Evaluation of Agreement Between Static Posturography Methods Employing Tensometers and Inertial Sensors
This study investigates the agreement between two methods used for the assessment of human balance system. Static posturography based on tensometers, using a commercially available platform, is used as the reference method. An alternative approach is a portable prototype MediPost system that utilise...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE access 2019, Vol.7, p.164120-164126 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 164126 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 164120 |
| container_title | IEEE access |
| container_volume | 7 |
| creator | Kotas, R. Janc, M. Kaminski, M. Marciniak, P. Zamyslowska-Szmytke, E. Tylman, W. |
| description | This study investigates the agreement between two methods used for the assessment of human balance system. Static posturography based on tensometers, using a commercially available platform, is used as the reference method. An alternative approach is a portable prototype MediPost system that utilises inertial sensors developed by the authors. Both approaches determine the movement of the subject's centre of mass, quantifying this movement in terms of angular speed. Data for the evaluation of agreement were obtained from 205 subjects, with each subject simultaneously tested with both methods. During the tests, the subject performed a set of standard procedures involving quiet standing in an upright position. In order to verify the agreement between the evaluated methods, the Bland-Altman, concordance correlation and intraclass correlation coefficients were used. In addition, the trajectories of the centre of gravity were compared. The obtained results show good agreement between the verified methods, even though they are based on different physical phenomena. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2952496 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2455594067</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>8894354</ieee_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b1c18855624a4b5795f87c4362a4b295</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2455594067</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-e1990c8b562109d680a9810f1edb637d41d051852f297b1b1aced46ea3fa31433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUVtLwzAULqKgzP0CXwI-b-be5HGOqQNFYfM5pO1p7eiamWTK_r2ZlWFeTs7l-87ly7IbgqeEYH03m88Xq9WUYqKnVAvKtTzLriiResIEk-f__pfZOIQNTk-lkMivsmbxZbu9ja3rkavRrPEAW-gjuof4DdCjVUzJEr25EPfeNd7uPg7oBeKHqwJabHedO7R9g9bQB7eFCD4g21do2YOPre3Q6pjw4Tq7qG0XYPxnR9n7w2I9f5o8vz4u57PnScmxihMgWuNSFULStFolFbZaEVwTqArJ8oqTCguiBK2pzgtSEFtCxSVYVltGOGOjbDnwVs5uzM63W-sPxtnW_Aacb4xNg5UdmIKURCmRWnHLC5FrUau85EzS5KZDJq7bgWvn3eceQjQbt_d9Gt9QLoTQHMs8VbGhqvQuBA_1qSvB5iiQGQQyR4HMn0AJdTOgWgA4IZTSnAnOfgAOo4wq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2455594067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Agreement Between Static Posturography Methods Employing Tensometers and Inertial Sensors</title><source>IEEE Open Access Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Kotas, R. ; Janc, M. ; Kaminski, M. ; Marciniak, P. ; Zamyslowska-Szmytke, E. ; Tylman, W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kotas, R. ; Janc, M. ; Kaminski, M. ; Marciniak, P. ; Zamyslowska-Szmytke, E. ; Tylman, W.</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigates the agreement between two methods used for the assessment of human balance system. Static posturography based on tensometers, using a commercially available platform, is used as the reference method. An alternative approach is a portable prototype MediPost system that utilises inertial sensors developed by the authors. Both approaches determine the movement of the subject's centre of mass, quantifying this movement in terms of angular speed. Data for the evaluation of agreement were obtained from 205 subjects, with each subject simultaneously tested with both methods. During the tests, the subject performed a set of standard procedures involving quiet standing in an upright position. In order to verify the agreement between the evaluated methods, the Bland-Altman, concordance correlation and intraclass correlation coefficients were used. In addition, the trajectories of the centre of gravity were compared. The obtained results show good agreement between the verified methods, even though they are based on different physical phenomena.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2952496</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IAECCG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway: IEEE</publisher><subject>Acceleration ; Accelerometers ; Agreements ; Angular speed ; Balance disorders ; Center of gravity ; Correlation coefficients ; Evaluation ; Force ; Inertial sensing devices ; inertial sensors ; Protocols ; Sensors ; Sociology ; static posturography ; Tensometers</subject><ispartof>IEEE access, 2019, Vol.7, p.164120-164126</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-e1990c8b562109d680a9810f1edb637d41d051852f297b1b1aced46ea3fa31433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-e1990c8b562109d680a9810f1edb637d41d051852f297b1b1aced46ea3fa31433</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0776-9173</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8894354$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2102,4024,27633,27923,27924,27925,54933</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kotas, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janc, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaminski, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marciniak, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamyslowska-Szmytke, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tylman, W.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Agreement Between Static Posturography Methods Employing Tensometers and Inertial Sensors</title><title>IEEE access</title><addtitle>Access</addtitle><description>This study investigates the agreement between two methods used for the assessment of human balance system. Static posturography based on tensometers, using a commercially available platform, is used as the reference method. An alternative approach is a portable prototype MediPost system that utilises inertial sensors developed by the authors. Both approaches determine the movement of the subject's centre of mass, quantifying this movement in terms of angular speed. Data for the evaluation of agreement were obtained from 205 subjects, with each subject simultaneously tested with both methods. During the tests, the subject performed a set of standard procedures involving quiet standing in an upright position. In order to verify the agreement between the evaluated methods, the Bland-Altman, concordance correlation and intraclass correlation coefficients were used. In addition, the trajectories of the centre of gravity were compared. The obtained results show good agreement between the verified methods, even though they are based on different physical phenomena.</description><subject>Acceleration</subject><subject>Accelerometers</subject><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Angular speed</subject><subject>Balance disorders</subject><subject>Center of gravity</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Force</subject><subject>Inertial sensing devices</subject><subject>inertial sensors</subject><subject>Protocols</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>static posturography</subject><subject>Tensometers</subject><issn>2169-3536</issn><issn>2169-3536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ESBDL</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUVtLwzAULqKgzP0CXwI-b-be5HGOqQNFYfM5pO1p7eiamWTK_r2ZlWFeTs7l-87ly7IbgqeEYH03m88Xq9WUYqKnVAvKtTzLriiResIEk-f__pfZOIQNTk-lkMivsmbxZbu9ja3rkavRrPEAW-gjuof4DdCjVUzJEr25EPfeNd7uPg7oBeKHqwJabHedO7R9g9bQB7eFCD4g21do2YOPre3Q6pjw4Tq7qG0XYPxnR9n7w2I9f5o8vz4u57PnScmxihMgWuNSFULStFolFbZaEVwTqArJ8oqTCguiBK2pzgtSEFtCxSVYVltGOGOjbDnwVs5uzM63W-sPxtnW_Aacb4xNg5UdmIKURCmRWnHLC5FrUau85EzS5KZDJq7bgWvn3eceQjQbt_d9Gt9QLoTQHMs8VbGhqvQuBA_1qSvB5iiQGQQyR4HMn0AJdTOgWgA4IZTSnAnOfgAOo4wq</recordid><startdate>2019</startdate><enddate>2019</enddate><creator>Kotas, R.</creator><creator>Janc, M.</creator><creator>Kaminski, M.</creator><creator>Marciniak, P.</creator><creator>Zamyslowska-Szmytke, E.</creator><creator>Tylman, W.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>ESBDL</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0776-9173</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2019</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Agreement Between Static Posturography Methods Employing Tensometers and Inertial Sensors</title><author>Kotas, R. ; Janc, M. ; Kaminski, M. ; Marciniak, P. ; Zamyslowska-Szmytke, E. ; Tylman, W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-e1990c8b562109d680a9810f1edb637d41d051852f297b1b1aced46ea3fa31433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acceleration</topic><topic>Accelerometers</topic><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Angular speed</topic><topic>Balance disorders</topic><topic>Center of gravity</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Force</topic><topic>Inertial sensing devices</topic><topic>inertial sensors</topic><topic>Protocols</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>static posturography</topic><topic>Tensometers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kotas, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janc, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaminski, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marciniak, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamyslowska-Szmytke, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tylman, W.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE Open Access Journals</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kotas, R.</au><au>Janc, M.</au><au>Kaminski, M.</au><au>Marciniak, P.</au><au>Zamyslowska-Szmytke, E.</au><au>Tylman, W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Agreement Between Static Posturography Methods Employing Tensometers and Inertial Sensors</atitle><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle><stitle>Access</stitle><date>2019</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>7</volume><spage>164120</spage><epage>164126</epage><pages>164120-164126</pages><issn>2169-3536</issn><eissn>2169-3536</eissn><coden>IAECCG</coden><abstract>This study investigates the agreement between two methods used for the assessment of human balance system. Static posturography based on tensometers, using a commercially available platform, is used as the reference method. An alternative approach is a portable prototype MediPost system that utilises inertial sensors developed by the authors. Both approaches determine the movement of the subject's centre of mass, quantifying this movement in terms of angular speed. Data for the evaluation of agreement were obtained from 205 subjects, with each subject simultaneously tested with both methods. During the tests, the subject performed a set of standard procedures involving quiet standing in an upright position. In order to verify the agreement between the evaluated methods, the Bland-Altman, concordance correlation and intraclass correlation coefficients were used. In addition, the trajectories of the centre of gravity were compared. The obtained results show good agreement between the verified methods, even though they are based on different physical phenomena.</abstract><cop>Piscataway</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2952496</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0776-9173</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2169-3536 |
| ispartof | IEEE access, 2019, Vol.7, p.164120-164126 |
| issn | 2169-3536 2169-3536 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2455594067 |
| source | IEEE Open Access Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Acceleration Accelerometers Agreements Angular speed Balance disorders Center of gravity Correlation coefficients Evaluation Force Inertial sensing devices inertial sensors Protocols Sensors Sociology static posturography Tensometers |
| title | Evaluation of Agreement Between Static Posturography Methods Employing Tensometers and Inertial Sensors |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T02%3A40%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Agreement%20Between%20Static%20Posturography%20Methods%20Employing%20Tensometers%20and%20Inertial%20Sensors&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20access&rft.au=Kotas,%20R.&rft.date=2019&rft.volume=7&rft.spage=164120&rft.epage=164126&rft.pages=164120-164126&rft.issn=2169-3536&rft.eissn=2169-3536&rft.coden=IAECCG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2952496&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2455594067%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2455594067&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=8894354&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_b1c18855624a4b5795f87c4362a4b295&rfr_iscdi=true |