Organisational factors and academic research agendas: an analysis of academics in the social sciences

The demands for academic research placed on contemporary universities are closely related to the levels of innovative research they are expected to produce. Concurrently, both governments and university management strive to make the production of academic research more cost-efficient and have implem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames) 2020-12, Vol.45 (12), p.2382-2397
Hauptverfasser: Horta, Hugo, Santos, João M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2397
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2382
container_title Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)
container_volume 45
creator Horta, Hugo
Santos, João M.
description The demands for academic research placed on contemporary universities are closely related to the levels of innovative research they are expected to produce. Concurrently, both governments and university management strive to make the production of academic research more cost-efficient and have implemented measures to ensure this. Top-down policies influenced by the concepts of new public management and managerialism have been introduced, pushing for competitiveness and increased performativity in academic research setups. These policies and guidelines have been criticised by academics as having eroded collegiality and autonomy, which are considered necessary to achieve quality research. The focus of this study is on the social sciences and aligns with this critique, demonstrating that autonomy and collegiality are the key organisational features fostering multidisciplinary, collaborative and riskier research agendas that lead to breakthroughs. Academics with high levels of organisational commitment are more likely to create research agendas that assume more conservative, discipline-bound and risk-averse traits, with less potential to achieve the intended innovative research outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/03075079.2019.1612351
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2462615489</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1277257</ericid><sourcerecordid>2462615489</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-977afb92b317f177278808e4fe40247df4a720f05753c9328d53a34ac39144053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt_QiHgeevkq9n1pIifCF4UvIVpNtHIdqOZFel_75aqR2FgDu_3Zh6PsZmAuYAaTkCBNWCbuQTRzMVCSGXEDpsIbaESVj_vssmGqTbQPjsgegOAha31hIWH8oJ9IhxS7rHjEf2QC3HsW44e27BKnpdAAYt_5fgS-hbpdJTHwW5NiXiOfyTx1PPhNXDKPo3XyKfQ-0CHbC9iR-HoZ0_Z09Xl48VNdf9wfXtxfl95rdRQNdZiXDZyqYSNwlpp6xrqoGPQILVto0YrIYKxRvlGybo1CpVGrxqhNRg1Zcfbu-8lf3wGGtxb_ixjUHJSL-RCGF03I2W2lC-ZqITo3ktaYVk7AW7TqPtt1G0adT-Njr7Z1hdK8n-eyzshx6jGjvrZVk99zGWFX7l0rRtw3eUSC_Y-kVP_v_gGAJ6Fhg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2462615489</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Organisational factors and academic research agendas: an analysis of academics in the social sciences</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Horta, Hugo ; Santos, João M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Horta, Hugo ; Santos, João M.</creatorcontrib><description>The demands for academic research placed on contemporary universities are closely related to the levels of innovative research they are expected to produce. Concurrently, both governments and university management strive to make the production of academic research more cost-efficient and have implemented measures to ensure this. Top-down policies influenced by the concepts of new public management and managerialism have been introduced, pushing for competitiveness and increased performativity in academic research setups. These policies and guidelines have been criticised by academics as having eroded collegiality and autonomy, which are considered necessary to achieve quality research. The focus of this study is on the social sciences and aligns with this critique, demonstrating that autonomy and collegiality are the key organisational features fostering multidisciplinary, collaborative and riskier research agendas that lead to breakthroughs. Academics with high levels of organisational commitment are more likely to create research agendas that assume more conservative, discipline-bound and risk-averse traits, with less potential to achieve the intended innovative research outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0307-5079</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-174X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1612351</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>academic research ; Academic staff ; Autonomy ; College Faculty ; Collegiality ; Competitiveness ; Cost analysis ; Educational Research ; Innovation ; Interdisciplinary Approach ; Managerial authority ; New public management ; Organizational commitment ; Performativity ; Professional Autonomy ; Public administration ; research agendas ; Research Needs ; Social Science Research ; Social Sciences ; Teacher Researchers</subject><ispartof>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 2020-12, Vol.45 (12), p.2382-2397</ispartof><rights>2019 Society for Research into Higher Education 2019</rights><rights>2019 Society for Research into Higher Education</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-977afb92b317f177278808e4fe40247df4a720f05753c9328d53a34ac39144053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-977afb92b317f177278808e4fe40247df4a720f05753c9328d53a34ac39144053</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6414-6891 ; 0000-0001-6814-1393</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1277257$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horta, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, João M.</creatorcontrib><title>Organisational factors and academic research agendas: an analysis of academics in the social sciences</title><title>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</title><description>The demands for academic research placed on contemporary universities are closely related to the levels of innovative research they are expected to produce. Concurrently, both governments and university management strive to make the production of academic research more cost-efficient and have implemented measures to ensure this. Top-down policies influenced by the concepts of new public management and managerialism have been introduced, pushing for competitiveness and increased performativity in academic research setups. These policies and guidelines have been criticised by academics as having eroded collegiality and autonomy, which are considered necessary to achieve quality research. The focus of this study is on the social sciences and aligns with this critique, demonstrating that autonomy and collegiality are the key organisational features fostering multidisciplinary, collaborative and riskier research agendas that lead to breakthroughs. Academics with high levels of organisational commitment are more likely to create research agendas that assume more conservative, discipline-bound and risk-averse traits, with less potential to achieve the intended innovative research outcomes.</description><subject>academic research</subject><subject>Academic staff</subject><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>Collegiality</subject><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Approach</subject><subject>Managerial authority</subject><subject>New public management</subject><subject>Organizational commitment</subject><subject>Performativity</subject><subject>Professional Autonomy</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>research agendas</subject><subject>Research Needs</subject><subject>Social Science Research</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Teacher Researchers</subject><issn>0307-5079</issn><issn>1470-174X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt_QiHgeevkq9n1pIifCF4UvIVpNtHIdqOZFel_75aqR2FgDu_3Zh6PsZmAuYAaTkCBNWCbuQTRzMVCSGXEDpsIbaESVj_vssmGqTbQPjsgegOAha31hIWH8oJ9IhxS7rHjEf2QC3HsW44e27BKnpdAAYt_5fgS-hbpdJTHwW5NiXiOfyTx1PPhNXDKPo3XyKfQ-0CHbC9iR-HoZ0_Z09Xl48VNdf9wfXtxfl95rdRQNdZiXDZyqYSNwlpp6xrqoGPQILVto0YrIYKxRvlGybo1CpVGrxqhNRg1Zcfbu-8lf3wGGtxb_ixjUHJSL-RCGF03I2W2lC-ZqITo3ktaYVk7AW7TqPtt1G0adT-Njr7Z1hdK8n-eyzshx6jGjvrZVk99zGWFX7l0rRtw3eUSC_Y-kVP_v_gGAJ6Fhg</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Horta, Hugo</creator><creator>Santos, João M.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6414-6891</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6814-1393</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Organisational factors and academic research agendas: an analysis of academics in the social sciences</title><author>Horta, Hugo ; Santos, João M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-977afb92b317f177278808e4fe40247df4a720f05753c9328d53a34ac39144053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>academic research</topic><topic>Academic staff</topic><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>Collegiality</topic><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Approach</topic><topic>Managerial authority</topic><topic>New public management</topic><topic>Organizational commitment</topic><topic>Performativity</topic><topic>Professional Autonomy</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>research agendas</topic><topic>Research Needs</topic><topic>Social Science Research</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Teacher Researchers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horta, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, João M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horta, Hugo</au><au>Santos, João M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1277257</ericid><atitle>Organisational factors and academic research agendas: an analysis of academics in the social sciences</atitle><jtitle>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</jtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2382</spage><epage>2397</epage><pages>2382-2397</pages><issn>0307-5079</issn><eissn>1470-174X</eissn><abstract>The demands for academic research placed on contemporary universities are closely related to the levels of innovative research they are expected to produce. Concurrently, both governments and university management strive to make the production of academic research more cost-efficient and have implemented measures to ensure this. Top-down policies influenced by the concepts of new public management and managerialism have been introduced, pushing for competitiveness and increased performativity in academic research setups. These policies and guidelines have been criticised by academics as having eroded collegiality and autonomy, which are considered necessary to achieve quality research. The focus of this study is on the social sciences and aligns with this critique, demonstrating that autonomy and collegiality are the key organisational features fostering multidisciplinary, collaborative and riskier research agendas that lead to breakthroughs. Academics with high levels of organisational commitment are more likely to create research agendas that assume more conservative, discipline-bound and risk-averse traits, with less potential to achieve the intended innovative research outcomes.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/03075079.2019.1612351</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6414-6891</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6814-1393</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0307-5079
ispartof Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 2020-12, Vol.45 (12), p.2382-2397
issn 0307-5079
1470-174X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2462615489
source EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects academic research
Academic staff
Autonomy
College Faculty
Collegiality
Competitiveness
Cost analysis
Educational Research
Innovation
Interdisciplinary Approach
Managerial authority
New public management
Organizational commitment
Performativity
Professional Autonomy
Public administration
research agendas
Research Needs
Social Science Research
Social Sciences
Teacher Researchers
title Organisational factors and academic research agendas: an analysis of academics in the social sciences
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T08%3A43%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Organisational%20factors%20and%20academic%20research%20agendas:%20an%20analysis%20of%20academics%20in%20the%20social%20sciences&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20higher%20education%20(Dorchester-on-Thames)&rft.au=Horta,%20Hugo&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2382&rft.epage=2397&rft.pages=2382-2397&rft.issn=0307-5079&rft.eissn=1470-174X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03075079.2019.1612351&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2462615489%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2462615489&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1277257&rfr_iscdi=true