The problem of scale in predicting biological responses to climate

Many analyses of biological responses to climate rely on gridded climate data derived from weather stations, which differ from the conditions experienced by organisms in at least two respects. First, the microclimate recorded by a weather station is often quite different to that near the ground surf...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global change biology 2020-12, Vol.26 (12), p.6657-6666
Hauptverfasser: Bütikofer, Luca, Anderson, Karen, Bebber, Daniel P., Bennie, Jonathan J., Early, Regan I., Maclean, Ilya M. D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6666
container_issue 12
container_start_page 6657
container_title Global change biology
container_volume 26
creator Bütikofer, Luca
Anderson, Karen
Bebber, Daniel P.
Bennie, Jonathan J.
Early, Regan I.
Maclean, Ilya M. D.
description Many analyses of biological responses to climate rely on gridded climate data derived from weather stations, which differ from the conditions experienced by organisms in at least two respects. First, the microclimate recorded by a weather station is often quite different to that near the ground surface, where many organisms live. Second, the temporal and spatial resolutions of gridded climate datasets derived from weather stations are often too coarse to capture the conditions experienced by organisms. Temporally and spatially coarse data have clear benefits in terms of reduced model size and complexity, but here we argue that coarse‐grained data introduce errors that, in biological studies, are too often ignored. However, in contrast to common perception, these errors are not necessarily caused directly by a spatial mismatch between the size of organisms and the scale at which climate data are collected. Rather, errors and biases are primarily due to (a) systematic discrepancies between the climate used in analysis and that experienced by organisms under study; and (b) the non‐linearity of most biological responses in combination with differences in climate variance between locations and time periods for which models are fitted and those for which projections are made. We discuss when exactly problems of scale can be expected to arise and highlight the potential to circumvent these by spatially and temporally down‐scaling climate. We also suggest ways in which adjustments to deal with issues of scale could be made without the need to run high‐resolution models over wide extents. Many analyses of biological responses to climate rely on coarse spatial and temporal resolution climate data. The use of such data are likely to cause errors, but these errors are not caused directly by spatial mismatch between the size of organisms and the scale of climate data. Rather, errors arise because of the non‐linearity of most biological responses in combination with differences in climate variance between locations and time periods for which models are fitted and those for which predictions are made.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/gcb.15358
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2462776766</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2462776766</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4548-674e4a859550b4e22efcf64f412c97ef30a26d32d770c2519d24aa6d2b52b6343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9PwzAMxSMEYmNw4AugSJw4dEucP22PrIKBNInLOEdt6o5OXTOaTmjfnowObvhiy_7p-ekRcsvZlIearW0x5Uqo5IyMudAqApno8-OsZMQZFyNy5f2GMSaA6UsyEpAqrSSMyXz1gXTXuaLBLXUV9TZvkNZt2GFZ275u17SoXePWdbjQDv3OtR497R21Tb3Ne7wmF1XeeLw59Ql5f35aZS_R8m3xmj0uIyuVTCIdS5R5olKlWCERACtbaVlJDjaNsRIsB10KKOOYWVA8LUHmuS6hUFBoIcWE3A-6we7nHn1vNm7fteGlAakhjnWsdaAeBsp2zvsOK7Prgs3uYDgzx7RMSMv8pBXYu5Pivthi-Uf-xhOA2QB81Q0e_lcyi2w-SH4DcPFx7g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2462776766</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The problem of scale in predicting biological responses to climate</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Bütikofer, Luca ; Anderson, Karen ; Bebber, Daniel P. ; Bennie, Jonathan J. ; Early, Regan I. ; Maclean, Ilya M. D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bütikofer, Luca ; Anderson, Karen ; Bebber, Daniel P. ; Bennie, Jonathan J. ; Early, Regan I. ; Maclean, Ilya M. D.</creatorcontrib><description>Many analyses of biological responses to climate rely on gridded climate data derived from weather stations, which differ from the conditions experienced by organisms in at least two respects. First, the microclimate recorded by a weather station is often quite different to that near the ground surface, where many organisms live. Second, the temporal and spatial resolutions of gridded climate datasets derived from weather stations are often too coarse to capture the conditions experienced by organisms. Temporally and spatially coarse data have clear benefits in terms of reduced model size and complexity, but here we argue that coarse‐grained data introduce errors that, in biological studies, are too often ignored. However, in contrast to common perception, these errors are not necessarily caused directly by a spatial mismatch between the size of organisms and the scale at which climate data are collected. Rather, errors and biases are primarily due to (a) systematic discrepancies between the climate used in analysis and that experienced by organisms under study; and (b) the non‐linearity of most biological responses in combination with differences in climate variance between locations and time periods for which models are fitted and those for which projections are made. We discuss when exactly problems of scale can be expected to arise and highlight the potential to circumvent these by spatially and temporally down‐scaling climate. We also suggest ways in which adjustments to deal with issues of scale could be made without the need to run high‐resolution models over wide extents. Many analyses of biological responses to climate rely on coarse spatial and temporal resolution climate data. The use of such data are likely to cause errors, but these errors are not caused directly by spatial mismatch between the size of organisms and the scale of climate data. Rather, errors arise because of the non‐linearity of most biological responses in combination with differences in climate variance between locations and time periods for which models are fitted and those for which predictions are made.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-1013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15358</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32956542</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Climate ; Climate Change ; Climate models ; Climatic data ; distribution ; Errors ; Forecasting ; Linearity ; Microclimate ; Organisms ; phenology ; resolution ; Scaling ; Variance analysis ; Weather ; Weather stations</subject><ispartof>Global change biology, 2020-12, Vol.26 (12), p.6657-6666</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4548-674e4a859550b4e22efcf64f412c97ef30a26d32d770c2519d24aa6d2b52b6343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4548-674e4a859550b4e22efcf64f412c97ef30a26d32d770c2519d24aa6d2b52b6343</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4440-1482 ; 0000-0001-8030-9136 ; 0000-0002-3289-2598</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgcb.15358$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgcb.15358$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32956542$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bütikofer, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bebber, Daniel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennie, Jonathan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Early, Regan I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maclean, Ilya M. D.</creatorcontrib><title>The problem of scale in predicting biological responses to climate</title><title>Global change biology</title><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><description>Many analyses of biological responses to climate rely on gridded climate data derived from weather stations, which differ from the conditions experienced by organisms in at least two respects. First, the microclimate recorded by a weather station is often quite different to that near the ground surface, where many organisms live. Second, the temporal and spatial resolutions of gridded climate datasets derived from weather stations are often too coarse to capture the conditions experienced by organisms. Temporally and spatially coarse data have clear benefits in terms of reduced model size and complexity, but here we argue that coarse‐grained data introduce errors that, in biological studies, are too often ignored. However, in contrast to common perception, these errors are not necessarily caused directly by a spatial mismatch between the size of organisms and the scale at which climate data are collected. Rather, errors and biases are primarily due to (a) systematic discrepancies between the climate used in analysis and that experienced by organisms under study; and (b) the non‐linearity of most biological responses in combination with differences in climate variance between locations and time periods for which models are fitted and those for which projections are made. We discuss when exactly problems of scale can be expected to arise and highlight the potential to circumvent these by spatially and temporally down‐scaling climate. We also suggest ways in which adjustments to deal with issues of scale could be made without the need to run high‐resolution models over wide extents. Many analyses of biological responses to climate rely on coarse spatial and temporal resolution climate data. The use of such data are likely to cause errors, but these errors are not caused directly by spatial mismatch between the size of organisms and the scale of climate data. Rather, errors arise because of the non‐linearity of most biological responses in combination with differences in climate variance between locations and time periods for which models are fitted and those for which predictions are made.</description><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Climatic data</subject><subject>distribution</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Linearity</subject><subject>Microclimate</subject><subject>Organisms</subject><subject>phenology</subject><subject>resolution</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Weather stations</subject><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9PwzAMxSMEYmNw4AugSJw4dEucP22PrIKBNInLOEdt6o5OXTOaTmjfnowObvhiy_7p-ekRcsvZlIearW0x5Uqo5IyMudAqApno8-OsZMQZFyNy5f2GMSaA6UsyEpAqrSSMyXz1gXTXuaLBLXUV9TZvkNZt2GFZ275u17SoXePWdbjQDv3OtR497R21Tb3Ne7wmF1XeeLw59Ql5f35aZS_R8m3xmj0uIyuVTCIdS5R5olKlWCERACtbaVlJDjaNsRIsB10KKOOYWVA8LUHmuS6hUFBoIcWE3A-6we7nHn1vNm7fteGlAakhjnWsdaAeBsp2zvsOK7Prgs3uYDgzx7RMSMv8pBXYu5Pivthi-Uf-xhOA2QB81Q0e_lcyi2w-SH4DcPFx7g</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Bütikofer, Luca</creator><creator>Anderson, Karen</creator><creator>Bebber, Daniel P.</creator><creator>Bennie, Jonathan J.</creator><creator>Early, Regan I.</creator><creator>Maclean, Ilya M. D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4440-1482</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8030-9136</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3289-2598</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>The problem of scale in predicting biological responses to climate</title><author>Bütikofer, Luca ; Anderson, Karen ; Bebber, Daniel P. ; Bennie, Jonathan J. ; Early, Regan I. ; Maclean, Ilya M. D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4548-674e4a859550b4e22efcf64f412c97ef30a26d32d770c2519d24aa6d2b52b6343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Climatic data</topic><topic>distribution</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Linearity</topic><topic>Microclimate</topic><topic>Organisms</topic><topic>phenology</topic><topic>resolution</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Weather stations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bütikofer, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bebber, Daniel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennie, Jonathan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Early, Regan I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maclean, Ilya M. D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bütikofer, Luca</au><au>Anderson, Karen</au><au>Bebber, Daniel P.</au><au>Bennie, Jonathan J.</au><au>Early, Regan I.</au><au>Maclean, Ilya M. D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The problem of scale in predicting biological responses to climate</atitle><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>6657</spage><epage>6666</epage><pages>6657-6666</pages><issn>1354-1013</issn><eissn>1365-2486</eissn><abstract>Many analyses of biological responses to climate rely on gridded climate data derived from weather stations, which differ from the conditions experienced by organisms in at least two respects. First, the microclimate recorded by a weather station is often quite different to that near the ground surface, where many organisms live. Second, the temporal and spatial resolutions of gridded climate datasets derived from weather stations are often too coarse to capture the conditions experienced by organisms. Temporally and spatially coarse data have clear benefits in terms of reduced model size and complexity, but here we argue that coarse‐grained data introduce errors that, in biological studies, are too often ignored. However, in contrast to common perception, these errors are not necessarily caused directly by a spatial mismatch between the size of organisms and the scale at which climate data are collected. Rather, errors and biases are primarily due to (a) systematic discrepancies between the climate used in analysis and that experienced by organisms under study; and (b) the non‐linearity of most biological responses in combination with differences in climate variance between locations and time periods for which models are fitted and those for which projections are made. We discuss when exactly problems of scale can be expected to arise and highlight the potential to circumvent these by spatially and temporally down‐scaling climate. We also suggest ways in which adjustments to deal with issues of scale could be made without the need to run high‐resolution models over wide extents. Many analyses of biological responses to climate rely on coarse spatial and temporal resolution climate data. The use of such data are likely to cause errors, but these errors are not caused directly by spatial mismatch between the size of organisms and the scale of climate data. Rather, errors arise because of the non‐linearity of most biological responses in combination with differences in climate variance between locations and time periods for which models are fitted and those for which predictions are made.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>32956542</pmid><doi>10.1111/gcb.15358</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4440-1482</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8030-9136</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3289-2598</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1354-1013
ispartof Global change biology, 2020-12, Vol.26 (12), p.6657-6666
issn 1354-1013
1365-2486
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2462776766
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Climate
Climate Change
Climate models
Climatic data
distribution
Errors
Forecasting
Linearity
Microclimate
Organisms
phenology
resolution
Scaling
Variance analysis
Weather
Weather stations
title The problem of scale in predicting biological responses to climate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T00%3A56%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20problem%20of%20scale%20in%20predicting%20biological%20responses%20to%20climate&rft.jtitle=Global%20change%20biology&rft.au=B%C3%BCtikofer,%20Luca&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=6657&rft.epage=6666&rft.pages=6657-6666&rft.issn=1354-1013&rft.eissn=1365-2486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gcb.15358&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2462776766%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2462776766&rft_id=info:pmid/32956542&rfr_iscdi=true