ZNN8QwnpSk5KyscIXwqMKzSscupWid7KM_qHiSGMmJlWzkyEpOrOTMavQ8zh47xj96G2XSfvrT-Gh1lqbz_7h_AdtGcEI</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Sinatra, Anne M.</creator><creator>Pollard, Kimberly A.</creator><creator>Files, Benjamin T.</creator><creator>Oiknine, Ashley H.</creator><creator>Ericson, Mark</creator><creator>Khooshabeh, Peter</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Social fidelity in virtual agents: Impacts on presence and learning</title><author>Sinatra, Anne M. ; Pollard, Kimberly A. ; Files, Benjamin T. ; Oiknine, Ashley H. ; Ericson, Mark ; Khooshabeh, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-46ad5c9db0193f38202af37d918102c511a55fb3af61faf592047e84c372caef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>CAI</topic><topic>Computer assisted instruction</topic><topic>Domains</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Social fidelity</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Virtual characters</topic><topic>Virtual environments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sinatra, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollard, Kimberly A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Files, Benjamin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oiknine, Ashley H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ericson, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khooshabeh, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Computers in human behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sinatra, Anne M.</au><au>Pollard, Kimberly A.</au><au>Files, Benjamin T.</au><au>Oiknine, Ashley H.</au><au>Ericson, Mark</au><au>Khooshabeh, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social fidelity in virtual agents: Impacts on presence and learning</atitle><jtitle>Computers in human behavior</jtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>114</volume><spage>106562</spage><pages>106562-</pages><artnum>106562</artnum><issn>0747-5632</issn><eissn>1873-7692</eissn><abstract>Teaching and training are increasingly moving from real world venues to computerized environments, with human instructors often being replaced or joined by virtual pedagogical agents. While system fidelity and immersive properties of virtual learning environments are frequently discussed in the literature, less often addressed is the fidelity of the social components of teaching and their inclusion in pedagogical agent design. Teaching is inherently a social process, making the social fidelity of virtual agents a potential factor affecting learning outcomes. In this paper, we explore the concept of social fidelity as it pertains to the teaching effectiveness of pedagogical agents. We define the term, distinguish two subcategories, and discuss representative examples of research in these domains. Promising avenues for improving learning outcomes with social fidelity include personalized language, politeness, personality, attention, feedback, social memory, and gestures. Key conclusions are that: Social fidelity is important to learning in non-social domains, tradeoffs exist when implementing certain forms of social fidelity, individual user differences need to be more widely considered, and more focused studies are needed to compare different levels of social fidelity to uncover how they impact learning outcomes. •We suggest that Social Fidelity has two divisions: Functional and Physical.•Social Fidelity may impact teaching effectiveness of pedagogical agents in non-social domains.•Tradeoffs exist when implementing some forms of Social Fidelity in pedagogical agents.•Personalized language, politeness, personality, and gestures in pedagogical agents have had positive learning impacts.</abstract><cop>Elmsford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.chb.2020.106562</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0747-5632
ispartof Computers in human behavior, 2021-01, Vol.114, p.106562, Article 106562
issn 0747-5632
1873-7692
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2465481801
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings
subjects Accuracy
CAI
Computer assisted instruction
Domains
Learning
Pedagogy
Social fidelity
Teachers
Teaching
Virtual characters
Virtual environments
title Social fidelity in virtual agents: Impacts on presence and learning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T05%3A16%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20fidelity%20in%20virtual%20agents:%20Impacts%20on%20presence%20and%20learning&rft.jtitle=Computers%20in%20human%20behavior&rft.au=Sinatra,%20Anne%20M.&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=114&rft.spage=106562&rft.pages=106562-&rft.artnum=106562&rft.issn=0747-5632&rft.eissn=1873-7692&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106562&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2465481801%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2465481801&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0747563220303113&rfr_iscdi=true