Toxicity of two Engelmann spruce (Pinaceae) monoterpene chemotypes from the southern Rocky Mountains to North American spruce beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)

Engelmann spruce, Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm. (Pinaceae), in the southern Rocky Mountains is composed of two distinct phloem monoterpene chemotypes that differ in relative abundances of multiple monoterpenes, particularly α-pinene and Δ3-carene (hereafter, the “α-pinene chemotype” and the “Δ3...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian entomologist 2020-12, Vol.152 (6), p.790-796
1. Verfasser: Davis, Thomas Seth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 796
container_issue 6
container_start_page 790
container_title Canadian entomologist
container_volume 152
creator Davis, Thomas Seth
description Engelmann spruce, Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm. (Pinaceae), in the southern Rocky Mountains is composed of two distinct phloem monoterpene chemotypes that differ in relative abundances of multiple monoterpenes, particularly α-pinene and Δ3-carene (hereafter, the “α-pinene chemotype” and the “Δ3-carene chemotype”). Here, relative toxicity of these chemotypes is tested on spruce beetle (Dendroctonus rufipennis Kirby) (Coleoptera: Scolytinae), a phloeophagous herbivore that colonises trees of both types. Synthetic monoterpene blends representing each chemotype were tested across a range of concentrations (0, 10, 50, 100, 200, and 500 µg/L) in the lab, and probability of survival of adult beetles exposed to each blend was modelled using a logit function. Logit curves were solved to determine LC25, LC50, and LC75 of each monoterpene blend. On average, probability of beetle survival was lower when exposed to the Δ3-carene chemotype than when exposed to the α-pinene chemotype. However, both chemotypes were completely lethal to beetles at concentrations exceeding 100 µg/L. Adult body mass did not affect survival probability. It is concluded that spruce phloem chemotypes may differ in their toxicity to spruce beetles, with potential consequences for patterns of host-tree colonisation by spruce beetle.
doi_str_mv 10.4039/tce.2020.49
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2462337300</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_4039_tce_2020_49</cupid><sourcerecordid>2462337300</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-f783580abd3d7d8316002e3f7dd307249318c2f26630b1a89d4caf1320d0fe093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkMFqFTEUhoMoeK2ufIGAG0WmPUmmdybuyqW2QqtiW3A35CYnvVNncqZJBp2H8V3NpUU3rv5z4OP74WfstYDDGpQ-yhYPJcjy6SdsJbRoKyVreMpWAFDuuvn-nL1I6a68x0LpFft9Tb962-eFk-f5J_HTcIvDaELgaYqzRf72ax-MRYPv-EiBMsYJA3K7w5HyMmHiPtLI8w55orlEDPwb2R8Lv6Q5ZNOHxDPxzxTzjp-MGHtr_sq3iHkoHRsakKbiNh_4laVhyb0rjS_ZM2-GhK8e84DdfDy93pxXF1_OPm1OLiortc6Vb1p13ILZOuUa1yqxBpCofOOcgkbWWonWSi_XawVbYVrtamu8UBIceAStDtibB-8U6X7GlLs7mmMolZ2s11KpRgEU6v0DZSOlFNF3U-xHE5dOQLffvyv7d_v9u3rvrB5pM25j727xn_R__B8o2Inc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2462337300</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toxicity of two Engelmann spruce (Pinaceae) monoterpene chemotypes from the southern Rocky Mountains to North American spruce beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)</title><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Davis, Thomas Seth</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Thomas Seth</creatorcontrib><description>Engelmann spruce, Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm. (Pinaceae), in the southern Rocky Mountains is composed of two distinct phloem monoterpene chemotypes that differ in relative abundances of multiple monoterpenes, particularly α-pinene and Δ3-carene (hereafter, the “α-pinene chemotype” and the “Δ3-carene chemotype”). Here, relative toxicity of these chemotypes is tested on spruce beetle (Dendroctonus rufipennis Kirby) (Coleoptera: Scolytinae), a phloeophagous herbivore that colonises trees of both types. Synthetic monoterpene blends representing each chemotype were tested across a range of concentrations (0, 10, 50, 100, 200, and 500 µg/L) in the lab, and probability of survival of adult beetles exposed to each blend was modelled using a logit function. Logit curves were solved to determine LC25, LC50, and LC75 of each monoterpene blend. On average, probability of beetle survival was lower when exposed to the Δ3-carene chemotype than when exposed to the α-pinene chemotype. However, both chemotypes were completely lethal to beetles at concentrations exceeding 100 µg/L. Adult body mass did not affect survival probability. It is concluded that spruce phloem chemotypes may differ in their toxicity to spruce beetles, with potential consequences for patterns of host-tree colonisation by spruce beetle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-347X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1918-3240</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4039/tce.2020.49</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>3-Carene ; Beetles ; Body mass ; Chemistry ; Coleoptera ; Dendroctonus rufipennis ; Exposure ; Forests ; Herbivores ; Laboratories ; Metabolites ; Monoterpenes ; Mortality causes ; Mountains ; Pheromones ; Phloem ; Picea engelmannii ; Pinaceae ; Probability theory ; Scientific Notes ; Survival ; Terpenes ; Toxicity ; Toxicity tests ; α-Pinene</subject><ispartof>Canadian entomologist, 2020-12, Vol.152 (6), p.790-796</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Entomological Society of Canada</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-f783580abd3d7d8316002e3f7dd307249318c2f26630b1a89d4caf1320d0fe093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-f783580abd3d7d8316002e3f7dd307249318c2f26630b1a89d4caf1320d0fe093</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2303-7554</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0008347X20000498/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Thomas Seth</creatorcontrib><title>Toxicity of two Engelmann spruce (Pinaceae) monoterpene chemotypes from the southern Rocky Mountains to North American spruce beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)</title><title>Canadian entomologist</title><addtitle>Can Entomol</addtitle><description>Engelmann spruce, Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm. (Pinaceae), in the southern Rocky Mountains is composed of two distinct phloem monoterpene chemotypes that differ in relative abundances of multiple monoterpenes, particularly α-pinene and Δ3-carene (hereafter, the “α-pinene chemotype” and the “Δ3-carene chemotype”). Here, relative toxicity of these chemotypes is tested on spruce beetle (Dendroctonus rufipennis Kirby) (Coleoptera: Scolytinae), a phloeophagous herbivore that colonises trees of both types. Synthetic monoterpene blends representing each chemotype were tested across a range of concentrations (0, 10, 50, 100, 200, and 500 µg/L) in the lab, and probability of survival of adult beetles exposed to each blend was modelled using a logit function. Logit curves were solved to determine LC25, LC50, and LC75 of each monoterpene blend. On average, probability of beetle survival was lower when exposed to the Δ3-carene chemotype than when exposed to the α-pinene chemotype. However, both chemotypes were completely lethal to beetles at concentrations exceeding 100 µg/L. Adult body mass did not affect survival probability. It is concluded that spruce phloem chemotypes may differ in their toxicity to spruce beetles, with potential consequences for patterns of host-tree colonisation by spruce beetle.</description><subject>3-Carene</subject><subject>Beetles</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Coleoptera</subject><subject>Dendroctonus rufipennis</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>Monoterpenes</subject><subject>Mortality causes</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Pheromones</subject><subject>Phloem</subject><subject>Picea engelmannii</subject><subject>Pinaceae</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Scientific Notes</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Terpenes</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Toxicity tests</subject><subject>α-Pinene</subject><issn>0008-347X</issn><issn>1918-3240</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkMFqFTEUhoMoeK2ufIGAG0WmPUmmdybuyqW2QqtiW3A35CYnvVNncqZJBp2H8V3NpUU3rv5z4OP74WfstYDDGpQ-yhYPJcjy6SdsJbRoKyVreMpWAFDuuvn-nL1I6a68x0LpFft9Tb962-eFk-f5J_HTcIvDaELgaYqzRf72ax-MRYPv-EiBMsYJA3K7w5HyMmHiPtLI8w55orlEDPwb2R8Lv6Q5ZNOHxDPxzxTzjp-MGHtr_sq3iHkoHRsakKbiNh_4laVhyb0rjS_ZM2-GhK8e84DdfDy93pxXF1_OPm1OLiortc6Vb1p13ILZOuUa1yqxBpCofOOcgkbWWonWSi_XawVbYVrtamu8UBIceAStDtibB-8U6X7GlLs7mmMolZ2s11KpRgEU6v0DZSOlFNF3U-xHE5dOQLffvyv7d_v9u3rvrB5pM25j727xn_R__B8o2Inc</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Davis, Thomas Seth</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2303-7554</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Toxicity of two Engelmann spruce (Pinaceae) monoterpene chemotypes from the southern Rocky Mountains to North American spruce beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)</title><author>Davis, Thomas Seth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-f783580abd3d7d8316002e3f7dd307249318c2f26630b1a89d4caf1320d0fe093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>3-Carene</topic><topic>Beetles</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Coleoptera</topic><topic>Dendroctonus rufipennis</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>Monoterpenes</topic><topic>Mortality causes</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Pheromones</topic><topic>Phloem</topic><topic>Picea engelmannii</topic><topic>Pinaceae</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Scientific Notes</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Terpenes</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Toxicity tests</topic><topic>α-Pinene</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Thomas Seth</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Canadian entomologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Thomas Seth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toxicity of two Engelmann spruce (Pinaceae) monoterpene chemotypes from the southern Rocky Mountains to North American spruce beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)</atitle><jtitle>Canadian entomologist</jtitle><addtitle>Can Entomol</addtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>152</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>790</spage><epage>796</epage><pages>790-796</pages><issn>0008-347X</issn><eissn>1918-3240</eissn><abstract>Engelmann spruce, Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm. (Pinaceae), in the southern Rocky Mountains is composed of two distinct phloem monoterpene chemotypes that differ in relative abundances of multiple monoterpenes, particularly α-pinene and Δ3-carene (hereafter, the “α-pinene chemotype” and the “Δ3-carene chemotype”). Here, relative toxicity of these chemotypes is tested on spruce beetle (Dendroctonus rufipennis Kirby) (Coleoptera: Scolytinae), a phloeophagous herbivore that colonises trees of both types. Synthetic monoterpene blends representing each chemotype were tested across a range of concentrations (0, 10, 50, 100, 200, and 500 µg/L) in the lab, and probability of survival of adult beetles exposed to each blend was modelled using a logit function. Logit curves were solved to determine LC25, LC50, and LC75 of each monoterpene blend. On average, probability of beetle survival was lower when exposed to the Δ3-carene chemotype than when exposed to the α-pinene chemotype. However, both chemotypes were completely lethal to beetles at concentrations exceeding 100 µg/L. Adult body mass did not affect survival probability. It is concluded that spruce phloem chemotypes may differ in their toxicity to spruce beetles, with potential consequences for patterns of host-tree colonisation by spruce beetle.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.4039/tce.2020.49</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2303-7554</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-347X
ispartof Canadian entomologist, 2020-12, Vol.152 (6), p.790-796
issn 0008-347X
1918-3240
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2462337300
source Cambridge Journals
subjects 3-Carene
Beetles
Body mass
Chemistry
Coleoptera
Dendroctonus rufipennis
Exposure
Forests
Herbivores
Laboratories
Metabolites
Monoterpenes
Mortality causes
Mountains
Pheromones
Phloem
Picea engelmannii
Pinaceae
Probability theory
Scientific Notes
Survival
Terpenes
Toxicity
Toxicity tests
α-Pinene
title Toxicity of two Engelmann spruce (Pinaceae) monoterpene chemotypes from the southern Rocky Mountains to North American spruce beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T17%3A31%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toxicity%20of%20two%20Engelmann%20spruce%20(Pinaceae)%20monoterpene%20chemotypes%20from%20the%20southern%20Rocky%20Mountains%20to%20North%20American%20spruce%20beetle%20(Coleoptera:%20Scolytidae)&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20entomologist&rft.au=Davis,%20Thomas%20Seth&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=152&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=790&rft.epage=796&rft.pages=790-796&rft.issn=0008-347X&rft.eissn=1918-3240&rft_id=info:doi/10.4039/tce.2020.49&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2462337300%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2462337300&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_4039_tce_2020_49&rfr_iscdi=true