Estimating the Effects of Forest Structure Changes From Wildfire on Snow Water Resources Under Varying Meteorological Conditions
Modeling forest change effects on snow is critical to resource management. However, many models either do not appropriately model canopy structure or cannot represent fine‐scale changes in structure following a disturbance. We applied a 1 m2 resolution energy budget snowpack model at a forested site...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water resources research 2020-11, Vol.56 (11), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Water resources research |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Moeser, C. David Broxton, Patrick D. Harpold, Adrian Robertson, Andrew |
description | Modeling forest change effects on snow is critical to resource management. However, many models either do not appropriately model canopy structure or cannot represent fine‐scale changes in structure following a disturbance. We applied a 1 m2 resolution energy budget snowpack model at a forested site in New Mexico, USA, affected by a wildfire, using input data from lidar to represent prefire and postfire canopy conditions. Both scenarios were forced with 37 years of equivalent meteorology to simulate the effect of fire‐mediated canopy change on snowpack under varying meteorology. Postfire, the simulated snow distribution was substantially altered, and despite an overall increase in snow, 32% of the field area displayed significant decreases, resulting in higher snowpack variability. The spatial differences in snow were correlated with the change in several direction‐based forest structure metrics (aspect‐based canopy edginess and gap area). Locations with decreases in snow following the fire were on southern aspects that transitioned to south facing canopy edges, canopy gaps that increased in size to the south, or where large trees were removed. Locations with largest increases in snow occurred where all canopy was removed. Changes in canopy density metrics, typically used in snow models to represent the forest, did not fully explain the effects of fire on snow distribution. This explains why many models are not able to represent greater postfire variability in snow distribution and tend to predict only increases in snowpack following a canopy disturbance event despite observational studies showing both increases and decreases.
Key Points
Forest gap shape and edginess help determine the locations of postdisturbance changes in snow
Changes in canopy density is not a good predictor of snowpack response to canopy disturbance at a fine scale
Increases in seasonal temperature and higher insolation heighten postdisturbance changes in snow variability |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2020WR027071 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2463710407</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2463710407</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3736-975570582f9030ac8718d1766954a59e8c61155e6569261034be03c204dc418d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWD9u_oCAV1cn381RllYFRajWHpeYzdYt240mWUpv_nRT6sGTp2GGh3dmHoQuCFwToPqGAoXFDKgCRQ7QiGjOC6UVO0QjAM4KwrQ6RicxrgAIF1KN0PckpnZtUtsvcfpweNI0zqaIfYOnPriY8EsKg01DcLj8MP3SRTwNfo0XbVc3bZ76Hr_0foMXJrmAZy76IdhMzfs6928mbHfZTy45H3znl601HS59X7ep9X08Q0eN6aI7_62naD6dvJb3xePz3UN5-1gYppgstBJCgRjTRgMDY8eKjGuipNSCG6Hd2EpChHBSSE0lAcbfHTBLgdeWZ5Sdost97mfwX0N-rFrlQ_u8sqJcMkWAg8rU1Z6ywccYXFN9hqwnbCsC1c5x9ddxxtke37Sd2_7LVotZOaNcS8l-AF3KfQo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2463710407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating the Effects of Forest Structure Changes From Wildfire on Snow Water Resources Under Varying Meteorological Conditions</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Moeser, C. David ; Broxton, Patrick D. ; Harpold, Adrian ; Robertson, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Moeser, C. David ; Broxton, Patrick D. ; Harpold, Adrian ; Robertson, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Modeling forest change effects on snow is critical to resource management. However, many models either do not appropriately model canopy structure or cannot represent fine‐scale changes in structure following a disturbance. We applied a 1 m2 resolution energy budget snowpack model at a forested site in New Mexico, USA, affected by a wildfire, using input data from lidar to represent prefire and postfire canopy conditions. Both scenarios were forced with 37 years of equivalent meteorology to simulate the effect of fire‐mediated canopy change on snowpack under varying meteorology. Postfire, the simulated snow distribution was substantially altered, and despite an overall increase in snow, 32% of the field area displayed significant decreases, resulting in higher snowpack variability. The spatial differences in snow were correlated with the change in several direction‐based forest structure metrics (aspect‐based canopy edginess and gap area). Locations with decreases in snow following the fire were on southern aspects that transitioned to south facing canopy edges, canopy gaps that increased in size to the south, or where large trees were removed. Locations with largest increases in snow occurred where all canopy was removed. Changes in canopy density metrics, typically used in snow models to represent the forest, did not fully explain the effects of fire on snow distribution. This explains why many models are not able to represent greater postfire variability in snow distribution and tend to predict only increases in snowpack following a canopy disturbance event despite observational studies showing both increases and decreases.
Key Points
Forest gap shape and edginess help determine the locations of postdisturbance changes in snow
Changes in canopy density is not a good predictor of snowpack response to canopy disturbance at a fine scale
Increases in seasonal temperature and higher insolation heighten postdisturbance changes in snow variability</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2020WR027071</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Atmospheric models ; Canopies ; Canopy ; Canopy gaps ; canopy structure change ; Distribution ; disturbance hydrology ; Energy budget ; Fire effects ; Fires ; forest disturbance ; Forests ; Herbivores ; Lidar ; Meteorological conditions ; Meteorology ; Observational studies ; postfire ; Resource management ; Snow ; snowmelt change ; Snowpack ; Spatial variations ; Variability ; Water resources ; Wildfires</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2020-11, Vol.56 (11), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3736-975570582f9030ac8718d1766954a59e8c61155e6569261034be03c204dc418d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3736-975570582f9030ac8718d1766954a59e8c61155e6569261034be03c204dc418d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2665-6820 ; 0000-0003-0154-9110 ; 0000-0003-2130-0347 ; 0000-0002-2566-9574</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2020WR027071$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2020WR027071$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46443,46867</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moeser, C. David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broxton, Patrick D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harpold, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating the Effects of Forest Structure Changes From Wildfire on Snow Water Resources Under Varying Meteorological Conditions</title><title>Water resources research</title><description>Modeling forest change effects on snow is critical to resource management. However, many models either do not appropriately model canopy structure or cannot represent fine‐scale changes in structure following a disturbance. We applied a 1 m2 resolution energy budget snowpack model at a forested site in New Mexico, USA, affected by a wildfire, using input data from lidar to represent prefire and postfire canopy conditions. Both scenarios were forced with 37 years of equivalent meteorology to simulate the effect of fire‐mediated canopy change on snowpack under varying meteorology. Postfire, the simulated snow distribution was substantially altered, and despite an overall increase in snow, 32% of the field area displayed significant decreases, resulting in higher snowpack variability. The spatial differences in snow were correlated with the change in several direction‐based forest structure metrics (aspect‐based canopy edginess and gap area). Locations with decreases in snow following the fire were on southern aspects that transitioned to south facing canopy edges, canopy gaps that increased in size to the south, or where large trees were removed. Locations with largest increases in snow occurred where all canopy was removed. Changes in canopy density metrics, typically used in snow models to represent the forest, did not fully explain the effects of fire on snow distribution. This explains why many models are not able to represent greater postfire variability in snow distribution and tend to predict only increases in snowpack following a canopy disturbance event despite observational studies showing both increases and decreases.
Key Points
Forest gap shape and edginess help determine the locations of postdisturbance changes in snow
Changes in canopy density is not a good predictor of snowpack response to canopy disturbance at a fine scale
Increases in seasonal temperature and higher insolation heighten postdisturbance changes in snow variability</description><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Canopy</subject><subject>Canopy gaps</subject><subject>canopy structure change</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>disturbance hydrology</subject><subject>Energy budget</subject><subject>Fire effects</subject><subject>Fires</subject><subject>forest disturbance</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Lidar</subject><subject>Meteorological conditions</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>postfire</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Snow</subject><subject>snowmelt change</subject><subject>Snowpack</subject><subject>Spatial variations</subject><subject>Variability</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Wildfires</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWD9u_oCAV1cn381RllYFRajWHpeYzdYt240mWUpv_nRT6sGTp2GGh3dmHoQuCFwToPqGAoXFDKgCRQ7QiGjOC6UVO0QjAM4KwrQ6RicxrgAIF1KN0PckpnZtUtsvcfpweNI0zqaIfYOnPriY8EsKg01DcLj8MP3SRTwNfo0XbVc3bZ76Hr_0foMXJrmAZy76IdhMzfs6928mbHfZTy45H3znl601HS59X7ep9X08Q0eN6aI7_62naD6dvJb3xePz3UN5-1gYppgstBJCgRjTRgMDY8eKjGuipNSCG6Hd2EpChHBSSE0lAcbfHTBLgdeWZ5Sdost97mfwX0N-rFrlQ_u8sqJcMkWAg8rU1Z6ywccYXFN9hqwnbCsC1c5x9ddxxtke37Sd2_7LVotZOaNcS8l-AF3KfQo</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Moeser, C. David</creator><creator>Broxton, Patrick D.</creator><creator>Harpold, Adrian</creator><creator>Robertson, Andrew</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2665-6820</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0154-9110</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2130-0347</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2566-9574</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>Estimating the Effects of Forest Structure Changes From Wildfire on Snow Water Resources Under Varying Meteorological Conditions</title><author>Moeser, C. David ; Broxton, Patrick D. ; Harpold, Adrian ; Robertson, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3736-975570582f9030ac8718d1766954a59e8c61155e6569261034be03c204dc418d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Canopy</topic><topic>Canopy gaps</topic><topic>canopy structure change</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>disturbance hydrology</topic><topic>Energy budget</topic><topic>Fire effects</topic><topic>Fires</topic><topic>forest disturbance</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Lidar</topic><topic>Meteorological conditions</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>postfire</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Snow</topic><topic>snowmelt change</topic><topic>Snowpack</topic><topic>Spatial variations</topic><topic>Variability</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Wildfires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moeser, C. David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broxton, Patrick D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harpold, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moeser, C. David</au><au>Broxton, Patrick D.</au><au>Harpold, Adrian</au><au>Robertson, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating the Effects of Forest Structure Changes From Wildfire on Snow Water Resources Under Varying Meteorological Conditions</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>11</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>Modeling forest change effects on snow is critical to resource management. However, many models either do not appropriately model canopy structure or cannot represent fine‐scale changes in structure following a disturbance. We applied a 1 m2 resolution energy budget snowpack model at a forested site in New Mexico, USA, affected by a wildfire, using input data from lidar to represent prefire and postfire canopy conditions. Both scenarios were forced with 37 years of equivalent meteorology to simulate the effect of fire‐mediated canopy change on snowpack under varying meteorology. Postfire, the simulated snow distribution was substantially altered, and despite an overall increase in snow, 32% of the field area displayed significant decreases, resulting in higher snowpack variability. The spatial differences in snow were correlated with the change in several direction‐based forest structure metrics (aspect‐based canopy edginess and gap area). Locations with decreases in snow following the fire were on southern aspects that transitioned to south facing canopy edges, canopy gaps that increased in size to the south, or where large trees were removed. Locations with largest increases in snow occurred where all canopy was removed. Changes in canopy density metrics, typically used in snow models to represent the forest, did not fully explain the effects of fire on snow distribution. This explains why many models are not able to represent greater postfire variability in snow distribution and tend to predict only increases in snowpack following a canopy disturbance event despite observational studies showing both increases and decreases.
Key Points
Forest gap shape and edginess help determine the locations of postdisturbance changes in snow
Changes in canopy density is not a good predictor of snowpack response to canopy disturbance at a fine scale
Increases in seasonal temperature and higher insolation heighten postdisturbance changes in snow variability</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2020WR027071</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2665-6820</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0154-9110</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2130-0347</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2566-9574</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1397 |
ispartof | Water resources research, 2020-11, Vol.56 (11), p.n/a |
issn | 0043-1397 1944-7973 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2463710407 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Atmospheric models Canopies Canopy Canopy gaps canopy structure change Distribution disturbance hydrology Energy budget Fire effects Fires forest disturbance Forests Herbivores Lidar Meteorological conditions Meteorology Observational studies postfire Resource management Snow snowmelt change Snowpack Spatial variations Variability Water resources Wildfires |
title | Estimating the Effects of Forest Structure Changes From Wildfire on Snow Water Resources Under Varying Meteorological Conditions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T23%3A57%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20the%20Effects%20of%20Forest%20Structure%20Changes%20From%20Wildfire%20on%20Snow%20Water%20Resources%20Under%20Varying%20Meteorological%20Conditions&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Moeser,%20C.%20David&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=11&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2020WR027071&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2463710407%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2463710407&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |