Hubs, Rebalancing and Service Providers in the Lightning Network
Payment channel networks are the most developed proposal to address the well-known issue of blockchain scalability. Currently, the Lightning Network (LN) is the mainstream and most used payment channel network. In a previous work we introduced CLoTH, a payment channel network simulator we developed...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE access 2019-01, Vol.7, p.1-1 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | IEEE access |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Conoscenti, Marco Vetro, Antonio De Martin, Juan Carlos |
description | Payment channel networks are the most developed proposal to address the well-known issue of blockchain scalability. Currently, the Lightning Network (LN) is the mainstream and most used payment channel network. In a previous work we introduced CLoTH, a payment channel network simulator we developed to analyze capabilities and limitations of such networks. In this work, using CLoTH, we present results of three groups of simulations on a recent snapshot of the LN, aimed to shed a light on the following aspects. Firstly, we investigated how hubs influence the LN performance. Then, we analyzed the effectiveness of two different channel rebalancing approaches, an active and a passive one. Eventually, we studied performance of the LN when a few service-providers nodes receive payments from the other network nodes, which is a typical use case of payment channel networks. We found that the LN is resilient to the removal of hubs, that our passive rebalancing approach reduces of about one fourth the payments failures due to channel unbalancing, and that in the service-providers scenario a consistent part of payments fails because channels directing to the service providers become unbalanced. Our work contributes to prove the strengthen of the Lightning Network when removing hubs and its weakness in the service-provider scenario. In addition, the passive rebalancing approach proposed in this work is a good candidate for the implementation in the Lightning Network protocol to mitigate channel unbalancing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2941448 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ieee_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2455624245</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>8839024</ieee_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9ac6441e16ac4f42a1848f84320364b8</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2455624245</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-124bc695dd18d4a084c82257c76ca57399b4fb49e75a99164b1fa91a9bcc38eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUF1PwjAUbYwmEuUX8LLEV4f9uNvaNwlBISFqRJ-btuugiCt2A-O_tzhCvC_35uR83ByEBgQPCcHibjQeTxaLIcVEDKkAAsDPUI-SXKQsY_n5v_sS9ZtmjePwCGVFD91Pd7q5TV6tVhtVG1cvE1WXycKGvTM2eQl-70obmsTVSbuyydwtV219oD3Z9tuHj2t0UalNY_vHfYXeHyZv42k6f36cjUfz1ADmbUooaBMjy5LwEhTmYDilWWGK3KisYEJoqDQIW2RKCJKDJpUSRAltDONWsys063xLr9ZyG9ynCj_SKyf_AB-WUoXWmY2VQpkcgFiSKwMVUEU48IoDo5hFYx69bjqvbfBfO9u0cu13oY7vSwpZllOIK7JYxzLBN02w1SmVYHloXnbNy0Pz8th8VA06lbPWnhScM4EpsF_i73z2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2455624245</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hubs, Rebalancing and Service Providers in the Lightning Network</title><source>IEEE Open Access Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Conoscenti, Marco ; Vetro, Antonio ; De Martin, Juan Carlos</creator><creatorcontrib>Conoscenti, Marco ; Vetro, Antonio ; De Martin, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><description>Payment channel networks are the most developed proposal to address the well-known issue of blockchain scalability. Currently, the Lightning Network (LN) is the mainstream and most used payment channel network. In a previous work we introduced CLoTH, a payment channel network simulator we developed to analyze capabilities and limitations of such networks. In this work, using CLoTH, we present results of three groups of simulations on a recent snapshot of the LN, aimed to shed a light on the following aspects. Firstly, we investigated how hubs influence the LN performance. Then, we analyzed the effectiveness of two different channel rebalancing approaches, an active and a passive one. Eventually, we studied performance of the LN when a few service-providers nodes receive payments from the other network nodes, which is a typical use case of payment channel networks. We found that the LN is resilient to the removal of hubs, that our passive rebalancing approach reduces of about one fourth the payments failures due to channel unbalancing, and that in the service-providers scenario a consistent part of payments fails because channels directing to the service providers become unbalanced. Our work contributes to prove the strengthen of the Lightning Network when removing hubs and its weakness in the service-provider scenario. In addition, the passive rebalancing approach proposed in this work is a good candidate for the implementation in the Lightning Network protocol to mitigate channel unbalancing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2941448</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IAECCG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway: IEEE</publisher><subject>Bitcoin ; Blockchain ; blockchain scalability ; Cloth ; Contracts ; Cryptography ; Hubs ; Lightning ; lightning network ; Networks ; Nodes ; payment channel ; payment channel network ; Peer-to-peer computing ; Scalability ; simulator ; Throughput</subject><ispartof>IEEE access, 2019-01, Vol.7, p.1-1</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-124bc695dd18d4a084c82257c76ca57399b4fb49e75a99164b1fa91a9bcc38eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-124bc695dd18d4a084c82257c76ca57399b4fb49e75a99164b1fa91a9bcc38eb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2027-3308 ; 0000-0003-2483-7692 ; 0000-0002-7867-1926</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8839024$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2102,27633,27924,27925,54933</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Conoscenti, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vetro, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Martin, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><title>Hubs, Rebalancing and Service Providers in the Lightning Network</title><title>IEEE access</title><addtitle>Access</addtitle><description>Payment channel networks are the most developed proposal to address the well-known issue of blockchain scalability. Currently, the Lightning Network (LN) is the mainstream and most used payment channel network. In a previous work we introduced CLoTH, a payment channel network simulator we developed to analyze capabilities and limitations of such networks. In this work, using CLoTH, we present results of three groups of simulations on a recent snapshot of the LN, aimed to shed a light on the following aspects. Firstly, we investigated how hubs influence the LN performance. Then, we analyzed the effectiveness of two different channel rebalancing approaches, an active and a passive one. Eventually, we studied performance of the LN when a few service-providers nodes receive payments from the other network nodes, which is a typical use case of payment channel networks. We found that the LN is resilient to the removal of hubs, that our passive rebalancing approach reduces of about one fourth the payments failures due to channel unbalancing, and that in the service-providers scenario a consistent part of payments fails because channels directing to the service providers become unbalanced. Our work contributes to prove the strengthen of the Lightning Network when removing hubs and its weakness in the service-provider scenario. In addition, the passive rebalancing approach proposed in this work is a good candidate for the implementation in the Lightning Network protocol to mitigate channel unbalancing.</description><subject>Bitcoin</subject><subject>Blockchain</subject><subject>blockchain scalability</subject><subject>Cloth</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Cryptography</subject><subject>Hubs</subject><subject>Lightning</subject><subject>lightning network</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Nodes</subject><subject>payment channel</subject><subject>payment channel network</subject><subject>Peer-to-peer computing</subject><subject>Scalability</subject><subject>simulator</subject><subject>Throughput</subject><issn>2169-3536</issn><issn>2169-3536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ESBDL</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUF1PwjAUbYwmEuUX8LLEV4f9uNvaNwlBISFqRJ-btuugiCt2A-O_tzhCvC_35uR83ByEBgQPCcHibjQeTxaLIcVEDKkAAsDPUI-SXKQsY_n5v_sS9ZtmjePwCGVFD91Pd7q5TV6tVhtVG1cvE1WXycKGvTM2eQl-70obmsTVSbuyydwtV219oD3Z9tuHj2t0UalNY_vHfYXeHyZv42k6f36cjUfz1ADmbUooaBMjy5LwEhTmYDilWWGK3KisYEJoqDQIW2RKCJKDJpUSRAltDONWsys063xLr9ZyG9ynCj_SKyf_AB-WUoXWmY2VQpkcgFiSKwMVUEU48IoDo5hFYx69bjqvbfBfO9u0cu13oY7vSwpZllOIK7JYxzLBN02w1SmVYHloXnbNy0Pz8th8VA06lbPWnhScM4EpsF_i73z2</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Conoscenti, Marco</creator><creator>Vetro, Antonio</creator><creator>De Martin, Juan Carlos</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>ESBDL</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2027-3308</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2483-7692</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7867-1926</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Hubs, Rebalancing and Service Providers in the Lightning Network</title><author>Conoscenti, Marco ; Vetro, Antonio ; De Martin, Juan Carlos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-124bc695dd18d4a084c82257c76ca57399b4fb49e75a99164b1fa91a9bcc38eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bitcoin</topic><topic>Blockchain</topic><topic>blockchain scalability</topic><topic>Cloth</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Cryptography</topic><topic>Hubs</topic><topic>Lightning</topic><topic>lightning network</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Nodes</topic><topic>payment channel</topic><topic>payment channel network</topic><topic>Peer-to-peer computing</topic><topic>Scalability</topic><topic>simulator</topic><topic>Throughput</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Conoscenti, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vetro, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Martin, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE Open Access Journals</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Conoscenti, Marco</au><au>Vetro, Antonio</au><au>De Martin, Juan Carlos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hubs, Rebalancing and Service Providers in the Lightning Network</atitle><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle><stitle>Access</stitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>7</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>1</epage><pages>1-1</pages><issn>2169-3536</issn><eissn>2169-3536</eissn><coden>IAECCG</coden><abstract>Payment channel networks are the most developed proposal to address the well-known issue of blockchain scalability. Currently, the Lightning Network (LN) is the mainstream and most used payment channel network. In a previous work we introduced CLoTH, a payment channel network simulator we developed to analyze capabilities and limitations of such networks. In this work, using CLoTH, we present results of three groups of simulations on a recent snapshot of the LN, aimed to shed a light on the following aspects. Firstly, we investigated how hubs influence the LN performance. Then, we analyzed the effectiveness of two different channel rebalancing approaches, an active and a passive one. Eventually, we studied performance of the LN when a few service-providers nodes receive payments from the other network nodes, which is a typical use case of payment channel networks. We found that the LN is resilient to the removal of hubs, that our passive rebalancing approach reduces of about one fourth the payments failures due to channel unbalancing, and that in the service-providers scenario a consistent part of payments fails because channels directing to the service providers become unbalanced. Our work contributes to prove the strengthen of the Lightning Network when removing hubs and its weakness in the service-provider scenario. In addition, the passive rebalancing approach proposed in this work is a good candidate for the implementation in the Lightning Network protocol to mitigate channel unbalancing.</abstract><cop>Piscataway</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2941448</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2027-3308</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2483-7692</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7867-1926</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-3536 |
ispartof | IEEE access, 2019-01, Vol.7, p.1-1 |
issn | 2169-3536 2169-3536 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2455624245 |
source | IEEE Open Access Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Bitcoin Blockchain blockchain scalability Cloth Contracts Cryptography Hubs Lightning lightning network Networks Nodes payment channel payment channel network Peer-to-peer computing Scalability simulator Throughput |
title | Hubs, Rebalancing and Service Providers in the Lightning Network |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T19%3A36%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ieee_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hubs,%20Rebalancing%20and%20Service%20Providers%20in%20the%20Lightning%20Network&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20access&rft.au=Conoscenti,%20Marco&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=7&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=1&rft.pages=1-1&rft.issn=2169-3536&rft.eissn=2169-3536&rft.coden=IAECCG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2941448&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ieee_%3E2455624245%3C/proquest_ieee_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2455624245&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=8839024&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_9ac6441e16ac4f42a1848f84320364b8&rfr_iscdi=true |