Formation of the Neoproterozoic Rifting Depression Groups of the Tarim Basin and its Hydrocarbon Potential: Responded to the Initial Opening of the Proto‐Tethy Ocean

The largest and superimposed Tarim basin developed on the one of the three bigger craton, Tarim Craton, in China. The early Paleozoic is the heyday of its development and cratonization, and then changes to the different property basin. The reserved sedimentary strata of Neoproterozoicare recognized...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta geologica Sinica (Beijing) 2020-10, Vol.94 (S1), p.16-16
Hauptverfasser: HE, Bizhu, JIAO, Cunli, LIU, Ruohan, HUANG, Taizhu, CAI, Zhihui, CAO, Zicheng, YUN, Xiaorui, Mingjie, Lan, JIANG, Zhongzheng, ZHU, Ding, YANG, Yujie, CUI, Junwen, HAO, Guangming
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 16
container_issue S1
container_start_page 16
container_title Acta geologica Sinica (Beijing)
container_volume 94
creator HE, Bizhu
JIAO, Cunli
LIU, Ruohan
HUANG, Taizhu
CAI, Zhihui
CAO, Zicheng
YUN, Xiaorui
Mingjie, Lan
JIANG, Zhongzheng
ZHU, Ding
YANG, Yujie
CUI, Junwen
HAO, Guangming
description The largest and superimposed Tarim basin developed on the one of the three bigger craton, Tarim Craton, in China. The early Paleozoic is the heyday of its development and cratonization, and then changes to the different property basin. The reserved sedimentary strata of Neoproterozoicare recognized mainly in the local of outcrops periphery orogenic belts, but drilling core in the basin reveals them seldom. The proto‐type of the initial Tarim Basinis always a mystery. The vast desert, huge‐thickness of sedimentary strata, multiple tectonic movements, and a low quality of deep data are the keys to getting to know him. We comprehensive field outcrops, wells, seismic reflection profiles with higher SNRs and aeromagnetic data, recognized about 20 normal fault‐controlled rifting depressions of the Cryogenian and Ediacaran, which scattered throughout the basin, and developed on the Precambrian metamorphic and crystalline basement. The structural framework is clearly different from that of the overlying Phanerozoic. The rifting depressions consist of mainly half grabens, symmetrical troughs and horst‐grabens. From the northeast to southwest of the basin, they are divided into three rifting depression groups (RDG) with the WNW, ENE, and NW‐trends that are mainly controlled by normal faults. From the Cryogenian to Ediacaran, most of the main inherited faults to active and eventually ceased at the end of the Ediacaran or Early Cambrian, while subsidence centers appeared and migrated eastward along the faults. They formed under the NNE‐SSW oriented and NNW‐SSE‐oriented extensional paleo‐stress fields (relative to the present) during the Neoproterozoic, and were accompanied by clockwise shearing. According to the analysis of the activities of syn‐sedimentary faults, filling sediments, magmatic events, and coordination with aeromagnetic anomalies, the tectonic properties of the fault depressions are different and are primarily continental rifts or intra‐continental fault‐controlled basins. The formation of the rifting depression was associated with the initial opening of the South Altun‐West Kunlun Ocean and the South Tianshan Ocean, which were located at the northern and southern margins of the Tarim Block, respectively, in response to the break‐up of the Supercontinent Rodinia and the initial opening of the Proto‐Tethys Ocean. Inthe RDG developedfluvial, shallow marine and carbonate platform facies, accompanied with multiple phases of magma activities and glaciations
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1755-6724.14436
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2459466023</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2459466023</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2316-3c34aa6dd0e00222280cae955ec2d7217ea564bd692ceb1a2f0385af4a2e79223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFOAyEURSdGE7W6dkvieiowA-O4q9XWJo1ttK4JZd4opoURaExd-Qn-hf_ll8jY6ta3gcC59yb3JckJwV0S54wUjKW8oHmX5HnGd5KDv5fdeMcYpyUjbD859P4ZY844YQfJ58C6pQzaGmRrFJ4A3YJtnA3g7JvVCt3pOmjziK6gceB9Cw6dXTX-l59Jp5foUnptkDQV0sGjm3XlrJJuHulp9DJBy8UFugPfWFNBhYL90Y6Mbn_QpAHThmwtpzHffr1_zCA8rdFEgTRHyV4tFx6Ot2cneRhcz_o36XgyHPV741TRjPA0U1kuJa8qDBjTOOdYSSgZA0WrgpICJOP5vOIlVTAnktY4O2eyziWFoqQ06ySnG9_YwcsKfBDPduVMjBQ0Z2XOOaZZpM42lHLWewe1aGIJ0q0FwaLdhmi7F2334mcbUcE3ile9gPV_uOj1h_cb4TcDuI9v</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2459466023</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Formation of the Neoproterozoic Rifting Depression Groups of the Tarim Basin and its Hydrocarbon Potential: Responded to the Initial Opening of the Proto‐Tethy Ocean</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>HE, Bizhu ; JIAO, Cunli ; LIU, Ruohan ; HUANG, Taizhu ; CAI, Zhihui ; CAO, Zicheng ; YUN, Xiaorui ; Mingjie, Lan ; JIANG, Zhongzheng ; ZHU, Ding ; YANG, Yujie ; CUI, Junwen ; HAO, Guangming</creator><creatorcontrib>HE, Bizhu ; JIAO, Cunli ; LIU, Ruohan ; HUANG, Taizhu ; CAI, Zhihui ; CAO, Zicheng ; YUN, Xiaorui ; Mingjie, Lan ; JIANG, Zhongzheng ; ZHU, Ding ; YANG, Yujie ; CUI, Junwen ; HAO, Guangming</creatorcontrib><description>The largest and superimposed Tarim basin developed on the one of the three bigger craton, Tarim Craton, in China. The early Paleozoic is the heyday of its development and cratonization, and then changes to the different property basin. The reserved sedimentary strata of Neoproterozoicare recognized mainly in the local of outcrops periphery orogenic belts, but drilling core in the basin reveals them seldom. The proto‐type of the initial Tarim Basinis always a mystery. The vast desert, huge‐thickness of sedimentary strata, multiple tectonic movements, and a low quality of deep data are the keys to getting to know him. We comprehensive field outcrops, wells, seismic reflection profiles with higher SNRs and aeromagnetic data, recognized about 20 normal fault‐controlled rifting depressions of the Cryogenian and Ediacaran, which scattered throughout the basin, and developed on the Precambrian metamorphic and crystalline basement. The structural framework is clearly different from that of the overlying Phanerozoic. The rifting depressions consist of mainly half grabens, symmetrical troughs and horst‐grabens. From the northeast to southwest of the basin, they are divided into three rifting depression groups (RDG) with the WNW, ENE, and NW‐trends that are mainly controlled by normal faults. From the Cryogenian to Ediacaran, most of the main inherited faults to active and eventually ceased at the end of the Ediacaran or Early Cambrian, while subsidence centers appeared and migrated eastward along the faults. They formed under the NNE‐SSW oriented and NNW‐SSE‐oriented extensional paleo‐stress fields (relative to the present) during the Neoproterozoic, and were accompanied by clockwise shearing. According to the analysis of the activities of syn‐sedimentary faults, filling sediments, magmatic events, and coordination with aeromagnetic anomalies, the tectonic properties of the fault depressions are different and are primarily continental rifts or intra‐continental fault‐controlled basins. The formation of the rifting depression was associated with the initial opening of the South Altun‐West Kunlun Ocean and the South Tianshan Ocean, which were located at the northern and southern margins of the Tarim Block, respectively, in response to the break‐up of the Supercontinent Rodinia and the initial opening of the Proto‐Tethys Ocean. Inthe RDG developedfluvial, shallow marine and carbonate platform facies, accompanied with multiple phases of magma activities and glaciations during the Cryogenian and Ediacaran. The structural architectures of interfaces between the Neoproterozoic and Cambrian are mainly angular and parallel unconformities in the RDG. Over the parallel unconformities in the RDGs are beneficial for the organic‐rich and /or phosphorites of the Yuertus Formation of the Lower Cambrian. The main fault belts of RDGs also controlled the small platform margin and slope break belt of in the Cambrian. The Neoproterozoic and the Lower Cambrian petroleum systems of the basin might be controlled by the RDGs in the initiation of the Tarimcraton.</description><edition>English ed.</edition><identifier>ISSN: 1000-9515</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-6724</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1755-6724.14436</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Richmond: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Anomalies ; Belts ; Cambrian ; Carbonates ; Core drilling ; Coring ; Cratons ; Drilling ; Fault lines ; Faults ; Geological faults ; Geological time ; Graben ; Interfaces ; Lava ; Magma ; Oil and gas exploration ; Oil exploration ; Orogeny ; Outcrops ; Paleoceanography ; Paleozoic ; Petroleum ; Petroleum system ; Phanerozoic ; Platforms (geology) ; Precambrian ; Profiles ; Proto‐Tethy Ocean ; Rifting ; rifting depression group ; Sedimentary facies ; Sediments ; Seismic reflection profiles ; Seismic surveys ; Shearing ; Strata ; Stress distribution ; Tarim Basin ; Tectonics ; unconformity between the Neoproterozoic and Cambrian</subject><ispartof>Acta geologica Sinica (Beijing), 2020-10, Vol.94 (S1), p.16-16</ispartof><rights>2020 Geological Society of China</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2316-3c34aa6dd0e00222280cae955ec2d7217ea564bd692ceb1a2f0385af4a2e79223</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1755-6724.14436$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1755-6724.14436$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27928,27929,45578,45579</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>HE, Bizhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JIAO, Cunli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LIU, Ruohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUANG, Taizhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAI, Zhihui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAO, Zicheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YUN, Xiaorui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mingjie, Lan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JIANG, Zhongzheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHU, Ding</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YANG, Yujie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CUI, Junwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAO, Guangming</creatorcontrib><title>Formation of the Neoproterozoic Rifting Depression Groups of the Tarim Basin and its Hydrocarbon Potential: Responded to the Initial Opening of the Proto‐Tethy Ocean</title><title>Acta geologica Sinica (Beijing)</title><description>The largest and superimposed Tarim basin developed on the one of the three bigger craton, Tarim Craton, in China. The early Paleozoic is the heyday of its development and cratonization, and then changes to the different property basin. The reserved sedimentary strata of Neoproterozoicare recognized mainly in the local of outcrops periphery orogenic belts, but drilling core in the basin reveals them seldom. The proto‐type of the initial Tarim Basinis always a mystery. The vast desert, huge‐thickness of sedimentary strata, multiple tectonic movements, and a low quality of deep data are the keys to getting to know him. We comprehensive field outcrops, wells, seismic reflection profiles with higher SNRs and aeromagnetic data, recognized about 20 normal fault‐controlled rifting depressions of the Cryogenian and Ediacaran, which scattered throughout the basin, and developed on the Precambrian metamorphic and crystalline basement. The structural framework is clearly different from that of the overlying Phanerozoic. The rifting depressions consist of mainly half grabens, symmetrical troughs and horst‐grabens. From the northeast to southwest of the basin, they are divided into three rifting depression groups (RDG) with the WNW, ENE, and NW‐trends that are mainly controlled by normal faults. From the Cryogenian to Ediacaran, most of the main inherited faults to active and eventually ceased at the end of the Ediacaran or Early Cambrian, while subsidence centers appeared and migrated eastward along the faults. They formed under the NNE‐SSW oriented and NNW‐SSE‐oriented extensional paleo‐stress fields (relative to the present) during the Neoproterozoic, and were accompanied by clockwise shearing. According to the analysis of the activities of syn‐sedimentary faults, filling sediments, magmatic events, and coordination with aeromagnetic anomalies, the tectonic properties of the fault depressions are different and are primarily continental rifts or intra‐continental fault‐controlled basins. The formation of the rifting depression was associated with the initial opening of the South Altun‐West Kunlun Ocean and the South Tianshan Ocean, which were located at the northern and southern margins of the Tarim Block, respectively, in response to the break‐up of the Supercontinent Rodinia and the initial opening of the Proto‐Tethys Ocean. Inthe RDG developedfluvial, shallow marine and carbonate platform facies, accompanied with multiple phases of magma activities and glaciations during the Cryogenian and Ediacaran. The structural architectures of interfaces between the Neoproterozoic and Cambrian are mainly angular and parallel unconformities in the RDG. Over the parallel unconformities in the RDGs are beneficial for the organic‐rich and /or phosphorites of the Yuertus Formation of the Lower Cambrian. The main fault belts of RDGs also controlled the small platform margin and slope break belt of in the Cambrian. The Neoproterozoic and the Lower Cambrian petroleum systems of the basin might be controlled by the RDGs in the initiation of the Tarimcraton.</description><subject>Anomalies</subject><subject>Belts</subject><subject>Cambrian</subject><subject>Carbonates</subject><subject>Core drilling</subject><subject>Coring</subject><subject>Cratons</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>Fault lines</subject><subject>Faults</subject><subject>Geological faults</subject><subject>Geological time</subject><subject>Graben</subject><subject>Interfaces</subject><subject>Lava</subject><subject>Magma</subject><subject>Oil and gas exploration</subject><subject>Oil exploration</subject><subject>Orogeny</subject><subject>Outcrops</subject><subject>Paleoceanography</subject><subject>Paleozoic</subject><subject>Petroleum</subject><subject>Petroleum system</subject><subject>Phanerozoic</subject><subject>Platforms (geology)</subject><subject>Precambrian</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><subject>Proto‐Tethy Ocean</subject><subject>Rifting</subject><subject>rifting depression group</subject><subject>Sedimentary facies</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Seismic reflection profiles</subject><subject>Seismic surveys</subject><subject>Shearing</subject><subject>Strata</subject><subject>Stress distribution</subject><subject>Tarim Basin</subject><subject>Tectonics</subject><subject>unconformity between the Neoproterozoic and Cambrian</subject><issn>1000-9515</issn><issn>1755-6724</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkcFOAyEURSdGE7W6dkvieiowA-O4q9XWJo1ttK4JZd4opoURaExd-Qn-hf_ll8jY6ta3gcC59yb3JckJwV0S54wUjKW8oHmX5HnGd5KDv5fdeMcYpyUjbD859P4ZY844YQfJ58C6pQzaGmRrFJ4A3YJtnA3g7JvVCt3pOmjziK6gceB9Cw6dXTX-l59Jp5foUnptkDQV0sGjm3XlrJJuHulp9DJBy8UFugPfWFNBhYL90Y6Mbn_QpAHThmwtpzHffr1_zCA8rdFEgTRHyV4tFx6Ot2cneRhcz_o36XgyHPV741TRjPA0U1kuJa8qDBjTOOdYSSgZA0WrgpICJOP5vOIlVTAnktY4O2eyziWFoqQ06ySnG9_YwcsKfBDPduVMjBQ0Z2XOOaZZpM42lHLWewe1aGIJ0q0FwaLdhmi7F2334mcbUcE3ile9gPV_uOj1h_cb4TcDuI9v</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>HE, Bizhu</creator><creator>JIAO, Cunli</creator><creator>LIU, Ruohan</creator><creator>HUANG, Taizhu</creator><creator>CAI, Zhihui</creator><creator>CAO, Zicheng</creator><creator>YUN, Xiaorui</creator><creator>Mingjie, Lan</creator><creator>JIANG, Zhongzheng</creator><creator>ZHU, Ding</creator><creator>YANG, Yujie</creator><creator>CUI, Junwen</creator><creator>HAO, Guangming</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Formation of the Neoproterozoic Rifting Depression Groups of the Tarim Basin and its Hydrocarbon Potential: Responded to the Initial Opening of the Proto‐Tethy Ocean</title><author>HE, Bizhu ; JIAO, Cunli ; LIU, Ruohan ; HUANG, Taizhu ; CAI, Zhihui ; CAO, Zicheng ; YUN, Xiaorui ; Mingjie, Lan ; JIANG, Zhongzheng ; ZHU, Ding ; YANG, Yujie ; CUI, Junwen ; HAO, Guangming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2316-3c34aa6dd0e00222280cae955ec2d7217ea564bd692ceb1a2f0385af4a2e79223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anomalies</topic><topic>Belts</topic><topic>Cambrian</topic><topic>Carbonates</topic><topic>Core drilling</topic><topic>Coring</topic><topic>Cratons</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>Fault lines</topic><topic>Faults</topic><topic>Geological faults</topic><topic>Geological time</topic><topic>Graben</topic><topic>Interfaces</topic><topic>Lava</topic><topic>Magma</topic><topic>Oil and gas exploration</topic><topic>Oil exploration</topic><topic>Orogeny</topic><topic>Outcrops</topic><topic>Paleoceanography</topic><topic>Paleozoic</topic><topic>Petroleum</topic><topic>Petroleum system</topic><topic>Phanerozoic</topic><topic>Platforms (geology)</topic><topic>Precambrian</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><topic>Proto‐Tethy Ocean</topic><topic>Rifting</topic><topic>rifting depression group</topic><topic>Sedimentary facies</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Seismic reflection profiles</topic><topic>Seismic surveys</topic><topic>Shearing</topic><topic>Strata</topic><topic>Stress distribution</topic><topic>Tarim Basin</topic><topic>Tectonics</topic><topic>unconformity between the Neoproterozoic and Cambrian</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HE, Bizhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JIAO, Cunli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LIU, Ruohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUANG, Taizhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAI, Zhihui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAO, Zicheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YUN, Xiaorui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mingjie, Lan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JIANG, Zhongzheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHU, Ding</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YANG, Yujie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CUI, Junwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAO, Guangming</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Acta geologica Sinica (Beijing)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HE, Bizhu</au><au>JIAO, Cunli</au><au>LIU, Ruohan</au><au>HUANG, Taizhu</au><au>CAI, Zhihui</au><au>CAO, Zicheng</au><au>YUN, Xiaorui</au><au>Mingjie, Lan</au><au>JIANG, Zhongzheng</au><au>ZHU, Ding</au><au>YANG, Yujie</au><au>CUI, Junwen</au><au>HAO, Guangming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Formation of the Neoproterozoic Rifting Depression Groups of the Tarim Basin and its Hydrocarbon Potential: Responded to the Initial Opening of the Proto‐Tethy Ocean</atitle><jtitle>Acta geologica Sinica (Beijing)</jtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>16</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>16-16</pages><issn>1000-9515</issn><eissn>1755-6724</eissn><abstract>The largest and superimposed Tarim basin developed on the one of the three bigger craton, Tarim Craton, in China. The early Paleozoic is the heyday of its development and cratonization, and then changes to the different property basin. The reserved sedimentary strata of Neoproterozoicare recognized mainly in the local of outcrops periphery orogenic belts, but drilling core in the basin reveals them seldom. The proto‐type of the initial Tarim Basinis always a mystery. The vast desert, huge‐thickness of sedimentary strata, multiple tectonic movements, and a low quality of deep data are the keys to getting to know him. We comprehensive field outcrops, wells, seismic reflection profiles with higher SNRs and aeromagnetic data, recognized about 20 normal fault‐controlled rifting depressions of the Cryogenian and Ediacaran, which scattered throughout the basin, and developed on the Precambrian metamorphic and crystalline basement. The structural framework is clearly different from that of the overlying Phanerozoic. The rifting depressions consist of mainly half grabens, symmetrical troughs and horst‐grabens. From the northeast to southwest of the basin, they are divided into three rifting depression groups (RDG) with the WNW, ENE, and NW‐trends that are mainly controlled by normal faults. From the Cryogenian to Ediacaran, most of the main inherited faults to active and eventually ceased at the end of the Ediacaran or Early Cambrian, while subsidence centers appeared and migrated eastward along the faults. They formed under the NNE‐SSW oriented and NNW‐SSE‐oriented extensional paleo‐stress fields (relative to the present) during the Neoproterozoic, and were accompanied by clockwise shearing. According to the analysis of the activities of syn‐sedimentary faults, filling sediments, magmatic events, and coordination with aeromagnetic anomalies, the tectonic properties of the fault depressions are different and are primarily continental rifts or intra‐continental fault‐controlled basins. The formation of the rifting depression was associated with the initial opening of the South Altun‐West Kunlun Ocean and the South Tianshan Ocean, which were located at the northern and southern margins of the Tarim Block, respectively, in response to the break‐up of the Supercontinent Rodinia and the initial opening of the Proto‐Tethys Ocean. Inthe RDG developedfluvial, shallow marine and carbonate platform facies, accompanied with multiple phases of magma activities and glaciations during the Cryogenian and Ediacaran. The structural architectures of interfaces between the Neoproterozoic and Cambrian are mainly angular and parallel unconformities in the RDG. Over the parallel unconformities in the RDGs are beneficial for the organic‐rich and /or phosphorites of the Yuertus Formation of the Lower Cambrian. The main fault belts of RDGs also controlled the small platform margin and slope break belt of in the Cambrian. The Neoproterozoic and the Lower Cambrian petroleum systems of the basin might be controlled by the RDGs in the initiation of the Tarimcraton.</abstract><cop>Richmond</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/1755-6724.14436</doi><tpages>1</tpages><edition>English ed.</edition></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1000-9515
ispartof Acta geologica Sinica (Beijing), 2020-10, Vol.94 (S1), p.16-16
issn 1000-9515
1755-6724
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2459466023
source Wiley Online Library Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Anomalies
Belts
Cambrian
Carbonates
Core drilling
Coring
Cratons
Drilling
Fault lines
Faults
Geological faults
Geological time
Graben
Interfaces
Lava
Magma
Oil and gas exploration
Oil exploration
Orogeny
Outcrops
Paleoceanography
Paleozoic
Petroleum
Petroleum system
Phanerozoic
Platforms (geology)
Precambrian
Profiles
Proto‐Tethy Ocean
Rifting
rifting depression group
Sedimentary facies
Sediments
Seismic reflection profiles
Seismic surveys
Shearing
Strata
Stress distribution
Tarim Basin
Tectonics
unconformity between the Neoproterozoic and Cambrian
title Formation of the Neoproterozoic Rifting Depression Groups of the Tarim Basin and its Hydrocarbon Potential: Responded to the Initial Opening of the Proto‐Tethy Ocean
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T13%3A40%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Formation%20of%20the%20Neoproterozoic%20Rifting%20Depression%20Groups%20of%20the%20Tarim%20Basin%20and%20its%20Hydrocarbon%20Potential:%20Responded%20to%20the%20Initial%20Opening%20of%20the%20Proto%E2%80%90Tethy%20Ocean&rft.jtitle=Acta%20geologica%20Sinica%20(Beijing)&rft.au=HE,%20Bizhu&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=16-16&rft.issn=1000-9515&rft.eissn=1755-6724&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1755-6724.14436&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2459466023%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2459466023&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true