Climate‐ versus geographic‐dependent patterns in the spatial distribution of macroinvertebrate assemblages in New World depressional wetlands

Analyses of biota at lower latitudes may presage impacts of climate change on biota at higher latitudes. Macroinvertebrate assemblages in depressional wetlands may be especially sensitive to climate change because weather‐related precipitation and evapotranspiration are dominant ecological controls...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global change biology 2020-12, Vol.26 (12), p.6895-6903
Hauptverfasser: Stenert, Cristina, Pires, Mateus M., Epele, Luis B., Grech, Marta G., Maltchik, Leonardo, McLean, Kyle I., Mushet, David M., Batzer, Darold P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6903
container_issue 12
container_start_page 6895
container_title Global change biology
container_volume 26
creator Stenert, Cristina
Pires, Mateus M.
Epele, Luis B.
Grech, Marta G.
Maltchik, Leonardo
McLean, Kyle I.
Mushet, David M.
Batzer, Darold P.
description Analyses of biota at lower latitudes may presage impacts of climate change on biota at higher latitudes. Macroinvertebrate assemblages in depressional wetlands may be especially sensitive to climate change because weather‐related precipitation and evapotranspiration are dominant ecological controls on habitats, and organisms of depressional wetlands are temperature‐sensitive ectotherms. We aimed to better understand how wetland macroinvertebrate assemblages were structured according to geography and climate. To do so, we contrasted aquatic‐macroinvertebrate assemblage structure (family level) between subtropical and temperate depressional wetlands of North and South America using presence–absence data from 264 of these habitats across the continents and more‐detailed relative‐abundance data from 56 depressional wetlands from four case‐study locations (North Dakota and Georgia in North America; southern Brazil and Argentinian Patagonia in South America). Both data sets roughly partitioned wetland numbers equally between the two climatic zones and between the continents. We used ordination methods (PCA and NMDS) and tests of multivariate dispersion (PERMDISP) to assess the distribution and the homogeneity in variation in the composition of macroinvertebrate assemblages across climates and continents, respectively. We found that macroinvertebrate assemblage structures in the subtropical depressional wetlands of North and South America were similar to each other (at the family level), while assemblages in the North and South American temperate wetlands were unique from the subtropics, and from each other. Tests of homogeneity of multivariate dispersion indicated that family‐level assemblage structures were more homogeneous in wetlands from the subtropical than the temperate zones. Our study suggests that ongoing climate change may result in the homogenization of macroinvertebrate assemblage structures in temperate zones of North and South America, with those assemblages becoming enveloped by assemblages from the subtropics. Biotic homogenization, more typically associated with other kinds of anthropogenic factors, may also be affected by climate change. We assessed wetland macroinvertebrate community compositions across the subtropical and temperate zones of North and South America, using meta‐analyses (264 wetlands) and more‐detailed case studies (56 wetlands in North Dakota, Georgia, Brazil, Argentina). Assemblages in the subtropics were homogeneous across b
doi_str_mv 10.1111/gcb.15367
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2462777073</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2462777073</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-aa0c9504f241409b617342db015169ced4e53ccea6d17569ed282267f4eb7dff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9O3DAQhy0EAkp76AtUljhxCPi_N8eyainSqlxAHCMnnixG2ST1OF1x4xHKK_IkmF3oDV_GGn3zaeZHyFfOTnl-Z8umPuVaGrtDDrk0uhBqZnZf_1oVnHF5QD4h3jPGpGBmnxxIUdpyNtOH5GnehZVL8Pz4j_6FiBPSJQzL6Ma70OSmhxF6D32io0sJYo809DTdAcXcCK6jPmCKoZ5SGHo6tHTlmjiEPssS1DGrqUOEVd25JWyGf8Oa3g6x8zTLIyDmwexZQ-pc7_Ez2Wtdh_DlrR6Rm58_rue_isXVxeX8-6JopJa2cI41pWaqFYorVtaGW6mErxnX3JQNeAVaNg0447nVpgQvZkIY2yqorW9beUSOt94xDn8mwFTdD1PMm2AllBHWWmZlpk62VD4KMUJbjTEHFh8qzqrX8KscfrUJP7Pf3oxTvQL_n3xPOwNnW2AdOnj42FRdzM-3yhf9sJNq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2462777073</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Climate‐ versus geographic‐dependent patterns in the spatial distribution of macroinvertebrate assemblages in New World depressional wetlands</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Stenert, Cristina ; Pires, Mateus M. ; Epele, Luis B. ; Grech, Marta G. ; Maltchik, Leonardo ; McLean, Kyle I. ; Mushet, David M. ; Batzer, Darold P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stenert, Cristina ; Pires, Mateus M. ; Epele, Luis B. ; Grech, Marta G. ; Maltchik, Leonardo ; McLean, Kyle I. ; Mushet, David M. ; Batzer, Darold P.</creatorcontrib><description>Analyses of biota at lower latitudes may presage impacts of climate change on biota at higher latitudes. Macroinvertebrate assemblages in depressional wetlands may be especially sensitive to climate change because weather‐related precipitation and evapotranspiration are dominant ecological controls on habitats, and organisms of depressional wetlands are temperature‐sensitive ectotherms. We aimed to better understand how wetland macroinvertebrate assemblages were structured according to geography and climate. To do so, we contrasted aquatic‐macroinvertebrate assemblage structure (family level) between subtropical and temperate depressional wetlands of North and South America using presence–absence data from 264 of these habitats across the continents and more‐detailed relative‐abundance data from 56 depressional wetlands from four case‐study locations (North Dakota and Georgia in North America; southern Brazil and Argentinian Patagonia in South America). Both data sets roughly partitioned wetland numbers equally between the two climatic zones and between the continents. We used ordination methods (PCA and NMDS) and tests of multivariate dispersion (PERMDISP) to assess the distribution and the homogeneity in variation in the composition of macroinvertebrate assemblages across climates and continents, respectively. We found that macroinvertebrate assemblage structures in the subtropical depressional wetlands of North and South America were similar to each other (at the family level), while assemblages in the North and South American temperate wetlands were unique from the subtropics, and from each other. Tests of homogeneity of multivariate dispersion indicated that family‐level assemblage structures were more homogeneous in wetlands from the subtropical than the temperate zones. Our study suggests that ongoing climate change may result in the homogenization of macroinvertebrate assemblage structures in temperate zones of North and South America, with those assemblages becoming enveloped by assemblages from the subtropics. Biotic homogenization, more typically associated with other kinds of anthropogenic factors, may also be affected by climate change. We assessed wetland macroinvertebrate community compositions across the subtropical and temperate zones of North and South America, using meta‐analyses (264 wetlands) and more‐detailed case studies (56 wetlands in North Dakota, Georgia, Brazil, Argentina). Assemblages in the subtropics were homogeneous across both continents, while assemblages across the two temperate zones were more unique and more heterogeneous; climate appears to be a primary control on assemblage structure. In the context of climate change, differences between the subtropical and temperate zones may presage the impacts of ongoing warming, where the homogeneity of the subtropics may envelop the heterogeneity of the temperate zones.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-1013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15367</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32979885</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anthropogenic factors ; Biota ; Brazil ; Climate ; Climate Change ; Climatic zones ; Continents ; Dispersion ; Distribution ; Ecological control ; Ecosystem ; Environmental impact ; Evapotranspiration ; functional trends ; Geography ; Homogeneity ; Homogenization ; Human influences ; Invertebrates ; latitude ; Macroinvertebrates ; Multivariate analysis ; North America ; Ordination ; ponds ; South America ; Spatial distribution ; Structures ; subtropical ; taxonomic trends ; temperate ; Temperate zones ; Weather ; Wetlands ; Zoobenthos</subject><ispartof>Global change biology, 2020-12, Vol.26 (12), p.6895-6903</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-aa0c9504f241409b617342db015169ced4e53ccea6d17569ed282267f4eb7dff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-aa0c9504f241409b617342db015169ced4e53ccea6d17569ed282267f4eb7dff3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9095-2018 ; 0000-0002-5728-8733</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgcb.15367$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgcb.15367$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32979885$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stenert, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pires, Mateus M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epele, Luis B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grech, Marta G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maltchik, Leonardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLean, Kyle I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mushet, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batzer, Darold P.</creatorcontrib><title>Climate‐ versus geographic‐dependent patterns in the spatial distribution of macroinvertebrate assemblages in New World depressional wetlands</title><title>Global change biology</title><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><description>Analyses of biota at lower latitudes may presage impacts of climate change on biota at higher latitudes. Macroinvertebrate assemblages in depressional wetlands may be especially sensitive to climate change because weather‐related precipitation and evapotranspiration are dominant ecological controls on habitats, and organisms of depressional wetlands are temperature‐sensitive ectotherms. We aimed to better understand how wetland macroinvertebrate assemblages were structured according to geography and climate. To do so, we contrasted aquatic‐macroinvertebrate assemblage structure (family level) between subtropical and temperate depressional wetlands of North and South America using presence–absence data from 264 of these habitats across the continents and more‐detailed relative‐abundance data from 56 depressional wetlands from four case‐study locations (North Dakota and Georgia in North America; southern Brazil and Argentinian Patagonia in South America). Both data sets roughly partitioned wetland numbers equally between the two climatic zones and between the continents. We used ordination methods (PCA and NMDS) and tests of multivariate dispersion (PERMDISP) to assess the distribution and the homogeneity in variation in the composition of macroinvertebrate assemblages across climates and continents, respectively. We found that macroinvertebrate assemblage structures in the subtropical depressional wetlands of North and South America were similar to each other (at the family level), while assemblages in the North and South American temperate wetlands were unique from the subtropics, and from each other. Tests of homogeneity of multivariate dispersion indicated that family‐level assemblage structures were more homogeneous in wetlands from the subtropical than the temperate zones. Our study suggests that ongoing climate change may result in the homogenization of macroinvertebrate assemblage structures in temperate zones of North and South America, with those assemblages becoming enveloped by assemblages from the subtropics. Biotic homogenization, more typically associated with other kinds of anthropogenic factors, may also be affected by climate change. We assessed wetland macroinvertebrate community compositions across the subtropical and temperate zones of North and South America, using meta‐analyses (264 wetlands) and more‐detailed case studies (56 wetlands in North Dakota, Georgia, Brazil, Argentina). Assemblages in the subtropics were homogeneous across both continents, while assemblages across the two temperate zones were more unique and more heterogeneous; climate appears to be a primary control on assemblage structure. In the context of climate change, differences between the subtropical and temperate zones may presage the impacts of ongoing warming, where the homogeneity of the subtropics may envelop the heterogeneity of the temperate zones.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>Climatic zones</subject><subject>Continents</subject><subject>Dispersion</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Ecological control</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>functional trends</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Homogeneity</subject><subject>Homogenization</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>latitude</subject><subject>Macroinvertebrates</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>Ordination</subject><subject>ponds</subject><subject>South America</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Structures</subject><subject>subtropical</subject><subject>taxonomic trends</subject><subject>temperate</subject><subject>Temperate zones</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Zoobenthos</subject><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9O3DAQhy0EAkp76AtUljhxCPi_N8eyainSqlxAHCMnnixG2ST1OF1x4xHKK_IkmF3oDV_GGn3zaeZHyFfOTnl-Z8umPuVaGrtDDrk0uhBqZnZf_1oVnHF5QD4h3jPGpGBmnxxIUdpyNtOH5GnehZVL8Pz4j_6FiBPSJQzL6Ma70OSmhxF6D32io0sJYo809DTdAcXcCK6jPmCKoZ5SGHo6tHTlmjiEPssS1DGrqUOEVd25JWyGf8Oa3g6x8zTLIyDmwexZQ-pc7_Ez2Wtdh_DlrR6Rm58_rue_isXVxeX8-6JopJa2cI41pWaqFYorVtaGW6mErxnX3JQNeAVaNg0447nVpgQvZkIY2yqorW9beUSOt94xDn8mwFTdD1PMm2AllBHWWmZlpk62VD4KMUJbjTEHFh8qzqrX8KscfrUJP7Pf3oxTvQL_n3xPOwNnW2AdOnj42FRdzM-3yhf9sJNq</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Stenert, Cristina</creator><creator>Pires, Mateus M.</creator><creator>Epele, Luis B.</creator><creator>Grech, Marta G.</creator><creator>Maltchik, Leonardo</creator><creator>McLean, Kyle I.</creator><creator>Mushet, David M.</creator><creator>Batzer, Darold P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9095-2018</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5728-8733</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Climate‐ versus geographic‐dependent patterns in the spatial distribution of macroinvertebrate assemblages in New World depressional wetlands</title><author>Stenert, Cristina ; Pires, Mateus M. ; Epele, Luis B. ; Grech, Marta G. ; Maltchik, Leonardo ; McLean, Kyle I. ; Mushet, David M. ; Batzer, Darold P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-aa0c9504f241409b617342db015169ced4e53ccea6d17569ed282267f4eb7dff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>Climatic zones</topic><topic>Continents</topic><topic>Dispersion</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Ecological control</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>functional trends</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Homogeneity</topic><topic>Homogenization</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>latitude</topic><topic>Macroinvertebrates</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>Ordination</topic><topic>ponds</topic><topic>South America</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Structures</topic><topic>subtropical</topic><topic>taxonomic trends</topic><topic>temperate</topic><topic>Temperate zones</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Zoobenthos</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stenert, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pires, Mateus M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epele, Luis B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grech, Marta G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maltchik, Leonardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLean, Kyle I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mushet, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batzer, Darold P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stenert, Cristina</au><au>Pires, Mateus M.</au><au>Epele, Luis B.</au><au>Grech, Marta G.</au><au>Maltchik, Leonardo</au><au>McLean, Kyle I.</au><au>Mushet, David M.</au><au>Batzer, Darold P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Climate‐ versus geographic‐dependent patterns in the spatial distribution of macroinvertebrate assemblages in New World depressional wetlands</atitle><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>6895</spage><epage>6903</epage><pages>6895-6903</pages><issn>1354-1013</issn><eissn>1365-2486</eissn><abstract>Analyses of biota at lower latitudes may presage impacts of climate change on biota at higher latitudes. Macroinvertebrate assemblages in depressional wetlands may be especially sensitive to climate change because weather‐related precipitation and evapotranspiration are dominant ecological controls on habitats, and organisms of depressional wetlands are temperature‐sensitive ectotherms. We aimed to better understand how wetland macroinvertebrate assemblages were structured according to geography and climate. To do so, we contrasted aquatic‐macroinvertebrate assemblage structure (family level) between subtropical and temperate depressional wetlands of North and South America using presence–absence data from 264 of these habitats across the continents and more‐detailed relative‐abundance data from 56 depressional wetlands from four case‐study locations (North Dakota and Georgia in North America; southern Brazil and Argentinian Patagonia in South America). Both data sets roughly partitioned wetland numbers equally between the two climatic zones and between the continents. We used ordination methods (PCA and NMDS) and tests of multivariate dispersion (PERMDISP) to assess the distribution and the homogeneity in variation in the composition of macroinvertebrate assemblages across climates and continents, respectively. We found that macroinvertebrate assemblage structures in the subtropical depressional wetlands of North and South America were similar to each other (at the family level), while assemblages in the North and South American temperate wetlands were unique from the subtropics, and from each other. Tests of homogeneity of multivariate dispersion indicated that family‐level assemblage structures were more homogeneous in wetlands from the subtropical than the temperate zones. Our study suggests that ongoing climate change may result in the homogenization of macroinvertebrate assemblage structures in temperate zones of North and South America, with those assemblages becoming enveloped by assemblages from the subtropics. Biotic homogenization, more typically associated with other kinds of anthropogenic factors, may also be affected by climate change. We assessed wetland macroinvertebrate community compositions across the subtropical and temperate zones of North and South America, using meta‐analyses (264 wetlands) and more‐detailed case studies (56 wetlands in North Dakota, Georgia, Brazil, Argentina). Assemblages in the subtropics were homogeneous across both continents, while assemblages across the two temperate zones were more unique and more heterogeneous; climate appears to be a primary control on assemblage structure. In the context of climate change, differences between the subtropical and temperate zones may presage the impacts of ongoing warming, where the homogeneity of the subtropics may envelop the heterogeneity of the temperate zones.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>32979885</pmid><doi>10.1111/gcb.15367</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9095-2018</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5728-8733</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1354-1013
ispartof Global change biology, 2020-12, Vol.26 (12), p.6895-6903
issn 1354-1013
1365-2486
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2462777073
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animals
Anthropogenic factors
Biota
Brazil
Climate
Climate Change
Climatic zones
Continents
Dispersion
Distribution
Ecological control
Ecosystem
Environmental impact
Evapotranspiration
functional trends
Geography
Homogeneity
Homogenization
Human influences
Invertebrates
latitude
Macroinvertebrates
Multivariate analysis
North America
Ordination
ponds
South America
Spatial distribution
Structures
subtropical
taxonomic trends
temperate
Temperate zones
Weather
Wetlands
Zoobenthos
title Climate‐ versus geographic‐dependent patterns in the spatial distribution of macroinvertebrate assemblages in New World depressional wetlands
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T17%3A46%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Climate%E2%80%90%20versus%20geographic%E2%80%90dependent%20patterns%20in%20the%20spatial%20distribution%20of%20macroinvertebrate%20assemblages%20in%20New%20World%20depressional%20wetlands&rft.jtitle=Global%20change%20biology&rft.au=Stenert,%20Cristina&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=6895&rft.epage=6903&rft.pages=6895-6903&rft.issn=1354-1013&rft.eissn=1365-2486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gcb.15367&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2462777073%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2462777073&rft_id=info:pmid/32979885&rfr_iscdi=true