Accuracy Rejection Normalized-Cost Curves (ARNCCs): A Novel 3-Dimensional Framework for Robust Classification

Machine learning (ML) offers several supervised learning algorithms to build classifiers for developing accurate decision support systems. However, the selection of robust classifier for reliable decision making in healthcare domain is three-fold: accuracy, refraining for low confidence decisions, a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE access 2019, Vol.7, p.160125-160143
Hauptverfasser: Abbas, Muhammad Rehan, Nadeem, Malik Sajjad Ahmed, Shaheen, Aliya, Alshdadi, Abdulrahman A., Alharbey, Riad, Shim, Seong-O, Aziz, Wajid
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 160143
container_issue
container_start_page 160125
container_title IEEE access
container_volume 7
creator Abbas, Muhammad Rehan
Nadeem, Malik Sajjad Ahmed
Shaheen, Aliya
Alshdadi, Abdulrahman A.
Alharbey, Riad
Shim, Seong-O
Aziz, Wajid
description Machine learning (ML) offers several supervised learning algorithms to build classifiers for developing accurate decision support systems. However, the selection of robust classifier for reliable decision making in healthcare domain is three-fold: accuracy, refraining for low confidence decisions, and the cost of decisions. In the field of medical science, there are costs associated with the incorrect and the refraining from decisions, which can have negative implications in devising adequate therapeutic interventions. For example, it may be life threating if a cancer patient is declared as healthy one (misclassification cost) or decision remains pending for some time (rejection cost). In this work we proposed the concept of Accuracy Rejection Normalized-Cost Curves (ARNCCs), which is an extension of Accuracy Rejection Curves (ARCs); a three-dimensional visualization technique to demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of classification algorithms over different rejection regions and normalized-cost (NC) to select the robust classifier. ARNCCs method holds ARCs plot on two dimensions, in addition it computes NC at third dimension against ratio of false positive costs and ratio of rejection costs obtained at different rejection rates. The proposed three-dimensional graphs have the potential to answer a variety of questions regarding accuracy, rejection rate and NC of a classifier. Six publicly available cancer datasets (four breast cancer and two lung cancer) having clinical parameters obtained from ML repository of University of California, Irvine (UCI) were used to assess the performance of proposed ARNCCs in this study. Empirical results show that ARNCCs provide broad range of decisions to choose the desired parameters (accuracy, rejection rate and NC) for further necessary actions as compared to traditional ARCs method. ARNCCs framework has the ability to more logically compare the performances of classification algorithms in terms of accuracy, rejection rate and NC based scenarios.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2950244
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ieee_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2455641331</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>8886402</ieee_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_869929a560cf4adebf88e6a610f3188b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2455641331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-521f763f4215974eea9a71bcf87cb85493fd8b3aea89aa21d3bf4206e7ccc74c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU9r3DAQxUVpIWGTT5CLoJf24I3-WZZ6M27SBEIKm-YsxvKoeGtHqWSnpJ--3jiEzmWG4f3eMDxCzjjbcs7sed00F3d3W8G43QpbMqHUO3IsuLaFLKV-_998RE5z3rOlzLIqq2My1t7PCfwz3eEe_dTHB3ob0whD_xe7ool5os2cnjDTT_Xutmny5y-0XiRPOFBZfO1HfMgLBAO9TDDin5h-0RAT3cV2PrAD5NyH3sPB-oR8CDBkPH3tG3J_efGjuSpuvn-7buqbwitmpqIUPFRaBiV4aSuFCBYq3vpgKt-aUlkZOtNKQDAWQPBOtouWaay895XyckOuV98uwt49pn6E9Owi9O5lEdNPB2nq_YDOaGuFhVIzHxR02AZjUIPmLEhulisb8nH1ekzx94x5cvs4p-Xh7IQqS624lHxRyVXlU8w5YXi7ypk7xOTWmNwhJvca00KdrVSPiG-EMUYrJuQ_FlON4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2455641331</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy Rejection Normalized-Cost Curves (ARNCCs): A Novel 3-Dimensional Framework for Robust Classification</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>IEEE Xplore Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Abbas, Muhammad Rehan ; Nadeem, Malik Sajjad Ahmed ; Shaheen, Aliya ; Alshdadi, Abdulrahman A. ; Alharbey, Riad ; Shim, Seong-O ; Aziz, Wajid</creator><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Muhammad Rehan ; Nadeem, Malik Sajjad Ahmed ; Shaheen, Aliya ; Alshdadi, Abdulrahman A. ; Alharbey, Riad ; Shim, Seong-O ; Aziz, Wajid</creatorcontrib><description>Machine learning (ML) offers several supervised learning algorithms to build classifiers for developing accurate decision support systems. However, the selection of robust classifier for reliable decision making in healthcare domain is three-fold: accuracy, refraining for low confidence decisions, and the cost of decisions. In the field of medical science, there are costs associated with the incorrect and the refraining from decisions, which can have negative implications in devising adequate therapeutic interventions. For example, it may be life threating if a cancer patient is declared as healthy one (misclassification cost) or decision remains pending for some time (rejection cost). In this work we proposed the concept of Accuracy Rejection Normalized-Cost Curves (ARNCCs), which is an extension of Accuracy Rejection Curves (ARCs); a three-dimensional visualization technique to demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of classification algorithms over different rejection regions and normalized-cost (NC) to select the robust classifier. ARNCCs method holds ARCs plot on two dimensions, in addition it computes NC at third dimension against ratio of false positive costs and ratio of rejection costs obtained at different rejection rates. The proposed three-dimensional graphs have the potential to answer a variety of questions regarding accuracy, rejection rate and NC of a classifier. Six publicly available cancer datasets (four breast cancer and two lung cancer) having clinical parameters obtained from ML repository of University of California, Irvine (UCI) were used to assess the performance of proposed ARNCCs in this study. Empirical results show that ARNCCs provide broad range of decisions to choose the desired parameters (accuracy, rejection rate and NC) for further necessary actions as compared to traditional ARCs method. ARNCCs framework has the ability to more logically compare the performances of classification algorithms in terms of accuracy, rejection rate and NC based scenarios.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2950244</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IAECCG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway: IEEE</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Cancer ; Cancer diagnosis ; Classification ; Classification algorithms ; classifier comparison ; Classifiers ; Costs ; Decision making ; Decision support systems ; Machine learning ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical science ; normalized cost (NC) ; Parameters ; reject option ; Rejection rate ; Reliability ; Robustness</subject><ispartof>IEEE access, 2019, Vol.7, p.160125-160143</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-521f763f4215974eea9a71bcf87cb85493fd8b3aea89aa21d3bf4206e7ccc74c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-521f763f4215974eea9a71bcf87cb85493fd8b3aea89aa21d3bf4206e7ccc74c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9815-0319 ; 0000-0002-4181-329X ; 0000-0002-1842-4624</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8886402$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2102,4024,27633,27923,27924,27925,54933</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Muhammad Rehan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadeem, Malik Sajjad Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaheen, Aliya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alshdadi, Abdulrahman A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alharbey, Riad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shim, Seong-O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aziz, Wajid</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy Rejection Normalized-Cost Curves (ARNCCs): A Novel 3-Dimensional Framework for Robust Classification</title><title>IEEE access</title><addtitle>Access</addtitle><description>Machine learning (ML) offers several supervised learning algorithms to build classifiers for developing accurate decision support systems. However, the selection of robust classifier for reliable decision making in healthcare domain is three-fold: accuracy, refraining for low confidence decisions, and the cost of decisions. In the field of medical science, there are costs associated with the incorrect and the refraining from decisions, which can have negative implications in devising adequate therapeutic interventions. For example, it may be life threating if a cancer patient is declared as healthy one (misclassification cost) or decision remains pending for some time (rejection cost). In this work we proposed the concept of Accuracy Rejection Normalized-Cost Curves (ARNCCs), which is an extension of Accuracy Rejection Curves (ARCs); a three-dimensional visualization technique to demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of classification algorithms over different rejection regions and normalized-cost (NC) to select the robust classifier. ARNCCs method holds ARCs plot on two dimensions, in addition it computes NC at third dimension against ratio of false positive costs and ratio of rejection costs obtained at different rejection rates. The proposed three-dimensional graphs have the potential to answer a variety of questions regarding accuracy, rejection rate and NC of a classifier. Six publicly available cancer datasets (four breast cancer and two lung cancer) having clinical parameters obtained from ML repository of University of California, Irvine (UCI) were used to assess the performance of proposed ARNCCs in this study. Empirical results show that ARNCCs provide broad range of decisions to choose the desired parameters (accuracy, rejection rate and NC) for further necessary actions as compared to traditional ARCs method. ARNCCs framework has the ability to more logically compare the performances of classification algorithms in terms of accuracy, rejection rate and NC based scenarios.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer diagnosis</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Classification algorithms</subject><subject>classifier comparison</subject><subject>Classifiers</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision support systems</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical science</subject><subject>normalized cost (NC)</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>reject option</subject><subject>Rejection rate</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Robustness</subject><issn>2169-3536</issn><issn>2169-3536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ESBDL</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU9r3DAQxUVpIWGTT5CLoJf24I3-WZZ6M27SBEIKm-YsxvKoeGtHqWSnpJ--3jiEzmWG4f3eMDxCzjjbcs7sed00F3d3W8G43QpbMqHUO3IsuLaFLKV-_998RE5z3rOlzLIqq2My1t7PCfwz3eEe_dTHB3ob0whD_xe7ool5os2cnjDTT_Xutmny5y-0XiRPOFBZfO1HfMgLBAO9TDDin5h-0RAT3cV2PrAD5NyH3sPB-oR8CDBkPH3tG3J_efGjuSpuvn-7buqbwitmpqIUPFRaBiV4aSuFCBYq3vpgKt-aUlkZOtNKQDAWQPBOtouWaay895XyckOuV98uwt49pn6E9Owi9O5lEdNPB2nq_YDOaGuFhVIzHxR02AZjUIPmLEhulisb8nH1ekzx94x5cvs4p-Xh7IQqS624lHxRyVXlU8w5YXi7ypk7xOTWmNwhJvca00KdrVSPiG-EMUYrJuQ_FlON4g</recordid><startdate>2019</startdate><enddate>2019</enddate><creator>Abbas, Muhammad Rehan</creator><creator>Nadeem, Malik Sajjad Ahmed</creator><creator>Shaheen, Aliya</creator><creator>Alshdadi, Abdulrahman A.</creator><creator>Alharbey, Riad</creator><creator>Shim, Seong-O</creator><creator>Aziz, Wajid</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>ESBDL</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9815-0319</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4181-329X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1842-4624</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2019</creationdate><title>Accuracy Rejection Normalized-Cost Curves (ARNCCs): A Novel 3-Dimensional Framework for Robust Classification</title><author>Abbas, Muhammad Rehan ; Nadeem, Malik Sajjad Ahmed ; Shaheen, Aliya ; Alshdadi, Abdulrahman A. ; Alharbey, Riad ; Shim, Seong-O ; Aziz, Wajid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-521f763f4215974eea9a71bcf87cb85493fd8b3aea89aa21d3bf4206e7ccc74c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer diagnosis</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Classification algorithms</topic><topic>classifier comparison</topic><topic>Classifiers</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision support systems</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical science</topic><topic>normalized cost (NC)</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>reject option</topic><topic>Rejection rate</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Robustness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Muhammad Rehan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadeem, Malik Sajjad Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaheen, Aliya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alshdadi, Abdulrahman A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alharbey, Riad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shim, Seong-O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aziz, Wajid</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005–Present</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore Open Access Journals</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library Online</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abbas, Muhammad Rehan</au><au>Nadeem, Malik Sajjad Ahmed</au><au>Shaheen, Aliya</au><au>Alshdadi, Abdulrahman A.</au><au>Alharbey, Riad</au><au>Shim, Seong-O</au><au>Aziz, Wajid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy Rejection Normalized-Cost Curves (ARNCCs): A Novel 3-Dimensional Framework for Robust Classification</atitle><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle><stitle>Access</stitle><date>2019</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>7</volume><spage>160125</spage><epage>160143</epage><pages>160125-160143</pages><issn>2169-3536</issn><eissn>2169-3536</eissn><coden>IAECCG</coden><abstract>Machine learning (ML) offers several supervised learning algorithms to build classifiers for developing accurate decision support systems. However, the selection of robust classifier for reliable decision making in healthcare domain is three-fold: accuracy, refraining for low confidence decisions, and the cost of decisions. In the field of medical science, there are costs associated with the incorrect and the refraining from decisions, which can have negative implications in devising adequate therapeutic interventions. For example, it may be life threating if a cancer patient is declared as healthy one (misclassification cost) or decision remains pending for some time (rejection cost). In this work we proposed the concept of Accuracy Rejection Normalized-Cost Curves (ARNCCs), which is an extension of Accuracy Rejection Curves (ARCs); a three-dimensional visualization technique to demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of classification algorithms over different rejection regions and normalized-cost (NC) to select the robust classifier. ARNCCs method holds ARCs plot on two dimensions, in addition it computes NC at third dimension against ratio of false positive costs and ratio of rejection costs obtained at different rejection rates. The proposed three-dimensional graphs have the potential to answer a variety of questions regarding accuracy, rejection rate and NC of a classifier. Six publicly available cancer datasets (four breast cancer and two lung cancer) having clinical parameters obtained from ML repository of University of California, Irvine (UCI) were used to assess the performance of proposed ARNCCs in this study. Empirical results show that ARNCCs provide broad range of decisions to choose the desired parameters (accuracy, rejection rate and NC) for further necessary actions as compared to traditional ARCs method. ARNCCs framework has the ability to more logically compare the performances of classification algorithms in terms of accuracy, rejection rate and NC based scenarios.</abstract><cop>Piscataway</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2950244</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9815-0319</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4181-329X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1842-4624</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-3536
ispartof IEEE access, 2019, Vol.7, p.160125-160143
issn 2169-3536
2169-3536
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2455641331
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; IEEE Xplore Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Accuracy
Algorithms
Cancer
Cancer diagnosis
Classification
Classification algorithms
classifier comparison
Classifiers
Costs
Decision making
Decision support systems
Machine learning
Medical diagnosis
Medical science
normalized cost (NC)
Parameters
reject option
Rejection rate
Reliability
Robustness
title Accuracy Rejection Normalized-Cost Curves (ARNCCs): A Novel 3-Dimensional Framework for Robust Classification
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T15%3A35%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ieee_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20Rejection%20Normalized-Cost%20Curves%20(ARNCCs):%20A%20Novel%203-Dimensional%20Framework%20for%20Robust%20Classification&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20access&rft.au=Abbas,%20Muhammad%20Rehan&rft.date=2019&rft.volume=7&rft.spage=160125&rft.epage=160143&rft.pages=160125-160143&rft.issn=2169-3536&rft.eissn=2169-3536&rft.coden=IAECCG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2950244&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ieee_%3E2455641331%3C/proquest_ieee_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2455641331&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=8886402&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_869929a560cf4adebf88e6a610f3188b&rfr_iscdi=true