Automatic and perceptual discrimination between dysarthria, apraxia of speech, and neurotypical speech

Automatic techniques in the context of motor speech disorders (MSDs) are typically two-class techniques aiming to discriminate between dysarthria and neurotypical speech or between dysarthria and apraxia of speech (AoS). Further, although such techniques are proposed to support the perceptual assess...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2021-06
Hauptverfasser: Kodrasi, I, Pernon, M, Laganaro, M, Bourlard, H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Kodrasi, I
Pernon, M
Laganaro, M
Bourlard, H
description Automatic techniques in the context of motor speech disorders (MSDs) are typically two-class techniques aiming to discriminate between dysarthria and neurotypical speech or between dysarthria and apraxia of speech (AoS). Further, although such techniques are proposed to support the perceptual assessment of clinicians, the automatic and perceptual classification accuracy has never been compared. In this paper, we investigate a three-class automatic technique and a set of handcrafted features for the discrimination of dysarthria, AoS and neurotypical speech. Instead of following the commonly used One-versus-One or One-versus-Rest approaches for multi-class classification, a hierarchical approach is proposed. Further, a perceptual study is conducted where speech and language pathologists are asked to listen to recordings of dysarthria, AoS, and neurotypical speech and decide which class the recordings belong to. The proposed automatic technique is evaluated on the same recordings and the automatic and perceptual classification performance are compared. The presented results show that the hierarchical classification approach yields a higher classification accuracy than baseline One-versus-One and One-versus-Rest approaches. Further, the presented results show that the automatic approach yields a higher classification accuracy than the perceptual assessment of speech and language pathologists, demonstrating the potential advantages of integrating automatic tools in clinical practice.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2461164644</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2461164644</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_24611646443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzEsKwjAUheEgCBbtHgJOW2iTtDoVUVyAc7mmtzSlTWIeaHdvURfg6Ay-w78gCeO8zPeCsRVJve-LomD1jlUVT0h7iMGMEJSkoBtq0Um0IcJAG-WlU6PSMxpN7xieiJo2kwcXOqcgo2AdvBRQ01JvEWWXfSIaozNhskrOmS9syLKFwWP62zXZnk_X4yW3zjwi-nDrTXR6phsTdVnWohaC__d6A0ihR_0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2461164644</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automatic and perceptual discrimination between dysarthria, apraxia of speech, and neurotypical speech</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Kodrasi, I ; Pernon, M ; Laganaro, M ; Bourlard, H</creator><creatorcontrib>Kodrasi, I ; Pernon, M ; Laganaro, M ; Bourlard, H</creatorcontrib><description>Automatic techniques in the context of motor speech disorders (MSDs) are typically two-class techniques aiming to discriminate between dysarthria and neurotypical speech or between dysarthria and apraxia of speech (AoS). Further, although such techniques are proposed to support the perceptual assessment of clinicians, the automatic and perceptual classification accuracy has never been compared. In this paper, we investigate a three-class automatic technique and a set of handcrafted features for the discrimination of dysarthria, AoS and neurotypical speech. Instead of following the commonly used One-versus-One or One-versus-Rest approaches for multi-class classification, a hierarchical approach is proposed. Further, a perceptual study is conducted where speech and language pathologists are asked to listen to recordings of dysarthria, AoS, and neurotypical speech and decide which class the recordings belong to. The proposed automatic technique is evaluated on the same recordings and the automatic and perceptual classification performance are compared. The presented results show that the hierarchical classification approach yields a higher classification accuracy than baseline One-versus-One and One-versus-Rest approaches. Further, the presented results show that the automatic approach yields a higher classification accuracy than the perceptual assessment of speech and language pathologists, demonstrating the potential advantages of integrating automatic tools in clinical practice.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Apraxia ; Classification ; Discrimination ; Dysarthria ; Speech</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2021-06</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kodrasi, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pernon, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laganaro, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourlard, H</creatorcontrib><title>Automatic and perceptual discrimination between dysarthria, apraxia of speech, and neurotypical speech</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Automatic techniques in the context of motor speech disorders (MSDs) are typically two-class techniques aiming to discriminate between dysarthria and neurotypical speech or between dysarthria and apraxia of speech (AoS). Further, although such techniques are proposed to support the perceptual assessment of clinicians, the automatic and perceptual classification accuracy has never been compared. In this paper, we investigate a three-class automatic technique and a set of handcrafted features for the discrimination of dysarthria, AoS and neurotypical speech. Instead of following the commonly used One-versus-One or One-versus-Rest approaches for multi-class classification, a hierarchical approach is proposed. Further, a perceptual study is conducted where speech and language pathologists are asked to listen to recordings of dysarthria, AoS, and neurotypical speech and decide which class the recordings belong to. The proposed automatic technique is evaluated on the same recordings and the automatic and perceptual classification performance are compared. The presented results show that the hierarchical classification approach yields a higher classification accuracy than baseline One-versus-One and One-versus-Rest approaches. Further, the presented results show that the automatic approach yields a higher classification accuracy than the perceptual assessment of speech and language pathologists, demonstrating the potential advantages of integrating automatic tools in clinical practice.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Apraxia</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Dysarthria</subject><subject>Speech</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNzEsKwjAUheEgCBbtHgJOW2iTtDoVUVyAc7mmtzSlTWIeaHdvURfg6Ay-w78gCeO8zPeCsRVJve-LomD1jlUVT0h7iMGMEJSkoBtq0Um0IcJAG-WlU6PSMxpN7xieiJo2kwcXOqcgo2AdvBRQ01JvEWWXfSIaozNhskrOmS9syLKFwWP62zXZnk_X4yW3zjwi-nDrTXR6phsTdVnWohaC__d6A0ihR_0</recordid><startdate>20210602</startdate><enddate>20210602</enddate><creator>Kodrasi, I</creator><creator>Pernon, M</creator><creator>Laganaro, M</creator><creator>Bourlard, H</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210602</creationdate><title>Automatic and perceptual discrimination between dysarthria, apraxia of speech, and neurotypical speech</title><author>Kodrasi, I ; Pernon, M ; Laganaro, M ; Bourlard, H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_24611646443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Apraxia</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Dysarthria</topic><topic>Speech</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kodrasi, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pernon, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laganaro, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourlard, H</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kodrasi, I</au><au>Pernon, M</au><au>Laganaro, M</au><au>Bourlard, H</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Automatic and perceptual discrimination between dysarthria, apraxia of speech, and neurotypical speech</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2021-06-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Automatic techniques in the context of motor speech disorders (MSDs) are typically two-class techniques aiming to discriminate between dysarthria and neurotypical speech or between dysarthria and apraxia of speech (AoS). Further, although such techniques are proposed to support the perceptual assessment of clinicians, the automatic and perceptual classification accuracy has never been compared. In this paper, we investigate a three-class automatic technique and a set of handcrafted features for the discrimination of dysarthria, AoS and neurotypical speech. Instead of following the commonly used One-versus-One or One-versus-Rest approaches for multi-class classification, a hierarchical approach is proposed. Further, a perceptual study is conducted where speech and language pathologists are asked to listen to recordings of dysarthria, AoS, and neurotypical speech and decide which class the recordings belong to. The proposed automatic technique is evaluated on the same recordings and the automatic and perceptual classification performance are compared. The presented results show that the hierarchical classification approach yields a higher classification accuracy than baseline One-versus-One and One-versus-Rest approaches. Further, the presented results show that the automatic approach yields a higher classification accuracy than the perceptual assessment of speech and language pathologists, demonstrating the potential advantages of integrating automatic tools in clinical practice.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2021-06
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2461164644
source Free E- Journals
subjects Accuracy
Apraxia
Classification
Discrimination
Dysarthria
Speech
title Automatic and perceptual discrimination between dysarthria, apraxia of speech, and neurotypical speech
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A05%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Automatic%20and%20perceptual%20discrimination%20between%20dysarthria,%20apraxia%20of%20speech,%20and%20neurotypical%20speech&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Kodrasi,%20I&rft.date=2021-06-02&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2461164644%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2461164644&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true