Hubs, Rebalancing and Service Providers in the Lightning Network

Payment channel networks are the most developed proposal to address the well-known issue of blockchain scalability. Currently, the Lightning Network (LN) is the mainstream and most used payment channel network. In a previous work we introduced CLoTH, a payment channel network simulator we developed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE access 2019-01, Vol.7, p.1-1
Hauptverfasser: Conoscenti, Marco, Vetro, Antonio, De Martin, Juan Carlos
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title IEEE access
container_volume 7
creator Conoscenti, Marco
Vetro, Antonio
De Martin, Juan Carlos
description Payment channel networks are the most developed proposal to address the well-known issue of blockchain scalability. Currently, the Lightning Network (LN) is the mainstream and most used payment channel network. In a previous work we introduced CLoTH, a payment channel network simulator we developed to analyze capabilities and limitations of such networks. In this work, using CLoTH, we present results of three groups of simulations on a recent snapshot of the LN, aimed to shed a light on the following aspects. Firstly, we investigated how hubs influence the LN performance. Then, we analyzed the effectiveness of two different channel rebalancing approaches, an active and a passive one. Eventually, we studied performance of the LN when a few service-providers nodes receive payments from the other network nodes, which is a typical use case of payment channel networks. We found that the LN is resilient to the removal of hubs, that our passive rebalancing approach reduces of about one fourth the payments failures due to channel unbalancing, and that in the service-providers scenario a consistent part of payments fails because channels directing to the service providers become unbalanced. Our work contributes to prove the strengthen of the Lightning Network when removing hubs and its weakness in the service-provider scenario. In addition, the passive rebalancing approach proposed in this work is a good candidate for the implementation in the Lightning Network protocol to mitigate channel unbalancing.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2941448
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ieee_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2455624245</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>8839024</ieee_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9ac6441e16ac4f42a1848f84320364b8</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2455624245</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-124bc695dd18d4a084c82257c76ca57399b4fb49e75a99164b1fa91a9bcc38eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUF1PwjAUbYwmEuUX8LLEV4f9uNvaNwlBISFqRJ-btuugiCt2A-O_tzhCvC_35uR83ByEBgQPCcHibjQeTxaLIcVEDKkAAsDPUI-SXKQsY_n5v_sS9ZtmjePwCGVFD91Pd7q5TV6tVhtVG1cvE1WXycKGvTM2eQl-70obmsTVSbuyydwtV219oD3Z9tuHj2t0UalNY_vHfYXeHyZv42k6f36cjUfz1ADmbUooaBMjy5LwEhTmYDilWWGK3KisYEJoqDQIW2RKCJKDJpUSRAltDONWsys063xLr9ZyG9ynCj_SKyf_AB-WUoXWmY2VQpkcgFiSKwMVUEU48IoDo5hFYx69bjqvbfBfO9u0cu13oY7vSwpZllOIK7JYxzLBN02w1SmVYHloXnbNy0Pz8th8VA06lbPWnhScM4EpsF_i73z2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2455624245</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hubs, Rebalancing and Service Providers in the Lightning Network</title><source>IEEE Open Access Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Conoscenti, Marco ; Vetro, Antonio ; De Martin, Juan Carlos</creator><creatorcontrib>Conoscenti, Marco ; Vetro, Antonio ; De Martin, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><description>Payment channel networks are the most developed proposal to address the well-known issue of blockchain scalability. Currently, the Lightning Network (LN) is the mainstream and most used payment channel network. In a previous work we introduced CLoTH, a payment channel network simulator we developed to analyze capabilities and limitations of such networks. In this work, using CLoTH, we present results of three groups of simulations on a recent snapshot of the LN, aimed to shed a light on the following aspects. Firstly, we investigated how hubs influence the LN performance. Then, we analyzed the effectiveness of two different channel rebalancing approaches, an active and a passive one. Eventually, we studied performance of the LN when a few service-providers nodes receive payments from the other network nodes, which is a typical use case of payment channel networks. We found that the LN is resilient to the removal of hubs, that our passive rebalancing approach reduces of about one fourth the payments failures due to channel unbalancing, and that in the service-providers scenario a consistent part of payments fails because channels directing to the service providers become unbalanced. Our work contributes to prove the strengthen of the Lightning Network when removing hubs and its weakness in the service-provider scenario. In addition, the passive rebalancing approach proposed in this work is a good candidate for the implementation in the Lightning Network protocol to mitigate channel unbalancing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2941448</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IAECCG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway: IEEE</publisher><subject>Bitcoin ; Blockchain ; blockchain scalability ; Cloth ; Contracts ; Cryptography ; Hubs ; Lightning ; lightning network ; Networks ; Nodes ; payment channel ; payment channel network ; Peer-to-peer computing ; Scalability ; simulator ; Throughput</subject><ispartof>IEEE access, 2019-01, Vol.7, p.1-1</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-124bc695dd18d4a084c82257c76ca57399b4fb49e75a99164b1fa91a9bcc38eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-124bc695dd18d4a084c82257c76ca57399b4fb49e75a99164b1fa91a9bcc38eb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2027-3308 ; 0000-0003-2483-7692 ; 0000-0002-7867-1926</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8839024$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2102,27633,27924,27925,54933</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Conoscenti, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vetro, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Martin, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><title>Hubs, Rebalancing and Service Providers in the Lightning Network</title><title>IEEE access</title><addtitle>Access</addtitle><description>Payment channel networks are the most developed proposal to address the well-known issue of blockchain scalability. Currently, the Lightning Network (LN) is the mainstream and most used payment channel network. In a previous work we introduced CLoTH, a payment channel network simulator we developed to analyze capabilities and limitations of such networks. In this work, using CLoTH, we present results of three groups of simulations on a recent snapshot of the LN, aimed to shed a light on the following aspects. Firstly, we investigated how hubs influence the LN performance. Then, we analyzed the effectiveness of two different channel rebalancing approaches, an active and a passive one. Eventually, we studied performance of the LN when a few service-providers nodes receive payments from the other network nodes, which is a typical use case of payment channel networks. We found that the LN is resilient to the removal of hubs, that our passive rebalancing approach reduces of about one fourth the payments failures due to channel unbalancing, and that in the service-providers scenario a consistent part of payments fails because channels directing to the service providers become unbalanced. Our work contributes to prove the strengthen of the Lightning Network when removing hubs and its weakness in the service-provider scenario. In addition, the passive rebalancing approach proposed in this work is a good candidate for the implementation in the Lightning Network protocol to mitigate channel unbalancing.</description><subject>Bitcoin</subject><subject>Blockchain</subject><subject>blockchain scalability</subject><subject>Cloth</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Cryptography</subject><subject>Hubs</subject><subject>Lightning</subject><subject>lightning network</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Nodes</subject><subject>payment channel</subject><subject>payment channel network</subject><subject>Peer-to-peer computing</subject><subject>Scalability</subject><subject>simulator</subject><subject>Throughput</subject><issn>2169-3536</issn><issn>2169-3536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ESBDL</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUF1PwjAUbYwmEuUX8LLEV4f9uNvaNwlBISFqRJ-btuugiCt2A-O_tzhCvC_35uR83ByEBgQPCcHibjQeTxaLIcVEDKkAAsDPUI-SXKQsY_n5v_sS9ZtmjePwCGVFD91Pd7q5TV6tVhtVG1cvE1WXycKGvTM2eQl-70obmsTVSbuyydwtV219oD3Z9tuHj2t0UalNY_vHfYXeHyZv42k6f36cjUfz1ADmbUooaBMjy5LwEhTmYDilWWGK3KisYEJoqDQIW2RKCJKDJpUSRAltDONWsys063xLr9ZyG9ynCj_SKyf_AB-WUoXWmY2VQpkcgFiSKwMVUEU48IoDo5hFYx69bjqvbfBfO9u0cu13oY7vSwpZllOIK7JYxzLBN02w1SmVYHloXnbNy0Pz8th8VA06lbPWnhScM4EpsF_i73z2</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Conoscenti, Marco</creator><creator>Vetro, Antonio</creator><creator>De Martin, Juan Carlos</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>ESBDL</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2027-3308</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2483-7692</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7867-1926</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Hubs, Rebalancing and Service Providers in the Lightning Network</title><author>Conoscenti, Marco ; Vetro, Antonio ; De Martin, Juan Carlos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-124bc695dd18d4a084c82257c76ca57399b4fb49e75a99164b1fa91a9bcc38eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bitcoin</topic><topic>Blockchain</topic><topic>blockchain scalability</topic><topic>Cloth</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Cryptography</topic><topic>Hubs</topic><topic>Lightning</topic><topic>lightning network</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Nodes</topic><topic>payment channel</topic><topic>payment channel network</topic><topic>Peer-to-peer computing</topic><topic>Scalability</topic><topic>simulator</topic><topic>Throughput</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Conoscenti, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vetro, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Martin, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE Open Access Journals</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Conoscenti, Marco</au><au>Vetro, Antonio</au><au>De Martin, Juan Carlos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hubs, Rebalancing and Service Providers in the Lightning Network</atitle><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle><stitle>Access</stitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>7</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>1</epage><pages>1-1</pages><issn>2169-3536</issn><eissn>2169-3536</eissn><coden>IAECCG</coden><abstract>Payment channel networks are the most developed proposal to address the well-known issue of blockchain scalability. Currently, the Lightning Network (LN) is the mainstream and most used payment channel network. In a previous work we introduced CLoTH, a payment channel network simulator we developed to analyze capabilities and limitations of such networks. In this work, using CLoTH, we present results of three groups of simulations on a recent snapshot of the LN, aimed to shed a light on the following aspects. Firstly, we investigated how hubs influence the LN performance. Then, we analyzed the effectiveness of two different channel rebalancing approaches, an active and a passive one. Eventually, we studied performance of the LN when a few service-providers nodes receive payments from the other network nodes, which is a typical use case of payment channel networks. We found that the LN is resilient to the removal of hubs, that our passive rebalancing approach reduces of about one fourth the payments failures due to channel unbalancing, and that in the service-providers scenario a consistent part of payments fails because channels directing to the service providers become unbalanced. Our work contributes to prove the strengthen of the Lightning Network when removing hubs and its weakness in the service-provider scenario. In addition, the passive rebalancing approach proposed in this work is a good candidate for the implementation in the Lightning Network protocol to mitigate channel unbalancing.</abstract><cop>Piscataway</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2941448</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2027-3308</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2483-7692</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7867-1926</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-3536
ispartof IEEE access, 2019-01, Vol.7, p.1-1
issn 2169-3536
2169-3536
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2455624245
source IEEE Open Access Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Bitcoin
Blockchain
blockchain scalability
Cloth
Contracts
Cryptography
Hubs
Lightning
lightning network
Networks
Nodes
payment channel
payment channel network
Peer-to-peer computing
Scalability
simulator
Throughput
title Hubs, Rebalancing and Service Providers in the Lightning Network
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T19%3A36%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ieee_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hubs,%20Rebalancing%20and%20Service%20Providers%20in%20the%20Lightning%20Network&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20access&rft.au=Conoscenti,%20Marco&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=7&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=1&rft.pages=1-1&rft.issn=2169-3536&rft.eissn=2169-3536&rft.coden=IAECCG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2941448&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ieee_%3E2455624245%3C/proquest_ieee_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2455624245&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=8839024&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_9ac6441e16ac4f42a1848f84320364b8&rfr_iscdi=true