Advancing statistical decision-making in sports science

The magnitude-based decisions (MBD) procedure was developed within sports science as an alternative to null hypothesis significance tests. It aimed to emphasise effect sizes and discourage dichotomous decision-making. The use of MBD was banned by some sports science journals following claims it lack...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2020-11
Hauptverfasser: Aisbett, Janet, Drinkwater, Eric J, Quarrie, Kenneth L, Woodcock, Stephen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Aisbett, Janet
Drinkwater, Eric J
Quarrie, Kenneth L
Woodcock, Stephen
description The magnitude-based decisions (MBD) procedure was developed within sports science as an alternative to null hypothesis significance tests. It aimed to emphasise effect sizes and discourage dichotomous decision-making. The use of MBD was banned by some sports science journals following claims it lacks a theoretical foundation and leads to high Type I error rates. To address these claims, we first generalise contour-enhanced funnel plots to allow for ranges of meaningful effect sizes, then relate regions defined in these plots to the decisions made by MBD. We then mathematically show how MBD fits within a class of multiple decision procedures. We have implemented this theoretically sound version of MBD as a visualisation tool that supports generalised funnel plots. The use of MBD could encourage researchers to plan test directionalities, test levels and error definitions, and the visualisation tool may help stakeholders engage with the design of analyses and the interpretation of trial findings.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2454519924</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2454519924</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_24545199243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNykEKwjAQQNEgCBbtHQKuA-kksXYpongA9yWkqUytSc2knl8FD-DqL95fsAKUqsReA6xYSTRIKWFXgzGqYPWhe9ngMNw4ZZuRMjo78s47JIxBPOz9axg4TTFl4uTQB-c3bNnbkXz565ptz6fr8SKmFJ-zp9wOcU7hQy1oo03VNKDVf9cbRJ82NA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2454519924</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Advancing statistical decision-making in sports science</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Aisbett, Janet ; Drinkwater, Eric J ; Quarrie, Kenneth L ; Woodcock, Stephen</creator><creatorcontrib>Aisbett, Janet ; Drinkwater, Eric J ; Quarrie, Kenneth L ; Woodcock, Stephen</creatorcontrib><description>The magnitude-based decisions (MBD) procedure was developed within sports science as an alternative to null hypothesis significance tests. It aimed to emphasise effect sizes and discourage dichotomous decision-making. The use of MBD was banned by some sports science journals following claims it lacks a theoretical foundation and leads to high Type I error rates. To address these claims, we first generalise contour-enhanced funnel plots to allow for ranges of meaningful effect sizes, then relate regions defined in these plots to the decisions made by MBD. We then mathematically show how MBD fits within a class of multiple decision procedures. We have implemented this theoretically sound version of MBD as a visualisation tool that supports generalised funnel plots. The use of MBD could encourage researchers to plan test directionalities, test levels and error definitions, and the visualisation tool may help stakeholders engage with the design of analyses and the interpretation of trial findings.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Decision making ; Decision theory ; Hypotheses ; Null hypothesis ; Sport science ; Sports ; Visualization</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2020-11</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>777,781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aisbett, Janet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drinkwater, Eric J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quarrie, Kenneth L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodcock, Stephen</creatorcontrib><title>Advancing statistical decision-making in sports science</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>The magnitude-based decisions (MBD) procedure was developed within sports science as an alternative to null hypothesis significance tests. It aimed to emphasise effect sizes and discourage dichotomous decision-making. The use of MBD was banned by some sports science journals following claims it lacks a theoretical foundation and leads to high Type I error rates. To address these claims, we first generalise contour-enhanced funnel plots to allow for ranges of meaningful effect sizes, then relate regions defined in these plots to the decisions made by MBD. We then mathematically show how MBD fits within a class of multiple decision procedures. We have implemented this theoretically sound version of MBD as a visualisation tool that supports generalised funnel plots. The use of MBD could encourage researchers to plan test directionalities, test levels and error definitions, and the visualisation tool may help stakeholders engage with the design of analyses and the interpretation of trial findings.</description><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision theory</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Null hypothesis</subject><subject>Sport science</subject><subject>Sports</subject><subject>Visualization</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNykEKwjAQQNEgCBbtHQKuA-kksXYpongA9yWkqUytSc2knl8FD-DqL95fsAKUqsReA6xYSTRIKWFXgzGqYPWhe9ngMNw4ZZuRMjo78s47JIxBPOz9axg4TTFl4uTQB-c3bNnbkXz565ptz6fr8SKmFJ-zp9wOcU7hQy1oo03VNKDVf9cbRJ82NA</recordid><startdate>20201125</startdate><enddate>20201125</enddate><creator>Aisbett, Janet</creator><creator>Drinkwater, Eric J</creator><creator>Quarrie, Kenneth L</creator><creator>Woodcock, Stephen</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201125</creationdate><title>Advancing statistical decision-making in sports science</title><author>Aisbett, Janet ; Drinkwater, Eric J ; Quarrie, Kenneth L ; Woodcock, Stephen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_24545199243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision theory</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Null hypothesis</topic><topic>Sport science</topic><topic>Sports</topic><topic>Visualization</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aisbett, Janet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drinkwater, Eric J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quarrie, Kenneth L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodcock, Stephen</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aisbett, Janet</au><au>Drinkwater, Eric J</au><au>Quarrie, Kenneth L</au><au>Woodcock, Stephen</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Advancing statistical decision-making in sports science</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2020-11-25</date><risdate>2020</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>The magnitude-based decisions (MBD) procedure was developed within sports science as an alternative to null hypothesis significance tests. It aimed to emphasise effect sizes and discourage dichotomous decision-making. The use of MBD was banned by some sports science journals following claims it lacks a theoretical foundation and leads to high Type I error rates. To address these claims, we first generalise contour-enhanced funnel plots to allow for ranges of meaningful effect sizes, then relate regions defined in these plots to the decisions made by MBD. We then mathematically show how MBD fits within a class of multiple decision procedures. We have implemented this theoretically sound version of MBD as a visualisation tool that supports generalised funnel plots. The use of MBD could encourage researchers to plan test directionalities, test levels and error definitions, and the visualisation tool may help stakeholders engage with the design of analyses and the interpretation of trial findings.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2020-11
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2454519924
source Free E- Journals
subjects Decision making
Decision theory
Hypotheses
Null hypothesis
Sport science
Sports
Visualization
title Advancing statistical decision-making in sports science
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T06%3A02%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Advancing%20statistical%20decision-making%20in%20sports%20science&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Aisbett,%20Janet&rft.date=2020-11-25&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2454519924%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2454519924&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true