A cross-sectoral integrated assessment of alternatives for climate mitigation in Madagascar
Using the integrated assessment model TIAM-ECN, we analyze how Madagascar's nationally determined contribution (NDC) to the Paris Agreement can be implemented in both the energy and non-energy sectors. We explore how the country's national climate goal for 2030 can be reached under two dif...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Climate policy 2020-11, Vol.20 (10), p.1257-1273 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1273 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1257 |
container_title | Climate policy |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Nogueira, Larissa P. Longa, Francesco Dalla van der Zwaan, Bob |
description | Using the integrated assessment model TIAM-ECN, we analyze how Madagascar's nationally determined contribution (NDC) to the Paris Agreement can be implemented in both the energy and non-energy sectors. We explore how the country's national climate goal for 2030 can be reached under two different cost levels for climate change mitigation through land-use change. We find that land use is the main sector in which large greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions must be achieved, but there are opportunities to also exploit the country's abundant domestic low-carbon energy resources. We explore the options for such a transformation of Madagascar's energy system, which today largely relies on the use of biomass. If GHG emissions reduction in land use is hard or too costly to implement, e.g. as a result of land property rights or forest logging practices, total final energy use needs to be almost entirely renewable by 2050. The power sector needs to rely on 100% renewables already by 2030. In our scenario runs, biomass, hydropower, solar and wind energy account for the vast majority of electricity generation in Madagascar from 2030 onwards. Electrification is introduced in the residential sector - notably for cooking. Cumulative additional undiscounted investment requirements may be as high as US$ 8 billion up to 2050.
Key policy insights
Madagascar could reach its 14% GHG emission reduction target relative to 2030 business-as-usual levels through the land use sector only. However, given the potential higher mitigation costs in land use and its links with the energy system, overlooking mitigation options in the energy sector could be a missed opportunity to exploit abundant domestic low-carbon energy resources.
Biomass may well remain the most important energy resource in Madagascar until 2050, mainly driven by residential cooking demand. Solid biomass stoves with efficient combustion should be promoted hand-in-hand with alternative fuels, e.g. electricity and bioethanol.
Promoting GHG mitigation in both AFOLU and energy sectors maximizes co-benefits, which enables achieving a higher number of sustainable development goals (SDGs).
Providing electricity for household services is an important part of climate change mitigation. Investments in power distribution infrastructure and decentralized electricity generation are needed to achieve electrification of rural households. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/14693062.2020.1791030 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2454626824</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2454626824</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-4c87ef2e9368e7cf717026c305d1675d6d00f50e8f8410b574405422671e1d673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEURYMoWKs_QQi4nvqSycfMzlL8goobXbkIMZOUKTOTmqRK_72pU3HnKuFxTnLfReiSwIxABdeEiboEQWcUaB7JmkAJR2hCJKeFZFwe53tmij10is5iXAMQUbNygt7m2AQfYxGtST7oDrdDsqugk22wjtHG2NshYe-w7pINg07tp43Y-YBN1_aZw32b2lWe-yHL-Ek3eqWj0eEcnTjdRXtxOKfo9e72ZfFQLJ_vHxfzZWE4I6lgppLWUVuXorLSOEkkUGFK4A0RkjeiAXAcbOUqRuCdS8aAM0qFJJY0QpZTdDW-uwn-Y2tjUmu_zUm7qCjjTFBRUZYpPlI_-wbr1Cbk_GGnCKh9j-q3R7XvUR16zB4ePWv80MY_K-fgZU2qOiM3I9IOuZdef_nQNSrpXeeDC3owWSv__-UbJJODXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2454626824</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A cross-sectoral integrated assessment of alternatives for climate mitigation in Madagascar</title><source>Taylor & Francis Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Nogueira, Larissa P. ; Longa, Francesco Dalla ; van der Zwaan, Bob</creator><creatorcontrib>Nogueira, Larissa P. ; Longa, Francesco Dalla ; van der Zwaan, Bob</creatorcontrib><description>Using the integrated assessment model TIAM-ECN, we analyze how Madagascar's nationally determined contribution (NDC) to the Paris Agreement can be implemented in both the energy and non-energy sectors. We explore how the country's national climate goal for 2030 can be reached under two different cost levels for climate change mitigation through land-use change. We find that land use is the main sector in which large greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions must be achieved, but there are opportunities to also exploit the country's abundant domestic low-carbon energy resources. We explore the options for such a transformation of Madagascar's energy system, which today largely relies on the use of biomass. If GHG emissions reduction in land use is hard or too costly to implement, e.g. as a result of land property rights or forest logging practices, total final energy use needs to be almost entirely renewable by 2050. The power sector needs to rely on 100% renewables already by 2030. In our scenario runs, biomass, hydropower, solar and wind energy account for the vast majority of electricity generation in Madagascar from 2030 onwards. Electrification is introduced in the residential sector - notably for cooking. Cumulative additional undiscounted investment requirements may be as high as US$ 8 billion up to 2050.
Key policy insights
Madagascar could reach its 14% GHG emission reduction target relative to 2030 business-as-usual levels through the land use sector only. However, given the potential higher mitigation costs in land use and its links with the energy system, overlooking mitigation options in the energy sector could be a missed opportunity to exploit abundant domestic low-carbon energy resources.
Biomass may well remain the most important energy resource in Madagascar until 2050, mainly driven by residential cooking demand. Solid biomass stoves with efficient combustion should be promoted hand-in-hand with alternative fuels, e.g. electricity and bioethanol.
Promoting GHG mitigation in both AFOLU and energy sectors maximizes co-benefits, which enables achieving a higher number of sustainable development goals (SDGs).
Providing electricity for household services is an important part of climate change mitigation. Investments in power distribution infrastructure and decentralized electricity generation are needed to achieve electrification of rural households.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1469-3062</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-7457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2020.1791030</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Alternative fuels ; Bioethanol ; Biofuels ; Biomass ; Biomass burning ; Biomass energy production ; Carbon ; Clean energy ; Climate and land use ; Climate change ; Climate change mitigation ; Climate policy ; Cooking ; Decentralization ; Electric power ; Electric power distribution ; Electricity ; Electricity generation ; Electrification ; Emissions ; Emissions control ; energy ; Energy consumption ; Energy industry ; Energy policy ; Energy resources ; Energy sources ; Ethanol ; Exploitation ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Households ; Hydroelectric power ; IAM ; Infrastructure ; Investment ; Investments ; Land use ; Logging ; Madagascar ; Mitigation ; Mitigation costs ; NDC ; Paris Agreement ; Property rights ; Renewable energy ; Residential areas ; Residential energy ; Rural areas ; Solar energy ; Stoves ; Sustainable development ; Sustainable Development Goals ; Transformation ; Wind power</subject><ispartof>Climate policy, 2020-11, Vol.20 (10), p.1257-1273</ispartof><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2020</rights><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-4c87ef2e9368e7cf717026c305d1675d6d00f50e8f8410b574405422671e1d673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-4c87ef2e9368e7cf717026c305d1675d6d00f50e8f8410b574405422671e1d673</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3156-5998</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14693062.2020.1791030$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14693062.2020.1791030$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27843,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nogueira, Larissa P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longa, Francesco Dalla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Zwaan, Bob</creatorcontrib><title>A cross-sectoral integrated assessment of alternatives for climate mitigation in Madagascar</title><title>Climate policy</title><description>Using the integrated assessment model TIAM-ECN, we analyze how Madagascar's nationally determined contribution (NDC) to the Paris Agreement can be implemented in both the energy and non-energy sectors. We explore how the country's national climate goal for 2030 can be reached under two different cost levels for climate change mitigation through land-use change. We find that land use is the main sector in which large greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions must be achieved, but there are opportunities to also exploit the country's abundant domestic low-carbon energy resources. We explore the options for such a transformation of Madagascar's energy system, which today largely relies on the use of biomass. If GHG emissions reduction in land use is hard or too costly to implement, e.g. as a result of land property rights or forest logging practices, total final energy use needs to be almost entirely renewable by 2050. The power sector needs to rely on 100% renewables already by 2030. In our scenario runs, biomass, hydropower, solar and wind energy account for the vast majority of electricity generation in Madagascar from 2030 onwards. Electrification is introduced in the residential sector - notably for cooking. Cumulative additional undiscounted investment requirements may be as high as US$ 8 billion up to 2050.
Key policy insights
Madagascar could reach its 14% GHG emission reduction target relative to 2030 business-as-usual levels through the land use sector only. However, given the potential higher mitigation costs in land use and its links with the energy system, overlooking mitigation options in the energy sector could be a missed opportunity to exploit abundant domestic low-carbon energy resources.
Biomass may well remain the most important energy resource in Madagascar until 2050, mainly driven by residential cooking demand. Solid biomass stoves with efficient combustion should be promoted hand-in-hand with alternative fuels, e.g. electricity and bioethanol.
Promoting GHG mitigation in both AFOLU and energy sectors maximizes co-benefits, which enables achieving a higher number of sustainable development goals (SDGs).
Providing electricity for household services is an important part of climate change mitigation. Investments in power distribution infrastructure and decentralized electricity generation are needed to achieve electrification of rural households.</description><subject>Alternative fuels</subject><subject>Bioethanol</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomass burning</subject><subject>Biomass energy production</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Clean energy</subject><subject>Climate and land use</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate change mitigation</subject><subject>Climate policy</subject><subject>Cooking</subject><subject>Decentralization</subject><subject>Electric power</subject><subject>Electric power distribution</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Electricity generation</subject><subject>Electrification</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>energy</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Energy resources</subject><subject>Energy sources</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Exploitation</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Hydroelectric power</subject><subject>IAM</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Logging</subject><subject>Madagascar</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Mitigation costs</subject><subject>NDC</subject><subject>Paris Agreement</subject><subject>Property rights</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Residential areas</subject><subject>Residential energy</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Stoves</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Sustainable Development Goals</subject><subject>Transformation</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><issn>1469-3062</issn><issn>1752-7457</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEURYMoWKs_QQi4nvqSycfMzlL8goobXbkIMZOUKTOTmqRK_72pU3HnKuFxTnLfReiSwIxABdeEiboEQWcUaB7JmkAJR2hCJKeFZFwe53tmij10is5iXAMQUbNygt7m2AQfYxGtST7oDrdDsqugk22wjtHG2NshYe-w7pINg07tp43Y-YBN1_aZw32b2lWe-yHL-Ek3eqWj0eEcnTjdRXtxOKfo9e72ZfFQLJ_vHxfzZWE4I6lgppLWUVuXorLSOEkkUGFK4A0RkjeiAXAcbOUqRuCdS8aAM0qFJJY0QpZTdDW-uwn-Y2tjUmu_zUm7qCjjTFBRUZYpPlI_-wbr1Cbk_GGnCKh9j-q3R7XvUR16zB4ePWv80MY_K-fgZU2qOiM3I9IOuZdef_nQNSrpXeeDC3owWSv__-UbJJODXQ</recordid><startdate>20201125</startdate><enddate>20201125</enddate><creator>Nogueira, Larissa P.</creator><creator>Longa, Francesco Dalla</creator><creator>van der Zwaan, Bob</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3156-5998</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201125</creationdate><title>A cross-sectoral integrated assessment of alternatives for climate mitigation in Madagascar</title><author>Nogueira, Larissa P. ; Longa, Francesco Dalla ; van der Zwaan, Bob</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-4c87ef2e9368e7cf717026c305d1675d6d00f50e8f8410b574405422671e1d673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Alternative fuels</topic><topic>Bioethanol</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomass burning</topic><topic>Biomass energy production</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Clean energy</topic><topic>Climate and land use</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate change mitigation</topic><topic>Climate policy</topic><topic>Cooking</topic><topic>Decentralization</topic><topic>Electric power</topic><topic>Electric power distribution</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Electricity generation</topic><topic>Electrification</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>energy</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Energy resources</topic><topic>Energy sources</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Exploitation</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Hydroelectric power</topic><topic>IAM</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Logging</topic><topic>Madagascar</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Mitigation costs</topic><topic>NDC</topic><topic>Paris Agreement</topic><topic>Property rights</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Residential areas</topic><topic>Residential energy</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Stoves</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Sustainable Development Goals</topic><topic>Transformation</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nogueira, Larissa P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longa, Francesco Dalla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Zwaan, Bob</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Climate policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nogueira, Larissa P.</au><au>Longa, Francesco Dalla</au><au>van der Zwaan, Bob</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A cross-sectoral integrated assessment of alternatives for climate mitigation in Madagascar</atitle><jtitle>Climate policy</jtitle><date>2020-11-25</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1257</spage><epage>1273</epage><pages>1257-1273</pages><issn>1469-3062</issn><eissn>1752-7457</eissn><abstract>Using the integrated assessment model TIAM-ECN, we analyze how Madagascar's nationally determined contribution (NDC) to the Paris Agreement can be implemented in both the energy and non-energy sectors. We explore how the country's national climate goal for 2030 can be reached under two different cost levels for climate change mitigation through land-use change. We find that land use is the main sector in which large greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions must be achieved, but there are opportunities to also exploit the country's abundant domestic low-carbon energy resources. We explore the options for such a transformation of Madagascar's energy system, which today largely relies on the use of biomass. If GHG emissions reduction in land use is hard or too costly to implement, e.g. as a result of land property rights or forest logging practices, total final energy use needs to be almost entirely renewable by 2050. The power sector needs to rely on 100% renewables already by 2030. In our scenario runs, biomass, hydropower, solar and wind energy account for the vast majority of electricity generation in Madagascar from 2030 onwards. Electrification is introduced in the residential sector - notably for cooking. Cumulative additional undiscounted investment requirements may be as high as US$ 8 billion up to 2050.
Key policy insights
Madagascar could reach its 14% GHG emission reduction target relative to 2030 business-as-usual levels through the land use sector only. However, given the potential higher mitigation costs in land use and its links with the energy system, overlooking mitigation options in the energy sector could be a missed opportunity to exploit abundant domestic low-carbon energy resources.
Biomass may well remain the most important energy resource in Madagascar until 2050, mainly driven by residential cooking demand. Solid biomass stoves with efficient combustion should be promoted hand-in-hand with alternative fuels, e.g. electricity and bioethanol.
Promoting GHG mitigation in both AFOLU and energy sectors maximizes co-benefits, which enables achieving a higher number of sustainable development goals (SDGs).
Providing electricity for household services is an important part of climate change mitigation. Investments in power distribution infrastructure and decentralized electricity generation are needed to achieve electrification of rural households.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/14693062.2020.1791030</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3156-5998</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1469-3062 |
ispartof | Climate policy, 2020-11, Vol.20 (10), p.1257-1273 |
issn | 1469-3062 1752-7457 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2454626824 |
source | Taylor & Francis Journals; PAIS Index |
subjects | Alternative fuels Bioethanol Biofuels Biomass Biomass burning Biomass energy production Carbon Clean energy Climate and land use Climate change Climate change mitigation Climate policy Cooking Decentralization Electric power Electric power distribution Electricity Electricity generation Electrification Emissions Emissions control energy Energy consumption Energy industry Energy policy Energy resources Energy sources Ethanol Exploitation Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Households Hydroelectric power IAM Infrastructure Investment Investments Land use Logging Madagascar Mitigation Mitigation costs NDC Paris Agreement Property rights Renewable energy Residential areas Residential energy Rural areas Solar energy Stoves Sustainable development Sustainable Development Goals Transformation Wind power |
title | A cross-sectoral integrated assessment of alternatives for climate mitigation in Madagascar |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T13%3A30%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20cross-sectoral%20integrated%20assessment%20of%20alternatives%20for%20climate%20mitigation%20in%20Madagascar&rft.jtitle=Climate%20policy&rft.au=Nogueira,%20Larissa%20P.&rft.date=2020-11-25&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1257&rft.epage=1273&rft.pages=1257-1273&rft.issn=1469-3062&rft.eissn=1752-7457&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14693062.2020.1791030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2454626824%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2454626824&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |