Morin's Ecology of Ideas and Derrida's Limitrophy: (Re-)Envisioning a Post-Human Ethics

Despite the myriad of differences between Edgar Morin and Jacques Derrida, this essay demonstrates that both thinkers expose the dangers of lingering, anthropocentric, binary logic in the modern world. Specifically, Morin and Derrida posit that various types of pervasive dichotomous thinking that ru...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Symploke (Bloomington, Ind.) Ind.), 2020-01, Vol.28 (1-2), p.297-312
1. Verfasser: Moser, Keith
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 312
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 297
container_title Symploke (Bloomington, Ind.)
container_volume 28
creator Moser, Keith
description Despite the myriad of differences between Edgar Morin and Jacques Derrida, this essay demonstrates that both thinkers expose the dangers of lingering, anthropocentric, binary logic in the modern world. Specifically, Morin and Derrida posit that various types of pervasive dichotomous thinking that run counter to contemporary scientific erudition are currently preventing global society from formulating a meaningful response to the impending environmental crisis. Indeed, one of the most salient features of Morin's ecology of ideas and Derrida's exercise in limitrophy is the deconstruction of simplistic dichotomies that conceal the richness and complexity of reality. In his encyclopedic, wide-ranging philosophy spanning several decades, Morin expresses a profound mistrust related to any philosophical position that is predicated upon the shaky edifi ce of binaries. It is in this sense in which Morin's notion of "complex thought" that he has been honing for more than half a century should be understood.
doi_str_mv 10.5250/symploke.28.1-2.0297
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2463688509</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.5250/symploke.28.1-2.0297</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.5250/symploke.28.1-2.0297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-596852731f60cf336de702557260a62c22b2e0f6f0515fe0ba5df5950f1d73fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkMtKAzEUhgdR8PoGLgIutIupJyeTZMad1KqFiuIFlyGdSWxqZ1KTqdC3d0q9bFydH85_gS9Jjin0OXI4j6t6Mffvpo95n6bYByzkVrJHOctSECi3Ow2i6HQhd5P9GGcAkGVI95LXOx9ccxrJsPRz_7Yi3pJRZXQkuqnIlQnBVbp7j13t2uAX09UFOXs0aW_YfLrofOOaN6LJg49terusdUOG7dSV8TDZsXoezdH3PUherofPg9t0fH8zGlyO0xKZbFNeiJyjZNQKKC1jojISkHOJArTAEnGCBqywwCm3BiaaV5YXHCytJLMTdpCcbHoXwX8sTWzVzC9D000qzAQTec6h6FzZxlUGH2MwVi2Cq3VYKQpqjVD9IFSYK6pQrRH-xbrymSnbehnNX7-ULOdCPa0xrykjUABaYBfrbWKz2PrwO_XvxBeEC4Py</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2463688509</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Morin's Ecology of Ideas and Derrida's Limitrophy: (Re-)Envisioning a Post-Human Ethics</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Moser, Keith</creator><creatorcontrib>Moser, Keith</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the myriad of differences between Edgar Morin and Jacques Derrida, this essay demonstrates that both thinkers expose the dangers of lingering, anthropocentric, binary logic in the modern world. Specifically, Morin and Derrida posit that various types of pervasive dichotomous thinking that run counter to contemporary scientific erudition are currently preventing global society from formulating a meaningful response to the impending environmental crisis. Indeed, one of the most salient features of Morin's ecology of ideas and Derrida's exercise in limitrophy is the deconstruction of simplistic dichotomies that conceal the richness and complexity of reality. In his encyclopedic, wide-ranging philosophy spanning several decades, Morin expresses a profound mistrust related to any philosophical position that is predicated upon the shaky edifi ce of binaries. It is in this sense in which Morin's notion of "complex thought" that he has been honing for more than half a century should be understood.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-0697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-0627</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5250/symploke.28.1-2.0297</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press</publisher><subject>Anthropocentrism ; Capitalism ; Derrida, Jacques ; Ecology ; Ethics ; General Articles ; Philosophy ; Posthumanism ; Realism ; Recreational equipment</subject><ispartof>Symploke (Bloomington, Ind.), 2020-01, Vol.28 (1-2), p.297-312</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2020 symplokē</rights><rights>Copyright © &lt;em&gt;symploke&lt;/em&gt;</rights><rights>Copyright University of Nebraska Press 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moser, Keith</creatorcontrib><title>Morin's Ecology of Ideas and Derrida's Limitrophy: (Re-)Envisioning a Post-Human Ethics</title><title>Symploke (Bloomington, Ind.)</title><description>Despite the myriad of differences between Edgar Morin and Jacques Derrida, this essay demonstrates that both thinkers expose the dangers of lingering, anthropocentric, binary logic in the modern world. Specifically, Morin and Derrida posit that various types of pervasive dichotomous thinking that run counter to contemporary scientific erudition are currently preventing global society from formulating a meaningful response to the impending environmental crisis. Indeed, one of the most salient features of Morin's ecology of ideas and Derrida's exercise in limitrophy is the deconstruction of simplistic dichotomies that conceal the richness and complexity of reality. In his encyclopedic, wide-ranging philosophy spanning several decades, Morin expresses a profound mistrust related to any philosophical position that is predicated upon the shaky edifi ce of binaries. It is in this sense in which Morin's notion of "complex thought" that he has been honing for more than half a century should be understood.</description><subject>Anthropocentrism</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Derrida, Jacques</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>General Articles</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Posthumanism</subject><subject>Realism</subject><subject>Recreational equipment</subject><issn>1069-0697</issn><issn>1534-0627</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PAF</sourceid><sourceid>PQLNA</sourceid><sourceid>PROLI</sourceid><recordid>eNptkMtKAzEUhgdR8PoGLgIutIupJyeTZMad1KqFiuIFlyGdSWxqZ1KTqdC3d0q9bFydH85_gS9Jjin0OXI4j6t6Mffvpo95n6bYByzkVrJHOctSECi3Ow2i6HQhd5P9GGcAkGVI95LXOx9ccxrJsPRz_7Yi3pJRZXQkuqnIlQnBVbp7j13t2uAX09UFOXs0aW_YfLrofOOaN6LJg49terusdUOG7dSV8TDZsXoezdH3PUherofPg9t0fH8zGlyO0xKZbFNeiJyjZNQKKC1jojISkHOJArTAEnGCBqywwCm3BiaaV5YXHCytJLMTdpCcbHoXwX8sTWzVzC9D000qzAQTec6h6FzZxlUGH2MwVi2Cq3VYKQpqjVD9IFSYK6pQrRH-xbrymSnbehnNX7-ULOdCPa0xrykjUABaYBfrbWKz2PrwO_XvxBeEC4Py</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Moser, Keith</creator><general>University of Nebraska Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLO</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PAF</scope><scope>PPXUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQLNA</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PROLI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Morin's Ecology of Ideas and Derrida's Limitrophy: (Re-)Envisioning a Post-Human Ethics</title><author>Moser, Keith</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-596852731f60cf336de702557260a62c22b2e0f6f0515fe0ba5df5950f1d73fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anthropocentrism</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Derrida, Jacques</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>General Articles</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Posthumanism</topic><topic>Realism</topic><topic>Recreational equipment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moser, Keith</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Literature Online Core (LION Core) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Learning: Literature</collection><collection>Literature Online Premium (LION Premium) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION) – US</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION eBooks)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Symploke (Bloomington, Ind.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moser, Keith</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Morin's Ecology of Ideas and Derrida's Limitrophy: (Re-)Envisioning a Post-Human Ethics</atitle><jtitle>Symploke (Bloomington, Ind.)</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>297</spage><epage>312</epage><pages>297-312</pages><issn>1069-0697</issn><eissn>1534-0627</eissn><abstract>Despite the myriad of differences between Edgar Morin and Jacques Derrida, this essay demonstrates that both thinkers expose the dangers of lingering, anthropocentric, binary logic in the modern world. Specifically, Morin and Derrida posit that various types of pervasive dichotomous thinking that run counter to contemporary scientific erudition are currently preventing global society from formulating a meaningful response to the impending environmental crisis. Indeed, one of the most salient features of Morin's ecology of ideas and Derrida's exercise in limitrophy is the deconstruction of simplistic dichotomies that conceal the richness and complexity of reality. In his encyclopedic, wide-ranging philosophy spanning several decades, Morin expresses a profound mistrust related to any philosophical position that is predicated upon the shaky edifi ce of binaries. It is in this sense in which Morin's notion of "complex thought" that he has been honing for more than half a century should be understood.</abstract><cop>Lincoln</cop><pub>University of Nebraska Press</pub><doi>10.5250/symploke.28.1-2.0297</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1069-0697
ispartof Symploke (Bloomington, Ind.), 2020-01, Vol.28 (1-2), p.297-312
issn 1069-0697
1534-0627
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2463688509
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Anthropocentrism
Capitalism
Derrida, Jacques
Ecology
Ethics
General Articles
Philosophy
Posthumanism
Realism
Recreational equipment
title Morin's Ecology of Ideas and Derrida's Limitrophy: (Re-)Envisioning a Post-Human Ethics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T17%3A12%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Morin's%20Ecology%20of%20Ideas%20and%20Derrida's%20Limitrophy:%20(Re-)Envisioning%20a%20Post-Human%20Ethics&rft.jtitle=Symploke%20(Bloomington,%20Ind.)&rft.au=Moser,%20Keith&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=297&rft.epage=312&rft.pages=297-312&rft.issn=1069-0697&rft.eissn=1534-0627&rft_id=info:doi/10.5250/symploke.28.1-2.0297&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.5250/symploke.28.1-2.0297%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2463688509&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.5250/symploke.28.1-2.0297&rfr_iscdi=true