“Since Those Days All Things Have Progressed for the Better”: Tradition, Progress, and Creation in Ambrose of Milan
In Ambrose’s apologetic writing against the Roman prefect Symmachus, he makes a surprising argument for Christianity’s superiority over Roman religious practices, arguing that Christianity is in fact a newer and therefore superior form of religion. The whole world has “progressed” and so must religi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Harvard theological review 2020-10, Vol.113 (4), p.440-459 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 459 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 440 |
container_title | The Harvard theological review |
container_volume | 113 |
creator | Fogleman, Alex |
description | In Ambrose’s apologetic writing against the Roman prefect Symmachus, he makes a surprising argument for Christianity’s superiority over Roman religious practices, arguing that Christianity is in fact a newer and therefore superior form of religion. The whole world has “progressed” and so must religious practices. In the letters to Symmachus, Ambrose’s arguments are ad hoc and apologetic, not constructive. This article seeks to understand better the intellectual and historical contexts that make Ambrose’s surprising convictions possible by looking at Ambrose’s writings on creation in the context of the pro-Nicene debates. Considering Ambrose’s writing in the Hexameron, I argue that Ambrose’s account of cosmological progress finds an intellectual milieu in pro-Nicene reflection on the implications of Christ’s divine consubstantiality for a doctrine of creation. When Christ is no longer seen as a mediator between God and the world, a new space is opened up to speak of creation’s change and even “progress” without a worry that doing so will jeopardize creation as the divine handiwork. Ambrose’s apologetic strategy, though apparently not directly related to pro-Nicene debates, is illuminated when seen against this backdrop. The result is a better understanding both of Ambrose’s strategies in particular and of the situation of fourth-century apologetics more broadly. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0017816020000218 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2454639989</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0017816020000218</cupid><galeid>A643702605</galeid><sourcerecordid>A643702605</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-8f1a2a48daa7696db36dd9e6735593b1cc91de9be6200af9e8446ca376cd00ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNklFv0zAQxyMEEmXwAXizxBPSMuzEcWLeurJ1k4qGtPJsXe1L5im1h50Ce9sHgS-3T4KjVUMVBWFLtnz3-5_tu8uy14weMcrqd5c0rQ0TtKBpFKx5kk0Yr6ucV6x-mk1Gdz76n2cvYrweIcH5JPt2f_fj0jqNZHnlI5IPcBvJtO_T0boukjP4iuRT8F3AGNGQ1gcyXCE5xmHAcH_38z1ZBjB2sN4dPoKHBJwhs4Aw2ol1ZLpehTG-b8lH24N7mT1roY_4arsfZJ9PT5azs3xxMT-fTRe55g0d8qZlUABvDEAtpDCrUhgjUdRlVclyxbSWzKBcoUj_hlZiw7nQUNZCG0rRlAfZm4e4N8F_2WAc1LXfBJeuVAWvuCilbORvqoMelXWtHwLotY1aTQUva1oIWiUq30N16DBA7x22Npl3-KM9fJoG11bvFbzdESRmwO9DB5sY1fnx_L_ZZr7418O3rPZ9jx2qlPDZxS7PHnidahYDtuom2DWEW8WoGttN_dFuSVNuNZBKbU2K-5jpv6t-AfR70qY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2454639989</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“Since Those Days All Things Have Progressed for the Better”: Tradition, Progress, and Creation in Ambrose of Milan</title><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Fogleman, Alex</creator><creatorcontrib>Fogleman, Alex</creatorcontrib><description>In Ambrose’s apologetic writing against the Roman prefect Symmachus, he makes a surprising argument for Christianity’s superiority over Roman religious practices, arguing that Christianity is in fact a newer and therefore superior form of religion. The whole world has “progressed” and so must religious practices. In the letters to Symmachus, Ambrose’s arguments are ad hoc and apologetic, not constructive. This article seeks to understand better the intellectual and historical contexts that make Ambrose’s surprising convictions possible by looking at Ambrose’s writings on creation in the context of the pro-Nicene debates. Considering Ambrose’s writing in the Hexameron, I argue that Ambrose’s account of cosmological progress finds an intellectual milieu in pro-Nicene reflection on the implications of Christ’s divine consubstantiality for a doctrine of creation. When Christ is no longer seen as a mediator between God and the world, a new space is opened up to speak of creation’s change and even “progress” without a worry that doing so will jeopardize creation as the divine handiwork. Ambrose’s apologetic strategy, though apparently not directly related to pro-Nicene debates, is illuminated when seen against this backdrop. The result is a better understanding both of Ambrose’s strategies in particular and of the situation of fourth-century apologetics more broadly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-8160</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-4517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0017816020000218</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>4th century ; Ambrose, Saint ; Apologetics (Christian) ; Book publishing ; Christianity ; Cosmogony ; Criticism and interpretation ; God ; Progress ; Religion ; Religious aspects ; Social aspects ; Theologians ; Theology ; Tradition (Religion) ; Traditions ; Writing</subject><ispartof>The Harvard theological review, 2020-10, Vol.113 (4), p.440-459</ispartof><rights>President and Fellows of Harvard College, 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0017816020000218/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27923,27924,55627</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fogleman, Alex</creatorcontrib><title>“Since Those Days All Things Have Progressed for the Better”: Tradition, Progress, and Creation in Ambrose of Milan</title><title>The Harvard theological review</title><addtitle>H. Theolo. Review</addtitle><description>In Ambrose’s apologetic writing against the Roman prefect Symmachus, he makes a surprising argument for Christianity’s superiority over Roman religious practices, arguing that Christianity is in fact a newer and therefore superior form of religion. The whole world has “progressed” and so must religious practices. In the letters to Symmachus, Ambrose’s arguments are ad hoc and apologetic, not constructive. This article seeks to understand better the intellectual and historical contexts that make Ambrose’s surprising convictions possible by looking at Ambrose’s writings on creation in the context of the pro-Nicene debates. Considering Ambrose’s writing in the Hexameron, I argue that Ambrose’s account of cosmological progress finds an intellectual milieu in pro-Nicene reflection on the implications of Christ’s divine consubstantiality for a doctrine of creation. When Christ is no longer seen as a mediator between God and the world, a new space is opened up to speak of creation’s change and even “progress” without a worry that doing so will jeopardize creation as the divine handiwork. Ambrose’s apologetic strategy, though apparently not directly related to pro-Nicene debates, is illuminated when seen against this backdrop. The result is a better understanding both of Ambrose’s strategies in particular and of the situation of fourth-century apologetics more broadly.</description><subject>4th century</subject><subject>Ambrose, Saint</subject><subject>Apologetics (Christian)</subject><subject>Book publishing</subject><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Cosmogony</subject><subject>Criticism and interpretation</subject><subject>God</subject><subject>Progress</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religious aspects</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Theologians</subject><subject>Theology</subject><subject>Tradition (Religion)</subject><subject>Traditions</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>0017-8160</issn><issn>1475-4517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNklFv0zAQxyMEEmXwAXizxBPSMuzEcWLeurJ1k4qGtPJsXe1L5im1h50Ce9sHgS-3T4KjVUMVBWFLtnz3-5_tu8uy14weMcrqd5c0rQ0TtKBpFKx5kk0Yr6ucV6x-mk1Gdz76n2cvYrweIcH5JPt2f_fj0jqNZHnlI5IPcBvJtO_T0boukjP4iuRT8F3AGNGQ1gcyXCE5xmHAcH_38z1ZBjB2sN4dPoKHBJwhs4Aw2ol1ZLpehTG-b8lH24N7mT1roY_4arsfZJ9PT5azs3xxMT-fTRe55g0d8qZlUABvDEAtpDCrUhgjUdRlVclyxbSWzKBcoUj_hlZiw7nQUNZCG0rRlAfZm4e4N8F_2WAc1LXfBJeuVAWvuCilbORvqoMelXWtHwLotY1aTQUva1oIWiUq30N16DBA7x22Npl3-KM9fJoG11bvFbzdESRmwO9DB5sY1fnx_L_ZZr7418O3rPZ9jx2qlPDZxS7PHnidahYDtuom2DWEW8WoGttN_dFuSVNuNZBKbU2K-5jpv6t-AfR70qY</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Fogleman, Alex</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>“Since Those Days All Things Have Progressed for the Better”: Tradition, Progress, and Creation in Ambrose of Milan</title><author>Fogleman, Alex</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-8f1a2a48daa7696db36dd9e6735593b1cc91de9be6200af9e8446ca376cd00ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>4th century</topic><topic>Ambrose, Saint</topic><topic>Apologetics (Christian)</topic><topic>Book publishing</topic><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Cosmogony</topic><topic>Criticism and interpretation</topic><topic>God</topic><topic>Progress</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religious aspects</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Theologians</topic><topic>Theology</topic><topic>Tradition (Religion)</topic><topic>Traditions</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fogleman, Alex</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Harvard theological review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fogleman, Alex</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“Since Those Days All Things Have Progressed for the Better”: Tradition, Progress, and Creation in Ambrose of Milan</atitle><jtitle>The Harvard theological review</jtitle><addtitle>H. Theolo. Review</addtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>440</spage><epage>459</epage><pages>440-459</pages><issn>0017-8160</issn><eissn>1475-4517</eissn><abstract>In Ambrose’s apologetic writing against the Roman prefect Symmachus, he makes a surprising argument for Christianity’s superiority over Roman religious practices, arguing that Christianity is in fact a newer and therefore superior form of religion. The whole world has “progressed” and so must religious practices. In the letters to Symmachus, Ambrose’s arguments are ad hoc and apologetic, not constructive. This article seeks to understand better the intellectual and historical contexts that make Ambrose’s surprising convictions possible by looking at Ambrose’s writings on creation in the context of the pro-Nicene debates. Considering Ambrose’s writing in the Hexameron, I argue that Ambrose’s account of cosmological progress finds an intellectual milieu in pro-Nicene reflection on the implications of Christ’s divine consubstantiality for a doctrine of creation. When Christ is no longer seen as a mediator between God and the world, a new space is opened up to speak of creation’s change and even “progress” without a worry that doing so will jeopardize creation as the divine handiwork. Ambrose’s apologetic strategy, though apparently not directly related to pro-Nicene debates, is illuminated when seen against this backdrop. The result is a better understanding both of Ambrose’s strategies in particular and of the situation of fourth-century apologetics more broadly.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0017816020000218</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-8160 |
ispartof | The Harvard theological review, 2020-10, Vol.113 (4), p.440-459 |
issn | 0017-8160 1475-4517 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2454639989 |
source | Cambridge Journals |
subjects | 4th century Ambrose, Saint Apologetics (Christian) Book publishing Christianity Cosmogony Criticism and interpretation God Progress Religion Religious aspects Social aspects Theologians Theology Tradition (Religion) Traditions Writing |
title | “Since Those Days All Things Have Progressed for the Better”: Tradition, Progress, and Creation in Ambrose of Milan |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T00%3A29%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CSince%20Those%20Days%20All%20Things%20Have%20Progressed%20for%20the%20Better%E2%80%9D:%20Tradition,%20Progress,%20and%20Creation%20in%20Ambrose%20of%20Milan&rft.jtitle=The%20Harvard%20theological%20review&rft.au=Fogleman,%20Alex&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=440&rft.epage=459&rft.pages=440-459&rft.issn=0017-8160&rft.eissn=1475-4517&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0017816020000218&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA643702605%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2454639989&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A643702605&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0017816020000218&rfr_iscdi=true |