Organisational factors and academic research agendas: an analysis of academics in the social sciences
The demands for academic research placed on contemporary universities are closely related to the levels of innovative research they are expected to produce. Concurrently, both governments and university management strive to make the production of academic research more cost-efficient and have implem...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames) 2020-12, Vol.45 (12), p.2382-2397 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2397 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2382 |
container_title | Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames) |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Horta, Hugo Santos, João M. |
description | The demands for academic research placed on contemporary universities are closely related to the levels of innovative research they are expected to produce. Concurrently, both governments and university management strive to make the production of academic research more cost-efficient and have implemented measures to ensure this. Top-down policies influenced by the concepts of new public management and managerialism have been introduced, pushing for competitiveness and increased performativity in academic research setups. These policies and guidelines have been criticised by academics as having eroded collegiality and autonomy, which are considered necessary to achieve quality research. The focus of this study is on the social sciences and aligns with this critique, demonstrating that autonomy and collegiality are the key organisational features fostering multidisciplinary, collaborative and riskier research agendas that lead to breakthroughs. Academics with high levels of organisational commitment are more likely to create research agendas that assume more conservative, discipline-bound and risk-averse traits, with less potential to achieve the intended innovative research outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/03075079.2019.1612351 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2462615489</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1277257</ericid><sourcerecordid>2462615489</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-977afb92b317f177278808e4fe40247df4a720f05753c9328d53a34ac39144053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt_QiHgeevkq9n1pIifCF4UvIVpNtHIdqOZFel_75aqR2FgDu_3Zh6PsZmAuYAaTkCBNWCbuQTRzMVCSGXEDpsIbaESVj_vssmGqTbQPjsgegOAha31hIWH8oJ9IhxS7rHjEf2QC3HsW44e27BKnpdAAYt_5fgS-hbpdJTHwW5NiXiOfyTx1PPhNXDKPo3XyKfQ-0CHbC9iR-HoZ0_Z09Xl48VNdf9wfXtxfl95rdRQNdZiXDZyqYSNwlpp6xrqoGPQILVto0YrIYKxRvlGybo1CpVGrxqhNRg1Zcfbu-8lf3wGGtxb_ixjUHJSL-RCGF03I2W2lC-ZqITo3ktaYVk7AW7TqPtt1G0adT-Njr7Z1hdK8n-eyzshx6jGjvrZVk99zGWFX7l0rRtw3eUSC_Y-kVP_v_gGAJ6Fhg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2462615489</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Organisational factors and academic research agendas: an analysis of academics in the social sciences</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Horta, Hugo ; Santos, João M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Horta, Hugo ; Santos, João M.</creatorcontrib><description>The demands for academic research placed on contemporary universities are closely related to the levels of innovative research they are expected to produce. Concurrently, both governments and university management strive to make the production of academic research more cost-efficient and have implemented measures to ensure this. Top-down policies influenced by the concepts of new public management and managerialism have been introduced, pushing for competitiveness and increased performativity in academic research setups. These policies and guidelines have been criticised by academics as having eroded collegiality and autonomy, which are considered necessary to achieve quality research. The focus of this study is on the social sciences and aligns with this critique, demonstrating that autonomy and collegiality are the key organisational features fostering multidisciplinary, collaborative and riskier research agendas that lead to breakthroughs. Academics with high levels of organisational commitment are more likely to create research agendas that assume more conservative, discipline-bound and risk-averse traits, with less potential to achieve the intended innovative research outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0307-5079</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-174X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1612351</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>academic research ; Academic staff ; Autonomy ; College Faculty ; Collegiality ; Competitiveness ; Cost analysis ; Educational Research ; Innovation ; Interdisciplinary Approach ; Managerial authority ; New public management ; Organizational commitment ; Performativity ; Professional Autonomy ; Public administration ; research agendas ; Research Needs ; Social Science Research ; Social Sciences ; Teacher Researchers</subject><ispartof>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 2020-12, Vol.45 (12), p.2382-2397</ispartof><rights>2019 Society for Research into Higher Education 2019</rights><rights>2019 Society for Research into Higher Education</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-977afb92b317f177278808e4fe40247df4a720f05753c9328d53a34ac39144053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-977afb92b317f177278808e4fe40247df4a720f05753c9328d53a34ac39144053</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6414-6891 ; 0000-0001-6814-1393</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1277257$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horta, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, João M.</creatorcontrib><title>Organisational factors and academic research agendas: an analysis of academics in the social sciences</title><title>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</title><description>The demands for academic research placed on contemporary universities are closely related to the levels of innovative research they are expected to produce. Concurrently, both governments and university management strive to make the production of academic research more cost-efficient and have implemented measures to ensure this. Top-down policies influenced by the concepts of new public management and managerialism have been introduced, pushing for competitiveness and increased performativity in academic research setups. These policies and guidelines have been criticised by academics as having eroded collegiality and autonomy, which are considered necessary to achieve quality research. The focus of this study is on the social sciences and aligns with this critique, demonstrating that autonomy and collegiality are the key organisational features fostering multidisciplinary, collaborative and riskier research agendas that lead to breakthroughs. Academics with high levels of organisational commitment are more likely to create research agendas that assume more conservative, discipline-bound and risk-averse traits, with less potential to achieve the intended innovative research outcomes.</description><subject>academic research</subject><subject>Academic staff</subject><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>Collegiality</subject><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Approach</subject><subject>Managerial authority</subject><subject>New public management</subject><subject>Organizational commitment</subject><subject>Performativity</subject><subject>Professional Autonomy</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>research agendas</subject><subject>Research Needs</subject><subject>Social Science Research</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Teacher Researchers</subject><issn>0307-5079</issn><issn>1470-174X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt_QiHgeevkq9n1pIifCF4UvIVpNtHIdqOZFel_75aqR2FgDu_3Zh6PsZmAuYAaTkCBNWCbuQTRzMVCSGXEDpsIbaESVj_vssmGqTbQPjsgegOAha31hIWH8oJ9IhxS7rHjEf2QC3HsW44e27BKnpdAAYt_5fgS-hbpdJTHwW5NiXiOfyTx1PPhNXDKPo3XyKfQ-0CHbC9iR-HoZ0_Z09Xl48VNdf9wfXtxfl95rdRQNdZiXDZyqYSNwlpp6xrqoGPQILVto0YrIYKxRvlGybo1CpVGrxqhNRg1Zcfbu-8lf3wGGtxb_ixjUHJSL-RCGF03I2W2lC-ZqITo3ktaYVk7AW7TqPtt1G0adT-Njr7Z1hdK8n-eyzshx6jGjvrZVk99zGWFX7l0rRtw3eUSC_Y-kVP_v_gGAJ6Fhg</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Horta, Hugo</creator><creator>Santos, João M.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6414-6891</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6814-1393</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Organisational factors and academic research agendas: an analysis of academics in the social sciences</title><author>Horta, Hugo ; Santos, João M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-977afb92b317f177278808e4fe40247df4a720f05753c9328d53a34ac39144053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>academic research</topic><topic>Academic staff</topic><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>Collegiality</topic><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Approach</topic><topic>Managerial authority</topic><topic>New public management</topic><topic>Organizational commitment</topic><topic>Performativity</topic><topic>Professional Autonomy</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>research agendas</topic><topic>Research Needs</topic><topic>Social Science Research</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Teacher Researchers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horta, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, João M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horta, Hugo</au><au>Santos, João M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1277257</ericid><atitle>Organisational factors and academic research agendas: an analysis of academics in the social sciences</atitle><jtitle>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</jtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2382</spage><epage>2397</epage><pages>2382-2397</pages><issn>0307-5079</issn><eissn>1470-174X</eissn><abstract>The demands for academic research placed on contemporary universities are closely related to the levels of innovative research they are expected to produce. Concurrently, both governments and university management strive to make the production of academic research more cost-efficient and have implemented measures to ensure this. Top-down policies influenced by the concepts of new public management and managerialism have been introduced, pushing for competitiveness and increased performativity in academic research setups. These policies and guidelines have been criticised by academics as having eroded collegiality and autonomy, which are considered necessary to achieve quality research. The focus of this study is on the social sciences and aligns with this critique, demonstrating that autonomy and collegiality are the key organisational features fostering multidisciplinary, collaborative and riskier research agendas that lead to breakthroughs. Academics with high levels of organisational commitment are more likely to create research agendas that assume more conservative, discipline-bound and risk-averse traits, with less potential to achieve the intended innovative research outcomes.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/03075079.2019.1612351</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6414-6891</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6814-1393</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0307-5079 |
ispartof | Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 2020-12, Vol.45 (12), p.2382-2397 |
issn | 0307-5079 1470-174X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2462615489 |
source | EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | academic research Academic staff Autonomy College Faculty Collegiality Competitiveness Cost analysis Educational Research Innovation Interdisciplinary Approach Managerial authority New public management Organizational commitment Performativity Professional Autonomy Public administration research agendas Research Needs Social Science Research Social Sciences Teacher Researchers |
title | Organisational factors and academic research agendas: an analysis of academics in the social sciences |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T08%3A43%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Organisational%20factors%20and%20academic%20research%20agendas:%20an%20analysis%20of%20academics%20in%20the%20social%20sciences&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20higher%20education%20(Dorchester-on-Thames)&rft.au=Horta,%20Hugo&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2382&rft.epage=2397&rft.pages=2382-2397&rft.issn=0307-5079&rft.eissn=1470-174X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03075079.2019.1612351&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2462615489%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2462615489&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1277257&rfr_iscdi=true |