PRIORITIZING THE WEIGHTS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA UNDER FUZZINESS: THE FUZZY FULL CONSISTENCY METHOD – FUCOM-F

Values, opinions, perceptions, and experiences are the forces that drive almost each and every kind of decision-making. Evaluation criteria are considered as sources of information used to compare alternatives and, as a result, make selection easier. Seeing their direct effect on the solution, weigh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Facta Universitatis. Series: Mechanical Engineering 2020-01, Vol.18 (3), p.419
Hauptverfasser: Pamucar, Dragan, Ecer, Fatih
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 419
container_title Facta Universitatis. Series: Mechanical Engineering
container_volume 18
creator Pamucar, Dragan
Ecer, Fatih
description Values, opinions, perceptions, and experiences are the forces that drive almost each and every kind of decision-making. Evaluation criteria are considered as sources of information used to compare alternatives and, as a result, make selection easier. Seeing their direct effect on the solution, weighting methods that most accurately determine criteria weights are needed. Unfortunately, the crisp values are insufficient to model real life problems due to the lack of complete information and the vagueness arising from linguistic assessments of decision-makers. Therefore, this paper proposes a novel subjective weighting method called the Fuzzy Full Consistency Method (FUCOM-F) for determining weights as accurately as possible under fuzziness. The most prominent feature of the proposed method is obtaining the most accurate weight values with very few pairwise comparisons. Consequently, thanks to this model, consistency and reliability of the results increase while the processing time and effort decrease. Moreover, an illustrative example related to the green supplier evaluation problem is performed. Finally, the robustness and effectiveness of the proposed fuzzy model is demonstrated by comparing it with fuzzy best-worst method (F-BWM) and fuzzy AHP (F-AHP) models.
doi_str_mv 10.22190/FUME200602034P
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2463167019</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2463167019</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-84276142a0928a4ba3946c0c049c4664845d4716cdd958e0953fdd918017b7cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMtOwkAUhidGEwmydjuJ68qZazvumjKlk5SW9KKBTVNKSSQq2MLCne_gG_okjuDGzTnnz_nOJT9CtwTuKSUKxmE50xRAAgXG5xdoQBkTDhDJL9EAmOAOBSqu0ajvtwBAGBVM8QHq5plJM1OYpUmmuIg0ftJmGhU5TsOT1I9-XPqFSRMcWE5nxsdlMtEZDsulHdJ5_nACf-XCxjjGQZrkJi90EizwTBdROsHfn1-2F6QzJ7xBV5v6pW9Hf3mIylAXQeTE6dQEfuw0VKqD43HqSsJpDYp6NV_V9l_ZQANcNVxK7nGx5i6RzXqthNeCEmxjS-IBcVdus2JDdHfeu-9278e2P1Tb3bF7sycryiUj0gWiLDU-U0236_uu3VT77vm17j4qAtXJ2-q_t-wHbIJh5Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2463167019</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PRIORITIZING THE WEIGHTS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA UNDER FUZZINESS: THE FUZZY FULL CONSISTENCY METHOD – FUCOM-F</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Pamucar, Dragan ; Ecer, Fatih</creator><creatorcontrib>Pamucar, Dragan ; Ecer, Fatih</creatorcontrib><description>Values, opinions, perceptions, and experiences are the forces that drive almost each and every kind of decision-making. Evaluation criteria are considered as sources of information used to compare alternatives and, as a result, make selection easier. Seeing their direct effect on the solution, weighting methods that most accurately determine criteria weights are needed. Unfortunately, the crisp values are insufficient to model real life problems due to the lack of complete information and the vagueness arising from linguistic assessments of decision-makers. Therefore, this paper proposes a novel subjective weighting method called the Fuzzy Full Consistency Method (FUCOM-F) for determining weights as accurately as possible under fuzziness. The most prominent feature of the proposed method is obtaining the most accurate weight values with very few pairwise comparisons. Consequently, thanks to this model, consistency and reliability of the results increase while the processing time and effort decrease. Moreover, an illustrative example related to the green supplier evaluation problem is performed. Finally, the robustness and effectiveness of the proposed fuzzy model is demonstrated by comparing it with fuzzy best-worst method (F-BWM) and fuzzy AHP (F-AHP) models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0354-2025</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2335-0164</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.22190/FUME200602034P</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nis: University of Nis</publisher><subject>Consistency ; Criteria ; Decision making ; Evaluation ; Robustness (mathematics) ; Weighting methods</subject><ispartof>Facta Universitatis. Series: Mechanical Engineering, 2020-01, Vol.18 (3), p.419</ispartof><rights>2020. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at http://casopisi.junis.ni.ac.rs/index.php/FUMechEng/about/editorialPolicies#openAccessPolicy.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-84276142a0928a4ba3946c0c049c4664845d4716cdd958e0953fdd918017b7cb3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-6174-3241</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pamucar, Dragan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ecer, Fatih</creatorcontrib><title>PRIORITIZING THE WEIGHTS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA UNDER FUZZINESS: THE FUZZY FULL CONSISTENCY METHOD – FUCOM-F</title><title>Facta Universitatis. Series: Mechanical Engineering</title><description>Values, opinions, perceptions, and experiences are the forces that drive almost each and every kind of decision-making. Evaluation criteria are considered as sources of information used to compare alternatives and, as a result, make selection easier. Seeing their direct effect on the solution, weighting methods that most accurately determine criteria weights are needed. Unfortunately, the crisp values are insufficient to model real life problems due to the lack of complete information and the vagueness arising from linguistic assessments of decision-makers. Therefore, this paper proposes a novel subjective weighting method called the Fuzzy Full Consistency Method (FUCOM-F) for determining weights as accurately as possible under fuzziness. The most prominent feature of the proposed method is obtaining the most accurate weight values with very few pairwise comparisons. Consequently, thanks to this model, consistency and reliability of the results increase while the processing time and effort decrease. Moreover, an illustrative example related to the green supplier evaluation problem is performed. Finally, the robustness and effectiveness of the proposed fuzzy model is demonstrated by comparing it with fuzzy best-worst method (F-BWM) and fuzzy AHP (F-AHP) models.</description><subject>Consistency</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Robustness (mathematics)</subject><subject>Weighting methods</subject><issn>0354-2025</issn><issn>2335-0164</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkMtOwkAUhidGEwmydjuJ68qZazvumjKlk5SW9KKBTVNKSSQq2MLCne_gG_okjuDGzTnnz_nOJT9CtwTuKSUKxmE50xRAAgXG5xdoQBkTDhDJL9EAmOAOBSqu0ajvtwBAGBVM8QHq5plJM1OYpUmmuIg0ftJmGhU5TsOT1I9-XPqFSRMcWE5nxsdlMtEZDsulHdJ5_nACf-XCxjjGQZrkJi90EizwTBdROsHfn1-2F6QzJ7xBV5v6pW9Hf3mIylAXQeTE6dQEfuw0VKqD43HqSsJpDYp6NV_V9l_ZQANcNVxK7nGx5i6RzXqthNeCEmxjS-IBcVdus2JDdHfeu-9278e2P1Tb3bF7sycryiUj0gWiLDU-U0236_uu3VT77vm17j4qAtXJ2-q_t-wHbIJh5Q</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Pamucar, Dragan</creator><creator>Ecer, Fatih</creator><general>University of Nis</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6174-3241</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>PRIORITIZING THE WEIGHTS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA UNDER FUZZINESS: THE FUZZY FULL CONSISTENCY METHOD – FUCOM-F</title><author>Pamucar, Dragan ; Ecer, Fatih</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-84276142a0928a4ba3946c0c049c4664845d4716cdd958e0953fdd918017b7cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Consistency</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Robustness (mathematics)</topic><topic>Weighting methods</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pamucar, Dragan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ecer, Fatih</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Facta Universitatis. Series: Mechanical Engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pamucar, Dragan</au><au>Ecer, Fatih</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PRIORITIZING THE WEIGHTS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA UNDER FUZZINESS: THE FUZZY FULL CONSISTENCY METHOD – FUCOM-F</atitle><jtitle>Facta Universitatis. Series: Mechanical Engineering</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>419</spage><pages>419-</pages><issn>0354-2025</issn><eissn>2335-0164</eissn><abstract>Values, opinions, perceptions, and experiences are the forces that drive almost each and every kind of decision-making. Evaluation criteria are considered as sources of information used to compare alternatives and, as a result, make selection easier. Seeing their direct effect on the solution, weighting methods that most accurately determine criteria weights are needed. Unfortunately, the crisp values are insufficient to model real life problems due to the lack of complete information and the vagueness arising from linguistic assessments of decision-makers. Therefore, this paper proposes a novel subjective weighting method called the Fuzzy Full Consistency Method (FUCOM-F) for determining weights as accurately as possible under fuzziness. The most prominent feature of the proposed method is obtaining the most accurate weight values with very few pairwise comparisons. Consequently, thanks to this model, consistency and reliability of the results increase while the processing time and effort decrease. Moreover, an illustrative example related to the green supplier evaluation problem is performed. Finally, the robustness and effectiveness of the proposed fuzzy model is demonstrated by comparing it with fuzzy best-worst method (F-BWM) and fuzzy AHP (F-AHP) models.</abstract><cop>Nis</cop><pub>University of Nis</pub><doi>10.22190/FUME200602034P</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6174-3241</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0354-2025
ispartof Facta Universitatis. Series: Mechanical Engineering, 2020-01, Vol.18 (3), p.419
issn 0354-2025
2335-0164
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2463167019
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Consistency
Criteria
Decision making
Evaluation
Robustness (mathematics)
Weighting methods
title PRIORITIZING THE WEIGHTS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA UNDER FUZZINESS: THE FUZZY FULL CONSISTENCY METHOD – FUCOM-F
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T13%3A12%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PRIORITIZING%20THE%20WEIGHTS%20OF%20THE%20EVALUATION%20CRITERIA%20UNDER%20FUZZINESS:%20THE%20FUZZY%20FULL%20CONSISTENCY%20METHOD%20%E2%80%93%20FUCOM-F&rft.jtitle=Facta%20Universitatis.%20Series:%20Mechanical%20Engineering&rft.au=Pamucar,%20Dragan&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=419&rft.pages=419-&rft.issn=0354-2025&rft.eissn=2335-0164&rft_id=info:doi/10.22190/FUME200602034P&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2463167019%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2463167019&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true