Screening for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Adults
According to the USPSTF, should she be screened again for bacteriuria? A. Screening is not recommended for asymptomatic nonpregnant adults because the potential harms of screening and treatment outweigh the benefits. The USPSTF considered the harms of screening to be at least small based on the know...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | American family physician 2020-04, Vol.101 (8), p.493-494 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 494 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 493 |
| container_title | American family physician |
| container_volume | 101 |
| creator | Mills, Justin Hulse, Scott |
| description | According to the USPSTF, should she be screened again for bacteriuria? A. Screening is not recommended for asymptomatic nonpregnant adults because the potential harms of screening and treatment outweigh the benefits. The USPSTF considered the harms of screening to be at least small based on the known harms associated with antibiotic use (changes to the microbiome and antimicrobial resistance). [...]the USPSTF concluded that screening in this group has no benefit and may be harmful (D recommendation). The views expressed in this work are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense, the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or the U.S. government. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2454212820</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2454212820</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p121t-2b84e617364e6966bd4d11a31edc3f92d7673bdc60a70d1cb7e693377fd722863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j11LwzAYhYMork7_ggS8LiTv2ybpZR3qhIEXbuBdSZNUMtYPk_Ri_96C8-rhwMM5nCuS8RIhZ6Jk1yRjjEGuUH2tyF2MxyXKkle3ZIUAFaqSZYR9muDc4Idv2o2B1vHcT2nsdfKGPmuTXPBz8Jr6gdZ2PqV4T246fYru4cI1Oby-7DfbfPfx9r6pd_nEgaccWlU4wSWKBZUQrS0s5xq5swa7CqwUEltrBNOSWW5auWiIUnZWAiiBa_L01zuF8Wd2MTXHcQ7DMtlAURbAQQFbrMeLNbe9s80UfK_Dufk_iL-PLEt_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2454212820</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Screening for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Adults</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Mills, Justin ; Hulse, Scott</creator><creatorcontrib>Mills, Justin ; Hulse, Scott</creatorcontrib><description>According to the USPSTF, should she be screened again for bacteriuria? A. Screening is not recommended for asymptomatic nonpregnant adults because the potential harms of screening and treatment outweigh the benefits. The USPSTF considered the harms of screening to be at least small based on the known harms associated with antibiotic use (changes to the microbiome and antimicrobial resistance). [...]the USPSTF concluded that screening in this group has no benefit and may be harmful (D recommendation). The views expressed in this work are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense, the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or the U.S. government.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-838X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-0650</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32293850</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Academy of Family Physicians</publisher><subject>Asymptomatic ; Birth weight ; Diabetes ; Sepsis ; Urine ; Urogenital system ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>American family physician, 2020-04, Vol.101 (8), p.493-494</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Academy of Family Physicians Apr 15, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32293850$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mills, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulse, Scott</creatorcontrib><title>Screening for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Adults</title><title>American family physician</title><addtitle>Am Fam Physician</addtitle><description>According to the USPSTF, should she be screened again for bacteriuria? A. Screening is not recommended for asymptomatic nonpregnant adults because the potential harms of screening and treatment outweigh the benefits. The USPSTF considered the harms of screening to be at least small based on the known harms associated with antibiotic use (changes to the microbiome and antimicrobial resistance). [...]the USPSTF concluded that screening in this group has no benefit and may be harmful (D recommendation). The views expressed in this work are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense, the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or the U.S. government.</description><subject>Asymptomatic</subject><subject>Birth weight</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>Urogenital system</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0002-838X</issn><issn>1532-0650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j11LwzAYhYMork7_ggS8LiTv2ybpZR3qhIEXbuBdSZNUMtYPk_Ri_96C8-rhwMM5nCuS8RIhZ6Jk1yRjjEGuUH2tyF2MxyXKkle3ZIUAFaqSZYR9muDc4Idv2o2B1vHcT2nsdfKGPmuTXPBz8Jr6gdZ2PqV4T246fYru4cI1Oby-7DfbfPfx9r6pd_nEgaccWlU4wSWKBZUQrS0s5xq5swa7CqwUEltrBNOSWW5auWiIUnZWAiiBa_L01zuF8Wd2MTXHcQ7DMtlAURbAQQFbrMeLNbe9s80UfK_Dufk_iL-PLEt_</recordid><startdate>20200415</startdate><enddate>20200415</enddate><creator>Mills, Justin</creator><creator>Hulse, Scott</creator><general>American Academy of Family Physicians</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200415</creationdate><title>Screening for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Adults</title><author>Mills, Justin ; Hulse, Scott</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p121t-2b84e617364e6966bd4d11a31edc3f92d7673bdc60a70d1cb7e693377fd722863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Asymptomatic</topic><topic>Birth weight</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>Urogenital system</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mills, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulse, Scott</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>American family physician</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mills, Justin</au><au>Hulse, Scott</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Screening for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Adults</atitle><jtitle>American family physician</jtitle><addtitle>Am Fam Physician</addtitle><date>2020-04-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>493</spage><epage>494</epage><pages>493-494</pages><issn>0002-838X</issn><eissn>1532-0650</eissn><abstract>According to the USPSTF, should she be screened again for bacteriuria? A. Screening is not recommended for asymptomatic nonpregnant adults because the potential harms of screening and treatment outweigh the benefits. The USPSTF considered the harms of screening to be at least small based on the known harms associated with antibiotic use (changes to the microbiome and antimicrobial resistance). [...]the USPSTF concluded that screening in this group has no benefit and may be harmful (D recommendation). The views expressed in this work are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense, the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or the U.S. government.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Academy of Family Physicians</pub><pmid>32293850</pmid><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-838X |
| ispartof | American family physician, 2020-04, Vol.101 (8), p.493-494 |
| issn | 0002-838X 1532-0650 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2454212820 |
| source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Asymptomatic Birth weight Diabetes Sepsis Urine Urogenital system Womens health |
| title | Screening for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Adults |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T06%3A53%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Screening%20for%20Asymptomatic%20Bacteriuria%20in%20Adults&rft.jtitle=American%20family%20physician&rft.au=Mills,%20Justin&rft.date=2020-04-15&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=493&rft.epage=494&rft.pages=493-494&rft.issn=0002-838X&rft.eissn=1532-0650&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2454212820%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2454212820&rft_id=info:pmid/32293850&rfr_iscdi=true |