The anatomy of exhumed river‐channel belts: Bedform to belt‐scale river kinematics of the Ruby Ranch Member, Cretaceous Cedar Mountain Formation, Utah, USA

Many published interpretations of ancient fluvial systems have relied on observations of extensive outcrops of thick successions. This paper, in contrast, demonstrates that a regional understanding of palaeoriver kinematics, depositional setting and sedimentation rates can be interpreted from local...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sedimentology 2020-12, Vol.67 (7), p.3655-3682
Hauptverfasser: Cardenas, Benjamin T., Mohrig, David, Goudge, Timothy A., Hughes, Cory M., Levy, Joseph S., Swanson, Travis, Mason, Jasmine, Zhao, Feifei, Fielding, Christopher
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3682
container_issue 7
container_start_page 3655
container_title Sedimentology
container_volume 67
creator Cardenas, Benjamin T.
Mohrig, David
Goudge, Timothy A.
Hughes, Cory M.
Levy, Joseph S.
Swanson, Travis
Mason, Jasmine
Zhao, Feifei
Fielding, Christopher
description Many published interpretations of ancient fluvial systems have relied on observations of extensive outcrops of thick successions. This paper, in contrast, demonstrates that a regional understanding of palaeoriver kinematics, depositional setting and sedimentation rates can be interpreted from local sedimentological measurements of bedform and barform strata. Dune and bar strata, channel planform geometry and bed topography are measured within exhumed fluvial strata exposed as ridges in the Ruby Ranch Member of the Cretaceous Cedar Mountain Formation, Utah, USA. The ridges are composed of lithified stacked channel belts, representing at least five or six re‐occupations of a single‐strand channel. Lateral sections reveal well‐preserved barforms constructed of subaqueous dune cross‐sets. The topography of palaeobarforms is preserved along the top surface of the outcrops. Comparisons of the channel‐belt centreline to local palaeotransport directions indicate that channel planform geometry was preserved through the re‐occupations, rather than being obscured by lateral migration. Rapid avulsions preserved the state of the active channel bed and its individual bars at the time of abandonment. Inferred minimum sedimentation durations for the preserved elements, inferred from cross‐set thickness distributions and assumed bedform migration rates, vary within a belt from one to ten days. Using only these local sedimentological measurements, the depositional setting is interpreted as a fluvial megafan, given the similarity in river kinematics. This paper provides a systematic methodology for the future synthesis of vertical and planview data, including the drone‐equipped 2020 Mars Rover mission, to exhumed fluvial and deltaic strata.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/sed.12765
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2462461666</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2462461666</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3555-129f87b65e7b28e6dfbdce182ad525bf1bbf1193111c6df6e91b67688a8917433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqWw4AaWWCE1bZw0TsKuhBaQipD6s47sZKKkJHaxHaA7jsANuBsnwW3YYo1taeZ7b6SH0CVxh8SekYZ8SLyQBkeoR3waOL4bk2PUc10_dNxwTE_RmdYb1yV0HMU99L0qATPBjGx2WBYYPsq2gRyr6g3Uz-dXVjIhoMYcaqNv8C3khVQNNvLQsYDOWA0djl8qAQ0zVab3VsY6L1q-wwsmshI_QcNBDXCiwLAMZKtxAjlT-Em2wrBK4Jl1tmopBnhtWGnf5eQcnRSs1nDx9_fRejZdJQ_O_Pn-MZnMHeYHQeAQLy6ikNMAQu5FQPOC5xmQyGN54AW8INxeEvs2oswOKcSE05BGEYtiEo59v4-uOt-tkq8taJNuZKuEXZl6Y2qLUEotdd1RmZJaKyjSraoapnYpcdN9_qnNPz3kb9lRx75XNez-B9Pl9K5T_AJ2cYnu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2462461666</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The anatomy of exhumed river‐channel belts: Bedform to belt‐scale river kinematics of the Ruby Ranch Member, Cretaceous Cedar Mountain Formation, Utah, USA</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Cardenas, Benjamin T. ; Mohrig, David ; Goudge, Timothy A. ; Hughes, Cory M. ; Levy, Joseph S. ; Swanson, Travis ; Mason, Jasmine ; Zhao, Feifei ; Fielding, Christopher</creator><creatorcontrib>Cardenas, Benjamin T. ; Mohrig, David ; Goudge, Timothy A. ; Hughes, Cory M. ; Levy, Joseph S. ; Swanson, Travis ; Mason, Jasmine ; Zhao, Feifei ; Fielding, Christopher</creatorcontrib><description>Many published interpretations of ancient fluvial systems have relied on observations of extensive outcrops of thick successions. This paper, in contrast, demonstrates that a regional understanding of palaeoriver kinematics, depositional setting and sedimentation rates can be interpreted from local sedimentological measurements of bedform and barform strata. Dune and bar strata, channel planform geometry and bed topography are measured within exhumed fluvial strata exposed as ridges in the Ruby Ranch Member of the Cretaceous Cedar Mountain Formation, Utah, USA. The ridges are composed of lithified stacked channel belts, representing at least five or six re‐occupations of a single‐strand channel. Lateral sections reveal well‐preserved barforms constructed of subaqueous dune cross‐sets. The topography of palaeobarforms is preserved along the top surface of the outcrops. Comparisons of the channel‐belt centreline to local palaeotransport directions indicate that channel planform geometry was preserved through the re‐occupations, rather than being obscured by lateral migration. Rapid avulsions preserved the state of the active channel bed and its individual bars at the time of abandonment. Inferred minimum sedimentation durations for the preserved elements, inferred from cross‐set thickness distributions and assumed bedform migration rates, vary within a belt from one to ten days. Using only these local sedimentological measurements, the depositional setting is interpreted as a fluvial megafan, given the similarity in river kinematics. This paper provides a systematic methodology for the future synthesis of vertical and planview data, including the drone‐equipped 2020 Mars Rover mission, to exhumed fluvial and deltaic strata.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-0746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3091</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/sed.12765</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madrid: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Bar ; Bedforms ; Belts ; channel belt ; Cretaceous ; Dunes ; fluvial sedimentology ; Kinematics ; Mars rovers ; Mountains ; Outcrops ; Planforms ; preservation ; Ridges ; River beds ; Rivers ; Sedimentary structures ; Sedimentation ; Sedimentation &amp; deposition ; Sedimentation rates ; sinuous ridge ; Strata ; Topography</subject><ispartof>Sedimentology, 2020-12, Vol.67 (7), p.3655-3682</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. © 2020 International Association of Sedimentologists</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 International Association of Sedimentologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3555-129f87b65e7b28e6dfbdce182ad525bf1bbf1193111c6df6e91b67688a8917433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3555-129f87b65e7b28e6dfbdce182ad525bf1bbf1193111c6df6e91b67688a8917433</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7061-1443 ; 0000-0003-4107-5749 ; 0000-0003-4297-9838 ; 0000-0002-6879-7621 ; 0000-0002-6222-139X ; 0000-0001-7246-219X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fsed.12765$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fsed.12765$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cardenas, Benjamin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohrig, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goudge, Timothy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Cory M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Joseph S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Travis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Jasmine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Feifei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fielding, Christopher</creatorcontrib><title>The anatomy of exhumed river‐channel belts: Bedform to belt‐scale river kinematics of the Ruby Ranch Member, Cretaceous Cedar Mountain Formation, Utah, USA</title><title>Sedimentology</title><description>Many published interpretations of ancient fluvial systems have relied on observations of extensive outcrops of thick successions. This paper, in contrast, demonstrates that a regional understanding of palaeoriver kinematics, depositional setting and sedimentation rates can be interpreted from local sedimentological measurements of bedform and barform strata. Dune and bar strata, channel planform geometry and bed topography are measured within exhumed fluvial strata exposed as ridges in the Ruby Ranch Member of the Cretaceous Cedar Mountain Formation, Utah, USA. The ridges are composed of lithified stacked channel belts, representing at least five or six re‐occupations of a single‐strand channel. Lateral sections reveal well‐preserved barforms constructed of subaqueous dune cross‐sets. The topography of palaeobarforms is preserved along the top surface of the outcrops. Comparisons of the channel‐belt centreline to local palaeotransport directions indicate that channel planform geometry was preserved through the re‐occupations, rather than being obscured by lateral migration. Rapid avulsions preserved the state of the active channel bed and its individual bars at the time of abandonment. Inferred minimum sedimentation durations for the preserved elements, inferred from cross‐set thickness distributions and assumed bedform migration rates, vary within a belt from one to ten days. Using only these local sedimentological measurements, the depositional setting is interpreted as a fluvial megafan, given the similarity in river kinematics. This paper provides a systematic methodology for the future synthesis of vertical and planview data, including the drone‐equipped 2020 Mars Rover mission, to exhumed fluvial and deltaic strata.</description><subject>Bar</subject><subject>Bedforms</subject><subject>Belts</subject><subject>channel belt</subject><subject>Cretaceous</subject><subject>Dunes</subject><subject>fluvial sedimentology</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Mars rovers</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Outcrops</subject><subject>Planforms</subject><subject>preservation</subject><subject>Ridges</subject><subject>River beds</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sedimentary structures</subject><subject>Sedimentation</subject><subject>Sedimentation &amp; deposition</subject><subject>Sedimentation rates</subject><subject>sinuous ridge</subject><subject>Strata</subject><subject>Topography</subject><issn>0037-0746</issn><issn>1365-3091</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqWw4AaWWCE1bZw0TsKuhBaQipD6s47sZKKkJHaxHaA7jsANuBsnwW3YYo1taeZ7b6SH0CVxh8SekYZ8SLyQBkeoR3waOL4bk2PUc10_dNxwTE_RmdYb1yV0HMU99L0qATPBjGx2WBYYPsq2gRyr6g3Uz-dXVjIhoMYcaqNv8C3khVQNNvLQsYDOWA0djl8qAQ0zVab3VsY6L1q-wwsmshI_QcNBDXCiwLAMZKtxAjlT-Em2wrBK4Jl1tmopBnhtWGnf5eQcnRSs1nDx9_fRejZdJQ_O_Pn-MZnMHeYHQeAQLy6ikNMAQu5FQPOC5xmQyGN54AW8INxeEvs2oswOKcSE05BGEYtiEo59v4-uOt-tkq8taJNuZKuEXZl6Y2qLUEotdd1RmZJaKyjSraoapnYpcdN9_qnNPz3kb9lRx75XNez-B9Pl9K5T_AJ2cYnu</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Cardenas, Benjamin T.</creator><creator>Mohrig, David</creator><creator>Goudge, Timothy A.</creator><creator>Hughes, Cory M.</creator><creator>Levy, Joseph S.</creator><creator>Swanson, Travis</creator><creator>Mason, Jasmine</creator><creator>Zhao, Feifei</creator><creator>Fielding, Christopher</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7061-1443</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4107-5749</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4297-9838</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6879-7621</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6222-139X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7246-219X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>The anatomy of exhumed river‐channel belts: Bedform to belt‐scale river kinematics of the Ruby Ranch Member, Cretaceous Cedar Mountain Formation, Utah, USA</title><author>Cardenas, Benjamin T. ; Mohrig, David ; Goudge, Timothy A. ; Hughes, Cory M. ; Levy, Joseph S. ; Swanson, Travis ; Mason, Jasmine ; Zhao, Feifei ; Fielding, Christopher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3555-129f87b65e7b28e6dfbdce182ad525bf1bbf1193111c6df6e91b67688a8917433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bar</topic><topic>Bedforms</topic><topic>Belts</topic><topic>channel belt</topic><topic>Cretaceous</topic><topic>Dunes</topic><topic>fluvial sedimentology</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Mars rovers</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Outcrops</topic><topic>Planforms</topic><topic>preservation</topic><topic>Ridges</topic><topic>River beds</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sedimentary structures</topic><topic>Sedimentation</topic><topic>Sedimentation &amp; deposition</topic><topic>Sedimentation rates</topic><topic>sinuous ridge</topic><topic>Strata</topic><topic>Topography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cardenas, Benjamin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohrig, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goudge, Timothy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Cory M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Joseph S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Travis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Jasmine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Feifei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fielding, Christopher</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Sedimentology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cardenas, Benjamin T.</au><au>Mohrig, David</au><au>Goudge, Timothy A.</au><au>Hughes, Cory M.</au><au>Levy, Joseph S.</au><au>Swanson, Travis</au><au>Mason, Jasmine</au><au>Zhao, Feifei</au><au>Fielding, Christopher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The anatomy of exhumed river‐channel belts: Bedform to belt‐scale river kinematics of the Ruby Ranch Member, Cretaceous Cedar Mountain Formation, Utah, USA</atitle><jtitle>Sedimentology</jtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>3655</spage><epage>3682</epage><pages>3655-3682</pages><issn>0037-0746</issn><eissn>1365-3091</eissn><abstract>Many published interpretations of ancient fluvial systems have relied on observations of extensive outcrops of thick successions. This paper, in contrast, demonstrates that a regional understanding of palaeoriver kinematics, depositional setting and sedimentation rates can be interpreted from local sedimentological measurements of bedform and barform strata. Dune and bar strata, channel planform geometry and bed topography are measured within exhumed fluvial strata exposed as ridges in the Ruby Ranch Member of the Cretaceous Cedar Mountain Formation, Utah, USA. The ridges are composed of lithified stacked channel belts, representing at least five or six re‐occupations of a single‐strand channel. Lateral sections reveal well‐preserved barforms constructed of subaqueous dune cross‐sets. The topography of palaeobarforms is preserved along the top surface of the outcrops. Comparisons of the channel‐belt centreline to local palaeotransport directions indicate that channel planform geometry was preserved through the re‐occupations, rather than being obscured by lateral migration. Rapid avulsions preserved the state of the active channel bed and its individual bars at the time of abandonment. Inferred minimum sedimentation durations for the preserved elements, inferred from cross‐set thickness distributions and assumed bedform migration rates, vary within a belt from one to ten days. Using only these local sedimentological measurements, the depositional setting is interpreted as a fluvial megafan, given the similarity in river kinematics. This paper provides a systematic methodology for the future synthesis of vertical and planview data, including the drone‐equipped 2020 Mars Rover mission, to exhumed fluvial and deltaic strata.</abstract><cop>Madrid</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/sed.12765</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7061-1443</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4107-5749</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4297-9838</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6879-7621</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6222-139X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7246-219X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0037-0746
ispartof Sedimentology, 2020-12, Vol.67 (7), p.3655-3682
issn 0037-0746
1365-3091
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2462461666
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Bar
Bedforms
Belts
channel belt
Cretaceous
Dunes
fluvial sedimentology
Kinematics
Mars rovers
Mountains
Outcrops
Planforms
preservation
Ridges
River beds
Rivers
Sedimentary structures
Sedimentation
Sedimentation & deposition
Sedimentation rates
sinuous ridge
Strata
Topography
title The anatomy of exhumed river‐channel belts: Bedform to belt‐scale river kinematics of the Ruby Ranch Member, Cretaceous Cedar Mountain Formation, Utah, USA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T18%3A09%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20anatomy%20of%20exhumed%20river%E2%80%90channel%20belts:%20Bedform%20to%20belt%E2%80%90scale%20river%20kinematics%20of%20the%20Ruby%20Ranch%20Member,%20Cretaceous%20Cedar%20Mountain%20Formation,%20Utah,%20USA&rft.jtitle=Sedimentology&rft.au=Cardenas,%20Benjamin%20T.&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=3655&rft.epage=3682&rft.pages=3655-3682&rft.issn=0037-0746&rft.eissn=1365-3091&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/sed.12765&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2462461666%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2462461666&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true