Global gaps in trait data for terrestrial vertebrates
Aim Trait data are increasingly being used in studies investigating the impacts of global changes on the structure and functioning of ecological communities. Despite a growing number of trait data collations for terrestrial vertebrates, there is to date no global assessment of the gaps and biases th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global ecology and biogeography 2020-12, Vol.29 (12), p.2143-2158 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2158 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2143 |
container_title | Global ecology and biogeography |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Etard, Adrienne Morrill, Sophie Newbold, Tim Sheard, Catherine |
description | Aim
Trait data are increasingly being used in studies investigating the impacts of global changes on the structure and functioning of ecological communities. Despite a growing number of trait data collations for terrestrial vertebrates, there is to date no global assessment of the gaps and biases the data present. Here, we assess whether terrestrial vertebrate trait data are taxonomically, spatially and phylogenetically biased.
Location
Global.
Time period
Present.
Major taxa studied
Terrestrial vertebrates.
Methods
We compile seven ecological traits and quantify coverage as the proportion of species for which an estimate is available. For a species, we define completeness as the proportion of non‐missing values across traits. We assess whether coverage and completeness differ across classes and examine phylogenetic biases in trait data. To investigate spatial biases, we test whether wider‐ranging species have more complete trait data than narrow‐ranging species. Additionally, we test whether species‐rich regions, which are of most concern for conservation, are less well sampled than species‐poor regions.
Results
Mammals and birds are well sampled even in species‐rich regions. For reptiles and amphibians (herptiles), only body size presents a high coverage (>80%), in addition to habitat‐related variables (amphibians). Herptiles are poorly sampled for other traits. The shortfalls are particularly acute in some species‐rich regions and for certain clades. Across all classes, geographically rarer species have less complete trait information.
Main conclusions
Trait information is less available on average in some of the most diverse areas and in geographically rarer species, both of which crucial for biodiversity conservation. Gaps in trait data might impede our ability to conduct large‐scale analyses, whereas biases can impact the validity of extrapolations. A short‐term solution to the problem is to estimate missing trait data using imputation techniques, whereas a longer‐term and more robust filling of existing gaps requires continued data‐collection efforts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/geb.13184 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2462825604</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2462825604</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3324-bdba14be62dfd4a705f630bfdd5d993a6b5c94fc15a89f6ee616d08bf75279a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsH_8GCJw_b5ru7Ry1tFQpeFLyFySYpW9ZunaRK_73RFW_OZebwzMzLQ8g1oxOWa7rxdsIEq-QJGTGpdVlxUZ3-zfz1nFzEuKWUKqn0iKhV11voig3sY9HuioTQpsJBgiL0WCSP6GPCNiMfHpO3CMnHS3IWoIv-6rePycty8Tx_KNdPq8f53bpshOCytM4Ck9Zr7oKTMKMqaEFtcE65uhagrWpqGRqmoKqD9l4z7Whlw0zxWQ21GJOb4e4e-_dDDmK2_QF3-aXhUvOKK01lpm4HqsE-RvTB7LF9AzwaRs23FZOtmB8rmZ0O7Gfb-eP_oFkt7oeNL_Z3YyU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2462825604</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global gaps in trait data for terrestrial vertebrates</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Etard, Adrienne ; Morrill, Sophie ; Newbold, Tim ; Sheard, Catherine</creator><contributor>Sheard, Catherine</contributor><creatorcontrib>Etard, Adrienne ; Morrill, Sophie ; Newbold, Tim ; Sheard, Catherine ; Sheard, Catherine</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
Trait data are increasingly being used in studies investigating the impacts of global changes on the structure and functioning of ecological communities. Despite a growing number of trait data collations for terrestrial vertebrates, there is to date no global assessment of the gaps and biases the data present. Here, we assess whether terrestrial vertebrate trait data are taxonomically, spatially and phylogenetically biased.
Location
Global.
Time period
Present.
Major taxa studied
Terrestrial vertebrates.
Methods
We compile seven ecological traits and quantify coverage as the proportion of species for which an estimate is available. For a species, we define completeness as the proportion of non‐missing values across traits. We assess whether coverage and completeness differ across classes and examine phylogenetic biases in trait data. To investigate spatial biases, we test whether wider‐ranging species have more complete trait data than narrow‐ranging species. Additionally, we test whether species‐rich regions, which are of most concern for conservation, are less well sampled than species‐poor regions.
Results
Mammals and birds are well sampled even in species‐rich regions. For reptiles and amphibians (herptiles), only body size presents a high coverage (>80%), in addition to habitat‐related variables (amphibians). Herptiles are poorly sampled for other traits. The shortfalls are particularly acute in some species‐rich regions and for certain clades. Across all classes, geographically rarer species have less complete trait information.
Main conclusions
Trait information is less available on average in some of the most diverse areas and in geographically rarer species, both of which crucial for biodiversity conservation. Gaps in trait data might impede our ability to conduct large‐scale analyses, whereas biases can impact the validity of extrapolations. A short‐term solution to the problem is to estimate missing trait data using imputation techniques, whereas a longer‐term and more robust filling of existing gaps requires continued data‐collection efforts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1466-822X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-8238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/geb.13184</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Amphibians ; Biodiversity ; Birds ; Body size ; Completeness ; Conservation ; coverage ; phylogenetic biases ; Phylogeny ; Reptiles ; Reptiles & amphibians ; spatial biases ; Spatial data ; Species ; taxonomic biases ; Terrestrial environments ; terrestrial vertebrates ; traits ; Vertebrates ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Global ecology and biogeography, 2020-12, Vol.29 (12), p.2143-2158</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. Global Ecology and Biogeography published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3324-bdba14be62dfd4a705f630bfdd5d993a6b5c94fc15a89f6ee616d08bf75279a93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3324-bdba14be62dfd4a705f630bfdd5d993a6b5c94fc15a89f6ee616d08bf75279a93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7361-0051 ; 0000-0002-1700-2972</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgeb.13184$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgeb.13184$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Sheard, Catherine</contributor><creatorcontrib>Etard, Adrienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrill, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newbold, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheard, Catherine</creatorcontrib><title>Global gaps in trait data for terrestrial vertebrates</title><title>Global ecology and biogeography</title><description>Aim
Trait data are increasingly being used in studies investigating the impacts of global changes on the structure and functioning of ecological communities. Despite a growing number of trait data collations for terrestrial vertebrates, there is to date no global assessment of the gaps and biases the data present. Here, we assess whether terrestrial vertebrate trait data are taxonomically, spatially and phylogenetically biased.
Location
Global.
Time period
Present.
Major taxa studied
Terrestrial vertebrates.
Methods
We compile seven ecological traits and quantify coverage as the proportion of species for which an estimate is available. For a species, we define completeness as the proportion of non‐missing values across traits. We assess whether coverage and completeness differ across classes and examine phylogenetic biases in trait data. To investigate spatial biases, we test whether wider‐ranging species have more complete trait data than narrow‐ranging species. Additionally, we test whether species‐rich regions, which are of most concern for conservation, are less well sampled than species‐poor regions.
Results
Mammals and birds are well sampled even in species‐rich regions. For reptiles and amphibians (herptiles), only body size presents a high coverage (>80%), in addition to habitat‐related variables (amphibians). Herptiles are poorly sampled for other traits. The shortfalls are particularly acute in some species‐rich regions and for certain clades. Across all classes, geographically rarer species have less complete trait information.
Main conclusions
Trait information is less available on average in some of the most diverse areas and in geographically rarer species, both of which crucial for biodiversity conservation. Gaps in trait data might impede our ability to conduct large‐scale analyses, whereas biases can impact the validity of extrapolations. A short‐term solution to the problem is to estimate missing trait data using imputation techniques, whereas a longer‐term and more robust filling of existing gaps requires continued data‐collection efforts.</description><subject>Amphibians</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Completeness</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>coverage</subject><subject>phylogenetic biases</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Reptiles</subject><subject>Reptiles & amphibians</subject><subject>spatial biases</subject><subject>Spatial data</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>taxonomic biases</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>terrestrial vertebrates</subject><subject>traits</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1466-822X</issn><issn>1466-8238</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsH_8GCJw_b5ru7Ry1tFQpeFLyFySYpW9ZunaRK_73RFW_OZebwzMzLQ8g1oxOWa7rxdsIEq-QJGTGpdVlxUZ3-zfz1nFzEuKWUKqn0iKhV11voig3sY9HuioTQpsJBgiL0WCSP6GPCNiMfHpO3CMnHS3IWoIv-6rePycty8Tx_KNdPq8f53bpshOCytM4Ck9Zr7oKTMKMqaEFtcE65uhagrWpqGRqmoKqD9l4z7Whlw0zxWQ21GJOb4e4e-_dDDmK2_QF3-aXhUvOKK01lpm4HqsE-RvTB7LF9AzwaRs23FZOtmB8rmZ0O7Gfb-eP_oFkt7oeNL_Z3YyU</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Etard, Adrienne</creator><creator>Morrill, Sophie</creator><creator>Newbold, Tim</creator><creator>Sheard, Catherine</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7361-0051</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1700-2972</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Global gaps in trait data for terrestrial vertebrates</title><author>Etard, Adrienne ; Morrill, Sophie ; Newbold, Tim ; Sheard, Catherine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3324-bdba14be62dfd4a705f630bfdd5d993a6b5c94fc15a89f6ee616d08bf75279a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Amphibians</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Completeness</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>coverage</topic><topic>phylogenetic biases</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Reptiles</topic><topic>Reptiles & amphibians</topic><topic>spatial biases</topic><topic>Spatial data</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>taxonomic biases</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>terrestrial vertebrates</topic><topic>traits</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Etard, Adrienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrill, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newbold, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheard, Catherine</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Global ecology and biogeography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Etard, Adrienne</au><au>Morrill, Sophie</au><au>Newbold, Tim</au><au>Sheard, Catherine</au><au>Sheard, Catherine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global gaps in trait data for terrestrial vertebrates</atitle><jtitle>Global ecology and biogeography</jtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2143</spage><epage>2158</epage><pages>2143-2158</pages><issn>1466-822X</issn><eissn>1466-8238</eissn><abstract>Aim
Trait data are increasingly being used in studies investigating the impacts of global changes on the structure and functioning of ecological communities. Despite a growing number of trait data collations for terrestrial vertebrates, there is to date no global assessment of the gaps and biases the data present. Here, we assess whether terrestrial vertebrate trait data are taxonomically, spatially and phylogenetically biased.
Location
Global.
Time period
Present.
Major taxa studied
Terrestrial vertebrates.
Methods
We compile seven ecological traits and quantify coverage as the proportion of species for which an estimate is available. For a species, we define completeness as the proportion of non‐missing values across traits. We assess whether coverage and completeness differ across classes and examine phylogenetic biases in trait data. To investigate spatial biases, we test whether wider‐ranging species have more complete trait data than narrow‐ranging species. Additionally, we test whether species‐rich regions, which are of most concern for conservation, are less well sampled than species‐poor regions.
Results
Mammals and birds are well sampled even in species‐rich regions. For reptiles and amphibians (herptiles), only body size presents a high coverage (>80%), in addition to habitat‐related variables (amphibians). Herptiles are poorly sampled for other traits. The shortfalls are particularly acute in some species‐rich regions and for certain clades. Across all classes, geographically rarer species have less complete trait information.
Main conclusions
Trait information is less available on average in some of the most diverse areas and in geographically rarer species, both of which crucial for biodiversity conservation. Gaps in trait data might impede our ability to conduct large‐scale analyses, whereas biases can impact the validity of extrapolations. A short‐term solution to the problem is to estimate missing trait data using imputation techniques, whereas a longer‐term and more robust filling of existing gaps requires continued data‐collection efforts.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/geb.13184</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7361-0051</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1700-2972</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1466-822X |
ispartof | Global ecology and biogeography, 2020-12, Vol.29 (12), p.2143-2158 |
issn | 1466-822X 1466-8238 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2462825604 |
source | Wiley Journals |
subjects | Amphibians Biodiversity Birds Body size Completeness Conservation coverage phylogenetic biases Phylogeny Reptiles Reptiles & amphibians spatial biases Spatial data Species taxonomic biases Terrestrial environments terrestrial vertebrates traits Vertebrates Wildlife conservation |
title | Global gaps in trait data for terrestrial vertebrates |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T15%3A07%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20gaps%20in%20trait%20data%20for%20terrestrial%20vertebrates&rft.jtitle=Global%20ecology%20and%20biogeography&rft.au=Etard,%20Adrienne&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2143&rft.epage=2158&rft.pages=2143-2158&rft.issn=1466-822X&rft.eissn=1466-8238&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/geb.13184&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2462825604%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2462825604&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |