Re-examining Roman Death Pollution

The idea that the dead were polluting — that is, that corpses posed a danger of making the living unclean, offensive both to their own communities and to the gods — has long occupied a fundamental position in Roman funerary studies. Nevertheless, what that pollution comprised, as well as how it affe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of Roman studies 2020-11, Vol.110, p.5-27
1. Verfasser: Emmerson, Allison L. C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 27
container_issue
container_start_page 5
container_title The Journal of Roman studies
container_volume 110
creator Emmerson, Allison L. C.
description The idea that the dead were polluting — that is, that corpses posed a danger of making the living unclean, offensive both to their own communities and to the gods — has long occupied a fundamental position in Roman funerary studies. Nevertheless, what that pollution comprised, as well as how it affected living society, remain subject to debate. This article aims to clarify the issue by re-examining the evidence for Roman attitudes towards the dead. Focusing on the city of Rome itself, I conclude that we have little reason to reconstruct a fear of death pollution prior to Late Antiquity; in fact, the term itself has been detrimental to current understandings. No surviving text from the late republican or early imperial periods indicates that corpses were objects of metaphysical fear, and rather than polluted, mourners are better conceived as obligated, bound by a variable combination of emotions and conventions to behave in certain, if certainly changeable, ways following a death.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0075435820001227
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2460062641</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0075435820001227</cupid><sourcerecordid>2460062641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-3cb5efa7074dfef6ad6f9dbd7608a8923a0111253763ca1007db33bfcd8e9a4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMoWFc_gLei5-pM0iTtUVZXhQVlVfBWpk2ydumfNW1Bv70tu-BBPM3hvd97w2PsHOEKAfX1C4CWsZAJBwDkXB-wALUUkeTJ-yELJjma9GN20nWb0RMrKQN2sbKR_aK6bMpmHa7amprw1lL_ET63VTX0ZducsiNHVWfP9nfG3hZ3r_OHaPl0_zi_WUaFQN1HosildaRBx8ZZp8gol5rcaAUJJSkXBIjIpdBKFITjQyYXIneFSWxKMYkZu9zlbn37Odiuzzbt4JuxMuOxAlBcxTi6cOcqfNt13rps68ua_HeGkE1TZH-mGBmxZ6jOfWnW9jf6f-oHsrVedA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2460062641</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Re-examining Roman Death Pollution</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Emmerson, Allison L. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Emmerson, Allison L. C.</creatorcontrib><description>The idea that the dead were polluting — that is, that corpses posed a danger of making the living unclean, offensive both to their own communities and to the gods — has long occupied a fundamental position in Roman funerary studies. Nevertheless, what that pollution comprised, as well as how it affected living society, remain subject to debate. This article aims to clarify the issue by re-examining the evidence for Roman attitudes towards the dead. Focusing on the city of Rome itself, I conclude that we have little reason to reconstruct a fear of death pollution prior to Late Antiquity; in fact, the term itself has been detrimental to current understandings. No surviving text from the late republican or early imperial periods indicates that corpses were objects of metaphysical fear, and rather than polluted, mourners are better conceived as obligated, bound by a variable combination of emotions and conventions to behave in certain, if certainly changeable, ways following a death.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0075-4358</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1753-528X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0075435820001227</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Centuries ; Dictionaries ; Fear &amp; phobias ; Funerals ; Grief ; Pollution</subject><ispartof>The Journal of Roman studies, 2020-11, Vol.110, p.5-27</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-3cb5efa7074dfef6ad6f9dbd7608a8923a0111253763ca1007db33bfcd8e9a4a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-3cb5efa7074dfef6ad6f9dbd7608a8923a0111253763ca1007db33bfcd8e9a4a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0075435820001227/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Emmerson, Allison L. C.</creatorcontrib><title>Re-examining Roman Death Pollution</title><title>The Journal of Roman studies</title><addtitle>J. Rom. Stud</addtitle><description>The idea that the dead were polluting — that is, that corpses posed a danger of making the living unclean, offensive both to their own communities and to the gods — has long occupied a fundamental position in Roman funerary studies. Nevertheless, what that pollution comprised, as well as how it affected living society, remain subject to debate. This article aims to clarify the issue by re-examining the evidence for Roman attitudes towards the dead. Focusing on the city of Rome itself, I conclude that we have little reason to reconstruct a fear of death pollution prior to Late Antiquity; in fact, the term itself has been detrimental to current understandings. No surviving text from the late republican or early imperial periods indicates that corpses were objects of metaphysical fear, and rather than polluted, mourners are better conceived as obligated, bound by a variable combination of emotions and conventions to behave in certain, if certainly changeable, ways following a death.</description><subject>Centuries</subject><subject>Dictionaries</subject><subject>Fear &amp; phobias</subject><subject>Funerals</subject><subject>Grief</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><issn>0075-4358</issn><issn>1753-528X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMoWFc_gLei5-pM0iTtUVZXhQVlVfBWpk2ydumfNW1Bv70tu-BBPM3hvd97w2PsHOEKAfX1C4CWsZAJBwDkXB-wALUUkeTJ-yELJjma9GN20nWb0RMrKQN2sbKR_aK6bMpmHa7amprw1lL_ET63VTX0ZducsiNHVWfP9nfG3hZ3r_OHaPl0_zi_WUaFQN1HosildaRBx8ZZp8gol5rcaAUJJSkXBIjIpdBKFITjQyYXIneFSWxKMYkZu9zlbn37Odiuzzbt4JuxMuOxAlBcxTi6cOcqfNt13rps68ua_HeGkE1TZH-mGBmxZ6jOfWnW9jf6f-oHsrVedA</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Emmerson, Allison L. C.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>Re-examining Roman Death Pollution</title><author>Emmerson, Allison L. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-3cb5efa7074dfef6ad6f9dbd7608a8923a0111253763ca1007db33bfcd8e9a4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Centuries</topic><topic>Dictionaries</topic><topic>Fear &amp; phobias</topic><topic>Funerals</topic><topic>Grief</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Emmerson, Allison L. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of Roman studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Emmerson, Allison L. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Re-examining Roman Death Pollution</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of Roman studies</jtitle><addtitle>J. Rom. Stud</addtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>110</volume><spage>5</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>5-27</pages><issn>0075-4358</issn><eissn>1753-528X</eissn><abstract>The idea that the dead were polluting — that is, that corpses posed a danger of making the living unclean, offensive both to their own communities and to the gods — has long occupied a fundamental position in Roman funerary studies. Nevertheless, what that pollution comprised, as well as how it affected living society, remain subject to debate. This article aims to clarify the issue by re-examining the evidence for Roman attitudes towards the dead. Focusing on the city of Rome itself, I conclude that we have little reason to reconstruct a fear of death pollution prior to Late Antiquity; in fact, the term itself has been detrimental to current understandings. No surviving text from the late republican or early imperial periods indicates that corpses were objects of metaphysical fear, and rather than polluted, mourners are better conceived as obligated, bound by a variable combination of emotions and conventions to behave in certain, if certainly changeable, ways following a death.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0075435820001227</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0075-4358
ispartof The Journal of Roman studies, 2020-11, Vol.110, p.5-27
issn 0075-4358
1753-528X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2460062641
source Cambridge Journals Online; JSTOR
subjects Centuries
Dictionaries
Fear & phobias
Funerals
Grief
Pollution
title Re-examining Roman Death Pollution
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T05%3A56%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Re-examining%20Roman%20Death%20Pollution&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20Roman%20studies&rft.au=Emmerson,%20Allison%20L.%20C.&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=110&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=5-27&rft.issn=0075-4358&rft.eissn=1753-528X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0075435820001227&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2460062641%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2460062641&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0075435820001227&rfr_iscdi=true