Development of an UNDRIP Compliance Assessment Tool: How a Performance Framework Could Improve State Compliance
Improving state compliance with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) can be supported by monitoring and measurement. Current approaches to monitoring state compliance with the UNDRIP are qualitative and non-standardized, which limits comparability across time a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International indigenous policy journal 2020-04, Vol.11 (2), p.1-23 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 23 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | International indigenous policy journal |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Smith, Jackson A. Mitchell, Terry L. |
description | Improving state compliance with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) can be supported by monitoring and measurement. Current approaches to monitoring state compliance with the UNDRIP are qualitative and non-standardized, which limits comparability across time and across geopolitical lines. In this article, we introduce a novel approach to monitoring compliance with the UNDRIP and human rights more generally. This work highlights the potential advantages of using a performance improvement framework to clearly identify gaps in compliance, monitor state compliance with the Declaration over time, and effectively assess and compare state compliance. We describe the development of a standardized UNDRIP compliance assessment tool and report the process and findings of a pilot test of the tool. The pilot assessment utilized the UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples' (SRRIP; Anaya, 2014) findings on the situation of Indigenous Peoples in Canada in three thematic areas: (a) self-government and self-governance; (b) consultation and free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC); and (c) land and natural resources. While insufficient for a fulsome assessment of Canada’s compliance with the UNDRIP, we restricted ourselves to the report for two reasons: first, to test the applicability of the tool for quantifying qualitative data; and, second, to evaluate the degree to which the UN monitoring mechanism for Indigenous rights adheres to the Declaration’s Articles for monitoring and reporting. We discuss implications and opportunities for improving human rights monitoring and state implementation efforts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.18584/iipj.2020.11.2.10713 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>erudit_JFNAL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2461934740</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><eruid>1069636ar</eruid><jstor_id>48767620</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1069636ar</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-164e573d2f4b14d1d96fde72714df5e90d872057084c9b320f64bd0ee5361f453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUGFPwjAQXYwmEuQnEJv4Gey1Xbv5jYAICVGi8LkZ7Jpsbutsh8R_7xjGcF_uXu69d5cXBEOgY4jCSDxmWZ2PGWUthjEbA1XAr4IexCBHoYrg-mK-DQbe57StiFIZQS-wM_zGwtYlVg2xhiQV2b7O3pdrMrVlXWRJtUcy8R697ygba4snsrBHkpA1OmNd2VHmLinxaN1nqzsUKVmWtbPfSD6apMELr7vgxiSFx8Ff7wfb-fNmuhit3l6W08lqtOdMNSOQAkPFU2bEDkQKaSxNioqpFpgQY5pGitFQ0Ujs4x1n1EixSyliyCUYEfJ-8HD2bd_4OqBvdG4PrmpPaiYkxFwoQVtWeGbtnfXeodG1y8rE_WiguotXn-LVp3g1gGa6i7fVDc-63DfW_YtEpKSS7OR7f96jO6RZc-EqY8ll4vgv49KCKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2461934740</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of an UNDRIP Compliance Assessment Tool: How a Performance Framework Could Improve State Compliance</title><source>Jstor Journals Open Access</source><creator>Smith, Jackson A. ; Mitchell, Terry L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Jackson A. ; Mitchell, Terry L.</creatorcontrib><description>Improving state compliance with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) can be supported by monitoring and measurement. Current approaches to monitoring state compliance with the UNDRIP are qualitative and non-standardized, which limits comparability across time and across geopolitical lines. In this article, we introduce a novel approach to monitoring compliance with the UNDRIP and human rights more generally. This work highlights the potential advantages of using a performance improvement framework to clearly identify gaps in compliance, monitor state compliance with the Declaration over time, and effectively assess and compare state compliance. We describe the development of a standardized UNDRIP compliance assessment tool and report the process and findings of a pilot test of the tool. The pilot assessment utilized the UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples' (SRRIP; Anaya, 2014) findings on the situation of Indigenous Peoples in Canada in three thematic areas: (a) self-government and self-governance; (b) consultation and free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC); and (c) land and natural resources. While insufficient for a fulsome assessment of Canada’s compliance with the UNDRIP, we restricted ourselves to the report for two reasons: first, to test the applicability of the tool for quantifying qualitative data; and, second, to evaluate the degree to which the UN monitoring mechanism for Indigenous rights adheres to the Declaration’s Articles for monitoring and reporting. We discuss implications and opportunities for improving human rights monitoring and state implementation efforts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1916-5781</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1916-5781</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18584/iipj.2020.11.2.10713</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Scholarship@Western (Western University)</publisher><subject>Compliance ; Evaluation ; Geopolitics ; Governance ; Human rights ; Indigenous peoples ; Informed consent ; Measurement ; Monitoring ; Native peoples ; Native rights ; Natural resources ; Policy ; Policy analysis</subject><ispartof>International indigenous policy journal, 2020-04, Vol.11 (2), p.1-23</ispartof><rights>Copyright ©, 2020Jackson A.Smith, Terry L.Mitchell</rights><rights>2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-164e573d2f4b14d1d96fde72714df5e90d872057084c9b320f64bd0ee5361f453</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48767620$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48767620$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,25354,27344,27866,27924,27925,33774,54524,54530,79569,79576</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48767620$$EView_record_in_JSTOR$$FView_record_in_$$GJSTOR</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Jackson A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Terry L.</creatorcontrib><title>Development of an UNDRIP Compliance Assessment Tool: How a Performance Framework Could Improve State Compliance</title><title>International indigenous policy journal</title><description>Improving state compliance with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) can be supported by monitoring and measurement. Current approaches to monitoring state compliance with the UNDRIP are qualitative and non-standardized, which limits comparability across time and across geopolitical lines. In this article, we introduce a novel approach to monitoring compliance with the UNDRIP and human rights more generally. This work highlights the potential advantages of using a performance improvement framework to clearly identify gaps in compliance, monitor state compliance with the Declaration over time, and effectively assess and compare state compliance. We describe the development of a standardized UNDRIP compliance assessment tool and report the process and findings of a pilot test of the tool. The pilot assessment utilized the UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples' (SRRIP; Anaya, 2014) findings on the situation of Indigenous Peoples in Canada in three thematic areas: (a) self-government and self-governance; (b) consultation and free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC); and (c) land and natural resources. While insufficient for a fulsome assessment of Canada’s compliance with the UNDRIP, we restricted ourselves to the report for two reasons: first, to test the applicability of the tool for quantifying qualitative data; and, second, to evaluate the degree to which the UN monitoring mechanism for Indigenous rights adheres to the Declaration’s Articles for monitoring and reporting. We discuss implications and opportunities for improving human rights monitoring and state implementation efforts.</description><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Geopolitics</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Indigenous peoples</subject><subject>Informed consent</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Native peoples</subject><subject>Native rights</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Policy</subject><subject>Policy analysis</subject><issn>1916-5781</issn><issn>1916-5781</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>LD-</sourceid><sourceid>LD.</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUGFPwjAQXYwmEuQnEJv4Gey1Xbv5jYAICVGi8LkZ7Jpsbutsh8R_7xjGcF_uXu69d5cXBEOgY4jCSDxmWZ2PGWUthjEbA1XAr4IexCBHoYrg-mK-DQbe57StiFIZQS-wM_zGwtYlVg2xhiQV2b7O3pdrMrVlXWRJtUcy8R697ygba4snsrBHkpA1OmNd2VHmLinxaN1nqzsUKVmWtbPfSD6apMELr7vgxiSFx8Ff7wfb-fNmuhit3l6W08lqtOdMNSOQAkPFU2bEDkQKaSxNioqpFpgQY5pGitFQ0Ujs4x1n1EixSyliyCUYEfJ-8HD2bd_4OqBvdG4PrmpPaiYkxFwoQVtWeGbtnfXeodG1y8rE_WiguotXn-LVp3g1gGa6i7fVDc-63DfW_YtEpKSS7OR7f96jO6RZc-EqY8ll4vgv49KCKA</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Smith, Jackson A.</creator><creator>Mitchell, Terry L.</creator><general>Scholarship@Western (Western University)</general><general>Western University</general><general>University of Western Ontario</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>LD-</scope><scope>LD.</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Development of an UNDRIP Compliance Assessment Tool: How a Performance Framework Could Improve State Compliance</title><author>Smith, Jackson A. ; Mitchell, Terry L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-164e573d2f4b14d1d96fde72714df5e90d872057084c9b320f64bd0ee5361f453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Geopolitics</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Indigenous peoples</topic><topic>Informed consent</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Native peoples</topic><topic>Native rights</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Policy</topic><topic>Policy analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Jackson A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Terry L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch (Alumni)</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>International indigenous policy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Jackson A.</au><au>Mitchell, Terry L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of an UNDRIP Compliance Assessment Tool: How a Performance Framework Could Improve State Compliance</atitle><jtitle>International indigenous policy journal</jtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>1-23</pages><issn>1916-5781</issn><eissn>1916-5781</eissn><abstract>Improving state compliance with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) can be supported by monitoring and measurement. Current approaches to monitoring state compliance with the UNDRIP are qualitative and non-standardized, which limits comparability across time and across geopolitical lines. In this article, we introduce a novel approach to monitoring compliance with the UNDRIP and human rights more generally. This work highlights the potential advantages of using a performance improvement framework to clearly identify gaps in compliance, monitor state compliance with the Declaration over time, and effectively assess and compare state compliance. We describe the development of a standardized UNDRIP compliance assessment tool and report the process and findings of a pilot test of the tool. The pilot assessment utilized the UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples' (SRRIP; Anaya, 2014) findings on the situation of Indigenous Peoples in Canada in three thematic areas: (a) self-government and self-governance; (b) consultation and free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC); and (c) land and natural resources. While insufficient for a fulsome assessment of Canada’s compliance with the UNDRIP, we restricted ourselves to the report for two reasons: first, to test the applicability of the tool for quantifying qualitative data; and, second, to evaluate the degree to which the UN monitoring mechanism for Indigenous rights adheres to the Declaration’s Articles for monitoring and reporting. We discuss implications and opportunities for improving human rights monitoring and state implementation efforts.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Scholarship@Western (Western University)</pub><doi>10.18584/iipj.2020.11.2.10713</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1916-5781 |
ispartof | International indigenous policy journal, 2020-04, Vol.11 (2), p.1-23 |
issn | 1916-5781 1916-5781 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2461934740 |
source | Jstor Journals Open Access |
subjects | Compliance Evaluation Geopolitics Governance Human rights Indigenous peoples Informed consent Measurement Monitoring Native peoples Native rights Natural resources Policy Policy analysis |
title | Development of an UNDRIP Compliance Assessment Tool: How a Performance Framework Could Improve State Compliance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T18%3A13%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-erudit_JFNAL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20an%20UNDRIP%20Compliance%20Assessment%20Tool:%20How%20a%20Performance%20Framework%20Could%20Improve%20State%20Compliance&rft.jtitle=International%20indigenous%20policy%20journal&rft.au=Smith,%20Jackson%20A.&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=1-23&rft.issn=1916-5781&rft.eissn=1916-5781&rft_id=info:doi/10.18584/iipj.2020.11.2.10713&rft_dat=%3Cerudit_JFNAL%3E1069636ar%3C/erudit_JFNAL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2461934740&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_eruid=1069636ar&rft_jstor_id=48767620&rfr_iscdi=true |