“Since Those Days All Things Have Progressed for the Better”: Tradition, Progress, and Creation in Ambrose of Milan

In Ambrose’s apologetic writing against the Roman prefect Symmachus, he makes a surprising argument for Christianity’s superiority over Roman religious practices, arguing that Christianity is in fact a newer and therefore superior form of religion. The whole world has “progressed” and so must religi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Harvard theological review 2020-10, Vol.113 (4), p.440-459
1. Verfasser: Fogleman, Alex
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 459
container_issue 4
container_start_page 440
container_title The Harvard theological review
container_volume 113
creator Fogleman, Alex
description In Ambrose’s apologetic writing against the Roman prefect Symmachus, he makes a surprising argument for Christianity’s superiority over Roman religious practices, arguing that Christianity is in fact a newer and therefore superior form of religion. The whole world has “progressed” and so must religious practices. In the letters to Symmachus, Ambrose’s arguments are ad hoc and apologetic, not constructive. This article seeks to understand better the intellectual and historical contexts that make Ambrose’s surprising convictions possible by looking at Ambrose’s writings on creation in the context of the pro-Nicene debates. Considering Ambrose’s writing in the Hexameron, I argue that Ambrose’s account of cosmological progress finds an intellectual milieu in pro-Nicene reflection on the implications of Christ’s divine consubstantiality for a doctrine of creation. When Christ is no longer seen as a mediator between God and the world, a new space is opened up to speak of creation’s change and even “progress” without a worry that doing so will jeopardize creation as the divine handiwork. Ambrose’s apologetic strategy, though apparently not directly related to pro-Nicene debates, is illuminated when seen against this backdrop. The result is a better understanding both of Ambrose’s strategies in particular and of the situation of fourth-century apologetics more broadly.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0017816020000218
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2454639989</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0017816020000218</cupid><galeid>A643702605</galeid><sourcerecordid>A643702605</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-8f1a2a48daa7696db36dd9e6735593b1cc91de9be6200af9e8446ca376cd00ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNklFv0zAQxyMEEmXwAXizxBPSMuzEcWLeurJ1k4qGtPJsXe1L5im1h50Ce9sHgS-3T4KjVUMVBWFLtnz3-5_tu8uy14weMcrqd5c0rQ0TtKBpFKx5kk0Yr6ucV6x-mk1Gdz76n2cvYrweIcH5JPt2f_fj0jqNZHnlI5IPcBvJtO_T0boukjP4iuRT8F3AGNGQ1gcyXCE5xmHAcH_38z1ZBjB2sN4dPoKHBJwhs4Aw2ol1ZLpehTG-b8lH24N7mT1roY_4arsfZJ9PT5azs3xxMT-fTRe55g0d8qZlUABvDEAtpDCrUhgjUdRlVclyxbSWzKBcoUj_hlZiw7nQUNZCG0rRlAfZm4e4N8F_2WAc1LXfBJeuVAWvuCilbORvqoMelXWtHwLotY1aTQUva1oIWiUq30N16DBA7x22Npl3-KM9fJoG11bvFbzdESRmwO9DB5sY1fnx_L_ZZr7418O3rPZ9jx2qlPDZxS7PHnidahYDtuom2DWEW8WoGttN_dFuSVNuNZBKbU2K-5jpv6t-AfR70qY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2454639989</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“Since Those Days All Things Have Progressed for the Better”: Tradition, Progress, and Creation in Ambrose of Milan</title><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Fogleman, Alex</creator><creatorcontrib>Fogleman, Alex</creatorcontrib><description>In Ambrose’s apologetic writing against the Roman prefect Symmachus, he makes a surprising argument for Christianity’s superiority over Roman religious practices, arguing that Christianity is in fact a newer and therefore superior form of religion. The whole world has “progressed” and so must religious practices. In the letters to Symmachus, Ambrose’s arguments are ad hoc and apologetic, not constructive. This article seeks to understand better the intellectual and historical contexts that make Ambrose’s surprising convictions possible by looking at Ambrose’s writings on creation in the context of the pro-Nicene debates. Considering Ambrose’s writing in the Hexameron, I argue that Ambrose’s account of cosmological progress finds an intellectual milieu in pro-Nicene reflection on the implications of Christ’s divine consubstantiality for a doctrine of creation. When Christ is no longer seen as a mediator between God and the world, a new space is opened up to speak of creation’s change and even “progress” without a worry that doing so will jeopardize creation as the divine handiwork. Ambrose’s apologetic strategy, though apparently not directly related to pro-Nicene debates, is illuminated when seen against this backdrop. The result is a better understanding both of Ambrose’s strategies in particular and of the situation of fourth-century apologetics more broadly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-8160</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-4517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0017816020000218</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>4th century ; Ambrose, Saint ; Apologetics (Christian) ; Book publishing ; Christianity ; Cosmogony ; Criticism and interpretation ; God ; Progress ; Religion ; Religious aspects ; Social aspects ; Theologians ; Theology ; Tradition (Religion) ; Traditions ; Writing</subject><ispartof>The Harvard theological review, 2020-10, Vol.113 (4), p.440-459</ispartof><rights>President and Fellows of Harvard College, 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0017816020000218/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27923,27924,55627</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fogleman, Alex</creatorcontrib><title>“Since Those Days All Things Have Progressed for the Better”: Tradition, Progress, and Creation in Ambrose of Milan</title><title>The Harvard theological review</title><addtitle>H. Theolo. Review</addtitle><description>In Ambrose’s apologetic writing against the Roman prefect Symmachus, he makes a surprising argument for Christianity’s superiority over Roman religious practices, arguing that Christianity is in fact a newer and therefore superior form of religion. The whole world has “progressed” and so must religious practices. In the letters to Symmachus, Ambrose’s arguments are ad hoc and apologetic, not constructive. This article seeks to understand better the intellectual and historical contexts that make Ambrose’s surprising convictions possible by looking at Ambrose’s writings on creation in the context of the pro-Nicene debates. Considering Ambrose’s writing in the Hexameron, I argue that Ambrose’s account of cosmological progress finds an intellectual milieu in pro-Nicene reflection on the implications of Christ’s divine consubstantiality for a doctrine of creation. When Christ is no longer seen as a mediator between God and the world, a new space is opened up to speak of creation’s change and even “progress” without a worry that doing so will jeopardize creation as the divine handiwork. Ambrose’s apologetic strategy, though apparently not directly related to pro-Nicene debates, is illuminated when seen against this backdrop. The result is a better understanding both of Ambrose’s strategies in particular and of the situation of fourth-century apologetics more broadly.</description><subject>4th century</subject><subject>Ambrose, Saint</subject><subject>Apologetics (Christian)</subject><subject>Book publishing</subject><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Cosmogony</subject><subject>Criticism and interpretation</subject><subject>God</subject><subject>Progress</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religious aspects</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Theologians</subject><subject>Theology</subject><subject>Tradition (Religion)</subject><subject>Traditions</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>0017-8160</issn><issn>1475-4517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNklFv0zAQxyMEEmXwAXizxBPSMuzEcWLeurJ1k4qGtPJsXe1L5im1h50Ce9sHgS-3T4KjVUMVBWFLtnz3-5_tu8uy14weMcrqd5c0rQ0TtKBpFKx5kk0Yr6ucV6x-mk1Gdz76n2cvYrweIcH5JPt2f_fj0jqNZHnlI5IPcBvJtO_T0boukjP4iuRT8F3AGNGQ1gcyXCE5xmHAcH_38z1ZBjB2sN4dPoKHBJwhs4Aw2ol1ZLpehTG-b8lH24N7mT1roY_4arsfZJ9PT5azs3xxMT-fTRe55g0d8qZlUABvDEAtpDCrUhgjUdRlVclyxbSWzKBcoUj_hlZiw7nQUNZCG0rRlAfZm4e4N8F_2WAc1LXfBJeuVAWvuCilbORvqoMelXWtHwLotY1aTQUva1oIWiUq30N16DBA7x22Npl3-KM9fJoG11bvFbzdESRmwO9DB5sY1fnx_L_ZZr7418O3rPZ9jx2qlPDZxS7PHnidahYDtuom2DWEW8WoGttN_dFuSVNuNZBKbU2K-5jpv6t-AfR70qY</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Fogleman, Alex</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>“Since Those Days All Things Have Progressed for the Better”: Tradition, Progress, and Creation in Ambrose of Milan</title><author>Fogleman, Alex</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-8f1a2a48daa7696db36dd9e6735593b1cc91de9be6200af9e8446ca376cd00ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>4th century</topic><topic>Ambrose, Saint</topic><topic>Apologetics (Christian)</topic><topic>Book publishing</topic><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Cosmogony</topic><topic>Criticism and interpretation</topic><topic>God</topic><topic>Progress</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religious aspects</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Theologians</topic><topic>Theology</topic><topic>Tradition (Religion)</topic><topic>Traditions</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fogleman, Alex</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences &amp; Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Harvard theological review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fogleman, Alex</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“Since Those Days All Things Have Progressed for the Better”: Tradition, Progress, and Creation in Ambrose of Milan</atitle><jtitle>The Harvard theological review</jtitle><addtitle>H. Theolo. Review</addtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>440</spage><epage>459</epage><pages>440-459</pages><issn>0017-8160</issn><eissn>1475-4517</eissn><abstract>In Ambrose’s apologetic writing against the Roman prefect Symmachus, he makes a surprising argument for Christianity’s superiority over Roman religious practices, arguing that Christianity is in fact a newer and therefore superior form of religion. The whole world has “progressed” and so must religious practices. In the letters to Symmachus, Ambrose’s arguments are ad hoc and apologetic, not constructive. This article seeks to understand better the intellectual and historical contexts that make Ambrose’s surprising convictions possible by looking at Ambrose’s writings on creation in the context of the pro-Nicene debates. Considering Ambrose’s writing in the Hexameron, I argue that Ambrose’s account of cosmological progress finds an intellectual milieu in pro-Nicene reflection on the implications of Christ’s divine consubstantiality for a doctrine of creation. When Christ is no longer seen as a mediator between God and the world, a new space is opened up to speak of creation’s change and even “progress” without a worry that doing so will jeopardize creation as the divine handiwork. Ambrose’s apologetic strategy, though apparently not directly related to pro-Nicene debates, is illuminated when seen against this backdrop. The result is a better understanding both of Ambrose’s strategies in particular and of the situation of fourth-century apologetics more broadly.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0017816020000218</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-8160
ispartof The Harvard theological review, 2020-10, Vol.113 (4), p.440-459
issn 0017-8160
1475-4517
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2454639989
source Cambridge Journals
subjects 4th century
Ambrose, Saint
Apologetics (Christian)
Book publishing
Christianity
Cosmogony
Criticism and interpretation
God
Progress
Religion
Religious aspects
Social aspects
Theologians
Theology
Tradition (Religion)
Traditions
Writing
title “Since Those Days All Things Have Progressed for the Better”: Tradition, Progress, and Creation in Ambrose of Milan
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T00%3A29%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CSince%20Those%20Days%20All%20Things%20Have%20Progressed%20for%20the%20Better%E2%80%9D:%20Tradition,%20Progress,%20and%20Creation%20in%20Ambrose%20of%20Milan&rft.jtitle=The%20Harvard%20theological%20review&rft.au=Fogleman,%20Alex&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=440&rft.epage=459&rft.pages=440-459&rft.issn=0017-8160&rft.eissn=1475-4517&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0017816020000218&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA643702605%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2454639989&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A643702605&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0017816020000218&rfr_iscdi=true